Summary:
In some applications, using `{V2}` syntax to embed a vote throws. The chain of causality looks like this:
- We try to render a `phabricator_form()`.
- This requires a CSRF token.
- We look for a CSRF token on the user.
- It's an omnipotent user with no token, so everything fails.
To resolve this, make sure we always pass the real user in.
Test Plan:
- Lots of `grep`.
- Made a Differential comment with `{V2}`.
- Made a Diffusion comment with `{V2}`.
- Made a Maniphest comment with `{V2}`.
- Replied to a Conpherence thread with `{V2}`.
- Created a Conpherence thread with `{V2}`.
- Used Conduit to update a Conpherence thread with `{V2}`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, lkassianik
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8849
Summary: This "Reply to comment, etc., etc." section got lost along the way at some point. Restore it for transaction mail.
Test Plan: Received mail from Maniphest with reply instructions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8700
Summary:
Ref T4107. Two issues:
- With strict MySQL settings, we try to insert `null` into the non-nullable `messageCount` field. Add an `initializeNew...` method.
- If we don't create a new conpherence (for example, because the message body is empty), we fatal on `getPHID()` right now.
Also, make this stuff a little easier to test.
Test Plan: Used `mail_handler.php` to receive empty conpherence mail, and new-thread conpherence mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4107
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7760
Summary:
also try to centralize some of the command parsing logic. note that differential is still an exception here. it uses a whitelist-style regex. i think long-term we should have this for every app but changing it seemed too big for this diff.
Fixes T3937.
Test Plan:
echo '!assign btrahan' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22 ; echo '!claim' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22
unit tests passed, though my new one is silly
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3937
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7307
Summary:
Moves all remaining mail handling into ReplyHandlers.
Farewell, `getPhabricatorToInformation()`! You were a bad method and no one liked you.
Ref T1205.
Test Plan:
- Used test console to send mail to Revisions, Tasks, Conpherences and Commits (these all actually work).
- Used test console to send mail to Requests, Macros, Questions and Mocks (these accept the mail but don't do anything with it, but didn't do anything before either).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5953
Summary: Ref T1205. Moves the handling logic for these email types to reply handlers.
Test Plan: Used test form to send conpherence and maniphest mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5945
Summary: This doesn't do anything, but touches a bunch of files so I split it out to reduce the size of the next diff. Basically, make `MailReceiver` classes responsible for loading their application objects. Ref T1205.
Test Plan: Inspection / next diff / code is not reached.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5941
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary: I'm not super happy with the prettiness of the code, but I wasn't able to come up with a good way to clean it up. Happy for suggestions.
Test Plan: sent message to btrahan@phabricator.dev from gmail. Copied raw email and piped it to mail_handler.php -- it created a conpherence! Repeated but sent to btrahan and xerxes and noted that the conpherence was created for both users
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2431
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4854
Summary: unifies the code and presentation between adding files via email and web. Also makes it possible to "attach" the same file multiple times, either by just talking about it in the different messages or multiple times in the same message.
Test Plan: sent message with attachment - it worked! sent a message referencing previous attachment - it work! sent a message with the same attachment in it like 12 times - it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4679
Summary: you have to attach files and participants before you can start editing the conpherenece
Test Plan: push it live and try again
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4674
Summary: Added a reply handler. A few problems -- first, I can't seem to get this to actually send me email so I haven't been able to reply (which I would have done by generating a reply, then copying the raw email into scripts/mail_handler.php). Second, the subject is often terrible on these emails -- unless the conpherence is named its something gross like "E4:" Third, on create I am noticing an error on array_combine() which I think is related to the need to write array_combine_not_broken or what have you I saw go by... (PhabricatorTransactionEditor does array_combine(xaction->getOldValue(), xaction->getOldValue()) and complains that the arrays are empty)
Test Plan: noted that /mail/ said mails were being sent
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4656
