1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-01 03:02:43 +01:00
Commit graph

29 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
43b35a02ce Use hybrid properties + search for Releeph branches, too
Summary: Ref T3092. Same deal as D6771, but for branches rather than projects.

Test Plan: {F54855}

Reviewers: btrahan, chad

Reviewed By: chad

CC: chad, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3092

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6775
2013-08-21 12:31:48 -07:00
epriestley
dcec8e60cc Move edit/deactivate operations onto project view page in Releeph
Summary:
Ref T3092.

Releeph's objects basically go like this:

  - At the top level, we have Projects (like "www" or "libphutil")
  - Each project has Branches (like "LATEST" or "v1.1.3")
  - Each branch has Requests (like pull requests, e.g. "please merge commit X into branch Y (in project Z)")

Currently, there's no real "project detail" or "branch detail" page. Instead, we have a search results page for their contained objects. That is, the "project detail" page shows a list of branches in the project, using ApplicationSearch.

This means that operations like "edit" and "deactivate" are one level up, on the respective list pages.

Instead, move details onto the detail pages. This gives us more room for actions and information, and simplifies the list views.

Basically, these are "detail pages" where the object content is a search interface. We do something simliar to this in Phame right now, although it's messier there (no ApplicationSearch yet).

@chad, you might have some ideas here. Roughly, the design question is "How should we present an object's detail view when its content is really a search interface (Phame Blog for Posts, Releeph Project for Branches)?"

I think the simple approach I've taken here (see screenshot) gives us reasonable results, but overall it's something we haven't done much or done too much thinking about, I think.

Test Plan: {F54774}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: chad, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3092

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6771
2013-08-19 18:30:30 -07:00
epriestley
751cd547c2 Remove dust from page construction
Summary:
  ^\s+(['"])dust\1\s*=>\s*true,?\s*$\n

Test Plan: Looked through the diff.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

CC: aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6769
2013-08-19 18:09:35 -07:00
epriestley
bd17fac935 Modernize Releeph branch edit and create interfaces
Summary: Ref T3092. Fixes T3724. Use modern/flexible UI for these interfaces. Removes the ability to retarget an existing branch (you can just close it and open a new one if you made a mistake).

Test Plan: {F54437} {F54438}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T3724

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6765
2013-08-16 18:58:26 -07:00
epriestley
210e30c257 Use ApplicationSearch for Releeph branch lists
Summary:
Releeph branch lists in project views have a bunch of custom UI right now; give them more standard UI and ApplicationSearch.

This drops a small piece of functionality: we now show only a total open request count instead of a detailed enumeration of each request status. I assume this is reasonable (that is, the important piece is "is there something to do on this branch?"), but we can muck with it if the more detailed status is important.

Test Plan: {F54344}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: LegNeato, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3656

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6764
2013-08-16 18:55:35 -07:00
epriestley
23e68ee8cb Use ApplicationSearch in ReleephBranchView
Summary:
Ref T3721. Releeph currently attempts to implement a flexible, field-driven search for branches, but it's building all of its own infrastructure and it ends up heading down some weird paths. In particular, it loads **every** request and then makes calls into fields to filter them. It also tries to be very very general, which isn't really necessary (for example, I think it's reasonable for us to assume that we won't let you disable the "requestor" field).

ApplicationSearch and CustomField provide more scalable approaches to this problem; move search on top of them. The query still ends up doing some filtering in-process, but it's now far more limited in scope and can be denormalized later.

Test Plan: {F54304}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: chad, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3721

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6758
2013-08-14 15:38:52 -07:00
epriestley
7821c98053 Use PhabricatorCustomField infrastructure to render Releeph custom fields on the edit screen
Summary:
Ref T3718. This moves custom field rendering on the edit screen to PhabricatorCustomField and makes all the APIs conformant.

We still run through edit with both old-school and new-school sets of fields, because the actual editing isn't on the new stuff yet. That will happen in a diff or two.

Test Plan: Edited a request; intentionally introduced errors and verified the form behaved as expected.

