Summary:
Currently, `ManiphestAuxiliaryFieldDefaultSpecification` uses about a dozen giant `switch` statements to implement stadard field types (int, string, date, bool, select, user, remarkup, etc). This is:
- pretty gross;
- not extensible; and
- doesn't really let us share that much code.
I got about halfway through porting a similar implementation into StandardField but I wasn't thrilled with it. Subclass StandardField instead to implement custom field types.
Test Plan: Added an "int" custom field, verified it had integer semantics and indexed into the integer index.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7005
Summary: Ref T418. Moves data from the Maniphest-specific table to the general one. This patch is a bit gross, but mostly about getting the reads and writes aimed correctly. Future patches will clean things up.
Test Plan: Migrated data across formats. Verified it survied the migration. Viewed and edited tasks' custom fields.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6999
Summary: Ref T418. Maniphest has an obsolete class-based field selector. Replace it with CustomField-based selectors, which use the nice config UI and are generally way easier to use.
Test Plan: Added custom fields; edited and viewed custom fields on tasks. Everything worked as expected.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6998
Summary: Ref T418. Depends on D6992. This adds index and value storage for Maniphest custom fields.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6995
Summary:
Ref T2625. Ref T3794. Ref T418. Ref T1703.
This is a more general version of D5278. It expands CustomField support to include real integration with ApplicationSearch.
Broadly, custom fields may elect to:
- build indicies when objects are updated;
- populate ApplicationSearch forms with new controls;
- read inputs entered into those controls out of the request; and
- apply constraints to search queries.
Some utility/helper stuff is provided to make this easier. This part could be cleaner, but seems reasonable for a first cut. In particular, the Query and SearchEngine must manually call all the hooks right now instead of everything happening magically. I think that's fine for the moment; they're pretty easy to get right.
Test Plan:
I added a new searchable "Company" field to People:
{F58229}
This also cleaned up the disable/reorder view a little bit:
{F58230}
As it did before, this field appears on the edit screen:
{F58231}
However, because it has `search`, it also appears on the search screen:
{F58232}
When queried, it returns the expected results:
{F58233}
And the actually good bit of all this is that the query can take advantage of indexes:
mysql> explain SELECT * FROM `user` user JOIN `user_customfieldstringindex` `appsearch_0` ON `appsearch_0`.objectPHID = user.phid AND `appsearch_0`.indexKey = 'mk3Ndy476ge6' AND `appsearch_0`.indexValue IN ('phacility') ORDER BY user.id DESC LIMIT 101;
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | appsearch_0 | ref | key_join,key_find | key_find | 232 | const,const | 1 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |
| 1 | SIMPLE | user | eq_ref | phid | phid | 194 | phabricator2_user.appsearch_0.objectPHID | 1 | |
+----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418, T1703, T2625, T3794
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6992
Summary: This class is no longer used. It has no callsites.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6996
Summary:
Removes a bunch of dead stuff:
- Old side nav with hard-coded filters.
- Old edit/list/delete/update interfaces for those filters.
- Old `buildStandardPageResponse()`.
- Some other junk with no callsites.
- Reduce the number of places where the "Create Task" button is built.
Test Plan: `grep`; used list view, batch editor, reports.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6985
Summary: This marks the first time in history that "Pro" has been removed.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6980
Summary: See discussion in D6955. This provides a table we can JOIN against to (effectively) "ORDER BY project name", populates it intially, and keeps it up to date as projects are edited.
Test Plan:
- Ran storage upgrade, verified projects populated into the table.
- Edited a project, verified its entry updated.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6957
Summary:
Part one of a large and complicated plot:
- The last filter for Maniphest "pro" queries is "Group By".
- This is currently executed in a convoluted and ridiculous way, loading massive amounts of data.
- The primary reason it works like it does is that we don't have a project name index available in Maniphest, so we can't sort in the DB.
- So, I want to provide a name index to Maniphest and push this work to the DB.
To do that, my plan is:
- Index projects in Search.
- Add a "did update index" event.
- Have Maniphest listen for it.
- When projects are updated, update their indexes in Maniphest.
- Rewrite the giant mess of "group by: project" to be somewhat reasonable.
- This may also extend to some future "group by: assignee".
This is the first small step down this path, which just indexes projects in search.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/search index --type project`, then searched for projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6955
Summary: Move this into a more consistent location.
Test Plan: Loaded Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6949
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary:
Ref T603. Ref T2625. Cutting this over is tricky because of Maniphest's existing saved queries. Plan here is:
- Build out the "pro" controller at `/maniphest/query/`.
- Once it's at parity, migrate custom queries.
- Nuke the old UI.
This provides a minimal implementation with no filter support.
Test Plan: Looked at `/maniphest/query/`, saw results technically available.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6933
Summary:
Ref T418. These implementations share no method names, so we can safely just move Maniphest fields into the `PhabricatorCustomField` hierarchy.
Replaces two Maniphest-specific custom field exceptions which nothing catches.
