Summary:
Ref T7664. Currently, when spreading subpriorities we may recurse deeply in certain conditions. Make sure we never recurse more than one level.
To try to mitigate issues with floating point precision, be more aggressive about selecting tasks to reorder.
I wasn't really able to come up with a realistic test case here, and the test cases I found which sort of approximated the behavior took way too long to generate data to actually commit.
This approach is inherently somewhat fragile but hopefully this is approximately good enough. We don't have a durable storage engine which can meaningfully represent double-linked lists right now.
Test Plan:
- Wrote some (slow) tests which kind of approximately hit the issue.
- Verified they maxed out at stack depth 2 after the change.
- Unit tests still pass.
- Dragged some tasks around.
- Couldn't come up with any pathological issues here by thinking about it?
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7664
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12511
Summary:
Ref T7803. The ApplicationSearch integration is still a little rough here, but it seems to have the correct behavior.
The rest of this is now at least relatively sane, cohesive, and properly behaved.
Test Plan:
- Used all grouping and ordering queries in Maniphest. Pagingated results.
- Used custom field ordering in Maniphest. Paginated results.
- Paginated through the `null` section of "Assigned" and "Projects" group-by queries. Pagingation now works correctly (it does not work at HEAD).
- Ran unit tests covering priority changes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7803
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12372
Summary: Fixes T7778. This was likely caused by removing an `array_filter()` somewhere in the course of T7731, but I'd rather have the code be more correct.
Test Plan:
Sent mail on a task with no owner.
- Before patch: unknown recipient.
- After patch: expected recipients.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7778
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12320
Summary:
Fixes T7731. When a user writes a "Send me an email" rule, always try send them an email, even if their notification settings would normally downgrade it to a notification.
In particular, this is stronger than these downgrades:
- Downgrades due to "self actions";
- downgrades due to "mail tags".
Test Plan:
- Wrote various Herald rules with "Send me an email" rules.
- Used `bin/mail list-outbound` / `show-outbound` to vet generated mail.
- Mail reacted properly to a variety of conditions (disabled accounts, settings, "send me an email" rule, forced delivery).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7731
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12300
Summary:
Fixes T7664. When there are a large number of tasks (400+) with the same subpriority (which can happen if the subpriority features are rarely used), it may take more than 30 seconds to rebalance them.
Make the algorithm more aggressive about rebalancing homogenous blocks of tasks.
This may need to get even fancier, but I'd guess it can process blocks 1-2 orders of magnitude larger, which should be ~all installs.
(If someone still hits issues with this, I'll make it fancier.)
Once a block is rebalanced, it doesn't need to be rebalanced again (at least, not as a whole block) so we basically just need to get over the initial hurdle here and then we're good.
In the worst case, we can provide `bin/maniphest rebalance` or similar and do the rebalance step offline.
And, in any case, we have more test coverage here now.
Test Plan:
- Existing tests.
- New tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7664
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12166
Summary:
Fixes T7563. Fixes T5201. Reframe this as two separate operations:
- Move before or after a task.
- Move to the beginning or end of a priority.
Then:
- Make all the order queries unambiguous and properly reversible, with an explicit `id` order.
- Just reuse `ManiphestTask` to get results in the correct order.
- Simplify the actual transaction apply logic.
- Detect and recover from cases where tasks have identical or similar subpriorities.
Test Plan:
- Wrote and executed unit tests.
- Dragged and dropped tasks within priorities and between priorities in the main Maniphest view.
- Dragged and dropped tasks within priorities in the workboard view, when ordered by priority.
- Also poked at the "natural" order, but that shouldn't be affected.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5201, T7563
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12121
Summary: Ref T5245. This is some of the associated cleanup there.
