Summary:
Ref T12074. Provide a basic but functional v3 API endpoint for reading workboard column information.
There is no equivalent to this in the UI yet, although there may be some day (perhaps adjacent to T5024).
Test Plan:
- Queried for all columns.
- Queried for columns on a particular board using `projectPHIDs`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17157
Summary:
Ref T12074. This allows callers to identify which columns an object appears in (currently, always tasks).
There are a few major cases:
- Object is in a normal column: we return column information.
- Object is in a proxy column (subproject or milestone). For example, when you look at the board for "Some Parent Project", the task might show up in a milestone column. I've chosen to not return anything in this case: you can figure out that the task is there by looking at the project structure, and this is kind of an internal artifact of the implementation and probably not useful to callers.
- Project does not have a workboard: we return nothing.
These seem fairly reasonable, I think?
Test Plan:
- Queried for tasks, using the "columns" attachment.
- Dragged a task across a board, querying it repeatedly. Got expected results for normal column (the column), subprojects with no board (nothing), milestones with no board (nothing) and mielstones/subprojects with a board (the column on //that// board, only, not the proxy column on the parent).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17156
Summary:
Ref T12074.
- Adds a new "parent" property on main results. This shows an abbreviated version of the project's parent, or `null` if the project is a root project.
- Adds a new "ancestor" attachment to pull the entire ancestor list.
- Adds a new "depth" property on main results.
- You can use "parent" or "depth" to tell if a project is a subproject or not.
These attempt to balance convenience, power, and performance: the full ancestor list can be big so I made it an attachment, but the other stuff isn't too big and is cheap and seems reasonable to always include.
Test Plan:
In API results:
- Saw null parent (root projects) and non-null parent (subprojects/milestones).
- Used "ancestors" attchment, got full list of ancestors.
- Saw appropriate "depth" values.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17154
Summary:
Ref T12074.
- `project.search` now returns milestones by default.
- A new constraint, `isMilestone`, allows filtering to milestones, non-milestones, or both (API and web UI).
- `project.search` now returns a milestone number for milestones, or `null` for non-milestones.
NOTE: Existing custom saved queries in projects which previously did not return milestones now will. I expect this to have little-to-no impact on users, and these queries are easy to correct, but I'll note this in changelogs.
Test Plan:
- Ran various queries with `project.search` and in the web UI, searching for milestones, non-milestones, and both.
- Web UI default behavior (no milestones) is unchanged, but you can now get milestones if you want them.
- Queried a milestone by ID/PHID via API.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17153
Summary: Ref T11957.
Test Plan:
- Viewed an existing project profile.
- Viewed a user profile.
- Created a new project.
- Edited a profile menu.
- Added new profile items.
- Grepped for renamed symbols.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11957
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17028
Summary: Visually, I think these are much cleaner (with colors), and provide more workspace. I also don't really use the sidenav here and if I did, it would be to go back to the project homepage. I think this is overall better. If navigation page to project home is difficult or hard to find, we can maybe make a better header / crumbs bar to reduce that.
Test Plan: New project -> basic new board. Existing project -> color board. Desktop, Mobile, Fullscreen
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16882
Summary:
This has been replaced by `PolicyCodex` after D16830. Also:
- Rebuild Celerity map to fix grumpy unit test.
- Fix one issue on the policy exception workflow to accommodate the new code.
Test Plan:
- `arc unit --everything`
- Viewed policy explanations.
- Viewed policy errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16831
Summary: It's super
Test Plan: Set lots of project icons
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16513
Summary: This fixes a bug where the icon won't display since it doesn't include `fa-`.
Test Plan: Change icon on a project, revisit timeline and see icon.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16512
Summary:
This reverts commit 3f50ba90f1.
Fixes T10412. Everyone seems to hate this and I don't feel strongly about it. It's definitely a little weird.
Test Plan: Straight revert.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10412
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15644
Summary: Fixes T10737. I agree that this is a better behavior than always making them blue (boring).
Test Plan:
what
{F1208333}
wut
Reviewers: hach-que, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10737
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15643
Summary:
Fixes T10466. Currently, clicking "Disable Mail" or "Enable Mail" on a project toggles an edge, but it gets a default "added an edge" story and transaction record.
These are confusing, useless and not interesting, so just hide them.
Test Plan:
- Before patch: clicked enable/disable mail, saw "added an edge" / "removed an edge" stories in feed and project history.
- After patch: clicked enable/disable mail, saw nothing in feed or project history.
