Summary: This reverts commit e70bb28ea0. We didn't end up using these.
Test Plan: Looked at Differential.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6357
Summary:
Ref T603. Ref T2625. Fixes T3241. Depends on D5451. Depends on D6346.
@wez, this changes the Differential revision list UI substantially and may generate a lot of bikeshedding / who-moved-my-cheese churn. See T3417 for context, for example. The motivations for this change are:
- The list now works on devices, like phones and tablets. This is a requirement to make the rest of Differential work on devices.
- Although ApplicationSearch intentionally presents a simpler interface initially and some options which were one click away before aren't now, it is much more powerful than the search it replaces and allows users to build, save, share, fork, edit, and customize a much wider range of queries. Users who used the old filters frequently can use Advanced Search -> Save Custom Query to create new versions of them, and of any other query. "Edit Queries.." allows users to remove and reorder queries, including builtin queries. Basically, there are like three things which have gone from "1-click" to "a few clicks", and ten trillion things which have gone from "hard/impossible" to "relatively easy".
The local screenshots look a bit iffy, but I think a lot of this is the fakenesss of my test data. If they still feel iffy in production we can tweak them until they feel good, like we did for Maniphest.
Test Plan:
{F48477}
{F48478}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, wez
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, s
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2625, T3241
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6347
Summary:
Tried out `PhabricatorObjectItemView` for Differential. It looks smexy and smooth.
Refs T2014
- Title and Date as Maniphest
- Author in the handle icon
- Bar color reflects revision status (Needs Review, Accepted, Abandoned etc.) @chad looking for non-blue is faster than keeping watch for everything that's not "Closed" in old table form
- Some status information are in footer icons; currently only stale/old status display as well as saved drafts, maybe more in future; these come into my mind:
- No reviewer warning
- Push Blocking Priority (T2730)
- Trivial, fast review guaranteed
- Sketch / Just looking for advice/help
- Arcanist Project (T2614)
- Denote "Public Send-in" (T1476)
{F37662}
{F37663}
{F37664}
{F37665}
Some flaws:
- Date and reviewers on every entry the same?
- No respect for Differential fields (for some reason, every entry appeared the same, so broke it to parts)
- Plenty of (potential) increase in height - advise reducing paging length from 100 to 50 - or just ignore me
Suggestions for the future:
- Expand the meta information regarding revisions; e.g. the various status displays above
- Uh... T2543, T1279, T793, T731 and what else I want for Differential, because they are awesome!
- T793 should be in particular easy appearance-wise, just copy-paste from Maniphest
Test Plan: By looking at it, of course. Verified there are no errors or crashed
Reviewers: epriestley, chad, btrahan, liguobig
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin, edward, nh
Maniphest Tasks: T2014
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5451
Conflicts:
src/__celerity_resource_map__.php
Summary: They seem to look OK?
Test Plan: {F48529} {F48530}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6350
Summary:
Ref T603.
- Primarily, this gets rid of a `DifferentialRevisionListData` callsite.
- Also modernize and clean up some UI stuff.
Test Plan:
{F48260}
{F48261}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6334
Summary: When I ignore setup issues, I want them to look dealt with, and keep yellow for new ones. Also updated callout colors.
Test Plan: Ignored a number of issues.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6300
Summary: Ref T3322. Depends on D6297. Here are some Phabricator tweaks to complment D6297.
Test Plan: {F47522}
Reviewers: garoevans
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3322
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6298
Summary:
Ref T2852. Primarily, this expands API access to Asana. As a user-visible effect, it links Asana tasks in Remarkup.
When a user enters an Asana URI, we register an onload behavior to make an Ajax call for the lookup. This respects privacy imposed by the API without creating a significant performance impact.
Test Plan: {F47183}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6274
Summary: ...also make it so in Pholio when you add an inline comment the preview refreshes. Fixes T2649.
Test Plan: played around in pholio leaving commentary. noted that a new inline comment would refresh the preview.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2649
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6267
Summary:
Currently, it takes one frame for animations to set their first value. For fading stuff in, that means it briefly appears at 100% opacity, then jumps to 0%, then fades in from there.
Instead, immediately tween to the initial value.
