Summary: Ref T13559. Substantially correct the client logic for "Save" and "Cancel" actions to handle unusual cases.
Test Plan:
Quoting behavior:
- Quoted a comment.
- Cancelled the quoted comment without modifying anything.
- Reloaded page.
- Before changes: quoted comment still exists.
- After changes: quoted comment is deleted.
- Looked at comment count in header, saw consistent behavior (before: weird behavior).
Empty suggestion behavior:
- Created a new comment on a suggestable file.
- Clicked "Suggest Edit" to enable suggestions.
- Without making any text or suggestion changes, clicked "Save".
- Before changes: comment saves, but is empty.
- After changes: comment deletes itself without undo.
General behavior:
- Created and saved an empty comment (deletes itself).
- Created and saved a nonempty comment (saves as draft).
- Created and saved an empty comment with an edit suggestion (saves).
- Created and saved an empty comment with a suggestion to entirely delete lines -- that is, no suggestion text (saves).
- Edited a comment, saved without changes (save).
- Edited a comment, save deleting all text (saves -- note that this is intentionally without undo, since this is a lot of steps to do by accident).
- Cancel editing an unchanged comment (cancels without undo).
- Cancel editing a changed comment (cancels with undo).
- Undo'd, got text back.
- Cancel new comment with no text (deletes without undo).
- Cancel new comment with text (deletes with undo).
- Undo'd, got text back.
- Saved a quoted comment with no changes (saves -- note that this is intentionally not a "delete", since just quoting someone seems fine if you click "Save" -- maybe you want to come back to it later).
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21654
Summary:
Ref T13559. Various client decisions depend on the "initial" or "committed" states of inline comments. Previously, these were informally constructed from "mostly similar" available values, or glossed over in some cases.
On the server, save the initial state when creating a comment. Save the committed state when applying a "save" operation. Send all three states to the client.
On the client, load and track all three states explicitly.
Test Plan: Created inlines, etc. See followups.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21653
Summary:
Ref T13559. Currently, the default text for inline comment side-loads in a bizarre way. Instead, when a user creates an inline comment, load the inline context and set it as part of the initial content state.
This allows the side channel (and the code that puts the text in place at the last second on the client) to be removed.
Test Plan: Created inlines, clicked "Suggest Edit". See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21652
Summary:
Ref T13559. When the user clicks the "Cancel" button, we sometimes take it to mean "delete" (when the comment is empty).
Both the client and server make a decision about this, and they may not agree, which causes the client to fall out of sync.
Make the client responsible for deciding whether it wants to interpret a click on the "Cancel" button as a "revert" or a "delete".
Test Plan: Cancelled empty and nonempty comments, etc. See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21649
Summary:
Ref T13559. When you click "Save" on an inline comment and it's empty, we may actually delete the comment.
Currently, the client and server both make decisions about whether the comment should be deleted. These decisions may not agree, causing the client state to fall out of sync.
Make the client authoritative about whether it wants to handle the user clicking the "Save" button as an intent to save or an intent to delete.
Test Plan: Saved empty and nonempty inlines. See followup changes.
Maniphest Tasks: T13559
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21648
Summary:
See PHI1876. Normally, deleted inlines are undeleted with an "undelete" operation, which clears the "isDeleted" flag.
However, when an inline is deleted implicitly by using "Cancel" without first saving it, the flag currently isn't cleared properly. This can lead to cases where inlines seem to vanish (they are shown to the user in the UI, but treated as deleted on submission).
Test Plan:
There are two affected sequences here:
- Create a new inline, type text, cancel, undo.
- Create a new inline, type text, cancel, undo, save.
The former sequence triggers an "edit" operation. The subsequent "Save" in the second sequence triggers a "save" operation.
It's normally impossible in the UI to execute a "save" without executing an "edit" first, but "save" clearly should undelete the comment if you get there somehow, so this change clears the deleted flag in both cases for completeness.
- Executed both sequences, saw comment persist in preview, on reload, and after submission.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21483
Summary:
Ref T13513. This still has quite a few rough edges and some significant performance isssues, but appears to mostly work.
Allow reviewers to "Suggest Edit" on an inline comment and provide replacement text for the highlighted source.
Test Plan: Created, edited, reloaded, and submitted inline comments in various states with and without suggestion text.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21276
Summary: Ref T13513. Introduce a formal server-side content state object so the whole state can be saved and restored to the drafts table, read from the request, etc.
Test Plan: Created and edited inlines. Reloaded drafts with edits. Submitted normal and editing comments. Grepped for affected symbols.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21275
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, all the inline code passes around strings to describe content. I plan to add background music, animation effects, etc., soon. To prepare for this change, make content a state object.
