Summary: Updates Legalpad Manage/Edit with new UI layouts.
Test Plan: Wrote a new document with and without a preamble, edit document, sign document
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15576
Summary: Pulls everything over to two column UI and new edit pages. Removed history view and consolidated some pages.
Test Plan: New Panel, Edit Panel. New Dashboard, Edit Dashboard, View Standalone pages.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15588
Summary: Minor, moves to `newPage`
Test Plan: Test both pages, still work
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15582
Summary: Little straggler here, updates to `newPage`
Test Plan: Review a document, no visibile changes
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15580
Summary: Updates Conpherence pages to use `newPage`
Test Plan: View a Room, view list of joined rooms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15578
Summary: Just clearing these all out.
Test Plan: Visit channel list and log page.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15577
Summary:
Ref T10709. Two issues:
- If a user sends an invalid `!command`, we can throw, which means we don't return HTTP 200. This makes Mailgun re-send the mail later.
- We don't parse headers of the modern API correctly, so the "Message-ID" failsafe doesn't work. Parse them correctly. I //believe// Mailgun's API changed at some point.
Test Plan:
This is difficult to test exhaustively in isolation. I used Mailgun's web tools to verify the format of the hook request, and faked some requests locally.
I'll keep an eye on this as it goes to production and make sure the fix is correct there.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10709
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15575
Summary: Modernize and use newer UI
Test Plan: Bounce around various views.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15574
Summary: Updates various Phriction pages to match new UI
Test Plan: New Document, Edit Document, View History, Revert Change
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15572
Summary: Swap over to modern components, `newPage` and `handleRequest`.
Test Plan: `arc lint` :(
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15571
Summary: Runs through Meta, cleaned up policies and editing email addresses to new UI
Test Plan: Set a new Email address for Maniphest, edit policies.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15569
Summary: Fixes T10704. This is just bad copy-paste -- "O" for "old" should be "N" for "new".
Test Plan:
- Followed steps on T10704.
- Applied patch.
- Marked inline done, replied, etc. No more JS errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10704
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15566
Summary: Cleans up Pholio, moves to two column layout, fix some transaction inconsistencies. This moves "Image" to the MainColumn, which feels fine, but I think we'll likely want some sort of "fullscreen" option for Pholio V2 like we have on workboards perhaps.
Test Plan:
New Mock, Edit Mock, View Mock.
{F1200450}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15564
Summary: Ref T9007
Test Plan: Navigate to "Advanced Search" in Badges, order by rarity, then by commonality. Rarest and most common badges should be ordered, respectively.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9007
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15555
Summary: This doesn't hit the ambiguous case in Diffusion so it seems fine to make it more consistent.
Test Plan: Looked at a little task-o.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15561
Summary: Walks through various object, rule, create forms and transcripts in Herald. Slightly nicer looking.
Test Plan: Make rules, see rules, edit rules, see transcripts.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15559
Summary: Fixes T10672. Cleaning this up myself since I was responsible for the implementation.
Test Plan: Leave a comment, Edit a badge, create a badge.
Reviewers: lpriestley, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10672
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15556
Summary: Adds basic commenting to Fund Initiatives.
Test Plan: Leave a comment, see comment.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15554
Summary: Uses BLUE_PROPERTY on Recipients box, removes redundent properties since we render the badge itself already.
Test Plan: View a badge with and without a description.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15553
Summary: [WIP] Tossing this up for safety and to read through it. Need to test, update some of the other flows. This updates everything in Auth for new UI and modern conventions.
Test Plan: Loooots of random testing, new providers, edit providers, logging out, forgot password... more coming.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15550
Summary:
[WIP] Allows awarding a badge from a user profile. Unsure of the interactions here if a user can't award any badges, or if we should just hide this.
Fixes T10688
Fixes T10318
Test Plan: Award some badges. Steal them back.
Reviewers: lpriestley, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10318, T10688
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15544
Summary: Ref T8941
Test Plan: Create an object and create multiple transactions, some time apart to ensure that time clumping isn't interfering. Make sure that events that are large enough to have a dropdown menu show badges under author pic.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8941
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15543
Summary:
Ref T10537. Currently, Nuance has a `NuanceRequestor` object, intended to represent the external user who created content (e.g., a GitHub account or a Twitter account or whatever).