Test Plan: Viewed Maniphest, edited/altered custom fields.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6927
Summary:
Ref T2625. Switches Diffusion to ApplicationSearch. Notes:
- Rendering is a bit rough, I'll clean that up next.
- Ordering is a bit arbitrary, also coming shortly.
Test Plan: Used `/diffusion/` to execute various searches.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6917
Summary:
Ref T3687. See some discussion in D6892. The JIRA doorkeeper publisher shares a reasonable amount of code with the Asana publisher. Remedy this:
- Create `DoorkeeperFeedWorker`, where shared functionality lives (mostly related to building story context objects).
- Push responsibility for enabling/disabling a worker into this new layer, via `isEnabled()`. This allows `FeedPublisherWorker` to dynamically find and schedule doorkeeper publishers, so third parties can add additional doorkeeper publishers.
- Some general cleanup/documentation.
Test Plan: Used `bin/feed republish` to republish stories about objects with JIRA and Asana links. Verified that doorkeeper publishers activated properly, made calls, and published events into the remote systems.
Reviewers: btrahan, akopanev22
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3687
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6906
Summary: Slightly more readable, less space than current index. LMK if you hate it though.
Test Plan: Look at user and dev book indexes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6932
Summary:
Adds most of Diffusion's commenting options available in the web UI
Mark method as deprecated immediately per @epriestley's request
Test Plan:
Used the Conduit web console to check:
* Lookup by PHID works
* Error is raised if commit by PHID is not found
* "action" validation works and raises appropriate error
* "message" raises error if empty
* Actions to raise concern or accept commit work
* Method is marked as deprecated from the start
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6923
Summary: Adds plain support for object lists that just look like lists
Test Plan: review UIexamples and a number of other applications
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6922
Summary: This is just renaming to PHUI (I like shorter text :)
Test Plan: reload workboard examples page, seems to not fatal and looks very appealing
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6904
Summary:
Ref T3687. Publish stories into JIRA.
These need some voicing fixes, which maybe involves straightening out the feed code. For example, they're voiced in-context ("updated this revision") when they should be voiced out-of-context ("updated D123").
Generally, this is similar to the Asana stuff but a lot simpler since we don't need to do any state management.
Test Plan: {F57366}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3687
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6892
Summary: this ends up being a little weird since you can't actually edit files. Also, since we create files all sorts of ways, sometimes without even having a user, we don't bother logging transactions for those events. Fixes T3651. Turns out this work is important for T3612, which is a priority of mine to help get Pholio out the door.
Test Plan: left a comment on a file. it worked! use bin/mail to verify mail content looked correct.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T3651, T3612
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6789
Summary: This adds a number of new styles for Diviner documentation. Not sure I've covered all the bases or wrote this in the most efficient manner, but passing it along now for early review before tightening everything up.
Test Plan: Review various class pages.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6888
Summary:
Ref T3687. This adds a field which allows you to link Differential Revisions to JIRA issues.
This is just about as basic as it can get, but gets the job done. The field enables itself if you have a JIRA auth provide. You enter JIRA issues in a comma-delimited format and it generates appropriate edges.
Nothing is pushed to the issues yet.
The only real rough part here is that if you commandeer a revision which is linked to issues you can't see, editing it is difficult via the CLI. This seems pretty much like a non-issue, but at some point we can let the field throw some kind of "RecoverableInvalidFieldException" which just warns the user. The "no reviewers, continue anyway?" prompt could then use that too.
Test Plan:
- Edited via web UI, tried valid/invalid edits, checked that edges showed up in the database, added/removed issues, clicked issue links.
- Edited via CLI, tried valid/invalid edits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3687
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6879
Summary:
Ref T3687. Adds a Doorkeeper bridge for JIRA issues, plus remarkup support. In particular:
- The Asana and JIRA remarkup rules shared most of their implementation, so I refactored what I could into a base class.
- Actual bridge implementation is straightforward and similar to Asana, although probably not similar enough to really justify refactoring.
Test Plan:
- When logged in as a JIRA-connected user, pasted a JIRA issue link and saw it enriched at rendering time.
- Logged in and out with JIRA.
- Tested an Asana link, too (seems I haven't broken anything).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3687
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6878
Summary:
Ref T3687. Depends on D6867. This allows login/registration through JIRA.
The notable difference between this and other providers is that we need to do configuration in two stages, since we need to generate and save a public/private keypair before we can give the user configuration instructions, which takes several seconds and can't change once we've told them to do it.
To this effect, the edit form renders two separate stages, a "setup" stage and a "configure" stage. In the setup stage the user identifies the install and provides the URL. They hit save, we generate a keypair, and take them to the configure stage. In the configure stage, they're walked through setting up all the keys. This ends up feeling a touch rough, but overall pretty reasonable, and we haven't lost much generality.
Test Plan: {F57059}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3687
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6868
Summary: Ref T3687. Depends on D6864. Implements the `OAuth1` provider in Phabricator (which is mostly similar to the OAuth2 provider, but doesn't share quite enough code to actually extend a common base class, I think) and Twitter as a concrete subclass.
