Summary: Converts final call site to PHUIDocumentViewPro.
Test Plan: grep for PHUIDocumentView, view new Welcome Page
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16379
Summary: Fixes T11437. Provides a normal form for configuring this, instead of weird "look up the PHID and adjust things in the database" stuff.
Test Plan:
{F1753651}
{F1753652}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11437
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16377
Summary: Fixes T7939. This doesn't get too fancy, but allows you to write Herald rules against Calendar events.
Test Plan:
- Wrote an "add red flag to events with party in the name" rule.
- Created a "mundane meeting", didn't get flagged.
- Created a "cool party", got flagged.
- Ran rules from the Herald test console.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16368
Summary: We deprecate the existing API method used to access build information from the API, but preserve its response structure after calling through to the new method. I've cordoned off the fields I needed to define in order to meet the output structure by putting those fields in a search attachment.
Test Plan:
Used the API console and looked at the list view controller for builds.
Old output structure:
```lang=json
{
"data": [
{
"id": "16823",
"phid": "PHID-HMBD-xghrwfz6luoye5rgc2hq",
"uri": "https://secure.phabricator.com/harbormaster/build/16823/",
"name": "Run Core Tests",
"buildablePHID": "PHID-HMBB-s6ykzm2jzxz4ymduztq3",
"buildPlanPHID": "PHID-HMCP-pcfxcgyoif67l3buc4zt",
"buildStatus": "passed",
"buildStatusName": "Passed"
}
],
"cursor": {
"limit": 100,
"after": "16823",
"before": null
}
}
```
New output structure:
```lang=json
{
"data": [
{
"id": 1,
"type": "HMBD",
"phid": "PHID-HMBD-qpgcmv67tzaauzayzit5",
"uri": "http://ec2-54-165-244-168.compute-1.amazonaws.com/harbormaster/build/1/",
"name": "arc lint + arc unit",
"buildStatusName": "Passed",
"buildablePHID": "PHID-HMBB-qdefith5uakkepqpjr2g",
"buildPlanPHID": "PHID-HMCP-zswbhazb7ipmaf4plygg",
"buildStatus": "passed",
"initiatorPHID": "PHID-USER-rihx4366f3aczsvc2wtb",
"dateCreated": 1450295643,
"dateModified": 1450295644,
"policy": {
"view": "users",
"edit": "users"
}
}
],
"maps": {},
"query": {
"queryKey": null
},
"cursor": {
"limit": 100,
"after": null,
"before": null,
"order": null
}
}
```
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16356
Summary:
It's only natural for users to be interested their own builds. We are also building in support for other sources of builds, the only formally supported way to run a build right now is via Herald.
In our third party codebase, we designate an application as the "thing" that started builds which are scheduled and managed automatically by phabricator. I believe this is a common practice elsewhere in the codebase when you're at a loss for a real human identity and you need to apply some transactions.
Test Plan: Ran some builds manually and saw them show up under the list of things I've run. Looking up builds based on those that had been started by a herald rule.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16353
Summary:
Ref T11404. Depends on D16350.
Currently, custom fields can issue "N+1" queries in some cases, so querying 100 revisions issues 100 extra queries.
This affects all `*.search` endpoints for objects with custom fields, and some older endpoints (notably `differential.query`).
This change bulk loads "normal" custom fields, which gets rid of some of these queries. Instead of loading fields for each object, we build a big list of all fields and load them all at once.
The next change will tackle the remaining inefficient edge queries.
Test Plan:
- Configured a custom field with normal database storage in Differential.
- Ran `differential.query`, looking at custom fields in results for correctness.
- Ran `differential.revision.search`, looking at custom fields in results for correctness.
- In both cases, observed queries drop from `3N` to `2N` (all the "normal" custom field stuff got bulk loaded).
Reviewers: yelirekim, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11404
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16351
Summary:
This supports a few basic use cases that aren't served by the buildable search engine:
- I'm trying to discover when the last time that this particular build plan failed was.
