Summary: See <https://github.com/phacility/phabricator/issues/665>. From reading documentation, this seems dramatically better for InnoDB tables than the default behavior.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage dump`, got a reasonable-looking dump.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10606
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- This drops two tables.
- Both tables were migrated to transactions a very long time ago and no longer have readers or writers.
Test Plan: Saw ~150 fewer warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10576
Summary: Fixes T6184. On a Revision page we don't show the date as an important piece of information, so it's also not likely useful on a Hovercard (and confusing as to what the date means).
Test Plan: Hover over a linked Diff
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10579
Summary:
An explicit navigation markup was recenty added. Use it in
the userguide instead of ad-hoc -> or `->` chains.
Test Plan: Read the docs.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10560
Conflicts:
src/docs/user/userguide/diffusion_hosting.diviner
Summary: Fixes T6199, checks if Calendar is installed and displays if so.
Test Plan: Turned Calendar on and off, tested both layouts.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10574
Summary: Fixes T6189. We currently don't raise these to the editor level, so files, mentions, and project stuff get ignored.
Test Plan: Verified that files added to question and answer bodies end up attached to the relevant objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6189
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10564
Summary: Ref T6185. Although it seems that we can't easily defuse or mitigate this, we can at least warn administrators.
Test Plan: Ran on my (unpatched, local) system, got a setup warning.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6185
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10561
Summary: Take my secrets on the road
Test Plan: View Passphrase on mobile device, see action list.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10562
Summary:
Ref T2015. This increases the Drydock worker lease time to 24 hours. We noticed that some leases took longer than 2 hours when leasing from AWS (the actual resource was successfully leased at around 2 hours, 19 minutes).
24 hours should be plenty enough time to actually lease anything from EC2 (or any other leases during builds).
Test Plan: Have not yet tested this.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2015
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10544
Summary: This fixes a unit test failure that started occurring due to the new membership locking feature.
Test Plan: Ran the unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10546
Summary: Ref T1191. Handful of minor things here (T6150, T6149, T6148, T6147, T6146) but nothing very noteworthy.
Test Plan: Viewed web UI, saw fewer errors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10527
Summary: Fixes T6177. Now that we've reframed "Beta" into "Prototype", there's no reason this needs to be in a separate super-hidden class of application anymore.
Test Plan: Saw Releeph available as a normal Prototype application.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6177
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10550
Summary: Fixes T6176. Language here is a bit awkard but I wanted to use the verb "removed" *and* still have the object first, so I ended up adding the before details parenthetically.
Test Plan: story no longer fatal'd in my feed
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6176
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10549
Summary: Fixes T6169 by using the new nav element on the existing troubleshooting hint the user missed. Fixes T6173 by implementing the user's suggestion.
Test Plan: Looked at docs and they looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: fas, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6169, T6173
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10548
Summary: Fixes T5374. Add an acceptance test to the `PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase` class which fails if a Celerity map is not up-to-date. In order to achieve this, a lot of code used to generate Celerity maps was transferred from `CelerityManagementMapWorkflow` to `CelerityResourceMap` and `CelerityResourceMapGenerator`.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit` and noticed that all tests passed. Modified a JavaScript file and ran `arc unit` again (without running `./bin/celerity map`)... this time the test failed, as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5374
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9817
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Adds support for custom fields.
- Adds support for partial indexes (indexes on a prefix of a column).
- Drops old auxiliary storage table: this was moved to custom field storage about a year ago.
- Drops old project table: this was moved to edges about two months ago.
Test Plan:
- Viewed web UI, saw fewer issues.
- Used `grep` to verify no readers/writers for storage or project table.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10526
Summary:
Ref T1191. Three parts:
- The old way of getting key information only got primary / unique / foreign keys, not all keys. Use `SHOW INDEXES` to get all keys instead.
- Track key uniqueness and raise warnings about it.
- Add a new "all issues" view to show an expanded, flat view of all issues. This is just an easier way to get a list so you don't have to dig around in the hierarchical view.
Test Plan:
{F206351}
{F206352}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10525
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- There was a varchar(50) column. I changed it to `text64`, since this length is unusual.
- There was an int(3) column. I changed it to `int32`, since this length is unusual.
Test Plan: Ran migrations, saw warnings disappear from config tool.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10524
Summary: Ref T1191. This was migrated to transactions a very long time ago.
Test Plan: Ran migration, grepped, left comments in Slowvote.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10523
Summary: T1191. Nothing very notable here.
Test Plan: Saw more blue in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10522
Summary: Ref T1191. Nothing too exciting in these.
Test Plan: Saw more blue in UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10521
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Fixes T6096. We've migrated away from this table in T4896. The data is now in the transaction table. There have been no reads or writes to this table for some time and I haven't seen any issues from users.
- Fixes T6097. Same deal as above. The data is now in the transaction comment table.
- Fixes T6100. This cache is safe to wipe out, since it's purely read-through. Wiping it will make the migration faster. The column type change fixes storage of PHP serialized objects in a text column.
Test Plan:
- Ran migrations.
- Observed some yellow go blue on the Database Status screen.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6096, T6100, T6097, T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10520
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notable:
- Allowed objects to remove default columns (some feed tables have no `id`).
- Added a "note" severity and moved all the charset stuff down to that to make progress more clear.
Test Plan:
Trying to make the whole thing blue...
{F205970}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10519
Summary: Ref T1191. Fills in some more of the databases. Nothing very notable here. I didn't encounter any issues or overlong keys.
