Summary:
Fixes T6559. No more flash, use Websockets. This is less aggressive than the earlier version, and retains more server logic.
- Support "wss".
- Make the client work.
- Remove "notification.user" entirely.
- Seems ok?
Test Plan:
In Safari, Firefox and Chrome, saw the browsers connect. Made a bunch of comments/updates and saw notifications.
Notable holes in the test plan:
- Haven't tested "wss" yet. I'll do this on secure.
- Notifications are //too fast// now, locally. I get them after I hit submit but before the page reloads.
- There are probably some other rough edges, this is a fairly big patch.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: joshuaspence, btrahan
Subscribers: fabe, btrahan, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6713, T6559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11143
Summary: Various fixes as suggested by JSHint.
Test Plan: Eye-balled it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9783
Summary: The `_activeListenerCount` variable is overkill, we should be able to achieve the same result using `Object.keys(this._listeners).length`.
Test Plan:
Mucked around in a NodeJS shell.
```lang=js
> Object.keys({}).length
0
> Object.keys({foo: 'bar'}).length
1
> Object.keys({1: 'foo', 2: 'bar'}).length
2
```
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9554
Summary: Ref T4324. Ref T5284. This adds server-side support for keeping track of a set of PHIDs that the Aphlict clients have subscribed to. Instead of broadcasting a notification to all clients (after which the clients can poll `/notification/individual` in order to determine whether or not they are interested in the notification), transmit notifications only to clients that have subscribed to a PHID that is relevant to the notification.
Test Plan:
I opened up two clients on the same host (incognito tabs in Chrome). Here is the output from the server:
```
> sudo ./bin/aphlict debug
Starting Aphlict server in foreground...
Launching server:
$ 'nodejs' '/usr/src/phabricator/src/applications/aphlict/management/../../../../support/aphlict/server/aphlict_server.js' --port='22280' --admin='22281' --host='localhost' --user='aphlict'
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:27 GMT+0000 (UTC)] Started Server (PID 4546)
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:36 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <FlashPolicy> Policy Request From ::ffff:192.168.1.1
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:37 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Connected from ::ffff:192.168.1.1
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:37 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Received data: {"command":"subscribe","data":["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]}
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:37 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Subscribed to: ["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:39 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Received data: {"command":"subscribe","data":["PHID-USER-kfohe3ca5oe6ygykmioq"]}
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:39 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Subscribed to: ["PHID-USER-kfohe3ca5oe6ygykmioq"]
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:42 GMT+0000 (UTC)] notification: {"key":"6023751084283587681","type":"notification","subscribers":["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]}
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:42 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Wrote Message
```
I verified (using the "Network" tab in Chrome) that an AJAX request to `/notification/individual/` was only made in the tab belonging to the user that triggered the test notification.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5284, T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9458
Summary:
Currently, the Aphlict server will crash if invalid JSON data is `POST`ed to it. I have fixed this to, instead, return a 400. Also made some minor formatting changes.
Ref T4324. Ref T5284. Also, modify the data structure that is passed around (i.e. `POST`ed to the Aphlict server and broadcast to the Aphlict clients) to include the subscribers. Initially, I figured that we shouldn't expose this information to the clients... however, it is necessary for T4324 that the `AphlictMaster` is able to route a notification to the appropriate clients.
Test Plan:
Making the following `curl` request: `curl --data "{" http://localhost:22281/`.
**Before**
```
sudo ./bin/aphlict debug
Starting Aphlict server in foreground...
Launching server:
$ 'nodejs' '/usr/src/phabricator/src/applications/aphlict/management/../../../../support/aphlict/server/aphlict_server.js' --port='22280' --admin='22281' --host='localhost' --user='aphlict'
[Wed Jun 11 2014 17:07:51 GMT+0000 (UTC)] Started Server (PID 2033)
[Wed Jun 11 2014 17:07:55 GMT+0000 (UTC)]
<<< UNCAUGHT EXCEPTION! >>>
SyntaxError: Unexpected end of input
>>> Server exited!
```
**After**
(No output... the bad JSON is caught and a 400 is returned)
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4324, T5284
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9480
Summary: Ref T4324. One of the server we start just sends pre-canned XML responses. Separate it out of the main file and hand it all the objects it interacts with in structured, reasonable ways.
Test Plan: Hit "Send Test Notification", saw notification, saw flash policy info in the log.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8257
Summary:
Ref T4324.
- Create `Listener` to represent listening clients.
- Create `ListenerList` to represent the current list of clients.
- Create `Logfile` to handle logging.
Test Plan: Clicked "Send Test Notification", verified logs, status and notifications all work correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8256
Summary:
Ref T4324. The server code is probably going to get a fair amount more complicated, so allow it to load Javelin classes in a mostly-reasonable way.
This integration has a few warts, but should be good enough to let us manage complexity through the next iteration of the server.
(Mostly I just want the concicse Javelin mechanism for defining new classes.)
Version bump is just so I can figure stuff out if this creates any issues for users based on which version of things they're running.
Test Plan: Started server, posted some messages through it.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8253