- (Note that this patch is not retroactive for feed, so already-published stories won't unpublish.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10466
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15361
Summary:
Ref T10349. These got sort of half-weirded-up before I separated subscriptions and watching fully. New rules are:
- You can watch whatever you want.
- Watching a parent watches everything inside it.
- If you're watching "Stonework" and go to "Stonework > Masonry", you'll see a "Watching Ancestor" hint to let you know you're already watching a parent or ancestor.
Test Plan:
- Watched and unwatched "Stonework".
- Watched and unwatched "Stonework > Iteration IV".
- While watching "Stonework", visited "Iteration IV" and saw "Watching Ancestor" hint.
- Created a task tagged "Stonework > Iteration IV". Got notified about it because I watch "Stonework".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15280
Summary:
Adds a UI for selecting background colors.
You can choose "Use Parent", which is the default, and allows you to set a color that all descendants inherit.
You can also choose "None", if a parent has a WHACKY BACKGROUND that you refuse to put up with.
Test Plan:
{F1114588}
{F1114589}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15279
Summary:
Ref T10349. At HEAD, if you create a task //on a board//, it floats to the top correctly.
If you create a task elsewhere and tag it with the board, you were subject to the whims of the layout engine and it would generally end up on the bottom.
Instead, make the rules consistent so that "virtual" positions (of tasks which haven't been committed to a particular position yet) still float to the top.
Test Plan:
- Created tasks from a board.
- Created tasks from Maniphest, then looked at them on a board.
- Moved tasks around.
- In all cases, newly created tasks floated to the top.
- Sorted by natural and priority.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15276
Summary:
Ref T10349. Columns have the same policies as the projects they belong to.
However, the current implementation just returns the policy directly. This usually works, but if the project has a policy like "Members of (This) Project", the policy filter tries to check if the viewer is a member of //the column itself//. That doesn't work, since columns don't have members. This leads to a situation where columns on "Editable By: Project Members" projects can not be edited.
Instead, return a permissive base policy and then use an extended policy to bind the column policy to the project policy.
Test Plan:
- Edited a column on an "Editable By: Members of Project" board.
- Added and ran a unit test covering this case.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15268
Summary:
Ref T10349. Instead of showing columns in "Backlog, Custom, Sprint 1, Sprint 2, Sprint 3" order, show the sprints in reverse order: 3, 2, 1.
This makes it easier to get to the new stuff, and you don't have to drag over older stuff or archive it immediately.
Trello's own meta-board for Trello development is a good example of this in the wild: older stuff goes out to the right, so you can get to the newer stuff easily:
https://trello.com/b/nC8QJJoZ/trello-development
Test Plan: Saw board in 3, 2, 1 order instead of 1, 2, 3.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10349
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15267
Summary: Fixes T10310. This replaces the "Hide Column" / "Show Column" option for milestone columns with one that archives/unarchives, and hides milestone columns when the milestone project is archived.
Test Plan:
- Hid and unhid a normal column (got normal dialogs).
- Hid and unhid a milestone column (got "archive project" dialogs, underlying project archived/unarchived, column vanished).
Reviewers: hach-que, #blessed_reviewers, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, chad
Subscribers: jcowgar, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10310
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15231
Summary:
Fixes T6641. This allows users who have permission to edit a project to use "Save as Default" to save the current order and filter as defaults for the project.
These are per-board defaults, and apply to all users. The rationale is that I think the best default ordering/filtering depends mostly on the board, not the viewer.
This seems to align with most requests in the task, although rationale is a bit light. But, for example, it seems reasonable you might want to change the default filter to "All Tasks" on a sprint board, so you can see what's in the "Done" column.
This also fixes some minor issues I ran into:
- Herald could hit an issue while checking permissions if the project was a subproject and a non-member had a triggering rule.
- "Advanced filter..." did not prefill with the current filter.
Test Plan:
- Set default order and filter on a workboard.
- Reloaded board, saw settings stick.
- Tried to edit a board as an unprivileged user (disabled menu items, error).
- Reviewed transaction log.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15260
Summary:
Fixes T7410.
- Adds a "Disable Workboard" action to the "Manage Backlog" menu.
- We'll probably move this somewhere else if/when that column gets too messy.
- Disabling a board hides it, prevents it from being recreated by non-editors, and hides the "Project (Backlog)" annotations.
- Resotring a board puts it back in pristine condition.
Test Plan:
- Disabled a board.
- Verified "(Backlog)" annotations vanished.
- Enabled a board.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T7410
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15215
Summary:
Ref T10289. This probably doesn't cover everything but should do a little bit better.
Although we should mabye just exlude milestones from this menu completely?