Test Plan:
foreach ManiphestTaskQuery site, I made the change (or not) and tested as follows:
=== Call sites where added needProjectPHIDs ===
- PhabricatorHomeMainController - loaded the home page
- ManiphestBatchEditController - batch edited some tasks (added a project)
- ManiphestConduitAPIMethod - tested implicitly when tested ManiphestUpdateConduitAPIMethod
- ManiphestInfoConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit console with input id : 1
- ManiphestQueryConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit console with input ids : [1, 2]
- ManiphestUpdateConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit with input id : 1 and comment : “asdasds"
- ManiphestReportController - viewed “By User” and “By Project”
- ManiphestSubpriorityController - changed the priority of a task via a drag on manphest home
- ManiphestTaskMailReceiver - updated Task 1 via bin/mail receive-test with a comment that is the README
- ManiphestTaskSearchEngine - loaded Manifest home page
- ManiphestTaskEditController - edited a task
- ManiphestTransactionEditor - closed a blocking task
- ManiphestTransactionSaveController - commented on a task
- PhabricatorProjectProfileController - viewed project with id of 1 that has a few tasks in it
- PhabricatorSearchAttachController - merged tasks together
- DifferentialTransactionEditor - submit a diff that references a task; commit the diff (thus closing the diff) and the task gets updated
- PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageParserWorker - submit a diff that references a task; commit the diff (thus closing the diff) and the task gets updated
=== Calls sites where *did not* add needProjectPHIDs (they do not appear in this revision) ===
- PhabricatorManiphestApplication - loaded the home page
- ManiphestGetTaskTransactionsConduitAPIMethod - used the method via conduit console with input ids : [1, 2] ManiphestTaskDetailController - viewed a task with and without associated projects; finished workflow creating a task with a parent
- ManiphestTransactionPreviewController - verified transaction preview showed up properly
- PhabricatorProjectBoardViewController - viewed a board
- PhabricatorProjectMoveController - moved a task around
- ManiphestRemarkupRule - made a task reference like {T123}
- ManiphestTaskQuery - executed a custom query for all tasks with page size of 2 and paginated through some tasks
- ManiphestTaskPHIDType - nothing random seems broken? =D
=== Call sites where had to do something funky ===
- ManiphestHovercardEventListener - loaded hover cards from task mentions
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11004
Summary: Ref T5604. Found this trying to open T5604 live. Basically this internal query needs the needSubscriberPHID set to true.
Test Plan: doing it live
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10975
Summary: Fixes T5604. This should fix some random bugs, lets us move forward more easily, and all that good stuff about killing code debt.
Test Plan:
- Conduit method maniphest.createtask
- verified creating user subscribed
- verified subscription transaction
- Conduit method maniphest.update
- verified subscribers set as specified to ccPHIDs parameter
- verified subscription transaction
- Herald
- verified herald rule to add subscriber worked
- verified no subscribers removed accidentally
- edit controller
- test create and verify author gets added IFF they put themselves in subscribers control box
- test update gets set to exactly what user enters
- lipsum generator'd tasks work
- bulk add subscribers works
- bulk remove subscriber works
- detail controller
- added myself by leaving a comment
- added another user via explicit action
- added another user via implicit mention
- task merge via search attach controller
- mail reply handler
- add subscriber via ./bin/mail receive-test
- unsubscribe via ./bin/mail receive-test
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10965
Summary: Fixes T4652, adding workboard link to emails
Test Plan: Move a task in a workboard from one column to another. Email notification should contain "WORKBOARD" section with link to that workboard
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4652
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10889
Summary: Fixes T6343. Grepped for all callsites and added addLinkSection where needed.
Test Plan: Tested Differential, Maniphest, Conpherence, Ponder and Macro. Inspect HTML mail for anchor tags. Inspect text mails for non-disruption.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: talshiri, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10762
Summary: see title. Ref T5875.
Test Plan: Merged one task into another task - verified transactions on both tasks. Merged two tasks into another task - verified transactions on all three tasks. Checked out my feed and saw MERGE_INTO stories and MERGE_FROM stories.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5875
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10427
Summary: Fixes T5769. Fixes T5861. Add mail tags for "unblock" and "column change".
Test Plan: Did unblocks and column changes, verified the mail got the right mailtags and recipient nondelivery flags.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5861, T5769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10241
Summary:
Ref T5861. Currently, mail tags are hard-coded; move them into applications. Each Editor defines its own tags.
This has zero impact on the UI or behavior.
Test Plan:
- Checked/unchecked some options, saved form.
- Swapped back to `master` and saw exactly the same values.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5861
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10238
Summary:
Fixes T5184. Fixes T5008. Three issues with stories/notifications about changing the status of tasks which block other tasks:
**Bad Feed Stories**
- Problem: Feed story rendering was confusing (T5184).
- Solution: fix it to provide context.
**Too Many Feed Stories**
- Problem: Feed gets a story for the original task's close ("a closed x"), and a story for each blocked task ("a closed x, a task blocking y").
- "Solution": Punt. These are redundant in the full feed but not in filtered feeds. Right solution is display-time aggregation. No users have really complained about this.
**Too Many Notifications**
- Problem: Users subscribed to both tasks get notified about the clsoe, and also about the unblocked task. These notifications are redundant.
- "Solution": Punt. This is easy to fix by silencing notifications for the sub-editor, but I'm worried it would be confusing. Users haven't complained. Display-time aggregation might be a better fix.
Test Plan: {F189463}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5008, T5184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10235
Summary:
- Fixes T5851. Currently, if a commit has `Fixes T123`, we generate an email with just that before generating the commit email. Don't send/publish transactions about a commit before it imports (this is a tiny bit hacky, but well-contained and I don't think it causes any problems).
- Fixes T4864. Currently, we try to parse Differential information even if Differential is not installed. Instead, do this only if Differential is installed.
