Summary:
Depends on D19585. Ref T13164.
Almost all transactions require CAN_EDIT on the object, but they generally do not enforce this directly today. Instead, this is effectively enforced by Controllers, API methods, and EditEngine doing a `CAN_EDIT` check when loading the object to be edited.
A small number of transactions do not require CAN_EDIT, and instead require only a weaker/lesser permission. These are:
- Joining a project which you have CAN_JOIN on.
- Leaving a project which isn't locked.
- Joining a Conpherence thread you can see (today, no separate CAN_JOIN permission for Conpherence).
- Leaving a Conpherence thread.
- Unsubscribing.
- Using the special `!history` command from email.
Additionally, these require CAN_INTERACT, which is weaker than CAN_EDIT:
- Adding comments.
- Subscribing.
- Awarding tokens.
Soon, I want to add "disabling users" to this list, so that you can disable users if you have "Can Disable User" permission, even if you can not otherwise edit users.
It's possible this list isn't exhaustive, so this change might break something by adding a policy check to a place where we previously didn't have one. If so, we can go weaken that policy check to the appropriate level.
Enforcement of these special cases is currently weird:
- We mostly don't actually enforce CAN_EDIT in the Editor; instead, it's enforced before you get to the editor (in EditEngine/Controllers).
- To apply a weaker requirement (like leaving comments or leaving a project), we let you get through the Controller without CAN_EDIT, then apply the weaker policy check in the Editor.
- Some transactions apply a confusing/redundant explicit CAN_EDIT policy check. These mostly got cleaned up in previous changes.
Instead, the new world order is:
- Every transaction has capability/policy requirements.
- The default is CAN_EDIT, but transactions can weaken this explicitly they want.
- So now we'll get requirements right in the Editor, even if Controllers or API endpoints make a mistake.
- And you don't have to copy/paste a bunch of code to say "yes, every transaction should require CAN_EDIT".
Test Plan:
- Tried to add members to a Conpherence thread I could not edit (permissions error).
- Left a Conpherence thread I could not edit (worked properly).
- Joined a thread I could see but could not edit (worked properly).
- Tried to join a thread I could not see (permissions error).
- Implemented `requireCapabilites()` on ManiphestTransactionEditor and tried to edit a task (upgrade guidance error).
- Mentioned an object I can not edit on another object (works).
- Mentioned another object on an object I can not edit (works).
- Added a `{F...}` reference to an object I can not edit (works).
- Awarded tokens to an object I can not edit (works).
- Subscribed/unsubscribed from an object I can not edit (works).
- Muted/unmuted an object I can not edit (works).
- Tried to do other types of edits to an object I can not edit (correctly results in a permissions error).
- Joined and left a project I can not edit (works).
- Tried to edit and add members to a project I can not edit (permissions error).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19586
Summary: Depends on D19584. Ref T13164. This check is an //extra// check: you need EDIT //and// this capability. Thus, we can do it in validation without issues.
Test Plan:
- This code isn't reachable today: all methods of applying this transaction do a separate check for "Can Lock" upfront.
- Commented out the "Can Lock" check in the LockController, tried to lock as a user without permission. Was rejected with a policy exception.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19585
Summary:
Depends on D19581. Ref T13164. This method has no effect:
- You must always have CAN_EDIT to reach an Editor in the first place.
- Per previous change, I'm going to restructure this so transactions explicitly check CAN_EDIT by default anyway.
Test Plan: Tried to edit and hide a project column as a user without permission, hit global permission checks long before reaching this method.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19582
Summary: See PHI193. Previously, see similar D18763. Skip this legacy-style policy check when creating a project, since we know you can add members, even if the policy doesn't actually resolve in your favor.
Test Plan:
- Created a project with edit policy "Members of project" and myself, plus any other user (so the code goes down this path, not the "join/leave" path) as members.
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19169
Summary:
Depends on D19009. Ref T13053. For "Must Encrypt" mail, we must currently strip the "Thread-Topic" header because it sometimes contains sensitive information about the object.
I don't actually know if this header is useful or anyting uses it. My understanding is that it's an Outlook/Exchange thing, but we also implement "Thread-Index" which I think is what Outlook/Exchange actually look at. This header may have done something before we implemented "Thread-Index", or maybe never done anything. Or maybe older versions of Excel/Outlook did something with it and newer versions don't, or do less. So it's possible that an even better fix here would be to simply remove this, but I wasn't able to convince myself of that after Googling for 10 minutes and I don't think it's worth hours of installing Exchange/Outlook to figure out. Instead, I'm just trying to simplify our handling of this header for now, and maybe some day we'll learn more about Exchange/Outlook and can remove it.
