1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-15 19:32:40 +01:00
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
b6c65719e4 Allow merchant controllers to review orders in Phortune
Summary: Ref T2787. Sets the stage for administrating / cancelling / refunding orders and hold orders.

Test Plan:
{F215140}

{F215141}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10663
2014-10-08 14:40:02 -07:00
epriestley
19db3fbb60 Allow merchants to disable payment providers and show more UI info
Summary:
Ref T2787.

  - Allow merchants to disable payment providers.
  - Show more useful information about providers on the payments page.
  - Make test vs live more clear.
  - Show merchant status.
  - Add a description to merchants to flesh them out a bit -- the merchant areas of responsibilities seem to be fitting well with accounts, etc.

Test Plan: {F215109}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10662
2014-10-08 08:31:24 -07:00
epriestley
9aa5a8cb7b Make payment providers a configurable property of Merchants in Phortune
Summary:
Ref T2787. Instead of making providers global configuration, make them a thing on merchants with web configuration.

Payment methods and some of the pyament workflow needs to be retooled a bit after this, but this seemed like a reasonable cutoff point for this diff.

Test Plan: See screenshots.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10649
2014-10-07 14:41:41 -07:00
epriestley
fcd2025a85 Add Merchants to Phortune
Summary:
Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration.

Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases.

The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc.

So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line.

This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes.

Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
2014-10-07 10:55:16 -07:00