Test Plan: Used web UI to click around and verify expected schemata match up against actual schemata well.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10516
Summary:
Fixes T5603. Puts the toggling of locking membership into the editor so we get exceptions and all that.
I think the dialogue when you try to leave a project that is locked could be a little better maybe? Right now it just says "You can't leave" and "The membership is locked" more or less; should I surface a link to the policy stuff there too?
Test Plan:
- made a project, toggled the "lock" setting, observed stickiness and good transactions being made
- locked a project and tried to leave as a non-editor - got a dialogue letting me know i couldn't
- locked a project and tried to leave as an editor - left successfully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10508
Summary: Ref T1191. This fills in some more features and gets audit and auth nearly generating reasonable expected schemata.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10500
Summary:
Ref T1191. The major issue motivation here is that InnoDB keys have a maximum length of 767 bytes. When we move `utf8` colums to `utf8mb4` columns, they'll jump from 3 bytes per character to 4 bytes per character, which may make some indexes too long. Add key schema to help spot this.
Also add nullability since it doesn't hurt.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10499
Summary:
Ref T1191. This lays some groundwork for generating the expected schemata, so we can compare them to the actual schemata and produce a meaningful diff.
- In general, each application will subclass `PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec` and provide a definition of the tables it expects.
- This class has helper methods to mostly-automatically build table definitions for Lisk and (in the future) edges.
- When building expected schema, we specify a "data type", like "epoch". This is the type of data the application stores in the column, from the application's point of view. The SchemaSpec converts this into the best avilable storage type: for example, "text" will translate to `utf8mb4` if it's availalbe, or `binary` if not. This gives us a layer of indirection to insulate us from craziness.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10497
Summary:
Ref T1191. This builds on the "view of the database as it exists" by building a view of the database as it is expected to exist (this is mostly empty for now) and comparing the two. We now render a view of the "comparison schema", which is the actual schema merged with the expected schema and annotated with the differences.
(I'm merging them like this because it makes it easier to handle both "missing" and "surpulus" warnings in a consistent way. If we tried to annotate just the actual or expected schema, the absence of components which are expected to exist is messy to handle.)
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10496
Summary:
Ref T1191. Plan here is:
- Build a tool showing the current schemata status (this diff).
- Have it compare the current status to the desired status (partly here, mostly in future diffs).
- Then add a migration tool, and eventually a setup issue to tell people to run it.
Test Plan:
Reviewed current schemata.
{F204492}
{F204493}
{F204494}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10494
Summary: See rP8806fb0296c2.
Test Plan:
me fail english
with bonus!
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10514
Summary:
Fixes T6084. Changes:
- Rename `phabricator.show-beta-applications` to `phabricator.show-prototypes`, to reinforce that these include early-development applications.
- Migrate the config setting.
- Add an explicit "no support" banner to the config page.
- Rename "Beta" to "Prototype" in the UI.
- Use "bomb" icon instead of "half star" icon.
- Document prototype applications in more detail.
- Explicitly document that we do not support these applications.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Resolved "obsolete config" issue.
- Viewed config setting.
- Browsed prototypes in Applications app.
- Viewed documentation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T6084
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10493
Summary: ...also re-jiggers all the anchor stuff to use $xaction ID. This seemed like the simplest way once I got in the code, as well as having nice properties for if / when we want to re-add some ajax stuff since the ID is a pretty solid piece of data to key off. Fixes T6083.
Test Plan: mentioned DX in private DX+1. Could see on DX the mention as me and not as the other user. For transactions, I left a comment on Paste and it worked, and I edited an existing transaction and it worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10488
Summary: Fixes T5536. Some bonus pht in there.
Test Plan: made a diff hovered over the stars and saw my new text.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10487
Summary:
Implements a new transaction - still TYPE_ACTION - but using a new DifferentialAction::ACTION_COMMIT_CLOSE. Augment rendering as necessary to display this new transaction. Saves enough information so T3686 is possible but stops short of implementing a popup to display this information. Fixes T5875. Ref T3686.
One small display oddity - this new transaction now renders at the top of the transaction group whereas when it was a comment it was on the bottom. I think this is basically okay but if not how fix? (Playing with the "strength" of these actions will mess up the email too?)
Test Plan: made a diff X that fixed task Y. committed. checked diff X, task Y, and the commit pages for proper transactions and all looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3686, T5875
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10485
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is still completely made up (no payment integration), but you can "back" an initiative, type a number in the box, and generate a database row. You can then seach for backers and things you've backed and such.
Notable changes:
- Renamed "FundBacking" to "FundBacker". The former name was sort of because you can back things multiple times, but stuff like `$backings` was just too weird.
- I think that's it?
Test Plan:
- Backed an initiative.
- Viewed that I became a backer.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10486
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is all pretty boilerplate, and does not interact with Phortune at all yet.
You can create "Initiatives", which have a title and description, and support most of the expected infrastructure (policies, transactions, mentions, edges, appsearch, remakrup, etc).
Only notable decisions:
- Initiatives have an explicit owner. I think it's good to have a single clearly-responsible user behind an initiative.
- I think that's it?
Test Plan:
- Created an initiative.
- Edited an initiative.
- Changed application policy defaults.
- Searched for initiatives.
- Subscribed to an initiative.
- Opened/closed an initiative.
- Used `I123` and `{I123}` in remarkup.
- Destroyed an initiative.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10481
