Summary:
Ref T10246. Ref T6741.
When you have a namespace like "phacility.net", require users creating services and devices within it to have edit permission on the namespace.
This primarily allows us to lock down future device names in the cluster, so instances can't break themselves once they get access to Almanac.
Test Plan:
- Configured a `phacility.net` namespace, locked myself out of it.
- Could not create new `stuff.phacility.net` services/devices.
- Could still edit existing devices I had permission for.
- Configured a `free.phacility.net` namespace with more liberal policies.
- Could create `me.free.phacility.net`.
- Still could not create `other.phacility.net`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6741, T10246
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15325
Summary:
Ref T6741. Ref T10246.
Root problem: to provide Drydock in the cluster, we need to expose Almanac, and doing so would let users accidentally or intentionally create a bunch of `repo006.phacility.net` devices/services which could conflict with the real ones we manage.
There's currently no way to say "you can't create anything named `*.blah.net`". This adds "namespaces", which let you do that (well, not yet, but they will after the next diff).
After the next diff, if you try to create `repo003.phacility.net`, but the namespace `phacility.net` already exists and you don't have permission to edit it, you'll be asked to choose a different name.
Also various modernizations and some new docs.
Test Plan:
- Created cool namespaces like `this.computer`.
- Almanac namespaces don't actually enforce policies yet.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6741, T10246
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15324