This does not change any user-visible behavior, it just prepares for content to become more complicated than a single string.
Test Plan: Created, edited, submitted, cancelled, etc., comments.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21273
Summary:
Ref T13513. When a user selects a text range and uses "New Inline Comment" to create a comment directly from a range, store the offset information alongside the comment.
When hovering the comment, highlight the original range.
Test Plan: {F7480926, size=full}
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21250
Summary:
Ref T13513. As part of inline metadata, save the document engine the change is being rendered with.
This will allow other parts of the UI to detect that an inline was created on a Jupyter notebook but is being rendered on raw source, or whatever else.
The immediate goal is to fix nonsensical inline snippet rendering in email on Jupyter notebooks.
Test Plan:
- Created inlines and replies on normal soure code, saw no document engine annotated in the database.
- Created inlines and replies on a Jupyter notebook rendered in Jupyter mode, saw "jupyter" annotations in the database.
- Swapped document engines between Jupyter and Source, etc.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21240
Summary:
Ref T13513. Currently, if you:
- click a line to create an inline;
- type some text;
- wait a moment; and
- close the page.
...you don't get an "Unsubmitted Draft" marker in the revision list.
Lift all the draft behavior to "InlineController" and make saving a draft dirty the overall container draft state.
Test Plan:
- Took the steps described above, got a draft state marker.
- Created, edited, submitted, etc., inlines in Diffusion and Differential.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21235
Summary: Ref T13513. Move querying to "DiffInlineCommentQuery" classes and lift them into the base Controller.
Test Plan: In Differential and Diffusion, created, edited, and submitted inline comments.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21231
Summary:
Ref T13513. Overloading "original text" to get "edit-on-load" comments into the right state has some undesirable side effects.
Instead, provide the text when the editor opens. This fixes a cancel interaction.
Test Plan:
- Create an inline, type text, don't save.
- Reload page.
- Cancel.
- Before: cancelled into empty state.
- After: cancelled into deleted+undo state.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21219
Summary:
Ref T13513. As users type text into inline comments, save the comment state as a draft on the server.
This has some rough edges, particularly around previews, but mostly works. See T13513 for notes.
Test Plan: Started an inline, typed some text, waited a second, reloaded the page, saw an editing inline with the saved text.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21216
Summary: Ref T13513. Refine some inline behaviors, see test plan.
Test Plan:
- Edit a comment ("A"), type text ("AB"), cancel, edit.
- Old behavior: edit and undo states (wrong, and undo does not function).
- New behavior: edit state only.
- Edit a comment ("A"), type text ("AB"), cancel. Undo ("AB"), cancel. Edit.
- Old behavior: "AB" (wrong: you never submitted this text).
- New behavior: "A".
- Create a comment, type text, cancel.
- Old behavior: counter appears in filetree (wrong, comment is undo-able but should not be counted).
- New behavior: no counter.
- Cancel editing an empty comment with no text.
- Old behavior: Something buggy -- undo, I think?
- New behavior: it just vanishes (correct behavior).
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21212
Summary:
Ref T13513. Now that the "currently being edited" state of inlines is saved on the server side, clear the flag when the user clicks "Cancel" to leave the "editing" state on the client.
This also serves to delete empty comments.
Test Plan:
- Clicked a line number to create a new comment. Then:
- Clicked "Cancel". Reloaded page, saw no more comment.
- Typed text, saved. Reloaded page, saw non-editing draft. Clicked "Edit", reloaded page, saw editing draft. Clicked "Cancel", reloaded page, saw non-editing draft.
- Typed text, saved. Clicked "Edit", deleted text, saved. Reloaded page, saw no more comment.
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21187
Summary:
Ref T13513. This is mostly an infrastructure cleanup change.
In a perfect world, this would be a series of several changes, but they're tightly interconnected and don't have an obvious clean, nontrivial partition (or, at least, I don't see one). Followup changes will exercise this code repeatedly and all of these individual mutations are "obviously good", so I'm not too worried about the breadth of this change.
---
Inline comments are stored as transaction comments in the `PhabricatorAuditTransactionComment` and `DifferentialTransactionComment` classes.
On top of these two storage classes sit `PhabricatorAuditInlineComment` and `DifferentialInlineComment`. Historically, these were an indirection layer over significantly different storage classes, but nowadays both storage classes look pretty similar and most of the logic is actually the same. Prior to this change, these two classes were about 80% copy/pastes of one another.