- Fixes T5771. Currently, if we can't figure out who the committer/author of a commit is, we don't publish a `Fixes T123` transaction. Instead, fall back to acting as "Diffusion" if we can't find a better actor. Most of this diff expands the role of application actors. The existing application actors (Herald and Harbormaster) seem to be working well.
Test Plan:
- Pushed a commit with `Fixes T123` and verified it did not generate email directly. (The task half of the transaction still does, correctly.)
- Uninstalled Differential and pushed a commit, got a clean import instead of an exception.
- Commented out author/committer PHIDs and pushed stuff, saw a "Diffusion" actor.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5771, T4864, T5851
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10221
Summary:
Ref T4807. This is probably a complete fix, but I'd be surprised if there isn't a little cleanup I missed.
When users drag tasks on a "natural"-ordered workboard, leave things where they put them.
This isn't //too// bad since a lot of the existing work is completely reusable (e.g., we don't need any new JS).
Test Plan:
- Dragged a bunch of stuff around, it stayed where I put it after dropped and when reloaded.
- Dragged stuff across priorities, no zany priority changes (in "natural" mode).
- Created new tasks, they show up at the top.
- Tagged new tasks, they show up at the top of backlog.
- Swapped to "priority" mode and got sorting and the old priority-altering reordering.
- Added tasks in priority mode.
- Viewed task transactions for correctness/sanity.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10182
Summary:
Ref T4807. This is an alternative to D10179. The problem these diffs solve is that I want to be able to reorder a column's positions without having to load the actual objects, but that's difficutl because two positions may have the same sequence number (and I think it's good that we allow that, since it makes a bunch of other stuff way easier).
Instead of using the object ID (e.g., the task ID) to reorder positions with the same sequence, use the position itself. This is a little easier, is less ambiguous if columns eventually have several types of objects, and produces a better behavior when old objects are freshly added to a board. For example, if you tag `T300` with `#project`, this new rule will push it to the top of "Backlog" while the old rule might have buried it deep. I think this behavior is desirable and more "natural".
When creating a group of new rows, we do order the batch by ID, so a group of freshly-tagged objects float to the top togehter in ID order. This seems like the most natural rule, too.
Test Plan:
- Loaded some boards with implicit objects on them (freshly tagged tasks) and saw rows create.
- Verified new rows created in the right order.
- Dragged some tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4807
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10180
Summary:
Fixes T5476. Using edges to store which objects are on which board columns ends up being pretty awkward. In particular, it makes T4807 very difficult to implement.
Introduce a dedicated `BoardColumnPosition` storage.
This doesn't affect ordering rules (T4807) yet: boards are still arranged by priority. We just read which tasks are on which columns out of a new table.
Test Plan:
- Migrated data, then viewed some boards. Saw exactly the same data.
- Dragged tasks from column to column.
- Created a task directly into a column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10160
Summary: Fixes T5751. Currently, we incorrectly overwrite `$xactions`.
Test Plan: Closed a blocking task, got an email about the correct transaction set ("closed task; added comment") instead of an overwritten transaction set ("closed blocking task").
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5751
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10088
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary:
Ref T5245. We'll still display the old ones, but write real edge transactions now -- not TYPE_PROJECTS transactions.
Some code remains to show the existing transactions. The next diff will modernize the old transactions so we can remove this code.
Test Plan:
- Previewed a project-editing comment.
- Submitted a project-editing comment.
- Edited a task's projects.
- Batch edited a task's projects.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9852
Summary: Ref T5245. This property predates edges and is unusual in modern applications. Stop writes to it and populate it implicitly from edges when querying.
Test Plan:
- Viewed task list.
- Created a task.
- Added and removed projects from tasks.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9851
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary:
Ref T5245. A very long time ago I had this terrible idea that we'd let objects react to edges being added and insert transactions in response.
This turned out to be a clearly bad idea very quickly, for like 15 different reasons. A big issue is that it inverts the responsibilities of editors. It's also just clumsy and messy.
We now have `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` instead, which mostly provides a cleaner way to deal with this.
Implement `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface`, implicitly moving all the attach actions (task/task, task/revision, task/commit, task/mock) to proper edge transactions.
The cost of this is that the inverse edges don't write transactions -- if you attach an object to another object, only the object you were acting on posts a transaction record. This is sort of buggy anyway already. I'll fix this in the next diff.
Test Plan: Attached tasks, revisions and mocks to a task, then detached them.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9838
Summary: Ref T5245. Currently, task/project links rely on side effects in `save()`. Make them more transaction-oriented, with the goal of moving fully to edges a few diffs down the line.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed projects using "Edit Task", "Associate Projects" comment action, and Herald.
- Verified database ended up in the expected state.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9833
Summary:
Ref T4967. Adds a "Watch" relationship to projects, which is stronger than member/subscribed.