- I want to know if any builds have deadlocked.
- At a glance, I'm more interested in what build plans are running, not which buildables are being built. This is more often than not the case.
Test Plan: {F1744003}
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16347
Summary: Ref T8116. Puts a list of packages on the publisher page, and a list of versions on the package page.
Test Plan: Viewed a publisher, saw packages. Viewed a package, saw versions. Looked at list views.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16321
Summary: Ref T8116. Add search-by-name and per-package / per-publisher search to Packages.
Test Plan: Searched publishers, packages, versions by name. Searched packages by publisher. Searched versions by package.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16320
Summary:
Ref T8116. This adds a control for creating publishers (default: administrators) and default publisher/package edit controls.
I've left the edit defaults at "no one" for now to force you to select a policy. This might be something to look at later.
Test Plan: Created publishers, packages. Tried to create publishers with "can create" policy set restrictively.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16319
Summary:
Ref T8116. A version has:
- a package (like "Arcanist") which it belongs to;
- a name (like "v3.1.5").
The name is immutable and unique, like the package key and publisher key.
Policy stuff:
- Versions have the exact same policies as their packages.
- You must be able to edit a package to create new versions of it.
This is still entirely uninteresting.
Test Plan: {F1731703}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16316
Summary:
Ref T8116. A package has:
- a publisher (like "Phacility"), from the previous revision;
- a name (like "Arcanist");
- a package key (like "arcanist").
The package key is immutable, like the publisher key.
This gives a package a full key like "phacility/arcanist".
Policy stuff:
- You must be able to view a publisher to view a package (currently, everyone can always see all publishers).
- You must be able to edit a publisher to create a new package inside it.
- Packages have separate view/edit permissions.
This still does nothing interesting.
Test Plan: {F1731663}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16315
Summary:
Ref T8116. Partially scavenged from D14152. This roughs in a new Packages application for Arcanist extensions and third-party applications, and adds a "Publisher" object.
A "Publisher" represents an individual or entity who is publishing a package, like "Phacility". It's explicitly //not// necessarily the original author -- just the primary entity vouching for the safety of the code.
A publisher just has a name and a unique key for now. For example, Phacility might have "Phacility" and "phacility", respectively.
Unique keys are immutable, e.g., the package "phacility/arcanist" will always be exactly the same package by exactly the same publisher.
Test Plan: {F1731621}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16314
Summary:
Fixes T11365. I tested these variants:
- `<input type="number" />`
- `<input type="text" pattern="\d*" />`
Of these, this one (using `pattern`) appears to have the best behavior: it shows the correct keyboard on iOS mobile and does nothing on desktops.
Using `type="number"` causes unwanted sub-controls to appear in desktop Safari, and a numbers + symbols keyboard to appear on iOS (presumably so users can type "." and "-" and maybe ",").
Test Plan: Tested variants in desktop browsers and iOS simulator, see here and T11365 for discussion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11365
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16323
Summary:
Ref T11326. This gets rid of the old multi-paged form stuff used in the last version of Diffusion.
This incidentally removes a callsite for a date control to make it a little easier to simplify them.
Test Plan: Grepped for all removed classes, no more callsites.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16302
Summary:
Fixes T9224. This adds:
- A "Default Edit Policy" and "Default View Policy" to Calendar, similar to other applications.
- "Event Host" and "Event Invitees" objects policies.
These policies often end up being redundant (the host can always view/edit, the invitees can always view), but they can be more clear than setting "No One", and "Editable By: Event Invitees" is a legitimately useful policy.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited events.
- Fiddled with defaults.
- Tried to remove myself as the event host for an "Editable By: Host" event, got an error ("you wouldn't be able to edit").
- Tried to remove myself as host/invitee for an "Editable By: Invitees" event, got an error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9224
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16294
Summary:
Fixes T10909. I think this is a generally reasonable sort of capability to expose, although I've made it edit-only for now (when creating an event, you're always the host).