This object is currently almost unused, and its design predates Doorkeeper. In D15541, I chose to use doorkeeper objects instead of NuanceRequestor objects to represent requestors.
I don't currently anticipate a need for such an object, given that we have Doorkeeper. If we do need it in the future for some reason, it would be fairly easy to restore it, create a requestor type which wraps a Doorkeeper object, and then migrate. Not super thrilling to do that, but not a huge mess.
`NuanceItem` still has a `requestorPHID`, but this is now a less formal object PHID instead of a more formal Requestor-object PHID, and holds a doorkeeper exeternal object PHID for GitHub events.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `nuancerequestor`.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`.
- Grepped for `requestor`, remaining uses of this term seem reasonable/correct.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15546
Summary: This is kinda bad in terms of UI (It just makes a json of the thing and diffs that), but it's a start.
Test Plan: edit rule, create rule, add/remove/edit conditions, actions
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15542
Summary:
Ref T10538. Ref T10537. This creates PHIDs which represent GitHub users, and uses them as the actors for synchronized comments.
I've just made them Doorkeeper objects. There are three major kinds of objects they //could// possibly be:
- Nuance requestor objects.
- External account objects.
- Doorkeeper objects.
I don't think we actually need distinct nuance requestor objects. These don't really do anything right now, and were originally created before Doorkeeper. I think Doorkeeper is a superset of nuance requestor functionality, and better developed and more flexible.
Likewise, doorkeeper objects are much more flexible than external account objects, and it's nice to imagine that we can import from Twootfeed or whatever without needing to build full OAuth for it. I also like less stuff touching auth code, when possible.
Making these separate from external accounts does make it a bit harder to reconcile external users with internal users, but I think that's OK, and that it's generally desirable to show the real source of a piece of content. That is, if I wrote a comment on GitHub but also have a Phabricator account, I think it's good to show "epriestley (GitHub)" (the GitHub user) as the author, not "epriestley" (the Phabricator user). I think this is generally less confusing overall, and we can add more linkage later to make it clearer.
Test Plan:
{F1194104}
{F1194105}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537, T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15541
Summary: Ref T10538. This probably gets push events where GitHub does not recognize the author wrong, but I don't have any of those yet.
Test Plan: Added and ran unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15540
Summary: Ref T10537. Add a new content source for Nuance. Prepare for better author attribution.
Test Plan: {F1194038}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15539
Summary: Fixes T10670, for users with exclusively archived badges, user profile should show "no badges" message instead of blank box
Test Plan: Award badge to user with no badges, archive badge, user profile should show "no badges" message under badges.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10670
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15538
Summary:
Fixes T10234. This is a more thorough fix.
Root issue is that some time around D13589, we started hitting an object cache for `loadCustomInlineRules()`, but didn't adjust the code to account for that.
So if a page created multiple similar engines, we'd return the same `$rule` object for multiple engines, call `setEngine()` on it with different engines, and then possibly try to render using an already-expired engine the second time through.
Instead, create a separate `$rule` object for each separate `$engine`.
Test Plan:
Repro is something like this:
- Create a custominlinerule which uses an engine.
- Purge the remarkup cache.
- Load a page which uses the rule in two engines (e.g., in a revision description, and also in an inline comment).
- Before change: second one could fatal. After change: clean load.
Reviewers: thoughtpolice, chad
Reviewed By: thoughtpolice, chad
Subscribers: thoughtpolice, eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T10234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15535
Summary:
Ref T10537.
- Let nuance items render custom curtain panels.
- Add a custom panel linking to the imported task, if one exists.
- Actually extract comments properly.
Test Plan:
Unit tests, plus:
{F1193800}
{F1193801}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15537
Summary: Ref T10677, Awarding/revoking badge should create a feed story on homepage with badge handle recipient handles
Test Plan: Award/revoke badge, open Feed, should see story with badge link and recipient links.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15534
Summary: Ref T10677, awarding/revoking a badge should create timeline entries with titles that are more clear (excludes homepage feed stories)
Test Plan: Award/revoke a badge to single or multiple users. See timeline entries that reflect those actions.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15533
Summary: Cleans up EditEngine, adds new layout to EditEngine and descendents
Test Plan: Test creating a new form, reordering, marking and unmarking defaults. View new forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15531
Summary: Adds headers, new layout to edit panels on Almanac.