Part of the reason they're so copy/pastey is that they implement a parent `Interface`. They are the only classes which implement this interface, and the interface does not provide any correctness guarantees (the storage objects are not actually constrained by it).
To simplify this:
- Make `PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface` an abstract base class instead.
- Lift as much code out of the `Audit` and `Differential` subclasses as possible.
- Delete methods which no longer have callers, or have only trivial callers.
---
Inline comments have two `View` rendering classes, `DetailView` and `EditView`. They share very little code.
Partly, this is because `EditView` does not take an `$inline` object. Historically, it needed to be able to operate on inlines that did not have an ID yet, and even further back in history this was probably just an outgrowth of a simple `<form />`.
These classes can be significantly simplified by passing an `$inline` to the `EditView`, instead of individually setting all the properties on the `View` itself. This allows the `DetailView` and `EditView` classes to share a lot of code.
The `EditView` can not fully render its content. Move the content rendering code into the view.
---
Prior to this change, some operations need to work on inlines that don't have an inline ID yet (we assign an ID the first time you "Save" a comment). Since "editing" comments will now be saved, we can instead create a row immediately.
This means that all the inline code can always rely on having a valid ID to work with, even if that ID corresponds to an empty, draft, "isEditing" comment. This simplifies more code in `EditView` and allows the "create" and "reply" code to be merged in `PhabricatorInlineCommentController`.
---
Client-side inline events are currently handled through a mixture of `ChangesetList` listeners (good) and ad-hoc row-level listeners (less good). In particular, the "save", "cancel", and "undo" events are row-level. All other events are list-level.
Move all events to list-level. This is supported by all inlines now having an ID at all stages of their lifecycle.
This allows some of the client behavior to be simplified. It currently depends on binding complex ad-hoc dictionaries into event handlers in `_drawRows()`, but it seems like almost all of this code can be removed. In fact, no more than one row ever seems to be drawn, so this code can probably be simplified further.
---
Finally, save an "isEditing" state. When we rebuild a revision on the client, click the "edit" button if it's in this state. This is a little hacky, but simpler to get into a stable state, since the row layout of an inline depends on a "view row" followed by an "edit row".
Test Plan:
- Created comments on either side of a diff.
- Edited a comment, reloaded, saw edit stick.
- Saved comments, reloaded, saw save stick.
- Edited a comment, typed text, cancelled, "unedited" to get state back.
- Created a comment, typed text, cancelled, "unedited" to get state back.
- Deleted a comment, "undeleted" to get state back.
Weirdness / known issues:
- Drafts don't autosave yet.
- Fixed in D21187:
- When you create an empty comment then reload, you get an empty editor. This is a bit silly.
- "Cancel" does not save state, but should, once drafts autosave.
- Mostly fixed in D21188:
- "Editing" comments aren't handled specially by the overall submission flow.
- "Editing" comments submitted in that state try to edit themselves again on load, which doesn't work.
Subscribers: jmeador
Maniphest Tasks: T13513
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21186
Summary:
Ref T13195. Fixes T8573. When you're adding inlines to your own stuff, mark them "Done" by default. You can unmark them as "Done" if you're legitimately leaving TODOs for yourself, although I think this is unusual.
(If this turns out to be less unusual than I think, we could consider an alternate rule: mark replies by the author as "Done" by default.)
Test Plan: Added some inlines as an author and a non-author. Saw my author inlines marked as "Done" by default. Submitted them; unmarked and submittted them.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13195, T8573
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19635
Summary:
Ref T13195. Ref T8573. The inline comment controllers currently use outdated `$user = $this->getRequest()->getUser()` calls.
Instead, use `$viewer = $this->getViewer()`.
This is just a small consistency update with no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Viewed and added inlines in Differential and Diffusion.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13195, T8573
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19633
Summary:
Ref T12616. This moves "reply" to the new stuff and deletes DifferentialInlineEditor, which no longer does anything.
(This breaks some keyboard shortcuts, but I'll rebase D17859 shortly.)
Test Plan: Replied to inlines; things seemed to work properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17894
Summary:
Ref T12616. This updates clicking the "Done" checkbox for the new stuff.
This one is pretty clean since the "Done" checkbox doesn't do too much weird magic.
Test Plan: Clicked the box a few times.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12616
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17888
Summary:
Fixes T10562. I left this behavior sort of ambiguous in the original implementation because I didn't anticipate or stumble across this situation.
It's easy to fix: when you reply to a ghost, just put the reply in the exact same place as the ghost (even if it's a different diff), so they always move/ghost/port/thread together.