Also clean up some minor leftovers in the code, and a couple of little bugs with recurrence frequencies.
Test Plan: Created an event, edited the host of an event.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16292
Summary: Ref T7944. The search method is a bit bare-bones for now, but these substantially work.
Test Plan: Edited events via API; queried events via API.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7944
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16288
Summary:
Ref T9275. Swaps Calendar over to modular transactions. Theoretically, this has almost no effect on anything.
Ref T10633. I didn't actually do anything here yet, but this gets us ready to put timestamps in email.
Test Plan: Created and edited a bunch of events, nothing seemed catastrophically broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275, T10633
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16286
Summary:
Ref T9275. This throws away the old EditController and switches fully to EditEngine.
There's still some sketchy behavior (particularly, no JS stuff yet) but I think all the basics work properly.
Test Plan: Created and edited events via EditEngine, everything seemed to work alright.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16283
Summary: Ref T9275. This gets things roughly into shape for a cutover to EditEngine, mostly by fixing some problems with "recurrence end date" not being nullable while editing events.
Test Plan: Edited events with EditPro controller, nothing was obviously broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16282
Summary:
Ref T9275. When you create a recurring event which recurs forever, we want to avoid writing an infinite number of rows to the database.
Currently, we write a row to the database right before you edit the event. Until then, we refer to it as `E123/999` or whatever ("instance 999 of event 123").
This creates a big mess with trying to make recurring events work with EditEngine, Subscriptions, Projects, Flags, Tokens, etc -- all of this stuff assumes that whatever you're working with has a PHID.
I poked at letting this stuff work without a PHID a little bit, but that looked like a gigantic mess.
Instead, generate an event "stub" a little sooner (when you look at the event detail page). This is basically just an ID/PHID to refer to the instance.
Then, when you edit the stub, "materialize" it into a real event.
This still has some issues, but I think it's more promising than the other approach was.
Also:
- Removes dead user profile calendar controller.
- Replaces comments with EditEngine comments.
Test Plan:
- Commented on a recurring event.
- Awarded tokens to a recurring event.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16248
Summary:
Ref T9275. This builds a Calendar EditEngine which only edits "name".
I'll add more fields, Conduit, etc., and move to modular transactions in future changes.
Test Plan: Used `editpro/` URI manually to edit the name of an event.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9275
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16235
Summary:
Ref T9360. Moves PhamePost to CommentEditEngine.
[x] HTTP Parameters dropdown on New Post goes to 404
[x] Implement EditEngine Comments
Test Plan: Make Post, Make Comment, Laugh.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9360
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16222
Summary:
Ref T10855. This can't replace the old edit flow yet, but get the basics in place.
(This is actually much closer to just being able to swap than I anticipated since CustomFields sort of just work, but the exiting flow has some "clone existing panel" / "place directly on dashboard" stuff that this doesn't yet.)
Test Plan: Created and edited a panel by manually using the "editpro" flow.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10855
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16226
Summary:
Ref T4788. This fixes all the bugs I was immediately able to catch:
- "Directory-Like" graph shapes could draw too many vertical lines.
- "Reverse-Directory-Like" graph shapes could draw too few vertical lines.
- Terminated, branched graph shapes drew the very last line to the wrong place.
This covers the behavior with tests, so we should be able to fix more stuff later without breaking anything.
Test Plan:
- Added failing tests and made them pass.
{F1708158}
{F1708159}
{F1708160}
{F1708161}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16216
Summary: Ref T4788. This seems reasonable locally, but not sure how it will feel on real data. Might need some tweaks, or might just be a terrible idea.
Test Plan: {F1708059}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16214
Summary:
Ref T4788. This separates the revision graph view into a base class with core logic and a revision class with Differential-specific logic, so I can subclass it in Maniphest, etc., and try using it in other applications to show similar graphs.