Specifically, when a task is tagged with a project, we'll include all project watchers in the email/notifications. Normally we don't include projects unless they're explicitly CC'd, or have some other active role in the object (like being a reviewer or auditor).
This allows you to closely follow a project without needing to write a Herald rule for every project you care about.
Test Plan:
- Watched/unwatched a project.
- Tested the watch/subscribe/member relationships:
- Watching implies subscribe.
- Joining implies subscribe.
- Leaving implies unsubscribe + unwatch.
- You can't unsubscribe until you unwatch (slightly better would be unsubscribe implies unwatch, but this is a bit tricky).
- Watched a project, then recevied email about a tagged task without otherwise being involved.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9185
Summary:
Ref T5008. Three notes:
- I'm not hiding these even if the status change is open -> open or closed -> closed. I think these are OK, but might be a little spammy.
- These show in feed, but shouldn't, since they're very redundant with stories which will almost always appear adjacently. Probably a bit spammy, see TODO. We can't hide them from feed without also squelching the notifications right now, which I //don't// want to do.
- You get a notification even if you're on the original task which changed status. This is definitely spammy, see other TODO.
Test Plan: {F156217}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5008
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9166
Summary: Fixes T4655. Basically leaves the display code intact for legacy installs but removes the option from the UI and removes "create" code.
Test Plan:
tried to attach file and the action was not in the dropdown!
made a new task and it worked!
commented on an old task and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8777
Summary: Fixes T4641.
Test Plan: Dragged a "normal" task between "high" and "low" tasks and it stayed as "normal". Generally seems correct when playing around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: mbishopim3, Beltran-rubo, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8622
Summary:
Ref T1812. I think integer constants are going to be confusing and error prone for users to interact with. For example, because we use 0-5, adding a second "open" status like "needs verification" without disrupting the existing statuses would require users to define a status with, e.g., constant `6`, but order it between constants `0` and `1`. And if they later remove statuses, they need to avoid reusing existing constants.
Instead, use more manageable string constants like "open", "resolved", etc.
We must migrate three tables:
- The task table itself, to update task status.
- The transaction table, to update historic status changes.
- The saved query table, to update saved queries which specify status sets.
Test Plan:
- Saved a query with complicated status filters.
- Ran migrations.
- Looked at the query, at existing tasks, and at task transactions.
- Forced migrations to run again to verify idempotentcy/safety.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8583
Summary: Fixes T4403. Supports the "send an email" action in Maniphest.
Test Plan: Wrote a "email duck" rule, then commented on a task and saw "duck" get an email.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8529
Summary:
Fixes T4362. If you have a default edit + view policy of "no one" things get weird when you try to create a task - basically its impossible.
Ergo, re-jigger how we do policy checks just a bit.
- if its a new object, don't bother with the "can the $actor edit this thing by virtue of having can see / can edit priveleges?" That makes no sense on create.
- add a hook so when doing the "will $actor still be able to edit this thing after all the edits" checks the object can be updated to its ultimate state. This matters for Maniphest as being the owner lets you do all sorts of stuff.
Test Plan:
- made a task with no one policy and assigned to no one - exception
- made a task with no one policy and assigned to me - success
- made a comment on the task - success
- reassigned the task to another user - exception
- reassigned the task to another user and updated policies to "users" - success
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aran, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4362
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8508
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T4484. This is a stepping stone to getting Herald supported in the new Differental code. Generally:
- Instead of an Editor either supporting or not supporting Herald, let it choose based on transactions. Specifically, Differential only runs rules on revision creation and diff updates.
- Optionally, allow an Editor to return some transactions to apply instead of having to apply everything itself. This lets us make it clear why changes happend in the transaction log, and share more code.
- I updated only one transaction type (owners in Maniphest) since it was the easiest and cleanest to update and test. Everything else still works like it used to, it just won't generate a transaction record yet.
- The transaction records are a touch rough, but we can clean them up later.
Test Plan: {F122282}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4484, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8404
Summary:
Fixes T4550 by changing supportsFeed to shouldPublishFeedStory, so things can be more granular like that are with mail. Attempts to fix things generally too, filtering out xactions that have no business in feed, etc.
Also return an updated Task HTML representation on drag and drop moves, etc. This is important so if the priority changes you can see it reflected in the UI.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around. observed no feed stories on subpriority drags. observed feed stories and updated color bars on stories that changed priority
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4550
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8399
Summary:
adds ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_PROJECT_COLUMN and makes it work. Had to clean up the Javascript ever so slightly as it was sending up the string "null" when it should just omit the data in these cases. Ref T4422.
