Summary:
Ref T1191. Ref T6203. While generating expected schemata, I ran into these columns which seem to have sketchy nullability.
- Mark most of them for later resolution (T6203). They work fine today and don't need to block T1191. Changing them can break the application, so we can't autofix them.
- Forgive a couple of them that are sort-of reasonable or going to get wiped out.
Test Plan: Saw 94 remaining warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191, T6203
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10593
Summary:
Ref T1191. We have several keys on `<x, y, id>`. When `id` is an auto-increment primary key, I believe this is exactly equivalent to a key on `<x, y>`, because the leaf nodes are implicitly sorted by `id`. We omit the implicit `id` elsewhere.
It would be nice to drop the `id` bit for consistency, but it's not doing any harm and this doesn't need to block the primary work of T1191.
Test Plan: Saw slightly fewer warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10592
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary:
Fixes T4880. More specifically
- adds an "edit" pencil to post lists iff you can edit the post
- style change so this has no text-decoration
- adds a "no data" box if you have no posts in a given view
- style change to crush some margins so it formats like posts do
- adds some validation that your configuration is correct if you are specifying a custom domain
- updates docs about custom domains
Test Plan: clicked around and it was better! (see screenshots) read doc changes carefully
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4880
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8918
Summary: Via HackerOne. This doesn't actually have any security impact as far as we can tell, but a researcher reported it since it seems suspicious. At a minimum, it could be confusing. Also improve some i18n stuff.
Test Plan: Hit all the error cases, then saved a valid custom domain.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8493
Summary:
nothing too crazy here. try to be smart about some defaults (i.e. phame title is optional and can be derived from title; post as not a draft by default; etc). Fixes T3695.
also do a little re-factoring to centralizing initializing new posts and turning posts into dictionaries. also change blogs => posts in another conduit method so it makes sense and stuff.
Test Plan: made some posts via conduit. testing trying to specify blogger, phame title, and isDraft, all worked nicely
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aran, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3695
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8485
Summary:
Via HackerOne. This defuses an attack which allows users to steal OAuth tokens through a clever sequence of steps:
- The attacker begins the OAuth workflow and copies the Facebook URL.
- The attacker mutates the URL to use the JS/anchor workflow, and to redirect to `/phame/live/X/` instead of `/login/facebook:facebook.com/`, where `X` is the ID of some blog they control. Facebook isn't strict about paths, so this is allowed.
- The blog has an external domain set (`blog.evil.com`), and the attacker controls that domain.
- The user gets stopped on the "live" controller with credentials in the page anchor (`#access_token=...`) and a message ("This blog has moved...") in a dialog. They click "Continue", which POSTs a CSRF token.
- When a user POSTs a `<form />` with no `action` attribute, the browser retains the page anchor. So visiting `/phame/live/8/#anchor` and clicking the "Continue" button POSTs you to a page with `#anchor` intact.
- Some browsers (including Firefox and Chrome) retain the anchor after a 302 redirect.
- The OAuth credentials are thus preserved when the user reaches `blog.evil.com`, and the attacker's site can read them.
This 302'ing after CSRF post is unusual in Phabricator and unique to Phame. It's not necessary -- instead, just use normal links, which drop anchors.
I'm going to pursue further steps to mitigate this class of attack more thoroughly:
- Ideally, we should render forms with an explicit `action` attribute, but this might be a lot of work. I might render them with `#` if no action is provided. We never expect anchors to survive POST, and it's surprising to me that they do.
- I'm going to blacklist OAuth parameters (like `access_token`) from appearing in GET on all pages except whitelisted pages (login pages). Although it's not important here, I think these could be captured from referrers in some cases. See also T4342.
Test Plan: Browsed all the affected Phame interfaces.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, arice
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8481
Summary:
Ref T603. This cleans up an existing callsite in the policy filter, and opens up some stuff in the future.