Test Plan:
See T10562 for reproduction steps and a "before" picture. Here's the after picture:
{F1168983}
The two comments at the bottom are pre-fix, and exhibit the bug. The comment at the top is post-fix, and appears adjacent to the original correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T10562
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15458
Summary: Fixes T8572. Ideally we would probably just permit this, but clean up the behavior until the day arrives when inline code is actually rewritten.
Test Plan:
- Tried to launch editors in Differential and Diffusion while comments were already open.
- Verified that "Jump to inline" works in both cases.
{F788008}
{F788009}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8572
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14094
Summary:
Fixes T8917. Prior to T2618, deleting inlines prompted users, then really deleted the rows.
After T2618, we delete immediately and offer "Undo". However, some interactions with drafts were missed, and we were only clearing the "this revision has a draft" flag on one of the delete pathways (when you delete all the comment text, then save the comment).
Make both the "Delete" action and the "Delete All Comment Text + Save" workflows do the same thing: mark the row as deleted, and clear any relevant drafts.
Test Plan:
- Made an inline comment on a clean revision with no "draft comments" marker in the list view.
- Used "delete" to delete it.
- After applying the patch, verified that no "draft commetns" marker appears in the list view.
- Used Delete and Edit + Remove Text + Save to delete comments in Differential and Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13665
Summary:
Ref T7447. Implements per-viewer comment hiding. Once a comment is obsolete or uninteresting, you can hide it completely.
This is sticky per-user.
My hope is that this will strike a better balance between concerns than some of the other approaches (conservative porting, summarization, hide-all).
Specifically, this adds a new action here:
{F435621}
Clicking it completely collapses the comment into a small icon on the previous line, and saves the comment state as hidden for you:
{F435626}
You can click the icon to reveal all hidden comments below the line.
Test Plan:
- Hid comments.
- Showed comments.
- Created, edited, deleted and submitted comments.
- Used Diffusion comments (hiding is not implemented there yet, but I'd plan to bring it there eventually if it works out in Differential).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jparise, yelirekim, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13009
Summary:
Ref T7447. Ref T7870. When you "reply" to a ghost inline, make it work properly.
This exact behavior is arguable. In particular, when you reply to a ghost inline, we //could// put the reply on the same diff as the original.
I suspect it aligns better with user exepectation to put the new inline on the current (visible) diff instead, and generally for inlines to flow forward through time and all of the ghosts to pretty much be older than all of the non-ghosts in most cases. We can see how it feels and adjust things if this turns out to not make sense.
Test Plan:
- Replied to ghost inlines, got new inlines on the proper display line.
- Replied to normal inlines, got normal behavior.
- Made some new inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7870, T7447
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12492
Summary:
Ref T1460. Overall:
- Pass `objectOwnerPHID` consistently.
- Pass viewer consistently.
- Set the correct draft state for checkboxes on the client.
Test Plan:
- Made inline comments in Differential.
- Made inline comments in Diffusion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12186
Summary:
This returns the PHID of the current revision owner, or the commit author, if one exists.
NOTE: For drafts, we currently return `null`; I'll fix that in a future change. Should be correct for submitted comments.
Test Plan: Added an inline, nothing seemed broken.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12185
Summary:
Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc.
Specifically, these are the behaviors:
- You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider..").
- You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff.
- When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold:
- Be consistent with how inlines work.
- Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories.
- The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented.
- UI is bare bones.
- No integration with the rest of the UI yet.
Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
Summary:
Ref T2009. Ref T1460.
Fixes T2618. When users hit "Delete" on inline comments, delete immediately and offer them "Undo". If they delete indirectly (e.g., by clicking "Delete" from the preview at the bottom of the page), we still prompt them, because the "Undo" action either won't be available or may not be easy to find. This is a "refdelete".
Fixes T6464. This was just a mess. Make it not as much of a mess. It should work now. Pretty sure.
Fixes T4999. We did not refresh these links often enough to find targets for them, so they could race with content. Reevaluate them after loading new changes.
Test Plan:
- Deleted and undid deletion of inlines from main view and preview.
- Clicked "View" on inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6464, T4999, T2618, T1460, T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12032
Summary:
Ref T2009. Ref T1460. The way Diffusion and Differential load inlines is horrible garbage right now:
- Differential does an ad-hoc query to get the PHIDs, then does a real load to policy check.
- Diffusion completely fakes things. In practice this is not a policy violation, but it's dangerous.
Make TransactionCommentQuery extensible so we can subclass it and get the query building correctly in the right Query layer.
