Summary: Fixes T5015, Allow Herald rules for Maniphest to act on task status changes.
Test Plan: Create Herald rule for Maniphest tasks to flag a task with status "wontfix". Change status of Maniphest task to "wontfix". Task should be flagged.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5015
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10842
Summary: Fixes T4666, add Herald rules to Phriction Documents
Test Plan: add Herald rule to flag if title contains "xyz", create Phriction Document with title "xyz". Phriction Document should be flagged.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4666
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10830
Summary:
Ref T5833. I want to add SSH keys to Almanac devices, but the edit workflows for them are currently bound tightly to users.
Instead, decouple key management from users and the settings panel.
Test Plan:
- Uploaded, generated, edited and deleted SSH keys.
- Hit missing name, missing key, bad key format, duplicate key errors.
- Edited/generated/deleted/etc keys for a bot user as an administrator.
- Got HiSec'd on everything.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10824
Summary:
Ref T4029. Fixes T6034.
Various front-end miscellania here. See D10814#96251. This more or less makes policy work but I am not going to call it "fixed" here since we need D10814 to be deployed too and will do that manually.
Test Plan:
- changed document policy from web ui and changes persisted
- changed document policy from web and had form error and changes persisted
- created a structure like users/users/justmyuserpolicy and made sure another user could delete the users/users/ doc
- moved a doc from a to b and verified policy persisted
- verified stub documents inherited policy of the document that stub them...!
- uploaded a file and verified that it 1) had the permissions of the page it was added to and 2) had an "attached" tab linking back to the page on the file page (this means T6034 is fixed with this)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6034, T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10816
Summary: Missed this in previous pass. Send these as links in HTML emails.
Test Plan: Register a new user that nees approval.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10815
Summary: Fixes T6262. Ref T4029. Also gets us ready for T5873 for these end points. I can file something new about someday adding phriction.query, etc but I think we'll remember and can look at that post T5873.
Test Plan: made a document via conduit and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6262, T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10813
Summary:
Ref T4029. Long live PhrictionTransactionEditor...! this means that all existing functionality runs 100% through the modern transactions + editor framework. this diff does a few things in sum
- kills the old editor
- moves conduit-based edits to new editor
- moves stubbing out documents to new editor
- deletes moving of wiki docs for projects functionality... (T4021#59511 is a better bigger battle plan here.)
Test Plan: edited a phriction document via conduit and it worked. created a new phriction document /that/was/deep/ and verified ancestral documents were properly stubbed out. changed a project name and noted no wiki page moves.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10792
Summary: Ref T5833. Since these will no longer be bound specifically to users, bring them to a more central location.
Test Plan:
- Edited SSH keys.
- Ran `bin/ssh-auth` and `bin/ssh-auth-key`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10791
Summary:
Ref T5833. Currently, SSH keys are associated only with users, and are a bit un-modern. I want to let Almanac Devices have SSH keys so devices in a cluster can identify to one another.
For example, with hosted installs, initialization will go something like this:
- A request comes in for `company.phacility.com`.
- A SiteSource (from D10787) makes a Conduit call to Almanac on the master install to check if `company` is a valid install and pull config if it is.
- This call can be signed with an SSH key which identifies a trusted Almanac Device.
In the cluster case, a web host can make an authenticated call to a repository host with similar key signing.
To move toward this, put a proper Query class on top of SSH key access (this diff). In following diffs, I'll:
- Rename `userPHID` to `objectPHID`.
- Move this to the `auth` database.
- Provide UI for device/key association.
An alternative approach would be to build some kind of special token layer in Conduit, but I think that would be a lot harder to manage in the hosting case. This gives us a more direct attack on trusting requests from machines and recognizing machines as first (well, sort of second-class) actors without needing things like fake user accounts.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed SSH keys.
- Added and removed SSH keys from a bot account.
- Tried to edit an unonwned SSH key (denied).
- Ran `bin/ssh-auth`, got sensible output.
- Ran `bin/ssh-auth-key`, got sensible output.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10790
Summary:
Fixes T2792. This adds a pluggable configuration layer between all the stuff on disk (local/file) and the runtime configurable stuff (database).
An install can subclass this source and:
- For Phacility, query a remote service (like Almanac) to retrieve hostname-based configuration, allowing one install to serve multiple instances.
- Maybe for Phacility, query a remote service (like Phlux) to retrieve sitevar-like configuration (e.g., put everything in readonly mode to deal with a maintenance issue?). Not sure if we'll do this or not. We might just nuke Phlux since Almanac is sort-of-a-superset of it for our purposes.
- For third parties, query some other remote service if that makes config management easier. In particular, it would theoretically let you put locked config in Zookeeper or whatever else you want.
Test Plan: Added a fake source and saw it inject configuration.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2792
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10787
Summary:
Ref T5833. Allow services and devices to be tagged with projects.
(These fluff apply implementations are a good example of the issue discussed in T6403.)
Test Plan: {F229569}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10782
Summary:
Ref T5833. Adds support for arbitrary properites to Almanac devices and bindings.
- For Devices, this allows you to maybe mark what `rack` a server is on, the `serial` number of a router, etc.