Test Plan: Pull up each edit panel in sandbox, save form.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15527
Summary: Ref T8996, Convert badge recipients from Edges to actual BadgeAward objects
Test Plan: Create badge, award it to recipient. Make sure adding/removing recipients works. (Still need to migrate exisiting recipients to new table and need to create activity feed blurbs)
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8996
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15014
Summary:
Fixes T10385. Two issues:
- `$show_blame` and `$show_color` were improperly swapped.
- Code to hide these columns got dropped somewhere, probably in my recent-ish rewrite.
Test Plan:
- Showed/hid blame.
- Showed/hid colors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10385
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15528
Summary:
Ref T10537. For Nuance, I want to introduce new sources (like "GitHub" or "GitHub via Nuance" or something) but this needs to modularize eventually.
Split ContentSource apart so applications can add new content sources.
Test Plan:
This change has huge surface area, so I'll hold it until post-release. I think it's fairly safe (and if it does break anything, the breaks should be fatals, not anything subtle or difficult to fix), there's just no reason not to hold it for a few hours.
- Viewed new module page.
- Grepped for all removed functions/constants.
- Viewed some transactions.
- Hovered over timestamps to get content source details.
- Added a comment via Conduit.
- Added a comment via web.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace XXXXX --no-quickstart -f` to re-run all historic migrations.
- Generated some objects with `bin/lipsum`.
- Ran a bulk job on some tasks.
- Ran unit tests.
{F1190182}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15521
Summary: Updates the Harbormaster UI to match the new two column everywhere else.
Test Plan: Did best I could, tested builds, plans, steps, buildables. Unable to test lint/unit locally, I need to set that up. Kick the tires for me pls. :3
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15523
Summary: Ref T10537. Show when an object is bridged to something external.
Test Plan: {F1190099}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15520
Summary:
Fixes T10665. See that task for discussion.
Because `$head_map` is not properly re-initialized for each ref we check, pushes which affect multiple branches (say, "A" and "B") can have information bleed from the first branch check to the second branch.
To trigger a problem behavior, you can push one commit which updates an existing branch, plus one commit which creates a new branch. If they process in the right order, the `$head_map` from the updated branch will bleed into the `$head_map` for the new branch and trigger an incorrect head split detection.
Test Plan:
- Pushed a set of changes which updated `branch-a` and created `branch-b`.
- Before change: improper detection of split heads.
- After change: clean push.
- Pushed a set of changes which split the head of `branch-d`.
- Correct detection of split heads.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10665
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15522
Summary: Ref T10538. This makes us render better human-readable descriptions of more GitHub event types.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15516
Summary: I know this is ultimately pointless but feel better about pushing back on users when there is no possible way they could be acting in good faith.
Test Plan: Read documents.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15518
Summary: Ref T10538. Very sloppy, but starting to sort of work. This sort of gets a piece of framework into a reasonable spot, next couple of diffs are going to be "extract comment text" and "show stuff in the UI" sorts of things.
Test Plan: {F1186726}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15511
Summary: This URI is currently a little whack.
Test Plan:
- With MFA, clicked "Edit Subscription" on a subscription.
- Clicked "Cancel".
- Before: Sent to `/phortune/phortune/edit/...`, a 404.
- After: Properly returned to subscription detail page.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15514
Summary: Moves everything I could find in Phortune to new UI layouts.
Test Plan: Tested every page I could get two, unclear how to test subscriptions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15513
Summary:
Ref T10537. Generally, when users interact with Nuance items we'll dump a command into a queue and apply it in the background. This avoids race conditions with multiple users interacting with an item, which Nuance is more subject to than other applications because it has an import/external component.
The "sync" command doesn't actually do anything yet.
Test Plan: {F1186365}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15506
Summary: Ref T10538. This extracts and renders URIs for GitHub events so we can link to the original thing on GitHub.