Test Plan: {F1093937}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10289
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15191
Summary:
Fixes T10287. Ref T10286.
- Link stuff properly.
- Generally, show "Parent (Milestone)" instead of "Milestone".
- This probably doesn't get 100% of `getName()` -> `getDisplayName()` swaps, but we can get those as we catch them.
Test Plan: See T10286. Also clicked stuff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10286, T10287
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15189
Summary:
Ref T10010.
- Don't allow milestones to be reordered.
- Hide phantom subproject columns when reodrering.
- Don't allow subproject/milestone columns to be renamed.
- Force milestones to be ordered at the end, and in the correct order.
- Add some missing crumbs.
Test Plan: Reordered columns, renamed columns, made a new column, viewed column details.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15183
Summary:
Ref T10010. These aren't perfect but I think (?) they aren't horribly broken.
- When a project is a parent project, destroy (as far as the user can tell) any custom columns.
- When a project has milestones, automatically generate columns on the project's workboard (if it has a workboard).
- When you move tasks between milestones, add the proper milestone tag.
- When you move tasks out of milestones back into the backlog, add the proper parent project tag.
- (Plenty of UI / design stuff to adjust.)
Test Plan:
- Dragged stuff between milestone columns.
- Used a normal workboard.
- Wasn't able to find any egregiously bad cases that did anything terrible.
{F1088224}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15171
Summary:
Ref T10010. See D15174. This gets rid of the "actually apply the change" callsite and moves it to layout engine.
Next up is to make the board view use the layout engine, then throw away all the whack code in ColumnPositionQuery, then move forward with D15171.
Test Plan:
- Dragged tasks within a column.
- Dragged tasks between columns.
- Dragged tasks to empty columns.
- Created a task in a column.
- Swapped board to priority sort, dragged a bunch of stuff all over.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15175
Summary:
Ref T10010. This is a precursor to D15171, which I'll eventually rebuild on top of these changes.
Currently, ColumnPositionQuery does a lot of "column layout" stuff that's very similar to the Milestone/Subproject stuff that needs to happen in D15171. The current approach there ended up splitting this layout stuff across two unrelated classes (ColumnPositionQuery + BoardViewController), neither of which is a particularly great place to do it -- the Query is too low-level, and the Controller is too high-level.
Instead, introduce a new "LayoutEngine" which does all this layout stuff. Swap two of the four places that we query this stuff over to the new engine:
- "Project (Column)" on tasks.
- Transaction generation when moving cards.
These sites aren't swapped by this diff, but will be by the next one:
- Actually applying transactions.
- Main layout for boards (this could swap easily now, but applying transactions currently relies on position writes having taken place, so it can't swap until the other one swaps).
Once everything is swapped over, I should be able to add the D15171 logic to LayoutEngine instead of BoardViewController and end up with a cleaner approach overall.
One particularly benefit is that //looking// at a board won't do a bunch of position writes anymore, which wasn't a big deal, but which I was a bit uneasy with.
Test Plan:
- Viewed tasks that are on boards, saw column annotations in project list.
- Moved cards between columns on a board.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15174
Summary: Fixes T6501. This adds more API information to the newish `project.search` API method.
Test Plan: Called `project.search`, used attachments.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6501
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15105
Summary:
First pass at a new Project Home page. This is starting to sprawl, so punting this up now before it gets too large.
- Project homes now have "large header"
- Custom Fields / Descriptions are in the main column
- Feed is simpler visually
- new "Background" option for PHUIObjectBoxView
- move header buttons globally to "Grey" instead of "Simple"
- New color and hover states for "Grey"
- Transitions on Buttons haha
- Edit Icon on Nav is now under "Manage" panel
- New "Manage" Panel
TODO:
- More testing of bad cases of Custom Fields
- Members Page in flux, needs design
- Um still not sure how to make Custom Field not show UI
Test Plan:
Lots of random Project page visits. Save project, watch project, edit project, etc.
{F1068191}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15097
Summary: Fixes T5819. Adds configuration for setting color labels on projects and changing the default. Options are locked to what we make available.
Test Plan: {F1066823}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15088
Summary:
Ref T10054. Ref T6113. Users can currently subscribe to projects, which causes them to receive:
# mail about project membership changes, description changes, etc; and
# mail to the project, e.g. when the project is added as a subscriber on a task, or a reviewer on a revision.
Almost no one cares about (1), and after D15061 you can use Herald to get this stuff if you really want it. (It will get progressively more annoying in the future with external membership sources causing automated project membership updates.)
