Summary:
This diff covers a bit of ground.
- PHUIDocumentExample has been added
- PHUIDocument has been extended with new features
- PhabricatorMenuView is now PHUIListView
- PhabricatorMenuItemView is now PHUIItemListView
Overall - I think I've gotten all the edges covered here. There is some derpi-ness that we can talk about, comments in the code. Responsive design is missing from the new features on PHUIDocument, will follow up later.
Test Plan: Tested mobile and desktop menus, old phriction layout, new document views, new lists, and object lists.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6130
Summary: I introduced this helper at some point, clean up all the code duplication around content sources.
Test Plan: Grepped; hit edit interfaces for most/all of these.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6030
Summary:
Ref T2787.
I //think// we could also use WePay as a recurring payment provider, but this is somewhat messy (OAuth + requires account) -- basically it's "add a WePay account" instead of "add a credit card".
The WePay checkout workflow is a bit upsell-y but basically reasonable.
I like that their API just has a `request($method, $params)` method instead of 30,000 lines of methods for each request type. I did hit one bug; I'll send a pull for that.
Test Plan: Got as far as the charge callback in testing; the rest isn't implemented for any provider yet.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5982
Summary:
Ref T2787. See discussion in D5834.
- Replace `PhortuneUtil` with `PhortuneCurrency`, which feels a little better and more flexible / future-proof.
- Add unit tests.
- Display prices explicitly as "$... USD".
Test Plan: Hit product list, cart, purchase flow, verified displays.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5841
Summary:
Paypal doesn't let us capture cards in a PCI-free way like Stripe and Balanced do, but we can provide a "pay with paypal" option at checkout. (For subscriptions, we'll have to invoice monthly to retain control over billing, but this doesn't seem wildly unreasonable.) The bitcoin provider MtGox works in a similar way, as do some other providers we might some day want to implement.
This adds:
- Hooks to providers so they can offer "pay once at checkout" workflows.
- Hooks so providers can have controllers, for redirect-based third-party workflows.
- Basic Paypal integration using the "Express Checkout Merchant API", which seems like the best fit for our use case. This only goes as far as shoving the user through the payment flow; we don't actually capture payments yet (paypal has around 35 different APIs, but this one seems to be the only PCI-free one which wouldn't give users an awful experience).
This diff is fairly checkpointey, but Phortune doesn't really bill anything yet anyway. Ref T2787.
Test Plan: Ran through Paypal sandbox workflow; "paid" for stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5834
Summary: Provide a bare implementation so that you can add PhortuneTestProvider as a payment method. Ref 2787.
Test Plan: Added "cards" through the test provider.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5772
Summary:
This has no real behavioral changes (except better error handling), it just factors things out to be a bit cleaner. In particular:
- Move more shared form behaviors into the common JS form component.
- Move more error handling into shared pathways.
- Make the specialized Stripe / Balanced methods do less work.
This needs some more polish for nontrival errors (especially on the Balanced side) but none of the error behavior is worse than it was and a lot of it is much better.
Ref T2787.
Test Plan: Hit all invalid form errors, added valid payment methods with Stripe and Balacned.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5771
Summary:
Allows Balanced payment methods to be added. This works essentially the same way as Stripe, except everything is a little bit different.
Slightly more stuff could be shared, but I feel //mostly// good about this. I'll probably do a bit more cleanup next. Some of the error handling is messy, in particular.
Ref T2787.
Test Plan: Added Balanced and Stripe payment methods.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5765
Summary:
General cleanup and separation into generic vs Stripe blocks of code.
- There was an old CC form view for Stripe stuff that I never cleaned up; clean that up.
- Move non-Stripe CC form rendering into a base class (Balanced can reuse it).
- Move non-Stripe CC form JS into a shareable class.
- Simplify JS a bit (JX.Workflow can add extra parameters to a request, so we don't need hidden inputs).
- Genericize CSS.
- Depend on Stripe JS directly, if they're down we're not going to be able to add cards anyway.
Ref T2787.
Test Plan: Hit all Stripe errors and added new cards.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5758
Summary:
Ref T2787. For payment methods that allow you to add a billable method (i.e., a credit card), move all the logic into the provider. In particular:
- Providers may (Stripe, Balanced) or may not (Paypal, MtGox) allow you to add rebillable payment methods. Providers which don't allow rebillable methods will appear at checkout instead and we'll just invoice you every month if you don't use a rebillable method.
- Providers which permit creation of rebillable methods handle their own data entry, since this will be per-provider.
- "Add Payment Method" now prompts you to choose a provider. This is super ugly and barely-usable for the moment. When there's only one choice, we'll auto-select it in the future.