In a number of cases we already use the object monogram or PHID as a "Thread-Topic" without users ever complaining, so I think that if this header is useful it probably isn't shown to users, or isn't shown very often (e.g., only in a specific "conversation" sub-view?). Just use the object PHID (which should be unique and stable) as a thread-topic, everywhere, automatically.
Then allow this header through for "Must Encrypt" mail.
Test Plan: Processed some local mail, saw object PHIDs for "Thread-Topic" headers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19012
Summary:
Ref PHI193. This method of enforcing policy checks is now (mostly) obsolete, and they're generally checked at the Controller/API level instead.
Notably, this method does not call `adjustObjectForPolicyChecks(...)` properly, so it can not handle special cases like "creating a project and taking its newly created members into account" for object policies like "Project Members".
Just remove these checks, which are redundant with checks elsewhere.
Test Plan:
- Set Project application default edit policy to "Administrators and Project Members".
- Tried to create a project as a non-administrator, adding myself.
- Before patch: policy fatal on a VOID object (the project with no PHID generated yet).
- After patch: object created properly. Got a sensible policy error if I didn't include myself as a member.
- Also verified that other edit rules are still enforced/respected (I can't edit stuff I shouldn't be able to edit).
- There's at least a bit of unit test coverage of this, too, which I updated to work via API (which hits the new broad capability checks) instead of via low-level transactions (which enforce only a subset of policy operations now).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18763
Summary: Builds out a map for icon->image in Projects, selects the icon's image as the default project image if there is no custom image chosen by the user.
Test Plan: Select various icons, see image change. Test choose picture, pick a new image.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18174
Test Plan: Unit tests pass, manually changed the default sort and filter on a workboard and observed expected transactions in the DB.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18013
Summary: This was interesting, because there were a mix of callsites using transactions and others that just set the property on the `Project` object. I made everything consistent in using transactions to change this property. I also found an implementation of `getTitle()` that I don't think is ever being invoked since `shouldHide()` is returning `true`, but I migrated it anyway.
Test Plan: Unit tests pass + enabling/disabling workboards (and importing).
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18004
Test Plan: Unit tests pass. Went through the UI for creating new subprojects and milestones, but didn't setup some API calls to check that all the validation errors were still caught.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17999
Summary: See T12673
Test Plan: Unit tests pass. Locked and unlocked a project and saw timeline changes.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17986
Summary: I'm not sure you can actually remove a project's image (maybe via the API?), but I kept the code for rendering the relevant title/feed anyway.
Test Plan: Unit tests + adding/changing project pictures.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17954
Test Plan: Unit tests all pass. Added/removed/altered some project hashtags and observed expected transactions in timeline.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17952
Summary: Also changes access modifiers on `PhabricatorProjectTransactionEditor` and sets up `storage` for `applyExternalEffects`.
Test Plan: Created new projects, attempted to create without name, with too long of a name, and with a name that conflicts with other projects and observed expected errors.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T12673
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17947
Summary:
Adds a UI for selecting background colors.
You can choose "Use Parent", which is the default, and allows you to set a color that all descendants inherit.
You can also choose "None", if a parent has a WHACKY BACKGROUND that you refuse to put up with.
Test Plan:
{F1114588}
{F1114589}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15279
Summary:
Fixes T10285.
- If a result (like a milestone) has no primary hashtag, try to fill in a secondary hashtag.
- If we can't find any hashtag, don't return the result.
This produces these behaviors:
- By default, you can't autocomplete milestones.
- If you give one a hashtag, you can.
We might want to give milestones "special" hashtags eventually (like `#xyz/33`) but this fixes the confusing/broken behavior in the UI and we can wait for a better use case for letting you autocomplete milestones, I think.
Also, don't try to cycle hashtags when renaming milestones. This was a little inconsistent before.
Test Plan:
- Autocompleted normal projects.
- Autocompleted milestones with explicit hashtags.
- No autocomplete entry for milestones with no special hashtags.
- Used normal typeahead to get tag-less milestones to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10285
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15261
Summary:
Fixes T6641. This allows users who have permission to edit a project to use "Save as Default" to save the current order and filter as defaults for the project.
These are per-board defaults, and apply to all users. The rationale is that I think the best default ordering/filtering depends mostly on the board, not the viewer.