- For Bindings, this allows you to maybe mark that a bound device is `active`, provide `credentials`, expose it as `readonly`, etc.
Test Plan: Added properties to Devices and Bindings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10781
Summary:
Ref T5833. Currently, we have an `AlmanacDeviceProperty`, but it doesn't use CustomFields and is specific to devices. Make this more generic:
- Reuse most of the CustomField infrastructure (so we can eventually get easy support for nice editor UIs, etc).
- Make properties more generic so Services, Bindings and Devices can all have them.
The major difference between this implementation and existing CustomField implementations is that all other implementations are application-authoritative: the application code determines what the available list of fields is.
I want Almanac to be a bit more freeform (basically: you can write whatever properties you want, and we'll put nice UIs on them if we have a nice UI available). For example, we might have some sort of "ServiceTemplate" that says "a database binding should usually have the fields 'writable', 'active', 'credential'", which would do things like offer these as options and put a nice UI on them, but you should also be able to write whatever other properties you want and add services without building a specific service template for them.
This involves a little bit of rule bending, but ends up pretty clean. We can adjust CustomField to accommodate this a bit more gracefully later on if it makes sense.
Test Plan: {F229172}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10777
Summary:
This implements as little as possible to stick a working transactions + editor codepath in the basic create / edit flow. Aside from the transaction tables, this also required adding a mailKey to a phrictionDocument.
Future work would include adding more transactions types for things like "move" and all the pertinent support. Even future work is to add things like policies which will work easily in the transaction framework. Ref T4029.
Test Plan:
- made a wiki doc
- edit a wiki doc
- had someone subscribe to a wiki doc and edited it
For all three, the edits worked, a reasonable email was sent out, and feed stories were generated.
- made a wiki doc at a /location/like/this
document "stubs" were made as expected in /location and /location/like
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10756
Summary:
Fixes T6416. The comment is consistent with intent, but the actual regexp doesn't quite work right. In particular, we incorrectly match `#security.` as `security.` (with a period) instead of `security` (with no period).
Since this stuff is a pain to test and I evidently got it wrong in this case in D8703, make it unit testable.
Test Plan:
Added unit tests. Also:
{F227181}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6416
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10753
Summary: Ref T5833. Allows you to bind a service (like `db.example.com`) to one or more interfaces (for example, to specify a pool with one read/write host and two read-only hosts). You can't configure which hosts have which properties yet, but you can add all the relevant interfaces to the service. Next diff will start supporting service, binding, and device properties like "is writable", "is active", etc., so that Almanac will be able to express operations like "change which database is writable", "disable writes", "bring a device down", etc.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10745
Summary: Ref T5833. An interface is an IP (maybe v4, maybe v6) and port on a specified network (public internet, VPN, NAT block, etc).
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10718
Summary: Ref T5833. This differentiates address spaces like the public internet from VPNs, so when a service is available at `192.168.0.1`, we'll know it's on some specific NAT block or whatever.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10715
Summary: Ref T5833. The "uninteresting" part of this object is virtually identical to AlmanacService.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10714
Summary: Ref T5833. See that task for functional goals and some discussion of design.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10713
Summary:
I am not sure how valuable this is *as is* - I think it needs different explanations for what happened in mercurial or subversion? I do not know what those explanations are.
Made an error in D10485 - the $hashes that were saved is an array of objects, so it ends up turning into garbage via the wonders of serialization and de-serialization. Fix that by explicitly saving the tree hash.
I would like to make this work for the other VCS types we support, add the "undo / nope" button and call it fixed.
Ref T3686.
Test Plan: clicked "explan why" and saw why
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5693, T3686
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10489
Summary: Ref T5702. This primarily gets URI routing out of Aphront and into an Application, for consistency.
Test Plan: Loaded some pages, got static resources.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10696
Summary: Ref T5702. Primarily, this gets the custom DarkConsole URI routes out of the Aphront core and into an Application, like almost all other routes.
Test Plan: Used DarkConsole.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10695
Summary: Ref T2787. When order statuses change, send merchants and users email about it.
Test Plan: Used `bin/mail` to review mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10694
Summary: Ref T2787. I mostly just want these in place so I can glue emails to them, but they're also useful on their own.
Test Plan: {F216515}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10688
Summary: Ref T2787. Currently, we show all orders/charges, which won't scale well. Show the 10 most recent and link to full order/charge history.
Test Plan: {F216325}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10685
Summary: Ref T2787. This stuff is now irrelevant and/or has no callsites.
Test Plan: `grep`, poked around
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad, btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10684
Summary: Ref T5835. Dump these into global search so you can find them.
Test Plan: {F216290}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10682
Summary:
Ref T2787. Make this a little more concrete with explicit membership instead of a general edit policy. In particular, we need to know who to email when orders happen, and can't reasonably do that with an edit policy.
I imagine this might eventually get more nuanced (e.g., users who can only approve orders vs users who can manage the merchant itself) but that's a long ways away.
Test Plan: {F216284}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10681
Summary:
Fixes T6145, T4016.
Filed T6287 and T6288 for some polish on this.
