Summary:
Fixes T10287. Ref T10286.
- Link stuff properly.
- Generally, show "Parent (Milestone)" instead of "Milestone".
- This probably doesn't get 100% of `getName()` -> `getDisplayName()` swaps, but we can get those as we catch them.
Test Plan: See T10286. Also clicked stuff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10286, T10287
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15189
Summary:
Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars:
- There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of.
- We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?)
- The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types?
- Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there.
- This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff?
---
I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault.
I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are:
- Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy.
- Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons.
We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons.
---
The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold.
I'd ideally like to try either:
- rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or
- rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it.
However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element.
(I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.)
Test Plan:
{F1049905}
{F1049906}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
Summary:
Ref T10010.
Currently, milestone subproject have editable icons/colors, but I don't think this is likely to be used much (the expectation is that milestones will be common and homogenous, and it doesn't make much sense to pick different icons for "Sprint 32" vs "Sprint 33", I think).
Locking the icon and color lets us simplify the form, make milestones more distinct, and potentially reuse the color later for other things (e.g., active/future/past or on time / overdue or whatever else) or just give them a special color to make them more visible.
The best argument for retaining this that I can come up with is that certain milestones may be special (e.g., Sprint 19 is a major release?), but you can just name it "Sprint 19 (v3.0!)" or something, which seems pretty good for now.
Also don't show milestones on task browse/list view.
Test Plan: {F1048532}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14912
Summary:
Ref T7707. Handles currently have a "status" field and a "disabled" field.
The "status" field has these possible values: "open", "closed", "1", "2". durp durp durp
Instead, do:
- status = <open, closed>
- availability = <full, partial, none, disabled>
I think these make more sense? And are a bit more general? And use the same kind of constants for all values!
Test Plan: Looked at all affected handles in all states (probably).
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7707
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12832
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getTypeConstant` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPHIDType`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 for a similar implementation.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9985
Summary: This further helps differentiate types/roles for projects.
Test Plan: {F169758}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9710
Summary:
Fixes T5342. Fixes T5161. Previously, we were a bit strict about deleting columns because you could orphan tasks. Let users recover these columns more easily so they can't shoot themselves in the foot.
- Change "Delete" language to "Hide".
- Add a button to let you see hidden columns.
- Remove restriction that you can only delete empty columns.
The new button is a little funky, but maybe it merges into the "Add Column" button and that becomes a dropdown with board actions? The rest of this feels OK to me.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5342, T5161
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9719
Summary: Fixes T5090. Introduced getIcon into Handle stack which allows you to specify a per handle icon. getIcon falls back ot getTypeIcon.
Test Plan: changed the icon on a project a bunch. verified transactions showed up. verified icon showed up in typeahead. verified icon showed up in tokens that were pre-generated (not typed in). units test passed.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5090
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9264
Summary: Fixes T4022. Hooks up the project profile controller to understanding URIs like /project/hashtag/ Also, makes handles have the new /project/hashtag/ URI by default, thus upselling that feature super duper heavily.
Test Plan: clicked some project links, noted pretty uri and page working nicely.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: chad, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4022
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9260
Summary:
Fixes T4021. Chooses to keep a "primary" slug based off the name - including all that lovely logic - and allow the user to specify "additional" slugs. Expose these as "hashtags" to the user.
Sets us up for a fun diff where we can delete all the Project => Phriction automagicalness. In terms of this diff, see the TODOs i added.
Test Plan:
added a primary slug as an additional slug - got an error. added a slug in use on another project - got an error. added multiple good slugs and they worked. removed slugs and it worked. made some remark using multiple new slugs and they all linked to the correct project
ran epriestley's case
- Create project "A".
- Give it additional slug "B".
- Try to create project "B".
and i got a nice error about hashtag collision
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4021
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9250
Summary:
Updates policy, headers, typeaheads to FA over policy icons
Need advice - can't seem to place where icons come from on Typeahead? Wrong icons and wrong colors.... it is late
Test Plan:
- grepped for SPRITE_STATUS
- grepped for sprite-status
- grepped for setStatus for headers
- grepped individual icons names
Browsed numerous places, checked new dropdowns, see pudgy people.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4739
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9179
Summary:
Fixes T4917. Currently, if a user doesn't have access to, e.g., Phriction, they still get a checkbox in the search results to search for Wiki Documents. Those results will be filtered anyway, so this is confusing at best.
Instead, bind PHID types to applications. This is a relatively tailored fix; some areas for potential future work:
- Go through every PHID type and bind them all to applications. Vaguely nice to have, but doesn't get us anything for now.
- If no searchable application is installed, we don't show you an error state. This isn't currently possible ("People" is always installed) but in the interest of generality we could throw an exception or something at least.
- The elasticserach thing could probably constrain types to visible types, but we don't have a viewer there easily right now.
Test Plan: Uninstalled Phriction, saw the checkbox vanish.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8904
Summary:
We currently share the same regexp between PHID matching (usually unambiguous) and remarkup matching (often ambiguous).
This means that some project monograms which should work fine don't work properly in some contexts. Improve these behaviors.
For example:
- `#domain.com`
- Previously did not work at all.
- Now works in unambiguous cases, and in remarkup.
- `#1`
- Previously did not work at all.
