Summary: Use `__CLASS__` instead of hard-coding class names. Depends on D12605.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12806
Summary: Ref T7152. Gives us an event hook so we can go make users a member of any instance they've been invited to as soon as they verify an email address.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/auth verify` to trigger the event.
- Build out the invite flow in rSERVICES.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7152
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11752
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary:
Ref T5245. A very long time ago I had this terrible idea that we'd let objects react to edges being added and insert transactions in response.
This turned out to be a clearly bad idea very quickly, for like 15 different reasons. A big issue is that it inverts the responsibilities of editors. It's also just clumsy and messy.
We now have `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` instead, which mostly provides a cleaner way to deal with this.
Implement `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface`, implicitly moving all the attach actions (task/task, task/revision, task/commit, task/mock) to proper edge transactions.
The cost of this is that the inverse edges don't write transactions -- if you attach an object to another object, only the object you were acting on posts a transaction record. This is sort of buggy anyway already. I'll fix this in the next diff.
Test Plan: Attached tasks, revisions and mocks to a task, then detached them.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9838
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary:
Ref T4657. Right now, you have to muck with `events.listeners` to install listeners. Instead, automatically install all subclasses of AutoEventListener.
Primarily, this makes it easier to resolve requests with "drop this file in `src/extensions/`, no warranty", which seems to have worked well so far in resolving things like custom remarkup rules, etc.
Test Plan:
- Added such a listener, had it autoregister.
- Clicked around and saw the effects of normal listeners.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4657
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9262
Summary:
Fixes T5069. T2222 mostly-intentionally stopped emitting these.
My sense is that users generally find event listeners (or, really, writing PHP at all) much less preferable to things like Herald rules or HTTP hooks. This is generally good, since those things are way easier to maintain, so I plan to continue moving away from events in cases where we have reasonable alternatives.
We also generally have more and better alternatives now than when these were written.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5069
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9151
Summary:
Fixes T3675.
- Maniphest had a couple of old non-event listeners; move them to events.
- Make most of the similar listeners a little more similar.
- Add checks for access to the application.
Test Plan:
- Viewed profile, project, task, revision.
- Clicked all the actions.
- Blocked access to various applications and verified the actions vanished.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3675
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7365
Summary:
Ref T3675. Some of these listeners shouldn't do their thing if the viewer doesn't have access to an application (for example, users without access to Differential should not be able to "Edit Tasks"). Set the stage for that:
- Introduce `PhabricatorEventListener`, which has an application.
- Populate this for event listeners installed by applications.
- Rename the "PeopleMenu" listeners to "ActionMenu" listeners, which better describes their modern behavior.
This doesn't actually change any behaviors.
Test Plan: Viewed Maniphest, Differntial, People.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3675
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7364
Summary:
See discussion in D6955. Provide an event for applications and users to update secondary search indexes.
Facebook: I don't recall exactly how all the search stuff is rigged up, but this might provide a more practical / less fragile alternative. I think it publishes into ElasticSearch now, and then intern somehow handles the result merge at display time, implictly relying on Phabricator's storage format? A cleaner approach might be to publish a secondary "intern" index in a standard format.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/search index --type proj --trace`, saw events fire.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: FacebookPOC, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6956
Summary: We currently die if an event listener throws when registering (e.g., because it is misconfigured), but this prevents you from running `bin/config` to fix it, which is a bit silly.
Test Plan: Created this revision with an invalid listener in config.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6761
Summary:
Ref T1536. Facebook currently does a check which should be on-login in registration hooks, and this is generally a reasonable hook to provide.
The "will login" event allows listeners to reject or modify a login, or just log it or whatever.
NOTE: This doesn't cover non-web logins right now -- notably Conduit. That's presumably fine.
(This can't land for a while, it depends on about 10 uncommitted revisions.)
Test Plan: Logged out and in again.
Reviewers: wez, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6202
Summary:
Currently, registration and authentication are pretty messy. Two concrete problems:
- The `PhabricatorLDAPRegistrationController` and `PhabricatorOAuthDefaultRegistrationController` controllers are giant copy/pastes of one another. This is really bad.
- We can't practically implement OpenID because we can't reissue the authentication request.
Additionally, the OAuth registration controller can be replaced wholesale by config, which is a huge API surface area and a giant mess.
Broadly, the problem right now is that registration does too much: we hand it some set of indirect credentials (like OAuth tokens) and expect it to take those the entire way to a registered user. Instead, break registration into smaller steps:
- User authenticates with remote service.
- Phabricator pulls information (remote account ID, username, email, real name, profile picture, etc) from the remote service and saves it as `PhabricatorUserCredentials`.
- Phabricator hands the `PhabricatorUserCredentials` to the registration form, which is agnostic about where they originate from: it can process LDAP credentials, OAuth credentials, plain old email credentials, HTTP basic auth credentials, etc.