Test Plan: Comments in Pholio fade in nicely. Preview is still a janky pile of mess until D6267.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6268
Summary:
Ref T2222. This adds PHIDs to all Differential comments so I can migrate the inlinecommment table to transaction_comment in the next diff.
@wez, this will issue a few million queries for Facebook (roughly, one for each Differential comment ever made). It's safe to skip the `.php` half of the patch, bring Phabricator up normally, and then apply this patch with Phabricator running if that eases the migration, although the next few diffs will probably be downtime-required migrations so maybe it's easier to just schedule some downtime.
Test Plan: Ran migration locally. Verified existing comments and new comments received PHIDs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: wez, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6266
Summary: Removes extra padding on rendering notifications in jx-notification.
Test Plan: test a notification
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6259
Summary: Changes it to a dialog view, tweaks some layout bugs on full width forms.
Test Plan: Tested loging in and resetting my password. Chrome + Mobile
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, nrp
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6257
Summary:
Ref T1536.
- When users try to add a one-of provider which already exists, give them a better error (a dialog explaining what's up with reasonable choices).
- Disable such providers and label why they're disabled on the "new provider" screen.
Test Plan:
{F47012}
{F47013}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6256
Summary: Not sure how to test this, but assume it's coming from this hover.
Test Plan: n/a
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3425
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6255
Summary: Added in color variables in most used places. Tweaked green to be a bit more serious.
Test Plan: Tested Tags, Error View, Timeline, Object Views, and Color Palette.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6244
Summary: Remade auth and policy icon.
Test Plan: look at the images.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6241
Summary: This adds an 83% Light set of colors for highlights, warnings, etc.
Test Plan: Tested Notifications, Error View, and Color Palette page. Test is out, not quite sure on notifications.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6239
Summary: Moves old auth icon to 'policy' and new icon is keys.
Test Plan: photoshop
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6236
Summary: Picked a set of standard colors. Based on our current Maniphest color set, but tweaked to the same hue with http://color.hailpixel.com/
Test Plan: Not intended to be end all be all, but a decent first cut. Applied to Maniphest and Tags.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6229
Summary: Ref T1536. If you only have button-based logins, the new login screen looks weird.
Test Plan:
Before
{F46725}
After
{F46726}
Reviewers: chad, jamesr
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6225
Summary: Touches a lot of little spacing things here and there, stuck to 4px grid when possible, checked mobile views.
Test Plan: Mobile, Logging In, Multiple Providers.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6220
Summary: Ref T1536. Many rough / broken edges, but adds the rough skeleton of the provider edit workflow.
Test Plan: {F46333}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6200
Summary: Ref T1536. Adds an initial "choose a provider type" screen for adding a new provider. This doesn't go anywhere yet.
Test Plan: {F46316}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6199
Summary: Ref T1536. These can probably use some design tweaking and there's a bit of a bug with profile images for some providers, but generally seems to be in the right ballpark.
Test Plan:
{F46604}
{F46605}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6210
Summary:
Ref T1536. Currently, we have separate panels for each link/unlink and separate controllers for OAuth vs LDAP.
Instead, provide a single "External Accounts" panel which shows all linked accounts and allows you to link/unlink more easily.
Move link/unlink over to a full externalaccount-based workflow.
Test Plan:
- Linked and unlinked OAuth accounts.
- Linked and unlinked LDAP accounts.
- Registered new accounts.
- Exercised most/all of the error cases.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6189
Summary: Ref T1536. Error state is a bit gross but we need to sort that out in general.
Test Plan:
{F46549}
{F46550}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6208
Summary:
Ref T1536. Ref T1930. Code is not reachable.
This provides password authentication and registration on the new provider/adapter framework.
I sort of cheated a little bit and don't really route any password logic through the adapter (instead, this provider uses an empty adapter and just sets the type/domain on it). I think the right way to do this //conceptually// is to treat username/passwords as an external black box which the adapter communicates with. However, this creates a lot of practical implementation and UX problems:
- There would basically be two steps -- in the first one, you interact with the "password black box", which behaves like an OAuth provider. This produces some ExternalAccount associated with the username/password pair, then we go into normal registration.
- In normal registration, we'd proceed normally.
This means:
- The registration flow would be split into two parts, one where you select a username/password (interacting with the black box) and one where you actually register (interacting with the generic flow). This is unusual and probably confusing for users.