Test Plan: {F1186332}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15505
Summary:
Ref T10537. This allows item types to expose item actions. Eventually these actions might be things like "promote to task", "tweet reply", "ban user forever", etc.
For now, provide a simple action which shows a raw item in a dialog.
Test Plan: {F1185573}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15504
Summary:
Ref T10537. These are objects which are bound to some external object, like a Maniphest task which is a representation of a GitHub issue.
This doesn't do much yet and may change, but my thinking is:
- I'm putting these on-object instead of on edges because I think we want to actively change the UI for them (e.g., clearly call out that the object is bridged) but don't want every page to need to do extra queries in the common case where zero bridged objects exist anywhere in the system.
- I'm making these one-to-one, more or less: an issue can't be bridged to a bunch of tasks, nor can a bunch of tasks be bridged to a single issue. Pretty sure this makes sense? I can't come up with any reasonable, realistic cases where you want a single GitHub issue to publish to multiple different tasks in Maniphest.
- Technically, one type of each bridgable object could be bridged, but I expect this to never actually occur. Hopefully.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, loaded some pages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15502
Summary: This is failing locally for me, set to getViewer and pull up cart.
Test Plan: View cart with a description.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15509
Summary: Ref T9456. This makes everything work, except that CircleCI doesn't fetch tags which are not ancestors of branch heads.
Test Plan: Ran passing builds through CircleCI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: dpaola2, JustinTulloss
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14288
Summary: Ref T9456. Some rough edges and we can't complete the build yet since I haven't written a webhook, but this mostly seems to be working.
Test Plan:
- Ran this build on some stuff.
- Ran a normal HTTP step build to make sure I didn't break that.
{F880301}
{F880302}
{F880303}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: JustinTulloss, joshma
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14286
Summary: Ref T9456. This is just a convenience type for things like API tokens, to make it harder for users to make mistakes and keep SSH keys out of the dropdown for "choose your API token".
Test Plan: {F879820}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14284
Summary: Fixes T10648. This was goofed and always did a meaningless no-op slice -- I mucked it up while doing the disabled project stuff elsewhere.
Test Plan:
- Tagged something with 5 projects.
- Saw the list sliced to 4 (the limit) with "...".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15508
Summary:
Fixes T10646. When you load the page or click "New Condition" or "New Action", we try to add a condition and action with some default values.
Currently, the logic just sets everything to `null` or `'default'`. This technically works in Safari, but is less successful in Chrome. (I think Safari prevents you from picking an invalid value.)
Instead of relying on the browser to pick the right value, set the correct value explicitly.
Test Plan:
- Created a new rule in Chrome, Safari.
- Added fields and conditions in Chrome, Safari.
- Edited existing rules in Chrome, Safari.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10646
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15507
Summary: Updates Spaces to new two column layout
Test Plan: Create a space, edit a space
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15503
Summary: Fixes T10234. This usage is unusual, out of date, and has some bad interactions with engines and custom rules.
Test Plan:
- Added `CustomInlineCodeRule` from P1129 as an extension rule.
- Put a custom `<code> ... </code>` block in a Maniphest task description.
- Saw fatal as described in task; applied change; saw rule work properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15501
Summary:
D9087 adds a nice typeahead but breaks the existing regex
search by quoting the pattern. Ideally, this change won't break the
typeahead, which as far as I can tell doesn't use the `pattern`
argument.
Test Plan:
Not yet.
RFC as to whether this change makes sense, will fix my local setup and resend if so.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15500
Summary: Ref T7789. Implement proper detection for read-only requests. Previously, we assumed every request was read/write and required lots of permissions, but we don't need "Can Push" permission if you're only cloning/fetching/pulling.
Test Plan:
- Set push policy to "no one".
- Fetched, got clean data out of LFS.
- Tried to push, got useful error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15499
Summary: Fixes T10625.
Test Plan: Faked this locallly and it looked OK, I'll check the mail in production. :3333
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15497
Summary:
- Fix spacing on InfoView inside collasped boxes
- Fix spacing on stacked PropertyLists in TwoColumn
- Fix spacing on Readmes on Tablets
- Fix unset variable on importing commits
Test Plan: Review each of the above cases.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15496
Summary: Ref T7789. This isn't the most perfect UI imaginable, but it's similar to what GitHub does and seems reasonable.