This seems to align with most requests in the task, although rationale is a bit light. But, for example, it seems reasonable you might want to change the default filter to "All Tasks" on a sprint board, so you can see what's in the "Done" column.
This also fixes some minor issues I ran into:
- Herald could hit an issue while checking permissions if the project was a subproject and a non-member had a triggering rule.
- "Advanced filter..." did not prefill with the current filter.
Test Plan:
- Set default order and filter on a workboard.
- Reloaded board, saw settings stick.
- Tried to edit a board as an unprivileged user (disabled menu items, error).
- Reviewed transaction log.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15260
Summary:
Fixes T6580. Now:
- Empty field means "unlimited".
- Zero means 0.
- Nonzero means that number.
(Although you can now have fractional points, I didn't change columns to allow fractional limits, because too bad.)
Test Plan: {F1103688}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6580
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15239
Summary:
Fixes T7410.
- Adds a "Disable Workboard" action to the "Manage Backlog" menu.
- We'll probably move this somewhere else if/when that column gets too messy.
- Disabling a board hides it, prevents it from being recreated by non-editors, and hides the "Project (Backlog)" annotations.
- Resotring a board puts it back in pristine condition.
Test Plan:
- Disabled a board.
- Verified "(Backlog)" annotations vanished.
- Enabled a board.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T7410
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15215
Summary:
Ref T10010.
- Viewing an empty board with milestone columns did a meaningless edge query. Don't do that.
- When creating the first milestone of a parent, force the indexing engine to rematerialize it inline. This sets `hasMilestones` properly. Otherwise, the daemons may take some time to fix this in the indexer.
Test Plan:
- Viewed an empty board of a project with a milestone.
- Viewed a normal board.
- Created the first milestone of a project with a big queue of daemons, saw project state immediately fully reflect the project having milestones.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15206
Summary:
Ref T10010. Instead of autojoining projects, provide "Initial Members: [___]" that the user can fill in.
This is only available in the web UI when creating a (non-milestone) project.
Test Plan:
- Created a new project with no members.
- Created a new project with some members.
- Created a new milestone (no control).
- Created a new project with myself as a member and an "Editable By: Project Members" policy, to verify this use case still works properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15195
Summary:
Ref T10054. Ref T6113. Users can currently subscribe to projects, which causes them to receive:
# mail about project membership changes, description changes, etc; and
# mail to the project, e.g. when the project is added as a subscriber on a task, or a reviewer on a revision.
Almost no one cares about (1), and after D15061 you can use Herald to get this stuff if you really want it. (It will get progressively more annoying in the future with external membership sources causing automated project membership updates.)
A lot of users are confused about (2) and how it relates to membership, watching, etc, and most users who want (2) don't want (1).
Instead, add an explicit option for this and explain what it does.
This is fairly verbose but I've hidden it on the member/watch screen, which is now the "explain how projects work" screen, I guess.
Test Plan:
{F1064929}
{F1064930}
{F1064931}
- Disabled/enabled mail for a project.
- Sent mail to a project with mail disabled, verified I didn't get a copy.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6113, T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15065
Summary:
Ref T6183. Ref T10054. Historically, only members could watch projects because there were some weird special cases with policies. These policy issues have been resolved and Herald is generally powerful enough to do equivalent watches on most objects anyway.
Also puts a "Watch Project" button on the feed panel to make the behavior and meaning more obvious.
Test Plan:
- Watched a project I was not a member of.
- Clicked the feed watch/unwatch button.
{F1064909}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6183, T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15063
Summary:
Ref T10054. Ref T6113. I'm going to remove subscribers from projects to fix the confusion between "watch" and "subscribe".
Users who have unusual use cases where they legitimately want to know when a project's description is updated or members change can use Herald to follow it.
This is also useful in general and improves consistency, although I don't have too many use cases for it.
Test Plan: Wrote a Herald rule, edited a project, saw the rule fire and send me email about the change.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6113, T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15061
Summary: Ref T10010. Fixes T10107. When we publish a transaction about a project, we perform visibility checks for many different users. We need to know all of the ancestors' members to perform these checks.
Test Plan:
- Before patch: when updating a subproject, daemons fatal trying to publish things because they can not test visibility of parent projects.
- After patch: daemons successfully publish subproject updates.
- Also added a unit test.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010, T10107
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15054
Summary:
Fixes T6856. Fixes T10164.
- Make the profile image composer code use the underlying icon name instead of the top-level icon key, so it works instead of 404'ing.
- Change the button to show a preview of the profile icon instead of the text "Use Icon and Color".