Some policy objects don't have real PHIDs:
PhabricatorTokenGiven
PhabricatorSavedQuery
PhabricatorNamedQuery
PhrequentUserTime
PhabricatorFlag
PhabricatorDaemonLog
PhabricatorConduitMethodCallLog
ConduitAPIMethod
PhabricatorChatLogEvent
PhabricatorChatLogChannel
Although it would be reasonable to add real PHIDs to some of these (like `ChatLogChannel`), it probably doesn't make much sense for others (`DaemonLog`, `MethodCallLog`). Just let them return `null`.
Also remove some duplicate `$id` and `$phid` properties. These are declared on `PhabricatorLiskDAO` and do not need to be redeclared.
Test Plan: Ran the `testEverythingImplemented` unit test, which verifies that all classes conform to the interface.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7306
Summary:
Ref T603. Adds clarifying text which expands on policies and explains exceptions and rules. The goal is to provide an easy way for users to learn about special policy rules, like "task owners can always see a task".
This presentation might be a little aggressive. That's probably OK as we introduce policies, but something a little more tempered might be better down the road.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7150
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary:
Ref T3599
Go through everything, grep a bit, replace some bits.
Test Plan: Navigate around a bit
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3599
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6871
Summary: Ref T1536. This is the last major migration. Moves us over to the DB and drops all the config stuff.
Test Plan:
- Ran the migration.
- Saw all my old config brought forward and respected, with accurate settings.
- Ran LDAP import.
- Grepped for all removed config options.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6243
Summary:
Ref T3023
Token support for Phriction Documents, Ponder Questions, and Phame Blogs
Test Plan: Token notifications and visual display seems to be working for the above types
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T3023
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5862
Summary:
Unmuck almost all of the we-sort-of-have-viewers-some-of-the-time mess.
There are a few notable cases here:
- I used Omnipotent users when indexing objects for search. I think this is correct; we do policy filtering when showing results.
- I cheated in a bad way in the Remarkup object rule, but fixing this requires fixing all the PhabricatorRemarkupEngine callsites (there are 85). I'll do that in the next diff.
- I cheated in a few random places, like when sending mail about package edits. These aren't a big deal.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all PhabricatorObjectHandleData references.
- Gave them viewers.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5151
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary:
Allow skins to serve arbitrary resources without needing to be mapped, so we can have a vibrant community of amateur skinners.
For "basic" skins, just put all the "css/" on the page always.
Includes an image to prove that works.
@vrana, pretty sure this has no impact outside of Phame but it does change Celerity so it might be to blame if there's any weirdness with static resources.
Test Plan:
{F21341}
{F21340}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3719
Summary:
Lower the barrier to entry for installing and creating skins, so we can kill Wordpress. You can now install skins by dropping them into a directory, and build either "advanced" (full phutil library) skins or "basic" (simple PHP templates) skins.
Next up is getting static resources working in an easy way for skins.
I put these in `externals/` for now so they don't get hit by lint.
Test Plan: Viewed the Pokeblog with the Oblivious skin.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3717
Summary: Restore summarization. Use the remarkup cache, and try to do it somewhat-intelligently (pick the first paragraph that looks like it's text).
Test Plan:
{F21323}
{F21324}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3715
Summary:
Two high-level things happening here:
- We no longer ever need to put meta-UI (content creation, editing, notices, etc.) on live blog views, since this is all in Phame now. I pulled this out.
- On the other hand, I pushed more routing/control logic into Skins and made the root skin a Controller instead of a View. This simplifies some of the code above skins, and the theory behind this is that it gives us greater flexibility to, e.g., put a glue layer between Phame and Wordpress templates or whatever else, and allows skins to handle routing and thus add pages like "About" or "Bio".
- I added a basic skin below the root skin which is more like the old root skin and has standard rendering hooks.
- "Ten Eleven" is a play on the popular (default?) Wordpress themes called "Twenty Ten", "Twenty Eleven" and "Twenty Twelve".
