1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-03 20:22:46 +01:00
Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
43215bf0bd Make Fund backers render a little more nicely
Summary: Ref T5835. Mostly UI smoothing. Also add a "Risks" field to initiatives.

Test Plan: {F214952}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10660
2014-10-08 05:32:42 -07:00
epriestley
608465da1e Track total funding amount on Fund initiatives
Summary: Ref T5835. Show total funding amount and payable merchant on initiatives.

Test Plan: {F214936}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10657
2014-10-08 05:31:48 -07:00
epriestley
9c4b8a0fb2 Adjust payment workflows to deal with merchants and configurable providers in Phortune
Summary:
Ref T2787. Builds on D10649 by rebining existing objects (carts, charges, etc) to merchantPHIDs and providerPHIDs instead of an implicit global merchant and weird global artifacts (providerType / providerKey).

Basically:

  - When you create something that users can pay for, you specify a merchant to control where the payment goes.
  - Accounts are install-wide, but payment methods are bound to merchants. This seems to do a reasonable job of balancing usability and technical concerns.
  - Replace a bunch of weird links between objects with standard PHIDs.
  - Improve "add payment method" flow.

Test Plan: Went through the Fund flow with Stripe and WePay, funding an initiative.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10652
2014-10-07 14:41:59 -07:00
epriestley
943c62d1e9 Add missing expected keys and uniqueness
Summary:
Ref T1191.

  - Adds definitions for missing keys and keys with wrong uniqueness. Generally, I defined these before fixing the key query to actually pull all keys and support uniqueness.
  - Moves "key uniqueness" to note severity; this is fixable (probably?) and there are no remaining issues.
  - Moves "Missing Key" to note severity; missing keys are fixable and all remaining missing keys are really missing (either missing edge keys, or missing PHID keys):

{F210089}

  - Moves "Surplus Key" to note seveirty; surplus keys are fixable all remaining surplus keys are really surplus (duplicate key in Harbormaster, key on unused column in Worker):

{F210090}

Test Plan:
  - Vetted missing/surplus/unique messages.
  - 146 issues remaining.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T1191

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10590
2014-10-01 07:53:50 -07:00
epriestley
e9ac3f436a Add expected schemata for Fund, Files, Flags and Legalpad
Summary: Ref T1191. Nothing too exciting in these.

Test Plan: Saw more blue in UI.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T1191

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10521
2014-09-19 05:44:40 -07:00
epriestley
09fb5667cc Allow users to back initiatives in Fund
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is still completely made up (no payment integration), but you can "back" an initiative, type a number in the box, and generate a database row. You can then seach for backers and things you've backed and such.

Notable changes:

  - Renamed "FundBacking" to "FundBacker". The former name was sort of because you can back things multiple times, but stuff like `$backings` was just too weird.
  - I think that's it?

Test Plan:
  - Backed an initiative.
  - Viewed that I became a backer.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10486
2014-09-12 06:31:11 -07:00
epriestley
e4f399b9fa Scaffolding for Fund
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is all pretty boilerplate, and does not interact with Phortune at all yet.

You can create "Initiatives", which have a title and description, and support most of the expected infrastructure (policies, transactions, mentions, edges, appsearch, remakrup, etc).

Only notable decisions:

  - Initiatives have an explicit owner. I think it's good to have a single clearly-responsible user behind an initiative.
  - I think that's it?

Test Plan:
  - Created an initiative.
  - Edited an initiative.
  - Changed application policy defaults.
  - Searched for initiatives.
  - Subscribed to an initiative.
  - Opened/closed an initiative.
  - Used `I123` and `{I123}` in remarkup.
  - Destroyed an initiative.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10481
2014-09-11 13:38:58 -07:00