- When creating a new non-milestone project, automatically set the profile image to the icon + color image.
Test Plan:
- Created several new projects, saw appropriate default icons.
- Edited projects, saw icon previews.
- Clicked icon buttons to set icons.
- Poked around other applications which use builtins (Pholio, user profiles) to look for anything I broke, but everything seemed fine.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6856, T10164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15050
Summary:
Ref T10168. When we try to remove an additional hashtag, we remove the normalized version.
Instead, remove both the literal and normalized versions. This allows us to remove old/invalid slugs.
Test Plan: Removed garbage slugs like `[,*,]`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10168
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15048
Summary:
Fixes T10089. This did work at one point, but was broken by D12868, which got too aggressive about mailing members.
We don't want to send mail to all members by default, only those who are subscribed. The parent implementation of `getMailCC()` handles this for us.
Test Plan:
Joined a project as users A and B. Unsubscribed with B. Made an edit.
Before patch: both A and B got mail. After patch: only A got mail.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10089
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14955
Summary: Ref T10004. This control doesn't disable visually or behaviorally, e.g. when locked in an EditEngine configuration.
Test Plan:
- Locked field for Projects.
- Reviewed form in EditEngine.
- Created/edited a project.
- Swapped default.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14911
Summary:
Ref T10010.
- Default name to "Milestone X".
- Remove policy controls, which have no effect.
- Don't generate slugs for milestones since this is a big pain where they all generate as `#milestone_1` by default (you can add one if you want). I plan to add some kind of syntax like `#parent/32` to mean "Milestone 32 in Parent" later.
- Don't require projects to have unique names (again, 900 copies of "Milestone X"). I think we can trust users to sort this out for themselves since modern Phabricator has "Can Create Projects" permission, etc.
Test Plan: Created some milestones, had a less awful experience.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14909
Summary:
Ref T10010. This has a lot of UI/UX problems but I think it:
- technically allows subproject creation;
- technically allows milestone creation;
- doesn't let users unwittingly destroy their installs (probably).
Test Plan:
- Created milestones.
- Created subprojects.
- Created and edited normal projects.
- Observed some reasonable interactions (e.g., you can't create milestones for a milestone or edit a superproject's members).
- Observed plenty of silly/confusing interactions that need additional work.
{F1046657}
{F1046658}
{F1046655}
{F1046656}
{F1046654}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14904
Summary: Ref T10010. This is pretty straightforward with a couple of very minor new behaviors, like the icon selector edit field.
Test Plan:
- Created projects.
- Edited projects.
- Saw "Create Project" in quick create menu.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14896
Summary:
Ref T10010. This will allow us to find superprojects with `withMemberPHIDs(...)` queries.
- Copy all the current real member edges to materialized member edges.
- Redirect all reads to look at materialized members.
- This table is already kept in sync by earlier work with indexing.
Basically, flow is:
- Writes (joining, leaving, adding/removing members) write to the real member edge type.
- After a project's members change, they're copied to the materialized member edge type for that project and all of its superprojects.
- Reads look at materialized members, so "Parent" sees the members of "Child" and "Grandchild" as its own members, but we still have the "real members" edge type to keep track of "natural" or "direct" members.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Ran unit tests.
- Saw the same projects as projects I was a member of.
- Added some `var_dump()` stuff to verify the Owners changed.
- Used `grep` to look for other readers of this edge type.
- Made some project updates.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14893
Summary:
Fixes T9019. Pretty much ripped from D14467. I added the "policy hint" stuff so that you can create a project with this policy immediately.
I really dislike how the "hint" code works, but we //almost// never need to use it and the badness feels fairly well-contained.
Also pick up a quick feedback fix from D14863.
Test Plan:
- Added test coverage, got it to pass.
- Created a project with "Visible To: Project Members".
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9019
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14869
Summary: Ref T8509. We currently give you a fairly obtuse error when trying to name a project something like "!!". The error is correct, but not as helpful as it could be. Give users a more specific, more helpful error.
Test Plan: {F1042883}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14872
Summary:
Fixes T8509. Changes these behaviors:
- If you create a project named "QQQ" and add "qqq" as a hashtag at the same time, it fails in an unhelpful way. (Now: succeeds.)
- If you add "qqq" as a hashtag to a project with primary hashtag "qqq", it fails in a correct but probably unnecessary way (Now: just works).
We could make one or both of these behaviors show the user an error instead, but I think it's likely that this behavior is just what they always want.
Test Plan:
- Added failing tests and made them pass.