NOTE: this is overall a bit buggy - e.g. move a task Foo from column A to top of column B; refresh; task Foo is at bottom of column B and should be at top of column B - but I plan on additional diff or three to clean this up.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around columns. clicked on those tasks and saw some nice transactions.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4422
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8366
Summary:
...this was nice to do for boards, since this diff also starts calling this code in the board move case. The big trick is to use the new expandTransactions hook to expand the subpriority transaction into a priority transaction if pertinent. The other stuff is just about hiding these new subpriority extractions.
...also removes the "edit" UI from the default board since we can't actually edit anything and it thus is buggy.
Ref T4422. Next step is to move board edits into the editor with their own little transaction.
Test Plan: re-orded tasks on a maniphest query, reloaded, and noted re-order stuck.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4422
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8358
Summary:
Ref T4110. This denormalized field used to power "Group By: Assigned" got dropped in the T2217 migration at some point.
Restore its population, and fix all the data in the database.
Test Plan: Ran migration, verified database came out reasonable-looking. Reassigned a task, verified database. Ran a "Group By: assigned" query.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7602
Summary:
This is primarily a client request, and a little bit use-case specific, but policies seem to be holding up well and I'm getting more comfortable about maintaining this. Much if it can run through ApplicationTransactions.
Allow the ability to edit status, policies, priorities, assignees and projects of a task to be restricted to some subset of users. Also allow bulk edit to be locked. This affects the editor itself and the edit, view and list interfaces.
Test Plan: As a restricted user, created, edited and commented on tasks. Tried to drag them around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7357
Summary: Drop the "Pro" bit.
Test Plan: Created/edited tasks, moved tasks around, generally made a mess. Nothing burned down.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7352
Summary:
maniphest tasks were fataling with priority 0 before making sure to add the return null if new object trick to the maniphest pro editor.
pholio had a problem where if you had no jpegs you were walking off array_rand. tighten the math and then just return a built-in if no uploaded user images could be found. Fixes T3889.
Test Plan: bin/lipsum generate for a few minutes and no errors
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3889
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7222
Summary: This ends up living in HeraldAdapter even though its "task only" stuff. Reason being There are 4 or 5 functions that have little hooks; see diff. Ref T1638.
Test Plan: made a rule to assign tasks to me if made on web - great success. made a rule to assign tasks to other guy and add a project if title contained "foobar" - great success, including some confusion as ther two herald rules fought each other for task ownership.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1638
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7146
Summary:
Ref T2217. This partially retreads the ground from D7115.
- We're rendering silly transactions about descriptions when creating tasks. Hide those.
- Move the "created" transaction back to status. This fixes two things that are otherwise more of a mess than I'd anticipated:
- It fixes Reports without making a mess (see <https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/395>).
- It renders old transactions properly (i.e., "created" instead of "reopened" for tasks older than the migration).
- Be explicit about action strength, so emails always say the most important thing in the subject.
Test Plan: Created and edited tasks, looked at resulting transactions, saw a cleaner transaction record.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7141
Summary:
Ref T603. Adds policy controls to the task edit UI.
@chad, status + policy renders a little weird -- did I mess something up? See screenshot.
Test Plan: Edited policies, viewed a task.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7123
Summary:
Ref T603. Make almost every task read policy-aware. Notable exceptions are:
- Edge editor -- this stuff is prescreened and should be moved to ApplicationTransactions eventually anyway.
- Search/attach stuff -- this stuff needs some general work. The actual list should be fine since you can't pull handles. There may be a very indirect hole here where you could attach an object you can't see (but do know the ID of) to an object you can see. Pretty fluff.
- The "Tasks" field in Differential will let you reference objects you can't see. Possibly this is desirable, in the case of commandeering revisions. Mostly, it was inconvenient to get a viewer (I think).
Test Plan:
- Called `maniphest.info`.
- Called `maniphest.update`.
- Batch edited tasks.
- Dragged and dropped tasks to change subpriority.
- Subscribed and unsubscribed from a task.
- Edited a task.
- Created a task.
- Created a task with a parent.
- Created a task with a template.
- Previewed a task update.
- Commented on a task.
- Added a dependency.
- Searched for "T33" in object search dialog.
- Created a branch "T33", ran `arc diff`, verified link.
- Pushed a commit with "Fixes T33", verified close.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7119
Summary:
standing on the shoulders of the badass work to move Maniphest to ApplicationTransactions, this diff implements a few methods and adds an adapter class.
For now, we can add cc and flag tasks. I figure see what people ask for? Ref T1368.
Test Plan: created herald rules for title and description text hits. made tasks and verified CC and flags worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1368, T1638
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7122
Summary: Ref T2217. These checks are no longer necessary, ApplicationTransactions handle them for us.
Test Plan:
- Made a no-effect edit, verified no new transactions showed up.
- Made real edits, saw them happen and leave transactions.
- Made an edit which just reorders CCs, saw it detected as no-effect.