Specifically, the Diffusion and Differential subclasses of this Query will add appropriate `withX()` methods to let us express the query in SQL.
Test Plan: Loaded, previewed, edited, and submitted inlines in Differential and Diffusion
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12026
Summary:
Ref T1460. Ref T2618.
When publishing a draft inline, mark the inline it replies to (if any) as replied to.
Also, don't load deleted comments as drafts (sets the stage for T2618).
I'll make an effort to clean up the loading mess here in the next revision, and find some more appropriate home for the shared code.
Test Plan: Made and replied to comments in Differential and Diffusion. Saw comments get marked as "Has Replies" and "Is Reply".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2618, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12025
Summary: Ref T2009. These subclasses have a mixture of similar methods, move them all to the base class.
Test Plan: Created/edited/undo/submitted comments on the left and right sides of a diff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12024
Summary: Ref T2009. This has two more copies of the scaffolding.
Test Plan: Created, edited, deleted, replied to inline comments.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12018
Summary:
Ref T1460. Track and store which comments are threaded replies to other comments, vs merely appearing on the same lines.
This doesn't actually write `hasReplies` yet, since that needs to happen when we un-draft comments on submission.
Test Plan: Made inline comments in Differential and Diffusion, including replies. Replies were marked as "Is Reply".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12017
Summary:
Ref T2009. Currently, the code figures out if a comment is on the left or right by looking at the `<th />` preceeding the enclosing `<td />`.
This gets the right result in 2-up, but in 1-up rows are always `<th />`, `<th />`, `<td />`, so it always detects every inline as being in the new file.
Because "old" and "new" cells aren't inherently distingushable in the 1up view, we can't use a DOM test for this at all. Instead, just track this state explicitly.
Test Plan:
- Made left/right comments in 1up view and 2up view.
- Viewed them in 1up and 2up views.
- Hovered in 1up and 2up views.
- Diff-of-diff'd and reviewed old/new comments, then made some more.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12011
Summary:
Ref T2009. Inline comments have "scaffolding", which is basically some empty table cells/rows around them to get the layout correct.
The scaffolding depends on the renderer, since the cells are different for side-by-side vs unified diffs.
This is currently duplicated all over the place:
- Edit view has 1up/2up.
- Detail view has 1up/2up.
- 1up renderer has 1up.
- 2up renderer has four separate copies of the 2up logic.
These all have subtle differences, which are mostly bugs. Start making the scaffolding more composable so we can get rid of that mess.
Test Plan: Added, edited, and removed inline comments on unified and side-by-side diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11997
Summary:
Ref T2009. These classes are "Differential" now, but are used elsewhere in diff infrastructure (e.g., Diffusion).
- Rename them to "PHUIDiff".
- Move them to "src/infrastructure/".
- Give them a base class.
Test Plan: Interacted with inlines in unified and side-by-side views.
Reviewers: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11996
Summary:
Ref T2009. This reduces how buggy inlines are. They're still buggy.
Specifically, the inline endpoint didn't know how to scaffold inlines before, so some of them ended up rendering in the wrong rows or breaking layouts.
This passes the current renderer through to the inline editor endpoint, so it can at least get the layout correct.
Test Plan: Interacted with inlines in unified and side-by-side views.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2009
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11988
Summary:
Full screen is a little foobar so disabling it for inline comments
Fixes T5272
Test Plan:
View inline comment after change, make sure full screen option
has gone.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5272
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9579
Summary: Better aligns the text area when leaving an inline comment. Also, phts
Test Plan: reload page, view new padding.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8370
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T1790. I partially modernized this recently, but bring it to the mail version too.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: zeeg, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1790, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8294
Summary: ...do it somewhat generically, so we could fairly easily add this to other applications. Fixes T3496. I got a wee bit lazy and decided not to migrate existing drafts. My excuses aside from laziness are doing it this way will let us see if anyone complains, we can always do a migration later if people do complain, and there's likely to be a lot of garbage data for older / bigger installs, and the migration didn't seem worth itgiven it would also likely be expensive in these cases.
Test Plan: made a draft inline comment on DX and observed DX had a note icon on Differential home page. made a draft comment on DX and observed DX had a note icon on Differential home page. deleted a draft inline comment and noted icon disappeared from Differential homepage. Submitted a draft comment + inline comment and noted icon disappeared.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3496
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8275
Summary: Fixes T4317. Update the "inline comment" control to a RemarkupControl. This could maybe use some padding/spacing/design touches eventually but seems OK for the moment.
Test Plan: {F101825}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4317
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7969
Test Plan: This is one of the rare moments where unit tests for views would be useful.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7547