- Now works in unambiguous cases.
- `#dot.`
- Previously did not work at all.
- Now works in unambiguous cases.
Test Plan:
- Created projects `domain.com`, `1`, etc.
- Used jump nav to match them unambiguously, everything worked.
- Used remarkup preview to match them ambiguously, the reasonable ones worked.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8703
Summary: Fixes T4408. I had to add a "status" to colum. I think we'll need this once we get fancier anyway but for now we have "active" and deleted.
Test Plan: deleted a column. noted reloaded workboard with all those tasks back in the default colun. loaded a task and saw the initial transaction had a "Disabled" icon next to the deleted workboard. also saw the new transaction back to the default column worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4408
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8544
Summary:
adds project images. Also fiddles with HTML + CSS just a bit so we have a "picture" column and a "details" column if a picture exists.
This keeps the details all in a nice column even if there are many details that end up being taller than the picture UI.
Fixes T3991.
Test Plan: looked at a task (no pic), project (pic w/ no details), and user (pic w/ many details) hovercard and all looked good on Chrome and Safari
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
CC: chad, Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3991
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8483
Summary: See thread; these are just bugs. Handles and main search do not mark projects correctly as open/closed.
Test Plan: Searched for projects and observed they respect the open/closed flags properly after reidnexing.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8237
Summary:
Ref T1279. The new dual-mode user/project tokenizers are a bit disorienting. Provide content type hints.
Very open to any suggestions here, most of this patch is just getting the right data in the right places. We can change things up pretty easily.
- I like the little icons in the tokens themselves, I think they look good and are useful.
- I'm less sold on the '(Project)' thing I did in the dropdown. We can easily make this richer if you have thoughts on it -- we could put icons in the left column maybe? Or right-justify the types?
- I made it always sort users above projects.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran, carl
Maniphest Tasks: T4420, T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7250
Summary: Currently, mentioning two projects in a block (`{#a} {#b}`) produces an overzealous parse. Forbid these characters in project monograms.
Test Plan: Got correct markup.
Reviewers: btrahan, dctrwatson, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8141
Summary: Ref T4264. Ref T4262. Ref T2628. Ref T3190. To write Herald object rules which bind to a project, I want to take the low budget approach and have the user just type `#project` into a text field. Formally recognize `#project` as an object name, by moving all the existing stuff from the remarkup rule to the PHID type declaration.
Test Plan: Typed `#project` into jump nav and `phid.lookup` in Conduit. Typed `#project` into Remarkup.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3190, T4264, T2628, T4262
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7882
Summary:
Ref T1344. This is //very// rough. Some UI issues:
- Empty states for the board and columns are junky.
- Column widths are crazy. I think we need to set them to fixed-width, since we may have an arbitrarily large number of columns?
- I don't think we have the header UI elements in M10 yet and that mock is pretty old, so I sort of very roughly approximated it.
- What should we do when you click a task title? Popping the whole task in a dialog is possible but needs a bunch of work to actually work. Might need to build "sheets" or something.
- Icons are slightly clipped for some reason.
- All the backend stuff is totally faked.
Generally, my plan is just to use these to implement all of T390. Specifically:
- "Kanban" projects will have "Backlog" on the left. You'll drag them toward the right as you make progress.
- "Milestone" projects will have "No Milestone" on the left, then "Milestone 9", "Milestone 8", etc.
- "Sprint" projects will have "Backlog" on the left, then "Sprint 31", "Sprint 30", etc.
So all of these things end up being pretty much exactly the same, with some minor text changes and new columns showing up on the left vs the right or whatever.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran, sascha-egerer
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7374
Summary:
While we mostly have reasonable effective object accessibility when you lock a user out of an application, it's primarily enforced at the controller level. Users can still, e.g., load the handles of objects they can't actually see. Instead, lock the queries to the applications so that you can, e.g., never load a revision if you don't have access to Differential.
This has several parts:
- For PolicyAware queries, provide an application class name method.
- If the query specifies a class name and the user doesn't have permission to use it, fail the entire query unconditionally.
- For handles, simplify query construction and count all the PHIDs as "restricted" so we get a UI full of "restricted" instead of "unknown" handles.
Test Plan:
- Added a unit test to verify I got all the class names right.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a normal user with public policies on and off.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a restricted user with public policies on and off. With restrictions, saw all traces of restricted apps removed or restricted.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7367
Summary:
Ref T1279. No actual logical changes, but:
- You can now add projects as reviewers from the revision view typeahead ("Add Reviewers" action).
- You can now add projects as reviewers from the revision detail typeahead.
- You can now add projects as reviewers from the CLI (`#yoloswag`).
- Generated commit messages now list project reviewers (`Reviewers: #yoloswag`).
I'll separate projects from users in the "Reviewers" tables in the next revision.
Test Plan:
- Added projects as reviewers using the web UI and CLI.
- Used `arc amend --show --revision Dnnn` to generate commit messages.
- Viewed revision with project reviewers in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7230
Summary: Ref T603. Ref D6941.
Test Plan: Clicked around all over - looked good. I plan to re-test D6941 to make sure the executeOne case works now as intended
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6944
Summary: Ref T2715. Move Projects to the new stuff.
Test Plan: Used `phid.query` to load projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6526