Test Plan: Made new projects from Maniphest - great success. Made new projects from project / create - also great success.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4016, T6145
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10679
Summary:
Ref T2787.
- Account members can add and remove other members (major use case is corporate accounts).
- Use a modern edge constant setup.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10678
Summary: Ref T5835. Make fund stories publish to feed and send email.
Test Plan: Made edits, etc., saw them in feed and outbound email.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10677
Summary: Ref T2787. Allow merchants to flag orders for review. For now, all orders are flagged for review. Eventually, I could imagine Herald rules for coarse things (e.g., require review of all orders over $1,000, or require review of all orders by users not on a whitelist) and maybe examining fraud data for the providers which support it.
Test Plan: {F215848}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10675
Summary: Ref T2787. Support multiple payment accounts so you can have personal vs company payment accounts.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10673
Summary:
Ref T2787. When Paypal comes back to us with funds on hold, dead-end the transaction but handle it properly.
Generally, smooth out the user interaction on weird states.
Implement refudnds/cancels for Paypal.
Test Plan: {F215230}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10667
Summary: Fixes T4018. Basically hits the bullet points in that task description except the "ideally" one.
Test Plan:
ran bin/config migrate and saw sensible output.
```
~> ./bin/config migrate
Migrating file-based config to more modern config...
Skipping config of source type PhabricatorConfigDatabaseSource...
Skipping config of source type PhabricatorConfigLocalSource...
Skipping config of source type PhabricatorConfigDefaultSource...
Done. Migrated 0 keys.
```
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4018
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10490
Summary:
Ref T2787. This has some rough edges but basically works.
- Users can cancel orders that are in incomplete states (or in complete states, if the application allows them to -- for example, some future application might allow cancellation of billed-but-not-shipped orders).
- Merchant controllers can partially or fully refund orders from any state after payment.
Test Plan: This is still rough around the edges, but issued Stripe and WePay refunds.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10664
Summary:
Ref T2787.
- Allow merchants to disable payment providers.
- Show more useful information about providers on the payments page.
- Make test vs live more clear.
- Show merchant status.
- Add a description to merchants to flesh them out a bit -- the merchant areas of responsibilities seem to be fitting well with accounts, etc.
Test Plan: {F215109}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10662
Summary:
Ref T2787. Instead of making providers global configuration, make them a thing on merchants with web configuration.
Payment methods and some of the pyament workflow needs to be retooled a bit after this, but this seemed like a reasonable cutoff point for this diff.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10649
Summary:
Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration.
Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases.
The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc.
So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line.
This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes.
Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
Summary:
Ref T2787. These were still stuck in the stone ages.
(The handles are pretty skeletal but most aren't used anywehre.)
Test Plan: Funded an initiative without anything breaking. Grepped for removed constants.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10647
Summary: Ref T2787. Similar to D10634, give applications more control over the cart workflow. For now this just means they get to pick exit URIs, but in the future they can manage more details of cart behavior.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative and got returned to the initiative instead of dead-ending in Phortune.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10638
Summary: Ref T2787. `Product` is currently a fairly heavy object, but as Phortune develops it makes a lot of sense to make it a lighter object and put more product logic in applications. Convert it into a fairly lightweight reference to applications. The idea is that Phortune is mostly providing a cart flow, and applications manage the details of products.
Test Plan: Funded an initiative for $1.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10634
Summary:
Ref T2787. Phortune currently stores a bunch of stuff as `...inUSDCents`. This ends up being pretty cumbersome and I worry it will create a huge headache down the road (and possibly not that far off if we do Coinbase/Bitcoin soon). Even now, it's more of a pain than I figured it would be.
Instead:
- Provide an application-level serialization mechanism.
- Provide currency serialization.
- Store currency in an abstract way (currently, as "1.23 USD") that can handle currencies in the future.
- Change all `...inUSDCents` to `..asCurrency`.
- This generally simplifies all the application code.
- Also remove some columns which don't make sense or don't make sense anymore. Notably, `Product` is going to get more abstract and mostly be provided by applications.
Test Plan:
- Created a new product.
- Purchased a product.
- Backed an initiative.
- Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10633
Summary:
Ref T4209. This creates storage for public keys against authorized hosts, such that servers can be authorized to make Conduit calls as the omnipotent user.
Servers are registered into this system by running the following command once:
```
bin/almanac register
```
NOTE: This doesn't implement authorization between servers, just the storage of public keys.
Placing this against Almanac seemed like the most sensible place, since I'm imagining in future that the `register` command will accept more information (like the hostname of the server so it can be found in the service directory).
Test Plan: Ran `bin/almanac register` and saw the host (and public key information) appear in the database.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4209
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10400
Summary:
Ref T1191. Now that the whole database is covered, we don't need to do as much work to build expected schemata. Doing them database-by-database was helpful in converting, but is just reudndant work now.
Instead of requiring every application to build its Lisk objects, just build all Lisk objects.
I removed `harbormaster.lisk_counter` because it is unused.
It would be nice to autogenerate edge schemata, too, but that's a little trickier.
Test Plan: Database setup issues are all green.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10620