- We would need to do a lot of re-hashing of passwords, since passwords currently depend on the username and user PHID, which won't exist yet during registration or the "black box" phase. This is a big mess I don't want to deal with.
- We hit a weird condition where two users complete step 1 with the same username but don't complete step 2 yet. The box knows about two different copies of the username, with two different passwords. When we arrive at step 2 the second time we have a lot of bad choices about how to reoslve it, most of which create security problems. The most stragihtforward and "pure" way to resolve the issues is to put password-auth usernames in a separate space, but this would be incredibly confusuing to users (your login name might not be the same as your username, which is bizarre).
- If we change this, we need to update all the other password-related code, which I don't want to bother with (at least for now).
Instead, let registration know about a "default" registration controller (which is always password, if enabled), and let it require a password. This gives us a much simpler (albeit slightly less pure) implementation:
- All the fields are on one form.
- Password adapter is just a shell.
- Password provider does the heavy lifting.
We might make this more pure at some point, but I'm generally pretty satisfied with this.
This doesn't implement the brute-force CAPTCHA protection, that will be coming soon.
Test Plan: Registered with password only and logged in with a password. Hit various error conditions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T1930
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6164
Summary: Rough pass at a PHUIButtonView Class. Keeps phutil_tag intact and adds some image features if you use the class.
Test Plan: UIExamples
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6192
Summary: Restrict the menu hovers to desktop
Test Plan: test desktop and mobile
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6190
Summary: Fixes T3242. Changes the red and orange objects to match the transactions. Also adds a highlight color to 'cards'.
Test Plan: Review my audits in my sandbox
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3242
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6184
Summary: Decided to just remove the hover grey to white, seems fine with the new white icons.
Test Plan: use homepage + icons
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6181
Summary: The shadow on the white icons was too harsh for their size, looked bad on timelines.
Test Plan: Check timeline example, phuilist example.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6176
Summary: Took a stab at some login icons for buttons.
Test Plan: photoshop
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6174
Summary: Fixes T3330
Test Plan: Test desktop and mobile menus in chrome and ios.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3330
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6157
Summary: Used more logical icons for subscribe, auto, and delete instead of the mail icons. Fixes T3329
Test Plan: Tested subscribing and unsubscribing in Maniphest.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3329
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6151
Summary: Adds collapsing of the sidebar, also allows you to say where it goes on mobile (above or below content). ToC for example, above. General Navbar, below. Up to you.
Test Plan: Review UIExamples and Diviner.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6150
Summary: Fixes some issues with lists and tablet/mobile layouts.
Test Plan: shrink my screen
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6148
Summary: Tweaks the dark, grey, and white icons to match the action-icons. Also added a home icon for navigation.
Test Plan: looked at list navs, action menus.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6142
Summary:
- Use the same styles for shared operations (`drag-ghost`, `drag-dragging`).
- Move shared code into the base class.
Test Plan: Dragged around tasks and named queries.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6141
Summary: Needed to be more restrictive
Test Plan: Test maniphest and list examples.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6139
Summary:
Also you have to drop them. So drag, and then drop.
This needs some cleanup and reconciliation/generalization with the Maniphest implementation. In particular, you can't drag things to the very top right now, and they should share more CSS and more behaviors.
Test Plan:
Look I alphabetized them:
{F45286}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6136
Summary:
See discussion in D6130. Basically, all of these should activate workflow:
<a data-sigil="workflow" href="...">...</a>
<div data-sigil="workflow">
<a href="...">...</a>
</div>
<form data-sigil="workflow" action="...">...</form>
<div data-sigil="workflow">
<form action="...">...</form>
</div>
The only case where we don't want to activate workflow is this one:
<form data-sigil="workflow">
<a href="...">...</a>
</form>
Here, the form should workflow but the `<a />` should not.
These cases aren't really covered:
// Undefined no matter where "workflow" is because it's nonsense.
<a><a>...</a></a>
// As above except like a million times more dumb.
<form><form>...</form></form>
// This one is ambiguous. The <a /> will currently workflow. We don't do
// this anywhere and probably never will. If we want a different rule we
// can cross that bridge when we come to it.
<div data-sigil="workflow">
<form action="...">
<a href="...">...</a>
</form>
</div>
Test Plan: Clicked/submitted some things with workflow.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6131