- As above, with projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7117
Summary:
Ref T2217. Fixes two issues:
# The "task created" email didn't include the task description, but should.
# We were treaging the "status" event as the "create", but that's kind of a mess. Treat the "title" event as the "create" instead. This makes initial emails say "[Created]".
Test Plan: Created some tasks, got better emails.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7115
Summary: Ref T2217. Pro is the new standard.
Test Plan: Lots of `grep`, made a pile of Maniphest views/edits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7093
Summary:
Ref T2217. Removes most of the code from ManiphestTransactionEditor.
- Provides mail tag support in ManiphestTransactionEditorPro.
- There was one more write (subscribe/unsubscribe button) that I'd missed; modernize that.
Test Plan:
- Clicked subscribe/unsubscribe.
- Made some edits, verified mail had appropriate mail tags.
Reviewers: btrahan, garoevans
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7091
Summary: Ref T2217. When you add comments (or use that interface to make updates), ship it through the new code.
Test Plan: Added comments, made other changes to Maniphest tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7088
Summary: Ref T2217. Nothing too surprising here. This transaction type is weird and should be replaced with the mainstream EDGE type at some point after things clear up more.
Test Plan: Attached and detached revisions and mocks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7085
Summary:
Ref T2217. Swaps batch edits to modern editor.
Also, fix some issues with required fields and viewers being required to render certain standard fields (notably, date).
Test Plan: Made various batch edits, verified they went through properly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7083
Summary: Ref T2217. All the reads route through new code already, start swapping writes over. This is the simplest writer, used when the user drag-and-drops stuff on the task list.
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped stuff across priorities. Got a transaction and some email. Verified the email and transaction looked OK, threaded properly, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7080
Summary:
Ref T2217. This is the risky, hard part; everything after this should be smooth sailing. This is //mostly// clean, except:
- The old format would opportunistically combine a comment with some other transaction type if it could. We no longer do that, so:
- When migrating, "edit" + "comment" transactions need to be split in two.
- When editing now, we should no longer combine these transaction types.
- These changes are pretty straightforward and low-impact.
- This migration promotes "auxiliary field" data to the new CustomField/StandardField format, so that's not a straight migration either. The formats are very similar, though.
Broadly, this takes the same attack that the auth migration did: proxy all the code through to the new storage. `ManiphestTransaction` is now just an API on top of `ManiphestTransactionPro`, which is the new storage format. The two formats are very similar, so this was mostly a straight copy from one table to the other.
Test Plan:
- Without performing the migration, made a bunch of edits and comments on tasks and verified the new code works correctly.
- Droped the test data and performed the migration.
- Looked at the resulting data for obvious discrepancies.
- Looked at a bunch of tasks and their transaction history.
- Used Conduit to pull transaction data.
- Edited task description and clicked "View Details" on transaction.
- Used batch editor.
- Made a bunch more edits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7068
Summary:
Ref T2217. I'm going to do the fake-double-writes ("double reads"?) thing where we proxy the storage that worked pretty well for auth. That is:
- (Some more cleanup diffs next, maybe?)
- Move all the data to the new storage, and make `ManiphestTransaction` read and write by wrapping `ManiphestTransactionPro`.
- If nothing breaks, it's a straight shot to nuking ManiphestTransaction callsite by callsite.
I think Maniphest is way easier than Differential, because there are very few query sites and no inline comments.
Test Plan: `grep` to find callsites. Loaded task view, called Conduit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7067
Summary: There's a bunch of stuff that lives only in AuxiliaryField which is called on objects which may be ManiphestCustomFields right now. This is basically a list of remaining API methods which need to be moved to the new stuff. This enables construction of new-style custom fields.
Test Plan: Created a sophisticated Maniphest custom field.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7013
Summary: Ref T418. Although Maniphest does not use ApplicationTransactions, we can fake a lot of it and provide a more uniform API. Deletes as much custom code from Maniphest as possible along the edit workflows, using core code instead.
Test Plan:
With custom fields:
- Edited a task.
- Created a task.
- Queried a task with Maniphest.
- Updated a task with Maniphest.
- Used `?template=nnn` to create a similar task.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7001
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary:
Same as //Subscribe//, //Unsubscribe// and //Automatically Subscribed// in differential.
Manually updated library map as windows is fun!
Test Plan: Subscribe, Unsubscribe!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5809
Summary:
Unmuck almost all of the we-sort-of-have-viewers-some-of-the-time mess.
There are a few notable cases here:
- I used Omnipotent users when indexing objects for search. I think this is correct; we do policy filtering when showing results.
- I cheated in a bad way in the Remarkup object rule, but fixing this requires fixing all the PhabricatorRemarkupEngine callsites (there are 85). I'll do that in the next diff.
- I cheated in a few random places, like when sending mail about package edits. These aren't a big deal.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all PhabricatorObjectHandleData references.
- Gave them viewers.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5151
Summary:
The search indexing API has several problems right now:
- Always runs in-process.