This doesn't do anything yet -- there is no way to create credentials objects (and no storage patch), but I wanted to get any initial feedback, especially about the event call for T2394. In particular, I think the implementation would look something like this:
$profile = $event->getValue('profile')
$username = $profile->getDefaultUsername();
$is_employee = is_this_a_facebook_employee($username);
if (!$is_employee) {
throw new Exception("You are not employed at Facebook.");
}
$fbid = get_fbid_for_facebook_username($username);
$profile->setDefaultEmail($fbid);
$profile->setCanEditUsername(false);
$profile->setCanEditEmail(false);
$profile->setCanEditRealName(false);
$profile->setShouldVerifyEmail(true);
Seem reasonable?
Test Plan: N/A yet, probably fatals.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, codeblock, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin, nh, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T2394
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4647
Summary: Added constants to PhabricatorEventType. Modified DifferentialRevisionEditor and DifferentialCommentEditor.
Test Plan:
Created a revision. Edited and made a comment on that revision. It's updating as usual. I think nothing broke may be it's working.
Let me know if I have done it correclty.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T2899
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5869
Summary: do so via event engine. note different order now...
Test Plan: toggled "show beta applications" to off and noted that Conpherence disappeared. Otherwise noted that links showed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2424
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4708
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary: We want to allow a broader access to our installation but we need to check the request in that case.
Test Plan:
Created a simple `PhabricatorRequestChecker` returning a custom controller.
Verified that this controller is used when accessing any page.
Returned `null` from this checker and verified that all 209 Phabricator pages are accessible.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: scottmac, aran, Korvin, btrahan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2488
Summary:
This does a few things:
- Allows you to flag pastes. This is straightforward.
- Allows Applications to register event listeners.
- Makes object action lists emit a 'didrenderactions' event, so other applications can add more actions. The Flags application injects its action in this way. This should generally make it much easier to add actions to objects when we add new applications, with less code duplication and better modularity. We have a really hacky version of this in Differential that I want to get rid of in lieu of this more general approach. I'm going to make object lists do the same thing, so any application can jump in and add stuff.
Test Plan: Flagged and unflagged pastes. Viewed home page, differential, flags list.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3377
Summary:
Currently, we have this cumbersome `PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageDetailParser` hook. This is really old and outdated; I want to just use the Differential custom field parser. See T945 for a specific application.
However, it allows installs to override author/committer association. Instead, provide an event hook for doing this.
Test Plan: Added a listener, made every commit resolve to "turtle", parsed some commits, verified the events looked sane and they now correctly were all attributed to "turtle".
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, nh
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1337
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3040
Summary:
- See D2741.
- When EdgeEditor performs edits, emit events.
- Listen for Maniphest edge events and save the changes as transactions.
- Do all this in a reasonably generic way that won't take too much rewriting as we use edges more generally.
Test Plan: Attached and detached commits from tasks, saw reasonable-looking transactions spring into existence.
Reviewers: btrahan, davidreuss
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2906
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary:
This event is fired after a task is created and assigned with an id.
Use case is sending an email notification to everyone in a project when a new task is
submitted to said project.
Test Plan:
Implement the event listener, submit a new task to a project, see if the project members
receive an email notification. I will submit the event handler in a separate diff once it's a bit
prettier and tested more thoroughly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2159
Summary: Last of the big final patches. Left a few debatable classes (12 out of about 400) that I'll deal with individually eventually.
Test Plan: Ran testEverythingImplemented.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1881
Test Plan:
Created a listener that adds some patterns to $matches array, reloaded
Differential, some changesets were not shown as generated.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, mareksapota
Differential Revision: 1200
Summary:
Move event framework from Phabricator to libphutil so it can be used in other
phutil projects, such as Arcanist.
Test plan:
Use along with path to libphutil, events should work as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Differential Revision: 1098
Summary: Allow tweaking Differential mail before sending.
Test Plan:
Wrote a listener renaming Differential attachments and it worked without
problems.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, mareksapota, davidreuss
Differential Revision: 1091
Summary: Shows events which a page dispatched, plus all the registered
listeners.
Test Plan:
Pretty basic for now, but works OK:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-49fcd23081ce55cf9369/
(I also made it dispatch some dummy events to verify they show up.)
Reviewers: aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 973
Summary:
This is an attempt to satisfy a lot of the one-off requests a little more
generally, by providing a relatively generic piece of event architecture.
Allow the registation of event listeners which can react to various application
events (currently, task editing).
I'll doc this a bit better but I wanted to see if anyone had massive objections
to doing this or the broad approach. The specific problem I want to address is
that one client wants to do a bunch of routing for tasks via email, so it's
either build a hook, or have them override most of ManiphestReplyHandler, or
something slightly more general like this.
Test Plan: Wrote a silly listener that adds "Quack!" to a task every time it is
edited and edited some tasks. I was justly rewarded.
Reviewers: nh, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 881