- Executed both scenarios described above from the web UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14871
Summary:
Ref T8509. This fixes three issues:
- Adding a slug like `UPPERCASE` would not give you a normalized slug. (Now: normalizes as `uppercase`.)
- Adding a slug like `UPPERCASE` would allow you to give two different projects the different tags `UPPERCASE` and `uppercase` (and `UpPeRcAsE`, etc). (Now: second tag is rejected as a duplicate.)
- Adding multiple identical or similar slugs would produce a duplicate key exception. (Now: ignores the duplicates.)
Test Plan:
- Added test coverage.
- Made tests pass.
- Hit these cases in the UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14870
Summary:
Ref T10010. Subprojects have the following general membership rule: if you are a member of a subproject ("Engineering > Backend"), you are also a member of the parent project.
It would be unreasonably difficult to implement this rule directly in SQL when querying `withMemberPHIDs()`, because we'd have to do an arbitrarily large number of arbitrarily deep joins, or fetch and then requery a lot of data.
Instead, introduce "materailized members", which are just a copy of all the effective members of a project. When a subproject has a membership change, we go recompute the effective membership of all the parent projects. Then we can just JOIN to satisfy `withMemberPHIDs()`.
Having this process avialable will also be useful in the future, when a project's membership might be defined by some external source.
Also make milestones mostly work like we'd expect them to with respect to membership and visibility.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Changed project members, verified materialized members populated correctly in the database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14863
Summary:
Ref T10010. This implements technical groundwork for subprojects. Specifically, it implements policy rules like Phriction:
- to see a project, you must be able to see all of its parents (and the project itself).
- you can edit a project if you can edit any of its parents (or the project itself).
To facilitiate this, we load all project ancestors when querying projects so we can do the view/edit checks.
This does NOT yet implement:
- proper membership rules for these projects (up next);
- any kind of UI to let users create subprojects.
Test Plan:
- Added unit tests.
- Executed unit tests.
- Browsed Projects (no change in behavior is expected).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14861
Summary:
Ref T10010. Currently, we do an unusual JOIN to make testing for viewer membership in projects a little cheaper.
This won't work as-is once we have subprojects, so standardize, simplify, and cover it with more tests for now. (I may be able to get a similar optimization later, but want a correct implementation first.)
Test Plan:
This change should create no behavioral differences.
- Added tests.
- Ran tests.
- Viewed projects.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14859
Summary:
Ref T9964. ApplicationSearch currently has a bunch of hard-coded `if ($object instanceof thing)` stuff.
Pull that out so it can live in extensions.
Test Plan:
- Searched by spaces, subscribers, projects.
{F1023921}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14764
Summary:
Ref T9132. Ref T9908. Fixes T5622. This allows you to copy some fields (projects, subscribers, custom fields, some per-application) from another object when creating a new object by passing the `?template=xyz` parameter.
Extend "copy" support to work with all custom fields.
Test Plan:
- Created new pastes, packages, tasks using `?template=...`
- Viewed new template docs page.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5622, T9132, T9908
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14699
Summary: Ref T9132. This still has a lot of rough edges but the basics seem to work OK.
Test Plan: {F1012627}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14653
Summary: Ref T9132. I had some hacks in place for dealing with Edge/Subscribers stuff. Clean that up so it's structured a little better.
Test Plan:
- Edited subscribers and projects.
- Verified things still show up in Conduit.
- Made concurrent edits (added a project in one window, removed it in another window, got a clean result with a correct merge of the two edits).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14601
Summary:
Ref T9132. Currently, EditEngine had some branchy-`instanceof` code like this:
```
if ($object instanceof Whatever) {
do_magic();
}
if ($object instanceof SomethingElse) {
do_other_magic();
}
```
...where `Whatever` and `SomethingElse` are first-party applications like ProjectsInterface and SubscribersInterface.
This kind of code is generally bad because third-parties can't add new stuff, and it suggest something is kind of hacky in its architecture. Ideally, we would eventually get rid of almost all of this.
T9789 is a similar discussion of this for the next layer down (`TransactionEditor`) and plans to get rid of branchy-instanceofs there too.
Since I'm about to add more stuff here (for Custom Fields), split it out first so I'm not digging us any deeper than I already dug us.
Broadly, this allows third-party extensions to add fields to every EditEngine UI if they want, like we do for Policies, Subscribers, Projects and Comments today (and CustomFields soon).
Test Plan:
{F1007575}
- Observed that all fields still appear on the form and seem to work correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14599