- It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it.
- Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster.
- Instead, make the API phid-oriented.
- No uniform indexing API.
- Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird.
- Instead, provide a uniform API.
- No uniform CLI.
- We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers.
- Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing.
- Not application-oriented.
- All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world.
- Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader.
Test Plan:
- `bin/search index`
- Indexed one revision, one task.
- Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types.
- Indexed `--all`.
- Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it.
- Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing.
- Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing.
- Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: 20after4, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary: 'TASK DETAIL' links point to the non-production uri. Our daemons run in an environment that uses different baseUrl because we can't use https locally (https is provided by our load balancers)
Test Plan: check emails generated with a non-production environment. See that the TASK DETAIL link points to production url.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3877
Summary: this makes notifications work better for folks who choose to handle things in Phabricator and not over email
Test Plan: had my test account and "real" account battle each other on a few tasks and divs. Noted that I received emails appropos to the respective settings.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1977
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3856
Summary:
See D3784, T1403. When we send a user an email and a notification from Maniphest, mark the notification as read.
(It would be nice to do the thing with `multiplexMail()` a little less hackily, but it gets very complicated to do correctly because we require handles but sometimes do not have an actor/user so I'm punting for now.)
Test Plan: Acted on a task, verified notification was marked read because I received an email.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3789
Summary: When we receive an email, figure out if any of the other tos and ccs are users. If they are, pass their phids through the stach as "exclude phids" and exclude them from getting the email.
Test Plan: used the various applications (audit, differential, maniphest) and noted emails were sent as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, Korvin, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T1676
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3645
Summary: This is a minor quality-of-life improvement to prevent D2968 from being as nasty as it is.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests; generated Differential, Maniphest and Diffusion emails and verified the bodies looked sensible.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T931
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2986
Summary:
- See D2741.
- When EdgeEditor performs edits, emit events.
- Listen for Maniphest edge events and save the changes as transactions.
- Do all this in a reasonably generic way that won't take too much rewriting as we use edges more generally.
Test Plan: Attached and detached commits from tasks, saw reasonable-looking transactions spring into existence.
Reviewers: btrahan, davidreuss
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2906
Summary:
Some e-mail clients display this header and it needs to be constant.
This is somehow involved but I doubt that there is a simpler solution.
Test Plan:
Applied SQL patch.
Commented on revision, commented on commit, changed package.
Verified that the `Thread-Topic` has constant and human readable value.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ola, aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2745
Summary: NOTE: This can break current ongoing conversations.
Test Plan: Commented on a revision and checked the header in the e-mail.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1340
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2723
Summary:
It seems that Outlook and Mail.app mostly ignores the threading headers and thread primarily by subject.
They are also very picky about the Re: part in the header.
I guess that's because users of these clients often hit Reply when they want to create a new message to the sender of an e-mail.
We need both of these applications to work with the same setting because we don't use multiplexing to prevent sending multiple e-mails to people in lists.
I also believe that the default behavior should just work in most setups.
I've tried several different combinations of putting "Re:" and none of them seems to always work in both clients.
This diff at least adds more abstraction to the code which should prevent copy/paste errors (two fixed by this diff!).
Test Plan: Sent several e-mails with varying subject, verified that they look as before in Outlook and Mail.app.
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2709
Summary:
Added `renderNotificationView()` abstract function to `PhabricatorFeedStory` base class.
Fixed duplicate line in `PhabricatorFeedStoryManiphest` class.
Fixed spacing/formatting in `ManiphestTransactionEditor`.
Test Plan: No functional changes
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: allenjohnashton, ddfisher, aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2698
Summary:
TransactionType gives us more information than
update, open, close, assign. We can display those in feed/notifications along with and comments on the actions.
Test Plan: did on local machine tested out.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: ddfisher, keebuhm, aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2683
Summary: First diff in a series of diffs to add notifications to Phabricator. This is the notification application ONLY. This commit does not include the changes to other applications that makes them add notifications. As such, no notifications will be generated beyond the initial database import.
Test Plan: This is part of the notifications architecture which has been running on http://theoryphabricator.com for the past several months.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, ddfisher
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: allenjohnashton, keebuhm, aran, Korvin, jungejason, nh
Maniphest Tasks: T974
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2571
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary:
- Add an explicit multiplexing option, and enable it by default. This is necessary for Mail.app to coexist with other clients ("Re:" breaks outlook at the very least, and generally sucks in the common case), and allows users with flexible clients to enable subject variance.
- Add an option for subject line variance. Default to not varying the subject, so mail no longer says [Committed], [Closed], etc. This is so the defaults thread correctly in Gmail (not entirely sure this actually works).
- Add a preference to enable subject line variance.
- Unless all mail is multiplexed, don't enable or respect the "Re" or "vary subject" preferences. These are currently shown and respected in non-multiplex cases, which creates inconsistent results.
