Summary:
- This is only slightly useful for updating Differential, since DiffQuery (vs RawDiffQuery) already gets you most of what you need. The only thing is that DiffQuery returns the diff for one path only right now(and the SVN version is very "special"). Should be easy to fix in the Git/HG cases at least, though (or maybe just use RawDiffQuery to avoid the SVN mess).
- Added a "download raw diff" link.
Test Plan: Viewed Diffusion and raw commits for SVN, Mercurial and Git repositories.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2350
Summary:
This is mostly in an effort to simplify D2323. Currently, we load one image into the database by default. This is a weird special case that makes things more complicated than necessary.
Instead, use a disk-based default avatar.
Test Plan: Verified that a user without an image appears with the default avatar as a handle, in profile settings, and on their person page.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, edward, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2331
Summary:
various stripe stuff, including
- external stripe library
- payment form
- test controller to play with payment form, sample business logic
My main questions / discussion topics are...
- is the stripe PHP library too big? (ie should I write something more simple just for phabricator?)
-- if its cool, what is the best way to include the client? (ie should I make it a submodule rather than the flat copy here?)
- is the JS I wrote (too) ridiculous?
-- particularly unhappy with the error message stuff being in JS *but* it seemed the best choice given the most juicy error messages come from the stripe JS such that the overall code complexity is lowest this way.
- how should the stripe JS be included?
-- flat copy like I did here?
-- some sort of external?
-- can we just load it off stripe servers at request time? (I like that from the "if stripe is down, stripe is down" perspective)
- wasn't sure if the date control was too silly and should just be baked into the form?
-- for some reason I feel like its good to be prepared to walk away from Stripe / switch providers here, though I think this is on the wrong side of pragmatic
Test Plan: - played around with sample client form
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2096
Summary: I looooove JS! It makes me giddy with glee!
Test Plan: Picked dates. See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2086
Summary:
Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks.
Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used
this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it.
The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish.
Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when
reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks
against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two
tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some
code to deal with this at some point if necessary.
I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all.
(There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header
counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.)
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt
Maniphest Tasks: T859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
Summary:
Flags are a personal collection of things you want to take a look at later. You can use several different colors and add notes.
Not really sure if this is actually a good idea or not but it was easy to build.
Planned features:
- Allow Herald rules to add flags.
- In the "edit flag" dialog, have a "[x] Subscribe Me" checkbox that CCs you.
- Support Diffusion.
- Support Phriction.
- Always show flags on an object if you have them (in every view)?
- Edit dialog feels a little heavy?
- More filtering in /flag/ tool.
- Add a top-level links somewhere?
Test Plan: Added, edited and removed flags from things. Viewed flags in flag view.
Reviewers: aran, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1041
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2024
Summary: A bunch of installs are doing this to varying degrees of success anyway, make it easier and nudge them toward a more consistent approach.
Test Plan: Set a custom logo, viewed normal and admin pages.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T700
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2019
Summary:
We render a huge picture of a PDF for PDFs right now, etc. This is hella dumb.
Also allow users to force this rendering style, and change the link name.
Test Plan: Uploaded image and non-image files, used layout=link and name=....
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1040
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2006
Summary:
- Feature request from Airtime that I missed in the feedback notes, came up yesterday.
- Identify git submodules as "FILE_SUBMODULE", not "FILE_NORMAL".
- Link git submodules to an external resolver endpoint, which tries to find commits in tracked repositories.
- Identify git symlinks as "FILE_SYMLINK", not "FILE_NORMAL".
- Add folder, file, symlink and externals icons.
Test Plan:
- externals/javelin is now identified as a submoudule and links to Javelin, not identified as a file and links to error.
- bin/phd is now identified as a symlink.
- Interfaces have pretty icons.
Reviewers: btrahan, cpiro, ddfisher, keebuhm, allenjohnashton
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1975
Summary:
The general idea here is to build a Differential-like dashboard which shows all
the things you need to audit and all the things that other people have raised
issues with, so you have a one-stop "what do I need to deal with?" interface.
- Add problem commits to the "active" view of /audit/.
- Add problem commits to homepage.
- Add commit browsing interfaces to /audit/.
- Add an "Audit" app button.
Test Plan: Looked at homepage, commit filters. Audited commits, verified state
changes reflected properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1712
Summary:
- Move the buttons in the jump nav to iOS-style "application" buttons in the
header. These are sort of ugly right now, but I think serviceable enough. Some
day we will hire a designer whose entire job is to pick up after me.