Reviewers: btrahan, testuser1122344

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3718

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6756
2013-08-14 15:36:13 -07:00
epriestley
74de24909b Partially move Releeph custom fields to PhabricatorCustomField
Summary:
Fixes T3661. Ref T3718. This makes Releeph custom fields extend PhabricatorCustomField so we can start moving over other pieces of infrastructure (rendering, storage, etc) to run through the same pathways. It's roughly the minimum amount of work required to be able to move forward.

NOTE: This removes per-project custom field selectors. Fields are now configured for an entire install. My understanding is that Facebook does not use this feature, and modern field infrastructure has moved away from selectors.

Test Plan: Viewed and edited projects, branches, and requests in Releeph. Grepped for removed config. Grepped for `field_selector`.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: LegNeato, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3661, T3718

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6750
2013-08-14 12:34:07 -07:00
epriestley
a84cc777c8 Remove "Project ID" from Releeph Projects
Summary:
Fixes T3660. Releeph Projects currently have an unused one-to-one mapping to Phabricator projects. This isn't consistent with other applications and has no integrations or uses. Get rid of it.

NOTE: Waiting for signoff from @legneato on T3660 before pulling the trigger here.

Test Plan: Created and edited Releeph projects. Grepped for references to project ID; there are a dozen or so but they're all either Releeph projects or Arcanist projects.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: LegNeato, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3660

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6635
2013-08-14 09:00:56 -07:00
epriestley
296818e129 Remove ReleephProject->repositoryID writes
Summary: Ref T3655. Depends on D6633. This removes the writes and the column.

Test Plan: Created a project, edited a project. Verified the table doesn't have any keys including this column.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: LegNeato, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3655

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6634
2013-08-14 09:00:25 -07:00
epriestley
a7955e919c Remove all reads of ReleephProject->repositoryID
Summary:
Ref T3655. ReleephProject currently has both `repositoryID` and `repositoryPHID`, which point to the same object and are reudundant. Get rid of all reads of `repositoryID`.

NOTE: This makes project loads depend on repository loads. The eventual rule here will be that you must be able to see a repository in order to see projects for that repository, which seems like a reasonable rule. We might need to tailor it more than this (e.g., if there are branch read permissions down the line) but this seems like a reasonable minimum.

Test Plan: Grepped for `repositoryID` in `releeph/`. Called `releeph.getbranches`.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: LegNeato, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3655

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6633
2013-08-14 08:59:28 -07:00
epriestley
ece246cb72 Modernize Releeph Request create/edit controller
Summary: Ref T3092.

Test Plan: Created a new pick request. Edited an existing pick request.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3092

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6630
2013-07-30 12:38:32 -07:00
epriestley
333e377488 Modernize Releeph project create controller
Summary:
Ref T3092.

  - Check for a duplicate key error;
  - do less single loading and use Query classes;
  - use responsive UI elements;
  - add crumbs.

Test Plan: Created a new project, and hit error cases.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3092

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6629
2013-07-30 12:38:11 -07:00
epriestley
cf9dc5d189 Fix bug when multiple comment forms appear on a single page
Summary:
Ref T3373. The submit listener doesn't properly scope the form it listens to right now, so several forms on the page mean that comments post to one of them more or less at random.

Scope it properly by telling it which object PHID it is associated with.

Test Plan: Made Question comments, saw comments Ajax in on the question itself rather than on an arbitrary answer.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3373

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6611
2013-07-29 12:04:10 -07:00
epriestley
215da7728f Use ApplicationSearch in Releeph project list
Summary: Ref T3092. Convert Releeph project list to ApplicationSearch.

Test Plan: {F50333}

Reviewers: btrahan, edward

Reviewed By: edward

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3092

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6474
2013-07-21 08:44:53 -07:00
epriestley
904a24c1df Provide an application-wide controller for Releeph
Summary: Fixes T3548. Concrete Releeph controllers currently extend either from ReleephController or PhabricatorController directly. Instead, make them all extend ReleephController. Introduce ReleephProjectController for controllers which depend on project context. Project context code which lived in ReleephController moves to ReleephProjectController.

Test Plan: Viewed list, project, releases, requests.