Not sure if we'll stick with it, but even if we don't this makes the code a bit cleaner and gets custom rendering logic out of the RevisionViewController, which is nice.
Test Plan: Viewed revisions, saw the stack UI completely unchanged.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16213
Summary:
Ref T10628. Currently, tabs are part of ObjectBoxes. However, the code is a bit of a mess and I want to use them in some other contexts, notably the "prose diff" dialog to show "old raw, new raw, diff".
Pull them out, and update Files to use the new stuff. My plan is:
- Update all callsites to this stuff.
- Remove the builtin-in ObjectBox integration to simplify ObjectBox a bit.
- Move forward with T10628.
This is pretty straightforward. A couple of the sigils are a little weird, but I'll update the JS later. For now, the same JS can drive both old and new tabs.
Test Plan: Viewed files, everything was unchanged.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16205
Summary: Ref T9360. This adds ability to search posts by blog(s) and by type better.
Test Plan:
Create some posts, search for them.
{F1705961}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9360
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16199
Summary:
Ref T4788. Fixes T7820. This updates the "Merge Duplicates In" interaction, and adds a "Close as Duplicate" action.
These are the last interactions that were using the old code, so it removes that code.
Merges are now recorded as real edges, so we can show them in the UI later on (originally from T9390, etc).
Also provides more general support for relationships which need EDIT permission, not-undoable relationships like merges, preventing relating an object to itself, and relationship side effects like merges.
Finally, fixes a couple of behaviors around typing an exact object name (like `T123`) to find the related object.
Test Plan:
- Merged tasks into the current task.
- Closed the current task as a duplicate of another task.
- Edited other relationships.
- Searched for tasks, commits, etc., by object monogram.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T7820
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16196
Summary: Ref T4788. This moves everything except "merge" to the new code.
Test Plan:
- Edited relationships in Differential, Diffusion, and Pholio.
- Uninstalled Pholio, made sure "Edit Mocks..." actions vanished.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16193
Summary:
Ref T4788. Fixes T9232. This moves the "search for stuff to attach to this object" flow away from hard-coding and legacy constants and toward something more modular and flexible.
It also adds an "Edit Commits..." action to Maniphest, resolving T9232. The behavior of the search for commits isn't great right now, but it will improve once these use real ApplicationSearch.
Test Plan: Edited a tasks' related commits, mocks, tasks, etc.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T9232
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16189
Summary:
Ref T11179. This splits "Edit Blocking Tasks" into two options now that we have more room ("Edit Parent Tasks", "Edit Subtasks").
This also renames "Blocking" tasks to "Subtasks", and "Blocked" tasks to "Parent" tasks. My goals here are:
- Make the relationship direction more clear: it's more clear which way is up with "parent" and "subtask" at a glance than with "blocking" and "blocked" or "dependent" and "dependency".
- Align language with "Create Subtask".
- To some small degree, use more flexible/general-purpose language, although I haven't seen any real confusion here.
Fixes T6815. I think I narrowed this down to two issues:
- Just throwing a bare exeception (we now return a dialog explicitly).
- Not killing open transactions when the cyclec check fails (we now kill them).
Test Plan:
- Edited parent tasks.
- Edited subtasks.
- Tried to introduce graph cycles, got a nice error dialog.
{F1697087}
{F1697088}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6815, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16166
Summary: Ref T11179. This is basically a "pro" controller to replace the SearchAttach controller. It does basically the same stuff, just in a (mostly) more modern and modular way.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed mocks.
- Added and removed revisions.
- Everything worked just like it did before.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16163
Summary:
Ref T11179. This generates the Maniphest menu items in a modular way. It doesn't change any of the underlying code yet.
Searching for commits doesn't work particularly well so I've just hidden that for now, but the item itself works fine.
Test Plan: {F1696849}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16162
Summary: This is the backend half of uploading an image as a header for Phame Blogs. Allows you to upload image, or delete it. Ref T10901
Test Plan:
Go to Manage Blog, visit Edit Header Image, Upload snarky file. See snarky file on Manage page. Edit Header Image, click delete, save, see file goes away.
