Summary:
Ref T9964. I added several hacks to get these working. Clean them up and pull this into a proper extension.
The behavior in the web UI is:
- they work in all applications; but
- they only show up in the UI if a value is specified.
So if you visit `/view/?ids=1,2` you get the field, but normally it's not present. We could refine this later. I'm going to add documentation about how to prefill these forms regardless, which should make this discoverable by reading the documentation.
There's one teensey weensey hack: in the API, I push these fields to the top of the table. That one feels OK, since it's purely a convenience/display adjustment.
Test Plan: Queried by IDs, reviewed docs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14769
Summary: Ref T9964. I left a couple of these unsupported for now since they're weird in some way.
Test Plan: {F1024031}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14767
Summary:
Ref T9964. Fill in more parameter types and descriptions.
(No date support yet since it's a bit more involved.)
Test Plan: {F1024022}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14766
Summary: Ref T9964. This fills in types and descriptions for ApplicationSearch fields in Paste.
Test Plan:
Got this nice table now:
{F1023999}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14765
Summary:
Ref T9964. I want to show users what we're expecting in "constraints", and let constraints like "authors=epriestley" work to make things easier.
I'm generally very happy with the "HTTPParameterType" stuff from EditEngine, so add a parallel set of "ConduitParameterType" classes. These are a little simpler than the HTTP ones, but have a little more validation logic.
Test Plan:
This is really just a proof of concept; some of these fields are now filled in:
{F1023845}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14763
Summary:
Ref T9964. Adds a new-style "owners.search" endpoint, and an extension for customfields.
Puts enough indirection in place to give us nice, consistent "custom.key" user-facing keys instead of "std:custom:owners:na0shf9a8dfdsafl" junk.
Test Plan:
- Searched Owners via API.
- Searched by ID.
- Ordered by custom fields.
- Reviewed API docs.
- Used normal search with ordering.
- Viewed custom field values in search results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14758
Summary:
Ref T9964. See that task for some context and discussion.
Ref T7715, which has the bigger picture here.
Basically, I want Conduit read endpoints to be full-power, ApplicationSearch-driven endpoints, so that applications can:
- Write one EditEngine and get web + conduit writes for free.
- Write one SearchEngine and get web + conduit reads for free.
I previously made some steps toward this, but this puts more of the structure in place.
Test Plan:
Viewed API console endpoint and read 20 pages of docs:
{F1021961}
Made various calls: with query keys, constraints, pagination, and limits.
Viewed new {nav Config > Modules} page.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14743
Summary: Move some `PhabricatorSearchField` subclasses to be adjacent to the application to which they belong. This seems generally better to me than lumping them all together in the `src/applications/search/field/` directory. I was also wondering if it makes sense to rename these subclasses as `PhabricatorXSearchField` rather than `PhabricatorSearchXField` (as per T5655), but wasn't really sure if these objects are meant to be search-fields, or just fields belonging to the #search application.
Test Plan: N/A.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13374
Summary: Ref T7950, Refactor Calendar Search, and implement Projects on events
Test Plan: Verify that all queries in Calendar search still work, and that events can now have associated Projects that you can search by in Calendar Search.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7950
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13393
Summary:
If you have a saved query with an order alias, we currently apply the order correctly but don't show the right value in the UI.
Map any saved value to the canoncial value when rendering the control.
Test Plan: Added some `var_dump()` and verified order key was getting mapped forward correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13227
Summary: Ref T8441. Ref T7715. I'm primarily clearing callers to `saveQueryOrder()` so I can get rid of it.
Test Plan: Used all Macro search features.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13194
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. Automatically generate a modern "Order" control in ApplicationSearch for engines which fully support SearchField.
Notably, this allows the standard "Order" control to automatically support custom field orders. We do this in Maniphest today, but in an ad-hoc way.
Test Plan: Performed order-by queries in Almanac (Services), Pholio, Files, People, Projects, and Paste.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13193
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. For modern Query classes, automatically make subscriber queries and SearchField integrations work.
In particular, we can just drive this query with EdgeLogic and don't need to do anything specific on these Query classes beyond making sure they're implemented in a way that picks up all of the EdgeLogic clauses.
Test Plan:
- Searched for subscribers in Pholio, Files, Paste, and Projects.
- Searched for all other fields in Projects to check that Query changes are OK.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13191
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. This is mostly about getting SearchFields + CustomFields working.
(This includes a couple of SearchFields which aren't used quite yet.)
Test Plan:
- Used all search controls.
- Defined custom fields and searched for them.
- Created an old saved search which searches on custom fields on master, switched to this patch, search worked exaclty as written.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13189
Summary: Ref T8441. Does what it says, provided other conditions (like using the new SearchField stuff) are fulfilled.
Test Plan:
{F473836}
{F473837}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13171
Summary: Ref T8441. Ref T7715. Let SearchFields do some value massaging before buiding queries so we don't have to work as hard in each SearchEngine. Particularly, they can handle evaluateTokens() from Tokenizers.
Test Plan: Paste automatically gained access to `viewer()`, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13170
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. Add a layer of indirection to fields in search engines. This will allow us to:
- Simplify SearchEngine code, which has collected a lot of duplication around expressing what is effectively field types.
- Automatically add fields like "Spaces" and "Projects" (primary driver for T8441).
- Reorder or hide fields (not sure if we really want to do this, but it seems plausible, and this will let us play around with it, at least).
- Drive Conduit Query methods via SearchEngines, so the same code specifies both the search UI and the `application.query` endpoint (primary driver in T7715).
Test Plan:
- Searched for stuff in Paste, everything behaved exaclty like it used to (except that I removed the "no language" checkbox, which seemed like fluff from a bygone era).
- Searched for stuff in other applications, saw no changes.
- Hit date field errors.
- Used query strings to specify values.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13169
