Summary:
Depends on D19121. Ref T13083. Group transactions and show groups in the debugging view.
Fix some of the most obvious issues with fact generation:
- No more 0-point facts.
- Engine can now generate at least one of every type of fact.
Test Plan: Generated facts, viewed them in the debugging view, fact generation largely appeared to align with reality. No more "no facts in storage" facts.
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19122
Summary:
Depends on D19119. Ref T13083. This is probably still very buggy, but I'm planning to build support tools to make debugging facts easier shortly.
This generates a large number of datapoints, at least, and can render some charts which aren't all completely broken in an obvious way.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact analyze --all`, got some charts with lines that went up and down in the web UI.
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19120
Summary:
Ref T13083. Facts has a fair amount of weird hardcoding and duplication of responsibilities. Reduce this somewhat: no more hard-coded fact aggregates, no more database-driven list of available facts, etc. Generally, derive all objective truth from FactEngines. This is more similar to how most other modern applications work.
For clarity, hopefully: rename "FactSpec" to "Fact". Rename "RawFact" to "Datapoint".
Split the fairly optimistic "RawFact" table into an "IntDatapoint" table with less stuff in it, then dimension tables for the object PHIDs and key names. This is primarily aimed at reducing the row size of each datapoint. At the time I originally wrote this code we hadn't experimented much with storing similar data in multiple tables, but this is now more common and has worked well elsewhere (CustomFields, Edges, Ferret) so I don't anticipate this causing issues. If we need more complex or multidimension/multivalue tables later we can accommodate them. The queries a single table supports (like "all facts of all kinds in some time window") don't make any sense as far as I can tell and could likely be UNION ALL'd anyway.
Remove all the aggregation stuff for now, it's not really clear to me what this should look like.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact analyze` and viewed web UI. Nothing exploded too violently.
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19119