{F1690966}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10901
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16140
Summary:
Ref T9028. This allows us to detect when commits are unreachable:
- When a ref (tag, branch, etc) is moved or deleted, store the old thing it pointed at in a list.
- After discovery, go through the list and check if all the stuff on it is still reachable.
- If something isn't, try to follow its ancestors back until we find something that is reachable.
- Then, mark everything we found as unreachable.
- Finally, rebuild the repository summary table to correct the commit count.
Test Plan:
- Deleted a ref, ran `pull` + `refs`, saw oldref in database.
- Ran `discover`, saw it process the oldref, mark the unreachable commit, and update the summary table.
- Visited commit page, saw it properly marked.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16133
Summary:
Ref T9028. This corrects the reachability of existing commits in a repository.
In particular, it can be used to mark deleted commits as unreachable.
Test Plan:
- Ran it on a bad repository, with bad args, etc.
- Ran it on a clean repo, got no changes.
- Marked a reachable commit as unreachable, ran script, got it marked reachable.
- Started deleting tags and branches from the local working copy while running the script, saw greater parts of the repository get marked unreachable.
- Pulled repository again, everything automatically revived.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9028
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16132
Summary:
Ref T11140. This makes encryption actually work:
- Provide a new configuation option, `keyring`, for specifying encryption keys.
- One key may be marked as `default`. This activates AES256 encryption for Files.
- Add `bin/files generate-key`. This is helps when generating valid encryption keys.
- Add `bin/files encode`. This changes the storage encoding of a file, and helps test encodings and migrate existing data.
- Add `bin/files cycle`. This re-encodes the block key with a new master key, if your master key leaks or you're just paraonid.
- Document all these options and behaviors.
Test Plan:
- Configured a bad `keyring`, hit a bunch of different errors.
- Used `bin/files generate-key` to try to generate bad keys, got appropriate errors ("raw doesn't support keys", etc).
- Used `bin/files generate-key` to generate an AES256 key.
- Put the new AES256 key into the `keyring`, without `default`.
- Uploaded a new file, verified it still uploaded as raw data (no `default` key yet).
- Used `bin/files encode` to change a file to ROT13 and back to raw. Verified old data got deleted and new data got stored properly.
- Used `bin/files encode --key ...` to explicitly convert a file to AES256 with my non-default key.
- Forced a re-encode of an AES256 file, verified the old data was deleted and a new key and IV were generated.
- Used `bin/files cycle` to try to cycle raw/rot13 files, got errors.
- Used `bin/files cycle` to cycle AES256 files. Verified metadata changed but file data did not. Verified file data was still decryptable with metadata.
- Ran `bin/files cycle --all`.
- Ran `encode` and `cycle` on chunked files, saw commands fail properly. These commands operate on the underlying data blocks, not the chunk metadata.
- Set key to `default`, uploaded a file, saw it stored as AES256.
- Read documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16127
Summary:
Ref T11140. This doesn't do anything yet since there's no way to enable it and no way to store master keys.
Those are slightly tougher problems and I'm not totally satisfied that I have an approach I really like for either problem, so I may wait for a bit before tackling them. Once they're solved, this does the mechanical encrypt/decrypt stuff, though.
This design is substantially similar to the AWS S3 server-side encryption design, and intended as an analog for it. The decisions AWS has made in design generally seem reasonable to me.
Each block of file data is encrypted with a unique key and a unique IV, and then that key and IV are encrypted with the master key (and a distinct, unique IV). This is better than just encrypting with the master key directly because:
- You can rotate the master key later and only need to re-encrypt a small amount of key data (about 48 bytes per file chunk), instead of re-encrypting all of the actual file data (up to 4MB per file chunk).
