Summary: [WIP] Tossing this up for safety and to read through it. Need to test, update some of the other flows. This updates everything in Auth for new UI and modern conventions.
Test Plan: Loooots of random testing, new providers, edit providers, logging out, forgot password... more coming.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15550
Summary:
[WIP] Allows awarding a badge from a user profile. Unsure of the interactions here if a user can't award any badges, or if we should just hide this.
Fixes T10688
Fixes T10318
Test Plan: Award some badges. Steal them back.
Reviewers: lpriestley, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10318, T10688
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15544
Summary: Ref T8941
Test Plan: Create an object and create multiple transactions, some time apart to ensure that time clumping isn't interfering. Make sure that events that are large enough to have a dropdown menu show badges under author pic.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8941
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15543
Summary:
Ref T10537. Currently, Nuance has a `NuanceRequestor` object, intended to represent the external user who created content (e.g., a GitHub account or a Twitter account or whatever).
This object is currently almost unused, and its design predates Doorkeeper. In D15541, I chose to use doorkeeper objects instead of NuanceRequestor objects to represent requestors.
I don't currently anticipate a need for such an object, given that we have Doorkeeper. If we do need it in the future for some reason, it would be fairly easy to restore it, create a requestor type which wraps a Doorkeeper object, and then migrate. Not super thrilling to do that, but not a huge mess.
`NuanceItem` still has a `requestorPHID`, but this is now a less formal object PHID instead of a more formal Requestor-object PHID, and holds a doorkeeper exeternal object PHID for GitHub events.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `nuancerequestor`.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`.
- Grepped for `requestor`, remaining uses of this term seem reasonable/correct.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15546
Summary: This is kinda bad in terms of UI (It just makes a json of the thing and diffs that), but it's a start.
Test Plan: edit rule, create rule, add/remove/edit conditions, actions
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15542
Summary:
Ref T10538. Ref T10537. This creates PHIDs which represent GitHub users, and uses them as the actors for synchronized comments.
I've just made them Doorkeeper objects. There are three major kinds of objects they //could// possibly be:
- Nuance requestor objects.
- External account objects.
- Doorkeeper objects.
I don't think we actually need distinct nuance requestor objects. These don't really do anything right now, and were originally created before Doorkeeper. I think Doorkeeper is a superset of nuance requestor functionality, and better developed and more flexible.
Likewise, doorkeeper objects are much more flexible than external account objects, and it's nice to imagine that we can import from Twootfeed or whatever without needing to build full OAuth for it. I also like less stuff touching auth code, when possible.
Making these separate from external accounts does make it a bit harder to reconcile external users with internal users, but I think that's OK, and that it's generally desirable to show the real source of a piece of content. That is, if I wrote a comment on GitHub but also have a Phabricator account, I think it's good to show "epriestley (GitHub)" (the GitHub user) as the author, not "epriestley" (the Phabricator user). I think this is generally less confusing overall, and we can add more linkage later to make it clearer.
Test Plan:
{F1194104}
{F1194105}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537, T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15541
Summary: Ref T10538. This probably gets push events where GitHub does not recognize the author wrong, but I don't have any of those yet.
Test Plan: Added and ran unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15540
Summary: Ref T10537. Add a new content source for Nuance. Prepare for better author attribution.
Test Plan: {F1194038}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15539
Summary: Fixes T10670, for users with exclusively archived badges, user profile should show "no badges" message instead of blank box
Test Plan: Award badge to user with no badges, archive badge, user profile should show "no badges" message under badges.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10670
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15538
Summary:
Fixes T10234. This is a more thorough fix.
Root issue is that some time around D13589, we started hitting an object cache for `loadCustomInlineRules()`, but didn't adjust the code to account for that.
So if a page created multiple similar engines, we'd return the same `$rule` object for multiple engines, call `setEngine()` on it with different engines, and then possibly try to render using an already-expired engine the second time through.
Instead, create a separate `$rule` object for each separate `$engine`.
Test Plan:
Repro is something like this:
- Create a custominlinerule which uses an engine.
- Purge the remarkup cache.
- Load a page which uses the rule in two engines (e.g., in a revision description, and also in an inline comment).
- Before change: second one could fatal. After change: clean load.
Reviewers: thoughtpolice, chad
Reviewed By: thoughtpolice, chad
Subscribers: thoughtpolice, eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T10234
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15535
Summary:
Ref T10537.
- Let nuance items render custom curtain panels.
- Add a custom panel linking to the imported task, if one exists.
- Actually extract comments properly.
Test Plan:
Unit tests, plus:
{F1193800}
{F1193801}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15537
Summary: Ref T10677, Awarding/revoking badge should create a feed story on homepage with badge handle recipient handles
Test Plan: Award/revoke badge, open Feed, should see story with badge link and recipient links.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15534
Summary: Ref T10677, awarding/revoking a badge should create timeline entries with titles that are more clear (excludes homepage feed stories)
Test Plan: Award/revoke a badge to single or multiple users. See timeline entries that reflect those actions.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15533
Summary: Cleans up EditEngine, adds new layout to EditEngine and descendents
Test Plan: Test creating a new form, reordering, marking and unmarking defaults. View new forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15531
Summary: Adds headers, new layout to edit panels on Almanac.
Test Plan: Pull up each edit panel in sandbox, save form.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15527
Summary: Ref T8996, Convert badge recipients from Edges to actual BadgeAward objects
Test Plan: Create badge, award it to recipient. Make sure adding/removing recipients works. (Still need to migrate exisiting recipients to new table and need to create activity feed blurbs)
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8996
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15014
Summary:
Fixes T10302. I think we had fixed-width dialog containers in the past (?) but they all handle their own centering now.