Test Plan:
{F1180271}
{F1180272}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15494
Summary: Ref T7789. Make sure these get cleaned up when a repository is destroyed.
Test Plan:
- Created a new repository.
- Pushed some LFS data to it.
- Used `bin/remove destroy` to nuke it.
- Verified the LFS stuff was cleaned up and the underlying files were destroyed (`SELECT * FROM repository_gitlfsref`, etc).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15493
Summary:
Ref T7789. Ref T10604. This implements the `upload` action, which streams file data into Files.
This makes Git LFS actually work, at least roughly.
Test Plan:
- Tracked files in an LFS repository.
- Pushed LFS data (`git lfs track '*.png'; git add something.png; git commit -m ...; git push`).
- Pulled LFS data (`git checkout master^; rm -rf .git/lfs; git checkout master; open something.png`).
- Verified LFS refs show up in the gitlfsref table.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789, T10604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15492
Summary: I think I like this better -- but maybe right-aligned?
Test Plan:
{F1180295}
{F1180296}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15495
Summary:
Ref T7789. This implements:
- A new table to store the `<objectHash, filePHID>` relationship between Git LFS files and Phabricator file objects.
- A basic response to `batch` commands, which return actions for a list of files.
Test Plan:
Ran `git lfs push origin master`, got a little further than previously:
```
epriestley@orbital ~/dev/scratch/poemslocal $ git lfs push origin master
Git LFS: (2 of 1 files) 174.24 KB / 87.12 KB
Git LFS operation "upload/b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69" is not supported by this server.
Git LFS operation "upload/b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69" is not supported by this server.
```
With `GIT_TRACE=1`, this shows the batch part of the API going through.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15489
Summary:
adds the `{{PHID....}}` rule. Should mostly be useful in UI code that refers to Objects.
It doesn't add any mention links/transactions.
Test Plan: Comment with this, see email (plain + html) and comment box.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15488
Summary: This updates (all?) of Diffusion/Audit to new UI, included edit and other extra form pages. It's fairly complete but I don't know all the nooks and crannies so to speak to fully verify I didn't mess anything up.
Test Plan: Tested creating new repositories, browsing, searching, auditing. Need more eyes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15487
Summary:
Ref T7789. This builds on top of `git-lfs-authenticate` to detect LFS requests, read LFS tokens, and route them to a handler which can do useful things.
This handler promptly drops them on the floor with an error message.
Test Plan:
Here's a transcript showing the parts working together so far:
- `git-lfs` connects to the server with SSH, and gets told how to connect with HTTP to do uploads.
- `git-lfs` uses HTTP, and authenticates with the tokens properly.
- But the server tells it to go away, and that it doesn't support anything, so the operation ultimately fails.
```
$ GIT_TRACE=1 git lfs push origin master
12:45:56.153913 git.c:558 trace: exec: 'git-lfs' 'push' 'origin' 'master'
12:45:56.154376 run-command.c:335 trace: run_command: 'git-lfs' 'push' 'origin' 'master'
trace git-lfs: Upload refs origin to remote [master]
trace git-lfs: run_command: git rev-list --objects master --not --remotes=origin
trace git-lfs: run_command: git cat-file --batch-check
trace git-lfs: run_command: git cat-file --batch
trace git-lfs: run_command: 'git' config -l
trace git-lfs: tq: starting 3 transfer workers
trace git-lfs: tq: running as batched queue, batch size of 100
trace git-lfs: prepare upload: b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69 lfs/dog1.jpg 1/1
trace git-lfs: tq: sending batch of size 1
trace git-lfs: ssh: local@localvault.phacility.com git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/18/poems.git upload
trace git-lfs: api: batch 1 files
trace git-lfs: HTTP: POST http://local.phacility.com/diffusion/POEMS/poems.git/info/lfs/objects/batch
trace git-lfs: HTTP: 404
trace git-lfs: HTTP: {"message":"Git LFS operation \"objects\/batch\" is not supported by this server."}
trace git-lfs: HTTP:
trace git-lfs: api: batch not implemented: 404
trace git-lfs: run_command: 'git' config lfs.batch false