Test Plan: Added new Stripe payment methods; hit all the Stripe errors.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5756
Summary: Abstract out the Stripiness of payment providers so we can add a Test provider (and maybe MtGox / Balanced / Paypal / etc). Ref T2787.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5752
Summary: Although I imagine we aren't really going to have an "add to cart" type storefront, putting this in place makes a lot of other workflows simpler. No storage yet, just allows reasonable construction of a "buy stuff" page.
Test Plan: {F41342}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5745
Summary: Fixes T2962. That task discusses this issue.
Test Plan: Read php-curl documentation to verify this change makes sense. Sent an email with SES.
Reviewers: btrahan, garoevans
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2962
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5669
Summary: Adds in the ActionList into Crumbs for mobile on many applications.
Test Plan: Tested each application except probably drydock since not sure how to test that. Also cleaned up Ponder a little.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5648
Summary:
Ref T2787. A product is the abstract representation of something you can buy or rent/subscribe to. Although the interface isn't locked down yet, this would ultimately be internal/administrative.
Products likely have some user-facing skin on top of them: plans would have a purchasing/comparison flow, physical goods would have a storefront, etc., so products don't have any information like descriptions or images, just the data that Phortune needs to correctly bill accounts.
Generally, this is very basic for the moment.
Test Plan:
{F37594}
{F37595}
{F37596}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5441
Summary:
Hook @btrahan's Stripe form to the rest of Phortune.
- Users can add payment methods.
- They are saved to Stripe and associated with PhortunePaymentMethods on our side.
- Payment methods appear on account overview.
Test Plan:
{F37548}
{F37549}
{F37550}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5438
Summary:
Ref T2787. This does very little so far, but makes inroads on accounts and billing. This is mostly just modeled on what Stripe looks like. The objects are:
- **Account**: Has one or more authorized users, who can make manage the account. An example might be "Phacility", and the three of us would be able to manage it. A user may be associated with more than one account (e.g., a corporate account and a personal account) but the UI tries to simplify the common case of a single account.
- **Payment Method**: Something we can get sweet sweet money from; for now, a credit card registered with Stripe. Payment methods are associated with an account.
- **Product**: A good (one time charge) or service (recurring charge). This might be "t-shirt" or "enterprise plan" or "hourly support" or whatever else.
- **Purchase**: Represents a user purchasing a Product for an Account, using a Payment Method. e.g., you bought a shirt, or started a plan, or purchased support.
- **Charge**: Actual charges against payment methods. A Purchase can create more than one charge if it's a plan, or if the first charge fails and we re-bill.
This doesn't fully account for stuff like coupons/discounts yet but they should fit into the model without any issues.
This only implements `Account`, and that only partially.
Test Plan: {F37531}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5435
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary: Fixes various array_combine() warnings for PHP < 5.4
Test Plan: lint/unit/grep
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4660
Summary:
- Implements `javelin_tag()`, which is `javelin_render_tag()` on top of `phutil_tag()` instead of `phutil_render_tag()`.
- Manually converts all or almost all of the trivial callsites.
Test Plan:
- Site does not seem any more broken than before.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4639
Summary: This is used in every other view.
Test Plan: Browsed around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4248
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary:
This is the first step in Phabricator internationalization.
It adds a translation selector and calls it at startup.
Installations can add custom selectors to override some texts.
We can add official translations in future.
Next step is to allow user to choose his translation which will override the global one.
This is currently used only for English plurals.
Test Plan: Displayed a diff with unit test error, verified that it says 'Detail' or 'Details' and not 'Detail(s)'.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1139
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2753
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary:
various stripe stuff, including
- external stripe library
- payment form
- test controller to play with payment form, sample business logic
My main questions / discussion topics are...
- is the stripe PHP library too big? (ie should I write something more simple just for phabricator?)
-- if its cool, what is the best way to include the client? (ie should I make it a submodule rather than the flat copy here?)
- is the JS I wrote (too) ridiculous?
-- particularly unhappy with the error message stuff being in JS *but* it seemed the best choice given the most juicy error messages come from the stripe JS such that the overall code complexity is lowest this way.
- how should the stripe JS be included?
-- flat copy like I did here?
-- some sort of external?
-- can we just load it off stripe servers at request time? (I like that from the "if stripe is down, stripe is down" perspective)
- wasn't sure if the date control was too silly and should just be baked into the form?
-- for some reason I feel like its good to be prepared to walk away from Stripe / switch providers here, though I think this is on the wrong side of pragmatic
Test Plan: - played around with sample client form
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2096