A lot of users are confused about (2) and how it relates to membership, watching, etc, and most users who want (2) don't want (1).
Instead, add an explicit option for this and explain what it does.
This is fairly verbose but I've hidden it on the member/watch screen, which is now the "explain how projects work" screen, I guess.
Test Plan:
{F1064929}
{F1064930}
{F1064931}
- Disabled/enabled mail for a project.
- Sent mail to a project with mail disabled, verified I didn't get a copy.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6113, T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15065
Summary:
Ref T6183. Ref T10054. Historically, only members could watch projects because there were some weird special cases with policies. These policy issues have been resolved and Herald is generally powerful enough to do equivalent watches on most objects anyway.
Also puts a "Watch Project" button on the feed panel to make the behavior and meaning more obvious.
Test Plan:
- Watched a project I was not a member of.
- Clicked the feed watch/unwatch button.
{F1064909}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6183, T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15063
Summary:
Fixes T6856. Fixes T10164.
- Make the profile image composer code use the underlying icon name instead of the top-level icon key, so it works instead of 404'ing.
- Change the button to show a preview of the profile icon instead of the text "Use Icon and Color".
- When creating a new non-milestone project, automatically set the profile image to the icon + color image.
Test Plan:
- Created several new projects, saw appropriate default icons.
- Edited projects, saw icon previews.
- Clicked icon buttons to set icons.
- Poked around other applications which use builtins (Pholio, user profiles) to look for anything I broke, but everything seemed fine.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6856, T10164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15050
Summary: Ref T10054. Take specialization off the objects and put it on Engine subclasses instead. One reason for this is that certain objects (like users) might have multiple different sets of panels in the future (e.g., their user profile and their home page).
Test Plan:
- No user-visible changes.
- PanelEngine no longer has any hardcoded "project" stuff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15018
Summary:
Ref T10054. This does a big chunk of the legwork to let users reconfigure profile menus (currently, just project menus).
This includes:
- Editing builtin items (e.g., you can rename the default items).
- Creating new items (for now, only links are available).
This does not yet include:
- Hiding items.
- Reordering items.
- Lots of fancy types of items (dashboards, etc).
- Any UI changes.
- Documentation (does feature: TODO link for documentation).
Test Plan:
{F1060695}
{F1060696}
{F1060697}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15010
Summary: Ref T10054. This has no product impact, but prepares us for customizable side nav on "profiles" (today, projects; probably users some day; and maybe other stuff down the road).
Test Plan: Clicked all links on a profile, everything was exactly the same as before.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15007
Summary:
Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars:
- There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of.
- We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?)
- The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types?
- Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there.
- This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff?
---
I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault.
I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are:
- Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy.
- Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons.
We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons.
---
The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold.
I'd ideally like to try either:
- rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or
- rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it.
However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element.
(I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.)
Test Plan:
{F1049905}
{F1049906}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
Summary:
Ref T10010.
Currently, milestone subproject have editable icons/colors, but I don't think this is likely to be used much (the expectation is that milestones will be common and homogenous, and it doesn't make much sense to pick different icons for "Sprint 32" vs "Sprint 33", I think).
Locking the icon and color lets us simplify the form, make milestones more distinct, and potentially reuse the color later for other things (e.g., active/future/past or on time / overdue or whatever else) or just give them a special color to make them more visible.
The best argument for retaining this that I can come up with is that certain milestones may be special (e.g., Sprint 19 is a major release?), but you can just name it "Sprint 19 (v3.0!)" or something, which seems pretty good for now.
Also don't show milestones on task browse/list view.
Test Plan: {F1048532}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14912
Summary:
Ref T10010.
- Default name to "Milestone X".
- Remove policy controls, which have no effect.
- Don't generate slugs for milestones since this is a big pain where they all generate as `#milestone_1` by default (you can add one if you want). I plan to add some kind of syntax like `#parent/32` to mean "Milestone 32 in Parent" later.
- Don't require projects to have unique names (again, 900 copies of "Milestone X"). I think we can trust users to sort this out for themselves since modern Phabricator has "Can Create Projects" permission, etc.
Test Plan: Created some milestones, had a less awful experience.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14909
Summary:
Ref T10010. This has a lot of UI/UX problems but I think it:
- technically allows subproject creation;
- technically allows milestone creation;
- doesn't let users unwittingly destroy their installs (probably).
Test Plan:
- Created milestones.
- Created subprojects.
- Created and edited normal projects.
- Observed some reasonable interactions (e.g., you can't create milestones for a milestone or edit a superproject's members).