trace git-lfs: tq: batch api not implemented, falling back to individual
trace git-lfs: ssh: local@localvault.phacility.com git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/18/poems.git upload b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69
trace git-lfs: api: uploading (b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69)
trace git-lfs: HTTP: POST http://local.phacility.com/diffusion/POEMS/poems.git/info/lfs/objects
trace git-lfs: HTTP: 404
trace git-lfs: HTTP: {"message":"Git LFS operation \"objects\" is not supported by this server."}
trace git-lfs: HTTP:
trace git-lfs: tq: retrying 1 failed transfers
trace git-lfs: ssh: local@localvault.phacility.com git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/18/poems.git upload b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69
trace git-lfs: api: uploading (b7e0aeb82a03d627c6aa5fc1bbfd454b6789d9d9affc8607d40168fa18cf6c69)
trace git-lfs: HTTP: POST http://local.phacility.com/diffusion/POEMS/poems.git/info/lfs/objects
trace git-lfs: HTTP: 404
trace git-lfs: HTTP: {"message":"Git LFS operation \"objects\" is not supported by this server."}
trace git-lfs: HTTP:
Git LFS: (0 of 1 files) 0 B / 87.12 KB
Git LFS operation "objects" is not supported by this server.
Git LFS operation "objects" is not supported by this server.
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15485
Summary:
Ref T10604. This uses the new standalone stream reader introduced in D15483 to read request data, instead of putting the logic in PhabricatorStartup.
It also doesn't read request data until it specifically needs to. This supports, e.g., streaming Git LFS PUT requests, and streaming more types of requests in the future.
Test Plan: See D15483. Made various different types of requests and wasn't immediately able to break anything.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15484
Summary:
Ref T7789. This implements a (probably) usable "git-lfs-authenticate" on top of the new temporary token infrastructure.
This won't actually do anything yet, since nothing reads the tokens.
Test Plan:
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate'
phabricator-ssh-exec: Expected `git-lfs-authenticate <path> <operation>`, but received too few arguments.
```
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate x'
phabricator-ssh-exec: Unrecognized repository path "x". Expected a path like "/diffusion/X/" or "/diffusion/123/".
```
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/22'
Exception: Expected `git-lfs-authenticate <path> <operation>`, but received too few arguments.
```
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/22 y'
Exception: Git LFS operation "y" is not supported by this server.
```
```
$ ./bin/ssh-exec --phabricator-ssh-user admin --ssh-command 'git-lfs-authenticate diffusion/22 upload'
{"header":{"Authorization":"Basic QGdpdC1sZnM6NmR2bDVreWVsaXNuMmtnNXBtbnZwM3VlaWhubmI1bmI="},"href":"http:\/\/local.phacility.com\/diffusion\/22\/new-callsign-free-repository.git\/info\/lfs"}
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7789
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15482
Summary:
Ref T10560. Reverts D15460. See that task for discussion: we dug up some more information to explain the behavior, and this key was just sort of sidestepping an analyze/cardinality estimate issue on the index.
With proper cardinality estimates it shouldn't be used, so just nuke it.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage adjust`, saw key drop.
Reviewers: eadler, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10560
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15486
Summary: Fixes T10603. This is the last of the ad-hoc temporary tokens.
Test Plan:
- Used a file token.
- Viewed type in {nav Config > Temporary Tokens}.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15481
Summary: Ref T10603. Swap these over and give them nice UI strings.
Test Plan:
- Refreshed a Twitter OAuth link.
- Unlinked and re-linked a Twitter account.
- Viewed the new type in {nav Config > Temporary Tokens}.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15480
Summary:
Ref T10603. We have a couple of sort of ad-hoc tokens, so start formalizing them. First up is MFA tokens.
Also adds a new config module panel for these.
Test Plan:
- Added MFA.
- Added MFA, intentionally fumbled the input, completed the workflow.
- Removed MFA.
- Viewed tokens, saw MFA sync tokens.
- Viewed new module config panel.
{F1177014}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15479