NOTE: @jungejason @nh @vrana This changes the default behavior (from non-multiplexing to multiplexing), and might break Facebook's integration. You should be able to keep the same behavior by setting the options appropriately, although if you can get the new defaults working they're probably better.
Test Plan:
Send mail from Maniphest, Differential and Audit. Updated preferences. Enabled/disabled multiplexing. Things seem OK?
NOTE: I haven't actually been able to repro the Gmail threading issue so I'm not totally sure what's going on there, maybe it started respecting "Re:" (or always has), but @cpiro and @20after4 both reported it independently. This fixes a bunch of bugs in any case and gives us more conservative set of defaults.
I'll see if I can buff out the Gmail story a bit but every client is basically a giant black box of mystery. :/
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason, nh
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: cpiro, 20after4, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1097, T847
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2206
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2091
Summary:
Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks.
Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used
this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it.
The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish.
Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when
reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks
against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two
tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some
code to deal with this at some point if necessary.
I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all.
(There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header
counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.)
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt
Maniphest Tasks: T859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
Summary: Last of the big final patches. Left a few debatable classes (12 out of about 400) that I'll deal with individually eventually.
Test Plan: Ran testEverythingImplemented.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1881
Summary: We render these in a realtively unreadable way right now; allow customization and provide reasonable defaults.
Test Plan: Looked at some tasks with custom fields on them.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T930
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1790
Summary:
A few similar requests have come in across several tools and use cases that I
think this does a reasonable job of resolving.
We currently send one email for each update an object receives, but these aren't
always appreciated:
- Asana does post-commit review via Differential, so the "committed" mails are
useless.
- Quora wants to make project category edits to bugs without spamming people
attached to them.
- Some users in general are very sensitive to email volumes, and this gives us
a good way to reduce the volumes without incurring the complexity of
delayed-send-batching.
The technical mechanism is basically:
- Mail may optionally have "mail tags", which indicate content in the mail
(e.g., "maniphest-priority, maniphest-cc, maniphest-comment" for a mail which
contains a priority change, a CC change, and a comment).
- If a mail has tags, remove any recipients who have opted out of all the
tags.
- Some tags can't be opted out of via the UI, so this ensures that important
email is still delivered (e.g., cc + assign + comment is always delivered
because you can't opt out of "assign" or "comment").
Test Plan:
- Disabled all mail tags in the web UI.
- Used test console to send myself mail with an opt-outable tag, it was
immediately dropped.
- Used test console to send myself mail with an opt-outable tag and a custom
tag, it was delivered.
- Made Differential updates affecting CCs with and without comments, got
appropriate delivery.
- Made Maniphest updates affecting project, priority and CCs with and without
comments, got appropriate delivery.
- Verified mail headers in all cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, moskov
Maniphest Tasks: T616, T855
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1635
Summary:
- When changing auxiliary field values, use transactions.
- Clean up some of the load/save logic for auxiliary fields so it's a little
more performant.
NOTE: The transaction display of auxiliary fields is incredibly hacky, I'll
follow up with a more nuanced approach but wanted to limit scope here.
Test Plan: Created and edited tasks with custom fields configured; created and
edited tasks without custom fields configured.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason, zeeg
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason
Maniphest Tasks: T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1283
Summary: I didn't get around to this earlier; add Feed/Maniphest integration.
This is partly motivated by wanting Projects to not be terrible. Pretty
straightforward.
Test Plan:
- Created, updated, reassigned and closed a task.
- Verified feed stories render reasonably.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Maniphest Tasks: T681
Differential Revision: 1232
transactional mail
Summary: See T571. SES refuses to deliver mail with this header and there are
various reports of other issues on the internet so I'm defaulting it to off.
Test Plan: Set config to true, tried to send mail, SES rejected it because of
"Precedence: bulk" header.
Reviewers: bmaurer, ola, jungejason, nh, aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, epriestley, bmaurer
Differential Revision: 1032
Summary:
We don't currently add CCs, but should (similar to how Differential works).
This also fixes some problems where you can get no-op CC transactions, and makes
mentions a little less aggressively colored.
Test Plan: Applied a bunch of CC/mention transactions to tasks and observed the
behavior.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, codeblock
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 634
Summary:
Maniphest is missing some keys and some query strategy which will make it
cumbersome to manage more than a few tens of thousands of tasks.
Test Plan:
Handily manipulated 100k-scale task groups. Maniphest takes about 250ms to
select and render pages of 1,000 tasks and has no problem paging and filtering
them, etc. We should be good to scale to multiple millions of tasks with these
changes.
Reviewed By: gc3
Reviewers: fratrik, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen, gc3
Commenters: jungejason
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley, gc3, jungejason
Differential Revision: 534