Test Plan: Viewed live blog and live posts. They aren't pretty, but they don't have extraneous resources.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3714
Summary: Currently the new detail pages don't show this information. Show it, and use the remarkup cache for BLAZING OODLES OF PERFOARMSNECES!!~~~
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3700
Summary:
Cleans up some of the mess I made in D3694. Basically:
- All blogs have an "internal" view with posts that uses mobile-friendly UIs, etc., so we don't have to do as much work with skins -- they just have to look pretty.
- Blogs now have a separate "live" view that we use to handle domains / skins.
- Simplified some views and use IDs in some URLs for consistency.
- Delete a bunch of edge/blogger/multi-blog code that's now obsolete.
Test Plan: Will attach screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3695
Summary:
This leaves the UI in a pretty rough state, but implements blog policy controls and queries, and 1:1 relationships between posts and blogs. Needs a bunch more cleanup but seemed like an okayish breaking point in terms of cohesiveness.
Posts have these rules:
- Drafts are visible only to the author.
- Published posts are visible to anyone who can see the blog they appear on.
- Posts are only editable by the author.
...so we don't need any special policy UI or state to accommodate these rules.
Posts may have no blog if they're grandfathered in or you write a post to a blog and then lose the ability to see the blog. This is the messiest edge case -- specifically:
- You write a post to blog A.
- You publish the post.
- I edit the "Visible To:" for blog A and set it to exclude you.
What we do in this case is let you see the post in "My Posts", but you can no longer see the blog and you'll see the post as not being part of a blog. We can maybe give you some UI to let you move it later or something.
Test Plan: Hit all (I think?) of the interfaces without issues. Definitely some UI problems still right now.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3694
Summary:
Adds "can view" and "can edit" policies to blogs. Replaces "bloggers" with "can join".
This doesn't fully remove "bloggers" because I didn't want this to get too crazy/huge.
Test Plan: Created, edited, deleted blogs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3693
Summary: I set one of my blogs to "phacility.com" based on `arc patch` and it now fatals since that's not a valid class anymore. :P Recover from these cases.
Test Plan: Viewed blog, no missing symbole exception.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3692
Summary:
introduce an abstract "PhameBlogSkin" class and instantiate two versions -- PhabricatorBlogSkin (Default) and PhacilityBlogSkin.
Most notable hack is including the directory /rsrc/images/phacility - this lets things "work" without messing around with the phacility.com CSS and instead just cutting and pasting most of the file.
Test Plan: played around with Phame a bunch. In particular, created a blog with a custom domain and the phacility skin. Verified it looked good and individual posts looked okay.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3687
Summary: this then enables people to create blog.theircompany.com. And for us, blog.phacility.com...!
Test Plan:
- created custom URIs of various goodness and verified the error messages were sensical.
- verified if "false" in configuration then custom uri stuff disappears
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3542
Summary:
blogs are collections of posts. a blog also has metadata like a name, description and "bloggers" that can edit the metadata of the blog and contribute posts.
changes include the post edit flow where bloggers can now select which blogs to publish to. also made various small tweaks throughout the UI to make things sensical and clean as the concept of blogs is introduced.
there's edges powering this stuff. bloggers <=> blogs and posts <=> blogs in particular.
Test Plan:
made blogs, deleted blogs, tried to make blogs with no bloggers. all went well.
verified ui to publish only showed up for public posts, published posts to blogs, un-published posts to blogs, re-published posts to blogs, deleted posts and verified they disappeared from blogs.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3003
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary:
'cuz we need to be phamous!
V1 feature set
- posts
-- standard thing you'd expect - a title and a remarkup-powered body and...
-- "phame" title - a short string that can be used to reference the story. this gets auto-updated when you mess with the title.
-- configuration - for now, do you want Facebook, Disqus or no comments? this is a per-post thing but feeds from an instance-wide configuration
Please do toss out any must have features or changes.
Test Plan: played around with this bad boy like whoa
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T1111
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2202