- This gives us more room (allowing us to restore "Maniphest" and
"Differential").
- This also disassociates the app buttons from the jump nav, which was a
point of confusion (user expectation that the text input is related to the
buttons).
- Allow "Active Revisions" and "Assigned Tasks" to collapse completely. They
didn't completely collapse before because the top-level "Active Tasks" / "Active
Revisions" was sort of overloaded as quick nav to apps. Now we have app buttons.
- Reduce overall size of jump nav.
Test Plan: Looked at homepage in various states of need-for-attention.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1694
Summary:
When an object is updated, record the content source for the update. This mostly
isn't terribly useful but one concrete thing I want to do with it is let admins
audit via-email replies more easily since there are a bunch of options which let
you do hyjinx if you intentionally configure them insecurely. I think having a
little more auditability around this feature is generally good. At some point
I'm going to turn this into a link admins can click to see details.
It also allows us to see how frequently different mechanisms are used, and lets
you see if someone is at their desk or on a mobile or whatever, at least
indirectly.
The "tablet" and "mobile" sources are currently unused but I figured I'd throw
them in anyway. SMS support should definitely happen at some point.
Not 100% sure about the design for this, I might change it to plain text at some
point.
Test Plan: Updated objects and saw update sources rendered.
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 844
Summary:
Add a new "Create Subtask" action that allows you to quickly split a task into
dependent subtasks, using the parent task as a template.
Followups:
- Cause "workflow=<parent>" to change "Create Another Task" into "Create
Another Subtask" (after D736).
- Show parent tasks (requires some schema stuff).
Test Plan:
- Created a new task.
- Created a new subtask.
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: hunterbridges, codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, codeblock
Differential Revision: 774
Summary:
This allows you to edit dependencies. It is a better patch than it used to be.
It depends on D725.
- If you create a cycle, it just throws an exception and aborts the workflow.
It should not do this.
- Tasks which depend on the current task aren't shown in the UI. Need to add a
new table for this.
- Transaction text says "attached Task" but should probably say "added a
dependency on task".
Test Plan: Created valid and invalid dependencies between tasks. Created valid
and invalid dependencies between revisions.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: davidreuss, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Commenters: codeblock
CC: aran, codeblock, tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Differential Revision: 595
Summary:
Allow duplicate tasks to be selected and merged in Maniphest.
I didn't create a separate transaction type for this because that implies a
bunch of really complicated rules which I don't want to sort out right now
(e.g., do we need to do cycle detection for merges? If so, what do we do when we
detect a cycle?) since I think it's unnecessary to get right for the initial
implementation (my Tasks merge implementation was similar to this and worked
quite well) and if/when we eventually need the metadata to be available in a
computer-readable form that need should inform the implementation.
Plenty of room for improvement here, of course.
Test Plan:
Merged duplicate tasks, tried to perform invalid merge operations (e.g., merge a
task into itself).
Tested existing attach workflows (task -> revision, revision -> task).
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: anjali, aran
Differential Revision: 459
Summary:
Make 'gd' an explicit optional dependency, test for it in setup, and make the
software behave correctly if it is not available.
When generating file thumnails, provide reasonable defaults and behavior for
non-image files.
Test Plan:
Uploaded text files, pdf files, etc., and got real thumbnails instead of a
broken image.
Simulated setup and gd failures and walked through setup process and image
fallback for thumbnails.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: toulouse, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 446
Summary:
ReviewBoard has a fancier version of this feature that's more granular -- the
keyboard can focus on individual changes. I think that's good and intend to
implement something similar, but this gets us a step closer and gets rid of some
of the bookkeeping stuff like making shortcuts discoverable.
(I have another brnach with Maniphest merging which also uses fatcow icons,
which is why the README seems a little out of context.)
Test Plan:
Used "j" and "k" to jump between changesets. Pressed "?" and got a list of
available shortcuts.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: moskov, aran, epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 412
Summary:
- Provide a red version of the logo for the admin view.
- Make selected tabs in the admin view look correct.
- Fix a Chrome styling issue where the username and "settings" would have
weird offsets.
Test Plan:
Loaded Phabricator in chrome and clicked around tabs of an admin interface.
Hovered over logo.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: cadamo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 371
Summary:
I ran a 99designs contest and this gear-eye thing was actually pretty okay. All
this stuff needs tweaks but at least it won't render with a big square on
windows anymore.
Test Plan:
Looked at menu, it seemed slightly more legitimate and designey than before?
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 363