Reviewers: btrahan, edward

Reviewed By: edward

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3548

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6472
2013-07-21 08:42:10 -07:00
Chad Little
f1bf27959f PHUIList, PHUIDocument updates
Summary:
This diff covers a bit of ground.

- PHUIDocumentExample has been added
- PHUIDocument has been extended with new features
- PhabricatorMenuView is now PHUIListView
- PhabricatorMenuItemView is now PHUIItemListView

Overall - I think I've gotten all the edges covered here. There is some derpi-ness that we can talk about, comments in the code. Responsive design is missing from the new features on PHUIDocument, will follow up later.

Test Plan: Tested mobile and desktop menus, old phriction layout, new document views, new lists, and object lists.

Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6130
2013-06-05 08:41:43 -07:00
Edward Speyer
55f8e2a565 Let requestors claim their code is picked
Summary:
In Releeph, `ReleephRequestHeaderView` will render you a "mark-manually-picked" button if (a) you are authoritative (chuckr) or (b) you are the person who created this Releeph request.

However `ReleephRequestActionController`, which handles these button presses, will only do something if you are (a).  This patch honors your button pressing if you are (b) as well.

Test Plan: Push buttons.  There's another bug in the Javascript do-stuff-without-reloading-the-page code that handles these button pushes, but I'd like to fix that separately from handling this hi-pri bug.

Reviewers: epriestley, wez

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6036
2013-05-28 16:21:26 +01:00
epriestley
1430c2c449 Provide a concrete class for one-off remarkup blocks
Summary: I want to use some of these for instructional text in Diffusion. Provide a concrete class to make one-offs cacheable and switch Releeph to use it.

Test Plan: {F44175}

Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6032
2013-05-24 12:37:53 -07:00
epriestley
6dda35897a Use setContentSourceFromRequest() in more places
Summary: I introduced this helper at some point, clean up all the code duplication around content sources.

Test Plan: Grepped; hit edit interfaces for most/all of these.

Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward

Reviewed By: chad

CC: aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6030
2013-05-24 10:48:34 -07:00
Bob Trahan
016b62a7ef Diffusion - move some DiffusionRequest queries to occur over Conduit
Summary: Ref T2784. This one was a wee bit complicated. Had to add PhabricatorUser and concept of initFromConduit (or not) to DiffusionRequest.

Test Plan: foreach repo, visited CALLSIGN and clicked a commit and verified they laoded correctly. Hacked code to hit NOT via Conduit and repeated tests to great success.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: chad, aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T2784

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5928
2013-05-14 15:32:19 -07:00
Edward Speyer
fcb7286533 ReleephRequest xactions
Summary:
Migrate to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions` (`ReleephRequestTransactions` applied by `ReleephRequestTransactionalEditor`, instead of `ReleephRequestEvents` created by `ReleephRequestEditor`) and migrate all the old events into transactions.  Email is supported in the standard way (no more `ReleephRequestMail`) as well.

This also collapses the Releeph request create and edit controllers into one class, as well as breaking everyone's subject-based mail rules by standardising them (but which should be more easily filtered by looking at headers.)

Test Plan:
* Make requests, then pick them.
* Pick and revert the same request so that discovery happens way after `arc` has told Releeph about what's been happening.
* Try to pick something that fails to pick in a project with pick instructions (and see the instructions are in the email.)
* Load all of FB's Releeph data into my DB and run the `storage upgrade` script.
* Request a commit via the "action" in a Differential revision.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: epriestley, aran, Korvin, wez

Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T2720

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5868
2013-05-11 15:20:09 +01:00
Edward Speyer
00cc6b1ba5 Double escape %N (%%N) for pht in Releeph project editor
Summary: Oops, `pht()` interpolates percent escape sequences, but this is a literal "%N".

Test Plan: Edit a Releeph project; notice no errors.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5897
2013-05-11 14:00:18 +01:00
Edward Speyer
48b7539d7d Cache the Releeph project edit page's help remarkup
Summary: I wrote some of the Releeph-project edit-page's help in remarkup.  This renders the remarkup using the `PhabricatorMarkupEngine` pipeline.

