Summary: In Maniphest, we provide an additional caption shortcut if you can create projects, which has no use if you cant. Fixes T6969
Test Plan: Check page with and without a user's capability.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6969
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11390
Summary: Ref T5752, moves mobile action menus to the object box instead of crumbs.
Test Plan: View action menus at tablet, desktop, and mobile break points. Verify clicking buttons works as expected opening menu.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5752
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11340
Summary:
Fixes T6932. Fixes some issues from D11303.
- When claiming a task, if it was previously unassigned, we would try to CC `null`.
- When claiming a task, if the current owner was already CC'd, the viewer would incorrectly be warned about all subscribers being CC'd.
Test Plan:
- Claimed an unclaimed task.
- Claimed a task with owner CC'd.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6932
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11336
Summary: Fixes T6732. Fix is to stop trying to catch the error in the controller and let the editor do its job.
Test Plan: tried to add an existing subscriber and got an error message about how that wouldn't do anything
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6732
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11303
Summary: Fixes T6179. This makes the interaction where users remove a task from a workboard much more pleasant.
Test Plan: Loaded up workboard for "A Project". Edited tasks and if / when I removed "A Project" they disappeared on save.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11259
Summary: Fixes T6555, The following should 404: /maniphest/task/create/?parent=asdf, /maniphest/task/create/?parent=0, /maniphest/task/create/?parent=999999 (where T999999 does not exist)
Test Plan: Navigate to /maniphest/task/create/?parent=asdf or /maniphest/task/create/?parent=0 or /maniphest/task/create/?parent=999999 (where T999999 does not exist). See 404.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6555
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11258
Summary: This class is no longer used after D6673.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11167
Summary: Modernize Pholio edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Attached a mock to a task, observed the expected comment in the transaction view (both ways).
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11113
Summary:
Ref T4411
I'm not quite sure if this is the right place for this as it will be difficult to provide proper user feedback of why we removed a particular subscriber.
Is the ApplicationTransactionEditor generally the right place to extract mentioned phids in comments?
On the other hand in some cases we cannot really give user feedback why a user was not subscribed (e.g.: commits & diffs)
Adding a diff to a repo where the user mentioned has no view permissions the subscriber is currently still added. Still would have to find where this is donet...
Any other places?
Unrelated: Is there any way to remove a subscriber from a commit/audit ?
Test Plan:
- Edited tasks with the mentioned user having view permissions to this specific task and without
- Raised concern with a commit and commented on the audit with the user having view permissions to the repo and without
- Added a commit to a repo with and without the mentioned user having permissions
- Mention a user in a task & commit comment with and without permissions
- Mentioning a user in a diff description & comments with and without permissions to the specific diff
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4411
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11049
Summary: Modernize Differential edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: From previous experience, these changes are fairly trivial and safe. I poked around a little to make sure things looked reasonably okay.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, Krenair, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11074
Summary:
...except the transaction class itself, which still needs some knowledge of these transactions for older installs.
Ref T5245. T5604 and T5245 are now in a similar place -- there's an unknown set of bugs introduced from my changes and there's still old display code lying around with some old transactions in the database. I'll stomp out the bugs if / when they surface and data migration is up next.
This revision also adds a "TransactionPreviewString" method to the edge objects so that we can have a prettier "Bob edited associated projects." preview of this transaction.
Test Plan: added a project from task detail and saw correct preview throughout process with correct project added. bulk removed a project from some tasks. added a project from the edit details pane.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11013
Summary: Ref T5245. This is some of the associated cleanup there.