Test Plan:
Created a Twitter provider. Registered, logged in, linked, refreshed account link.
{F57054}
{F57056}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3687
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6865
Summary: Currently, adapters can only fail mail temporarily. Allow them to indicate a permanent failure by throwing a special exception.
Test Plan: Added and ran unit tests.
Reviewers: wez, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6847
Summary:
Ref T988. Various improvements:
- Generate function documentation, mostly correctly.
- Raise some warnings about bad documentation.
- Allow `.book` files to exclude paths from generation.
- Add a book for technical docs.
- Exclude "ghosts" from common queries (atoms which used to exist, but no longer do, but which we want to keep the PHIDs around for in case they come back later).
This is a bit rough still, but puts us much closer to being able to get rid of the old Diviner.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6812
Summary:
This attempts some consistency in form layouts. Notably, they all now contain headers and are 16px off the sides and tops of pages. Also updated dialogs to the same look and feel. I think I got 98% of forms with this pass, but it's likely I missed some buried somewhere.
TODO: will take another pass as consolidating these colors and new gradients in another diff.
Test Plan: Played in my sandbox all week. Please play with it too and let me know how they feel.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6806
Summary: Fixes T2213
Test Plan: Updated a pholio mock description. Observed that when I first showed details there was a round trip made. Toggled show / hide noting no more trips made to server.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2213
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6801
Summary: Ref T3663. Same as D6785, but for branches. No writes to this table yet.
Test Plan: Clicked "View History", got a blank but non-broken page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6787
Summary: Ref T3663. There's no data recorded in this table yet, but add the UI and controller for it. Edits and such will eventually go here.
Test Plan: Clicked "View History" on a project, got an empty but non-broken page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6785
Summary:
Ref T3663. This is a proto-transaction record which is obsoleted by real transactions. It has no UI, so I'm not bothering to retain/migrate the data since there's no regression.
Just get rid of it and all its writers. I'm keeping the table for now in case something crazy uses this somehow, so no data is actually destroyed.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6784
Summary: This has two use sites and no special logic.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6783
Summary: Ref T3718. Releeph has a custom implementation of this exception; a more general version exists in CustomField. Use the more general one. Nothing catches the specific one.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6782
Summary: Ref T3092. This was obsoleted recently and has no more call/use sites.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6779
Summary: Ref T3663. This is obsolete code which is used only in this migration, which Facebook has already performed and which isn't relevant for any other installs.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6777
Summary:
Releeph branch lists in project views have a bunch of custom UI right now; give them more standard UI and ApplicationSearch.
This drops a small piece of functionality: we now show only a total open request count instead of a detailed enumeration of each request status. I assume this is reasonable (that is, the important piece is "is there something to do on this branch?"), but we can muck with it if the more detailed status is important.
Test Plan: {F54344}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6764
Summary: Ref T2766. Does the integration via ApplicationTransactionsEditor. Only did addCC and Flag for proof of concept.
Test Plan: Made a rule to cc, made a rule to flag. They worked! (will attach screens to diff)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2766
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6766
Summary:
Ref T3721. Releeph currently attempts to implement a flexible, field-driven search for branches, but it's building all of its own infrastructure and it ends up heading down some weird paths. In particular, it loads **every** request and then makes calls into fields to filter them. It also tries to be very very general, which isn't really necessary (for example, I think it's reasonable for us to assume that we won't let you disable the "requestor" field).
ApplicationSearch and CustomField provide more scalable approaches to this problem; move search on top of them. The query still ends up doing some filtering in-process, but it's now far more limited in scope and can be denormalized later.
Test Plan: {F54304}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3721
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6758
Summary: Ref T3718. This is not used and does not seem particularly useful.
Test Plan: Grep.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6755
Summary:
Ref T1703. Ref T3718. This introduces `PhabricatorCustomFieldAttachment`, which is just a fancy `array()`. The goal here is to simplify `PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface` as much as possible.
In particular, it can now use common infrastructure (`assertAttached()`) and is more difficult to get wrong.
Test Plan: Edited custom fields on profile.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6752
Summary:
Fixes T3661. Ref T3718. This makes Releeph custom fields extend PhabricatorCustomField so we can start moving over other pieces of infrastructure (rendering, storage, etc) to run through the same pathways. It's roughly the minimum amount of work required to be able to move forward.
NOTE: This removes per-project custom field selectors. Fields are now configured for an entire install. My understanding is that Facebook does not use this feature, and modern field infrastructure has moved away from selectors.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited projects, branches, and requests in Releeph. Grepped for removed config. Grepped for `field_selector`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3661, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6750
Summary:
Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here:
**PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller:
foreach ($fields as $field) {
// do some junk
}
Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`.
**PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc).
**Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it.
The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes).
**Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs.
Test Plan:
{F54240}
{F54241}
{F54242}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