Test Plan:
* Edit a Releeph project.
* Feel the cool base of a laptop whose CPU is no longer being thrashed by onerous remarkup rendering duties.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T3098

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5898
2013-05-10 22:39:36 +01:00
Edward Speyer
5b2fc6a184 Simplify ReleephRequest schema
Summary:
Removing a bunch of cache-style columns from `ReleephRequest`, where it's actually much easier to just load the information at runtime.

This makes sense for migrating to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions`, where each xaction changes one aspect of a `ReleephRequest` at a time (rather than multiple columns at once.)

Test Plan: Request something, run `arc releeph` and watch the picks, pass on some RQs, run `arc releeph` and watch the reverts.

Reviewers: wez, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: epriestley, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2720

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5851
2013-05-08 10:27:20 +01:00
Chad Little
8eb85683f0 pht for Releeph
Summary: Went and pht'd most everything I could find, except exceptions. Fixes T3091

Test Plan: Bopped around the application, didn't seem to break anything but didn't test all flows. Should be safe.

Reviewers: epriestley, edward

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T3091

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5825
2013-05-03 18:33:49 -07:00
epriestley
ae1f0e3b1b Introduce ReleephProjectQuery
Summary:
Adds a policy-aware query class for selecting Releeph projects. This doesn't really change anything.

  - Make `ReleephProject` implment `PhabricatorPolicyInterface`, beginning the long journey to make it policy-aware.
  - Implement `ReleephProjectQuery`, for querying projects using cursor-based, policy-aware paging.
  - Use it on the list view, so we load only ~100 projects instead of all of them.
  - Tweaked some of the URI routing stuff to make it a little more consistent with common practices.

Ref T2714.

Test Plan:
{F36434}
{F36435}

Reviewers: edward

Reviewed By: edward

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2714

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5390
2013-03-22 06:29:37 -07:00
Anh Nhan Nguyen
04869c6fcc Made declaration of ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController::willProcessRequest() consistent with AphrontController::willProcessRequest(array $uri_data)
Summary:
When submitting a diff I noticed that the unit test `testEverythingImplemented` threw an error that did not fail a test.

```
[2013-03-18 16:35:16] ERROR 2048: Declaration of ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController::willProcessRequest() should be compatible with AphrontController::willProcessRequest(array $uri_data) at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/phabricator/src/applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php:99]
  #0 PhutilBootloader::executeInclude called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/__phutil_library_init__.php:203]
  #1 PhutilBootloader::executeInclude(/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/phabricator/src/applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/__phutil_library_init__.php:193]
  #2 PhutilBootloader::loadLibrarySource(phabricator, applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/symbols/PhutilSymbolLoader.php:341]
  #3 PhutilSymbolLoader::loadSymbol(Array of size 4 starting with: { type => class }) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/symbols/PhutilSymbolLoader.php:246]
  #4 PhutilSymbolLoader::selectAndLoadSymbols() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/phabricator/src/infrastructure/__tests__/PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase.php:15]
  #5 PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase::testEverythingImplemented()
  #6 call_user_func_array(Array of size 2 starting with: { 0 => Object PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase }, Array ) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/src/unit/engine/phutil/ArcanistPhutilTestCase.php:441]
  #7 ArcanistPhutilTestCase::run() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/src/unit/engine/PhutilUnitTestEngine.php:60]
  #8 PhutilUnitTestEngine::run() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/src/workflow/ArcanistUnitWorkflow.php:160]
  #9 ArcanistUnitWorkflow::run() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/scripts/arcanist.php:271]
```

Test Plan:
`arc unit --everything` before this change gave error.

applied this change. Re-ran `arc unit --everything`, no error.

Reviewers: edward

Reviewed By: edward

CC: aran, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5373
2013-03-19 06:04:43 -07:00
Edward Speyer
2497e5b5ed Releeph (Phabricator part)
Summary: A copy of the Releeph release tool.

Test Plan: Generally, click everything at least once.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan

Maniphest Tasks: T2094

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4932
2013-03-15 11:28:43 +00:00