Test Plan:
foreach ManiphestTaskQuery site, I made the change (or not) and tested as follows:
=== Call sites where added needProjectPHIDs ===
- PhabricatorHomeMainController - loaded the home page
- ManiphestBatchEditController - batch edited some tasks (added a project)
- ManiphestConduitAPIMethod - tested implicitly when tested ManiphestUpdateConduitAPIMethod
- ManiphestInfoConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit console with input id : 1
- ManiphestQueryConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit console with input ids : [1, 2]
- ManiphestUpdateConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit with input id : 1 and comment : “asdasds"
- ManiphestReportController - viewed “By User” and “By Project”
- ManiphestSubpriorityController - changed the priority of a task via a drag on manphest home
- ManiphestTaskMailReceiver - updated Task 1 via bin/mail receive-test with a comment that is the README
- ManiphestTaskSearchEngine - loaded Manifest home page
- ManiphestTaskEditController - edited a task
- ManiphestTransactionEditor - closed a blocking task
- ManiphestTransactionSaveController - commented on a task
- PhabricatorProjectProfileController - viewed project with id of 1 that has a few tasks in it
- PhabricatorSearchAttachController - merged tasks together
- DifferentialTransactionEditor - submit a diff that references a task; commit the diff (thus closing the diff) and the task gets updated
- PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageParserWorker - submit a diff that references a task; commit the diff (thus closing the diff) and the task gets updated
=== Calls sites where *did not* add needProjectPHIDs (they do not appear in this revision) ===
- PhabricatorManiphestApplication - loaded the home page
- ManiphestGetTaskTransactionsConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit console with input ids : [1, 2] ManiphestTaskDetailController - viewed a task with and without associated projects; finished workflow creating a task with a parent
- ManiphestTransactionPreviewController - verified transaction preview showed up properly
- PhabricatorProjectBoardViewController - viewed a board
- PhabricatorProjectMoveController - moved a task around
- ManiphestRemarkupRule - made a task reference like {T123}
- ManiphestTaskQuery - executed a custom query for all tasks with page size of 2 and paginated through some tasks
- ManiphestTaskPHIDType - nothing random seems broken? =D
=== Call sites where had to do something funky ===
- ManiphestHovercardEventListener - loaded hover cards from task mentions
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11004
Summary: Fixes T5604. This should fix some random bugs, lets us move forward more easily, and all that good stuff about killing code debt.
Test Plan:
- Conduit method maniphest.createtask
- verified creating user subscribed
- verified subscription transaction
- Conduit method maniphest.update
- verified subscribers set as specified to ccPHIDs parameter
- verified subscription transaction
- Herald
- verified herald rule to add subscriber worked
- verified no subscribers removed accidentally
- edit controller
- test create and verify author gets added IFF they put themselves in subscribers control box
- test update gets set to exactly what user enters
- lipsum generator'd tasks work
- bulk add subscribers works
- bulk remove subscriber works
- detail controller
- added myself by leaving a comment
- added another user via explicit action
- added another user via implicit mention
- task merge via search attach controller
- mail reply handler
- add subscriber via ./bin/mail receive-test
- unsubscribe via ./bin/mail receive-test
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10965
Summary: See <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T906>. This behavior is a bug; we should remove the button if the user can't use the application.
Test Plan:
- With Macro uninstalled, did these things verifying the button vanished:
- Sent a user a message.
- Edited a revision.
- Edited repository basic information.
- Edited an initiative.
- Edited a Harbormaster build step.
- Added task comments.
- Edited profile blurb.
- Edited blog description.
- Commented on Pholio mock.
- Uploaded Pholio image.
- Edited Phortune merchant.
- Edited Phriction document.
- Edited Ponder answer.
- Edited Ponder question.
- Edited Slowvote poll.
- Edited a comment.
- Reinstalled Macro and saw button come back.
- Used button to put silly text on a funny picture.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10900
Summary: Finishes up work on PHUIInsetForm, cleans up the UI a bit when editing multiple tasks
Test Plan:
Edit multiple tasks, apply some new projects, still works as expected.
{F236044}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10881
Summary: ...way way down in PhabricatorController. Use it on ManiphestTaskDetailController to test it. Ref T4712. I think the pager logic to be added as part of T4712 can safely reside entirely within this method. As I said earlier, 5 parameters is a lot, so I don't really want to add more. Next diff would do the pagination logic and the diff after that would deploy it everywhere. If while deploying it everywhere I find something off, that will be a different diff.
Test Plan: viewed maniphest tasks and they looked as spiffy as ever.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4712
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10844
Summary: Missed this in previous pass. Send these as links in HTML emails.
Test Plan: Register a new user that nees approval.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10815
Summary:
Ref T5702. This is a forward-looking change which provides some very broad API improvements but does not implement them. In particular:
- Controllers no longer require `$request` to construct. This is mostly for T5702, directly, but simplifies things in general. Instead, we call `setRequest()` before using a controller. Only a small number of sites activate controllers, so this is less code overall, and more consistent with most constructors not having any parameters or effects.