- Instead of putting the master key on every server, you can put it on some dedicated keyserver which accepts encrypted keys, decrypts them, and returns plaintext keys, and can send it 32-byte keys for decryption instead of 4MB blocks of file data.
- You have to compromise the master key, the database, AND the file store to get the file data. This is probably not much of a barrier realistically, but it does make attacks very slightly harder.
The "KeyRing" thing may change once I figure out how I want users to store master keys, but it was the simplest approach to get the unit tests working.
Test Plan:
- Ran unit tests.
- Dumped raw data, saw encrypted blob.
- No way to actually use this in the real application yet so it can't be tested too extensively.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16124
Summary:
Ref T11140. When reading and writing files, we optionally apply a "storage format" to them.
The default format is "raw", which means we just store the raw data.
This change modularizes formats and adds a "rot13" format, which proves formatting works and is testable. In the future, I'll add real encryption formats.
Test Plan:
- Added unit tests.
- Viewed files in web UI.
- Changed a file's format to rot13, saw the data get rotated on display.
- Set default format to rot13:
- Uploaded a small file, verified data was stored as rot13.
- Uploaded a large file, verified metadata was stored as "raw" (just a type, no actual data) and blob data was stored as rot13.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16122
Summary: Ref T9897, makes blogs searchable
Test Plan: Make a blog, index it, search for it.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16119
Summary: Adds PhamePost object to fulltextsearch index. Some issue searching just "Open" though? Also "closed" objects search fine but don't display as disabled.
Test Plan:
bin/search index --type POST
{F1687043}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16116
Summary:
Ref T9789. `Transaction` and `Editor` classes are the last major pieces of infrastructure that haven't been fully modularized.
Some of the specific issues are:
- `Editor` classes rely on a bunch of `instanceof` stuff in the base class to pick up transaction types like "subscribe", "projects", etc. Instead, applications should be adding these, and third-party applications should be able to add them.
- Code is spread across `Transaction` and `Editor` classes somewhat oddly. For example, generating old/new values would probably make more sense at the `Transaction` level, but it currently exists at the `Editor` level.
- Both types of classes have a lot of functions based on `switch()` statements, which require a ton of boilerplate and are just generally kind of hard to work with.
This creates classes for each type of transaction, and moves almost all of the logic to them. These classes are simpler and more focused than the old stuff was, and can organize related code better.
This starts inching toward defining `CoreTransactions` for features shared across applications. It only defines the "Create" transaction so far, but at some point I plan to move all the other shared transactions to Core and let them control which objects they're available for.
Test Plan:
- Created pastes with web UI and API.
- Edited all paste properites.
- Archived/activated.
- Verified files got reasonable names.
- Reviewed timeline and feed.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16111
Summary:
Ref T11035. This only fixes half of the issue: comment editing has been fixed, but normal transactions which edit things like descriptions haven't yet.
The normal edits aren't fixed because the "oldValues" are populated too late. The code should start working once they get populated sooner, but I don't want to jump the gun on that since it'll probably have some spooky effects. I have some other transaction changes coming down the pipe which should provide a better context for testing "oldValue" population order.
Test Plan:
- Mentioned `@dog` in a comment.
- Removed `@dog` as a subscriber.
- Edited the comment, adding some unrelated text at the end (e.g., fixing a typo).
- Before change: `@dog` re-added as subscriber.
- After change: no re-add.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16108
Summary:
When having lots of repos, seeing "all revisions in this project" is hard, and we ended up adding herald rules to basically copy project tags to the revisions on a per-project basis. Adding a "tagged: project" function to the Repositories search field allows users to find differentials within a project.
Fix T10850.
Test Plan: search differentials by tagging project and repository in the Repository field
Reviewers: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: avivey, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T10850
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16096
Summary: Ref T9897. Adds ability to Archive a Phame Post (only visible under ApplicationSearch).
Test Plan: Archive a post, re-publish it, search for it, archive it again. View Home, Blog, Live pages.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9897
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16104