This was causing them to be slightly off-center as a result, and creating the 7px issue in T10302.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a wide dialog (task edit).
- Viewed a narrow dialog (notification dismissal confirmation).
- Viewed dialogs on wide/narrow screens.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10302
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15529
Summary:
Fixes T10385. Two issues:
- `$show_blame` and `$show_color` were improperly swapped.
- Code to hide these columns got dropped somewhere, probably in my recent-ish rewrite.
Test Plan:
- Showed/hid blame.
- Showed/hid colors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10385
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15528
Summary:
Ref T10537. For Nuance, I want to introduce new sources (like "GitHub" or "GitHub via Nuance" or something) but this needs to modularize eventually.
Split ContentSource apart so applications can add new content sources.
Test Plan:
This change has huge surface area, so I'll hold it until post-release. I think it's fairly safe (and if it does break anything, the breaks should be fatals, not anything subtle or difficult to fix), there's just no reason not to hold it for a few hours.
- Viewed new module page.
- Grepped for all removed functions/constants.
- Viewed some transactions.
- Hovered over timestamps to get content source details.
- Added a comment via Conduit.
- Added a comment via web.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace XXXXX --no-quickstart -f` to re-run all historic migrations.
- Generated some objects with `bin/lipsum`.
- Ran a bulk job on some tasks.
- Ran unit tests.
{F1190182}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15521
Summary: Updates the Harbormaster UI to match the new two column everywhere else.
Test Plan: Did best I could, tested builds, plans, steps, buildables. Unable to test lint/unit locally, I need to set that up. Kick the tires for me pls. :3
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15523
Summary: Ref T10537. Show when an object is bridged to something external.
Test Plan: {F1190099}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15520
Summary:
Fixes T10665. See that task for discussion.
Because `$head_map` is not properly re-initialized for each ref we check, pushes which affect multiple branches (say, "A" and "B") can have information bleed from the first branch check to the second branch.
To trigger a problem behavior, you can push one commit which updates an existing branch, plus one commit which creates a new branch. If they process in the right order, the `$head_map` from the updated branch will bleed into the `$head_map` for the new branch and trigger an incorrect head split detection.
Test Plan:
- Pushed a set of changes which updated `branch-a` and created `branch-b`.
- Before change: improper detection of split heads.
- After change: clean push.
- Pushed a set of changes which split the head of `branch-d`.
- Correct detection of split heads.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10665
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15522
Summary: Ref T10538. This makes us render better human-readable descriptions of more GitHub event types.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15516
Summary: I know this is ultimately pointless but feel better about pushing back on users when there is no possible way they could be acting in good faith.
Test Plan: Read documents.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15518
Summary: Ref T10538. Very sloppy, but starting to sort of work. This sort of gets a piece of framework into a reasonable spot, next couple of diffs are going to be "extract comment text" and "show stuff in the UI" sorts of things.
Test Plan: {F1186726}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15511
Summary: This URI is currently a little whack.
Test Plan:
- With MFA, clicked "Edit Subscription" on a subscription.
- Clicked "Cancel".
- Before: Sent to `/phortune/phortune/edit/...`, a 404.
- After: Properly returned to subscription detail page.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15514
Summary: Moves everything I could find in Phortune to new UI layouts.
Test Plan: Tested every page I could get two, unclear how to test subscriptions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15513
Summary:
Ref T10537. Generally, when users interact with Nuance items we'll dump a command into a queue and apply it in the background. This avoids race conditions with multiple users interacting with an item, which Nuance is more subject to than other applications because it has an import/external component.
The "sync" command doesn't actually do anything yet.
Test Plan: {F1186365}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15506
Summary: Ref T10538. This extracts and renders URIs for GitHub events so we can link to the original thing on GitHub.
Test Plan: {F1186332}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15505
Summary:
Ref T10537. This allows item types to expose item actions. Eventually these actions might be things like "promote to task", "tweet reply", "ban user forever", etc.
For now, provide a simple action which shows a raw item in a dialog.
Test Plan: {F1185573}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15504
Summary:
Ref T10537. These are objects which are bound to some external object, like a Maniphest task which is a representation of a GitHub issue.
This doesn't do much yet and may change, but my thinking is:
- I'm putting these on-object instead of on edges because I think we want to actively change the UI for them (e.g., clearly call out that the object is bridged) but don't want every page to need to do extra queries in the common case where zero bridged objects exist anywhere in the system.
- I'm making these one-to-one, more or less: an issue can't be bridged to a bunch of tasks, nor can a bunch of tasks be bridged to a single issue. Pretty sure this makes sense? I can't come up with any reasonable, realistic cases where you want a single GitHub issue to publish to multiple different tasks in Maniphest.
- Technically, one type of each bridgable object could be bridged, but I expect this to never actually occur. Hopefully.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, loaded some pages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15502
Summary: This is failing locally for me, set to getViewer and pull up cart.
Test Plan: View cart with a description.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15509
Summary: Ref T9456. This makes everything work, except that CircleCI doesn't fetch tags which are not ancestors of branch heads.
Test Plan: Ran passing builds through CircleCI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: dpaola2, JustinTulloss
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14288
Summary: Ref T9456. Some rough edges and we can't complete the build yet since I haven't written a webhook, but this mostly seems to be working.
Test Plan:
- Ran this build on some stuff.
- Ran a normal HTTP step build to make sure I didn't break that.
{F880301}
{F880302}
{F880303}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: JustinTulloss, joshma
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14286
Summary: Ref T9456. This is just a convenience type for things like API tokens, to make it harder for users to make mistakes and keep SSH keys out of the dropdown for "choose your API token".
Test Plan: {F879820}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T9456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14284