- `$request` now offers `getURIData($key, ...)`. This is an alternate way of accessing `$data` which is currently only available on `willProcessRequest(array $data)`. Almost all controllers which implement this method do so in order to read one or two things out of the URI data. Instead, let them just read this data directly when processing the request.
- Introduce `handleRequest(AphrontRequest $request)` and deprecate (very softly) `processRequest()`. The majority of `processRequest()` calls begin `$request = $this->getRequest()`, which is avoided with the more practical signature.
- Provide `getViewer()` on `$request`, and a convenience `getViewer()` on `$controller`. This fixes `$viewer = $request->getUser();` into `$viewer = $request->getViewer();`, and converts the `$request + $viewer` two-liner into a single `$this->getViewer()`.
Test Plan:
- Browsed around in general.
- Hit special controllers (redirect, 404).
- Hit AuditList controller (uses new style).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10698
Summary: Ref T6031. I figure its totally cool to include the user creating the task as a subscriber, even if from the template case, so just do that there too. Code is written such that if the user wasn't already in the subscriber case they end up being the last person in the tokenizer. Theoretically this should make any users who didn't want to be automagically subscribed via the create from template case to remove themselves.
Test Plan: made a template from a task that didn't have me as a subscriber initially and observed i was a subscriber.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6031
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10408
Summary: Fixes T6029. We should append custom fields last so they show up after things like projects, tokens, etc that render via UI events.
Test Plan: viewed a task with custom fields and projects was last
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10407
Summary:
Fixes T5140. When you ajax-edit a task and we send back a full-size card, we currently always put a drag grip on it.
If you clicked the "edit" thing from a priority-ordered list, this is appropriate. However, if you clicked it from some other type of list, it is not.
Pass the expected grippableness through the call.
Test Plan:
- Edited a task from a reorderable (priority-ordered) view, got grip.
- Edited a task from a nonreorderable (author-ordered) view, got no grip.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10282
Summary: Fixes T5829. This stuff is old and busted, but keep it working for now.
Test Plan: No more fatal when there are recently closed tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5829
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10201
Summary:
Ref T4807. This is probably a complete fix, but I'd be surprised if there isn't a little cleanup I missed.
When users drag tasks on a "natural"-ordered workboard, leave things where they put them.
This isn't //too// bad since a lot of the existing work is completely reusable (e.g., we don't need any new JS).
Test Plan:
- Dragged a bunch of stuff around, it stayed where I put it after dropped and when reloaded.
- Dragged stuff across priorities, no zany priority changes (in "natural" mode).
- Created new tasks, they show up at the top.
- Tagged new tasks, they show up at the top of backlog.
- Swapped to "priority" mode and got sorting and the old priority-altering reordering.
- Added tasks in priority mode.
- Viewed task transactions for correctness/sanity.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10182
Summary:
Ref T4807. This doesn't actually do anything yet, but adds a dropdown menu for choosing an ordering and gets all the UI working correctly.
This also fixes a bug where column hidden state wouldn't persist across filter changes.
(I won't land this until it does something, but the next diff will probably be a mess so this seemed like a clean place to sever things.)
Test Plan:
{F187114}
- Altered sort ordering.
- Altered hidden state and filters, verified all states persisted correctly.
- Added `phlog()` to edit/create and move controllers and verified they receive sort information.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: swisspol, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10178
Summary:
Ref T5245. This removes some hacks and activates two meaningful interactions:
- The "projects" field goes through shared code now.
- Mentioning projects in tasks using hashtags now tags them.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a task with projects.
- Viewed a task with no projects.
- Viewed a task with projects and board positions.
- Viewed a revision with projects.
- Made a `#hashtag` comment in Maniphest and got a project association.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10177
Summary:
Fixes T5476. Using edges to store which objects are on which board columns ends up being pretty awkward. In particular, it makes T4807 very difficult to implement.
Introduce a dedicated `BoardColumnPosition` storage.
This doesn't affect ordering rules (T4807) yet: boards are still arranged by priority. We just read which tasks are on which columns out of a new table.
