1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-14 19:02:41 +01:00
Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
c5a06a624a Use application PHIDs for mailing lists
Summary:
Ref T2715. Ref T603. Ref T2625.

  - Implement policies.
  - Use policy queries.
  - Use ApplicationSearch.
  - Use application PHIDs.

Test Plan: Browsed things with lists CC'd; edited lists; created a list, used `phid.query` to query handles.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2625, T2715

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6513
2013-07-22 12:17:33 -07:00
epriestley
544a84ebb9 Move outbound mail lists to CLI and enhance details
Summary: Finish off moving all this stuff to the CLI. Ref T3306.

Test Plan:
  PROPERTIES
  ID: 6483
  Status: void
  Retry Count: 0
  Next Retry: 1373494457
  Related PHID: PHID-DREV-5bnb33yeuhuaulyc3exg
  Message: Message has no valid recipients: all To/Cc are disabled, invalid, or configured not to receive this mail.

  PARAMETERS
  from: PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov
  is-html:
  parent-message-id: null
  thread-id: differential-rev-PHID-DREV-5bnb33yeuhuaulyc3exg-req
  is-first-message: null
  is-bulk: 1
  mailtags: ["differential-comment"]
  cc: ["PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi"]
  subject: D22: quack quack
  subject-prefix: [Differential]
  vary-subject-prefix: [Commented On]
  worker-task: 936546

  HEADERS
  Thread-Topic: D22: quack quack
  X-Herald-Rules: none
  X-Differential-Author: <PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov>
  X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr>
  X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi>
  X-Differential-CC: <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt>
  X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok>
  X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f>
  X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye>
  X-Differential-CCs: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr>, <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi>, <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt>, <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok>, <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f>, <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye>
  X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr>
  X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi>
  X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt>
  X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok>
  X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f>
  X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye>
  X-Differential-Explicit-CCs: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr>, <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi>, <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt>, <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok>, <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f>, <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye>
  X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov>
  X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr>
  X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi>
  X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt>
  X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok>
  X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f>
  X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye>

  RECIPIENTS
  ! dog (dog)
      - This user is disabled; disabled users do not receive mail.

  BODY
  epriestley has commented on the revision "quack quack".

    zxcbzxcb

  REVISION DETAIL
    http://local.aphront.com:8080/D22

  To: epriestley
  Cc: Unknown User, dog, list, duck, epriestley992, asana

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3306

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6423
2013-07-10 18:52:22 -07:00
epriestley
293a475e39 Show why recipients were excluded from mail
Summary:
Ref T3306. This interface has a hard time balancing security/policy issues and I'm not sure what the best way forward is. Some possibilities:

  # We just let you see everything from the web UI.
    - This makes debugging easier.
    - Anyone who can see this stuff can trivially take over any user's account with five seconds of work and no technical expertise (reset their password from the web UI, then go read the email and click the link).
  # We let you see everything, but only for messages you were a recipient of or author of.
    - This makes it much more difficult to debug issues with mailing lists.
      - But maybe we could just say mailing list recipients are "public", or define some other ruleset.
    - Generally this gets privacy and ease of use right.
  # We could move the whole thing to the CLI.
    - Makes the UI/UX way worse.
  # We could strike an awkward balance between concerns, as we do now.
    - We expose //who// sent and received messages, but not the content of the messages. This doesn't feel great.

I'm inclined to probably go with (2) and figure something out for mailing lists?

Anyway, irrespective of that this should generally make things more clear, and improves the code a lot if nothing else.

Test Plan:
{F49546}

  - Looked at a bunch of mail.
  - Sent mail from different apps.
  - Checked that recipients seem correct.

Reviewers: btrahan, chad

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3306

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6413
2013-07-10 15:17:38 -07:00