Summary: Ref T5750. This makes browse work for all of the dynamic tokenizers in Herald, Policies, batch editor, etc.
Test Plan: Used tokenizers in Herald, Policies, Batch editor.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12442
Summary:
Ref T4420. This doesn't share all the code it really should, and renders a little odd. Make it more standard.
(Icons aren't handled totally correctly but there's no usability impact and all that code should just get cleaned up.)
Test Plan: Used custom policy typeahead, had a more standard experience.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9902
Summary: As advised by JSHint.
Test Plan: I'm not really sure how to comprehensively test this. It looks okay to me.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9677
Summary: Takes a pass at standardizing spacing and colors for lists and tokens.
Test Plan: Tested a lot of lists, policy, timeline, quick create, diffusion.
Reviewers: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9325
Summary:
Updates policy, headers, typeaheads to FA over policy icons
Need advice - can't seem to place where icons come from on Typeahead? Wrong icons and wrong colors.... it is late
Test Plan:
- grepped for SPRITE_STATUS
- grepped for sprite-status
- grepped for setStatus for headers
- grepped individual icons names
Browsed numerous places, checked new dropdowns, see pudgy people.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4739
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9179
Summary: Ref T603. When a user selects "Custom", we pop open the rules dialog and let them create a new rule or edit the existing rule.
Test Plan: Set some objects to have custom policies.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7300
Summary: Currently, when a dialog is submitted the Workflow itself emits an event but no DOM event is emitted. The workflow event is fine for handlers which only use JS, but there's currently no way for a handler to act more like a normal form handler. This event gives normal form handlers a way to capture Workflow submits and muck around with form contents, etc.
Test Plan: In a future diff, edited policies via a Workflow dialog.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7295
Summary: Ref T603. Make this a little easier to use by highlighting the current value.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7289
Summary: Ref T603. After thinking about this for a bit I can't really come up with anything better than what Facebook does, so I'm going to implement something similar for choosing custom policies. To start with, swap this over to a JS-driven dropdown.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7285
Summary:
Ref T603. This isn't remotely usable yet, but I wanted to get any feedback before I build it out anymore.
I think this is a reasonable interface for defining custom policies? It's basically similar to Herald, although it's a bit simpler.
I imagine users will rarely interact with this, but this will service the high end of policy complexity (and allow the definition of things like "is member of LDAP group" or whatever).
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7217