Test Plan:
- Migrated data, then viewed some boards. Saw exactly the same data.
- Dragged tasks from column to column.
- Created a task directly into a column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10160
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Ref T4420. This one is users plus "upforgrabs". I renamed that to "none" and gave it a special visual style to make it more discoverable. Future diffs will improve this.
Test Plan:
- Used it in global search.
- Used it in batch editor.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9891
Summary: Ref T4420. This is just "project", plus the special "no project" token, but that doesn't actually work. Replace it with a normal project typeahead. This is only used in Maniphest's reports.
Test Plan: Searched for a couple of projects in reports.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9890
Summary:
Ref T5245. We'll still display the old ones, but write real edge transactions now -- not TYPE_PROJECTS transactions.
Some code remains to show the existing transactions. The next diff will modernize the old transactions so we can remove this code.
Test Plan:
- Previewed a project-editing comment.
- Submitted a project-editing comment.
- Edited a task's projects.
- Batch edited a task's projects.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9852
Summary: Ref T5245. This property predates edges and is unusual in modern applications. Stop writes to it and populate it implicitly from edges when querying.
Test Plan:
- Viewed task list.
- Created a task.
- Added and removed projects from tasks.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9851
Summary: Ref T5245. This moves the actual storage over and stops reads and writes to the old table.
Test Plan:
- Verified tasks retained projects across the migration.
- Added and removed projects from tasks.
- Searched for: all, any, users' projects, not-in-projects, no-projects.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9850
Summary: Ref T5245. With work elsewhere (notably, D9839) we can remove this TODO and use real transactions.
Test Plan: Pushed a `closes Txxx` commit and got a close + transaction.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9848
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary:
Ref T5245. See some discussion in D9838.
When we attach object A to object B, we'd like to write transactions on both sides but only write the actual edges once.
To do this, allow edge types to `shouldWriteInverseTransactions()`. When an edge type opts into this, have editors apply the inverse transactions before writing the edge. These inverse transactions don't actually apply effects, they just show up in the transaction log.
Test Plan: Attached and detached revisions from tasks, saw transactions appear on both sides of the operation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9839
Summary: Ref T4420. Update "projects" source.
Test Plan:
- Edited projects on a Differential revision.
- Edited projects on a commit.
- Edited projects on a repository.
- Edited projects in feed search.
- Edited projects in a Herald rule field.
- Edited projects in a Herald rule action.
- Edited projects in Maniphest batch editor.
- Edited projects on Maniphest task.
- Edited projects in "Associate Projects..." action in Maniphest.
- Edited projects on Maniphest search in "all projects", "any project" and "not projects" fields.
- Edited projects on a Paste.
- Edited projects on a Pholio mock.
- Edited projects on a custom policy rule.
- Edited projects on a Ponder question.
- Edited projects on a Diffusion search query.
- Edited projects on a global search query.
- Edited projects on a slowvote.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9884
Summary: change typeahead placeholder to include 'or "upforgrabs" to unassign...' Fixes T2267. Well, makes it as good as its going to be until we get some new space age UI.
Test Plan: new text looks okay-ish
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2267
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9882
Summary:
Ref T5476. Currently, the task edit code assumes it knows what the UI looks like and sends back where on the column an item should be inserted.
This is buggy after adding filters, and relatively complex. Instead, send down the ordering on the whole column and sort it in the UI. This is a bit simpler overall and more general. It makes it easier to further generalize this code for T5476.
Test Plan:
- Edited a task on a board, changing priority. Saw it reorder properly.
- Edited a task on a board in a field of other tasks at the same top-level priority. Saw it refresh without reordering.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9832
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary:
Standardizes tag rendering in Maniphest and Maniphest/Diffusion list views.
(This might need some size/spacing tweaks, I tried to make it look reasonable.)
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9741
Summary:
Ref T5446.
- For all callsites which do not specify a value, set `false` explicitly.
- Make `true` the default.
Test Plan: Used `grep`, then manually went through everything.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5446
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9687
Summary: Not sure if this is the correct fix, but I think it's where you intend to go?
Test Plan: Click on link in Task, get the the correct board. Click lots of links of boards and make sure everything still works.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5361
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9520
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