- Observed plenty of silly/confusing interactions that need additional work.
{F1046657}
{F1046658}
{F1046655}
{F1046656}
{F1046654}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14904
Summary: Ref T10010. This is pretty straightforward with a couple of very minor new behaviors, like the icon selector edit field.
Test Plan:
- Created projects.
- Edited projects.
- Saw "Create Project" in quick create menu.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14896
Summary: Ref T10010. This is primarily to make "Parent > Child > Grandchild" navigation more manageable for subprojects, at least for now.
Test Plan: Viewed profile, members, feed; saw crumbs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14891
Summary: Ref T10010. This still needs support for attachments (to get members) and more constraints (like slugs), but mostly works.
Test Plan: Ran query, saw basically sensible results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14889
Summary:
Ref T10010. Subprojects have the following general membership rule: if you are a member of a subproject ("Engineering > Backend"), you are also a member of the parent project.
It would be unreasonably difficult to implement this rule directly in SQL when querying `withMemberPHIDs()`, because we'd have to do an arbitrarily large number of arbitrarily deep joins, or fetch and then requery a lot of data.
Instead, introduce "materailized members", which are just a copy of all the effective members of a project. When a subproject has a membership change, we go recompute the effective membership of all the parent projects. Then we can just JOIN to satisfy `withMemberPHIDs()`.
Having this process avialable will also be useful in the future, when a project's membership might be defined by some external source.
Also make milestones mostly work like we'd expect them to with respect to membership and visibility.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Changed project members, verified materialized members populated correctly in the database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14863
Summary:
Ref T10010. This adds infrastructure for querying projects by type, depth, parent and ancestor.
I needed to revise the "extended policy check" cycle detection rules. When, e.g., querying a grandchild, they incorrectly detected a cycle because both the child and grandchild needed to check the policy of the grandparent.
Instead, simplify it to just do a basic runaway calldepth check. There are many other safety mechanisms to make it so this can't ever occur.
(Cycle detection does have existing test coverage, and those tests still pass, it just takes a little longer to detect the cycle internally.)
There is still no way to create subprojects in the UI.
Test Plan: Added and executed unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14862
Summary:
Ref T10010. This implements technical groundwork for subprojects. Specifically, it implements policy rules like Phriction:
- to see a project, you must be able to see all of its parents (and the project itself).
- you can edit a project if you can edit any of its parents (or the project itself).
To facilitiate this, we load all project ancestors when querying projects so we can do the view/edit checks.
This does NOT yet implement:
- proper membership rules for these projects (up next);
- any kind of UI to let users create subprojects.
Test Plan:
- Added unit tests.
- Executed unit tests.
- Browsed Projects (no change in behavior is expected).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14861
Summary: Ref T9979. This simplifies/standardizes the code a bit, but mostly gives us more consistent class names and structure.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/search index --type ...` to index documents of every indexable type.
- Searched for documents by unique text, found them.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14842
Summary:
Ref T10010. This does some cleanups on the schema:
- `viewPolicy`, `editPolicy` and `joinPolicy` were nullable, but should never be `null`. Set them to defaults if they're null, then make the column non-nullable.
- Rename `phrictionSlug` to `primarySlug` and stop adding and removing trailing slashes from it.
- Add new columns to support milestones and non-milestone subprojects.
- Drop very old subprojectPHIDs column. This hasn't done anything in the UI for years and years, and isn't particularly realistic to migrate forward.
The new columns aren't reachable from the UI.
Test Plan:
- Applied patches.
- Grepped for `phrictionSlug`.
- Grepped for `subprojectPHIDs`.
- Created tasks.
- Edited tasks.
- Verified existing tasks still had primary slugs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14825
Summary:
Ref T9992. This is a step on the path to getting EditEngine working in Badges, Projects and Calendar.
This doesn't add a new `EditField` for icons yet, just standardizes the old stuff. New stuff is more general and I saved 150 lines of code.
I put the endpoint in Files because the similar "choose a profile picture" endpoint will definitely go there, and this endpoint might eventually feature, like, "draw your own icon~~" or something.
Test Plan:
- Created events, projects and badges with custom icons.
- Edited events, projects and badges, changing their icons.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9992
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14799
Summary:
Ref T9551. We currently use the same logic for generating project hashtags and Phriction slugs, but should be a little more conservative with project hashtags.
Stop them from generating with stuff that won't parse in a "Reviewers:" field or generally in commments (commas, colons, etc).
Test Plan:
Created a bunch of projects with nonsense in them and saw them generate pretty reasonable hashtags.
{F873456}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14261
