Summary: also add a few more words
Test Plan: looks good!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7404
Summary: See title. Fixes T1809.
Test Plan:
verified each type that has flaggable interface still can be flagged
verified that new custom query filter works
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1809
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7392
Summary: Some scripts might find it easier to work with PHIDs instead of user names.
Test Plan:
Use ?assign=<username> and ?assign=<PHID-USER> with the create task URI.
See assignee input being filled correctly.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7401
Summary: First cut of an 'info panel' for phabricator. Basic concept is for display a list of items with a bit more info and depth and an object item list. Projects could be a good first example.
Test Plan: UIExamples
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7398
Summary:
Projects and priority inputs can be prefilled similar to how title
and description fields work.
Prefilling of projects already worked but used PHIDs instead of
more user friendly name so I changed that too.
Test Plan:
Visit [[/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Maniphest;Easy&priority=100&assign=vrana&title=Hip-hip&description=hooray!|example]]
and see prefilled form fields.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7394
Summary:
Fixes T4024.
- Mention FreeBSD by name.
- Make "install this on a normal computer" more explicit.
- Make "install this on a entire domain" more explicit.
Test Plan:
{F74892}
{F74891}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4024
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7397
Summary:
Gets rid of some old Differential-specific nonsense and replaces it with general runtime-pluggable Remarkup rules.
Facebook: This removes two options which may be in use. Have any classes being added via config here just subclass the new abstract bases instead. This should take 5 seconds to fix. You can adjust order by overriding `getPriority()` on the rules, if necessary.
Test Plan: See comments.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: FacebookPOC, andrewjcg, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7393
Summary: More Diffusion/Differential touch ups, ToC, etc.
Test Plan: Look at colors, see that they match or look better.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3952
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7386
Summary: Changes to checkmark and crossed circle to match active projects
Test Plan: installed and uninstalled an application. poor conpherence.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7390
Summary: Makes a white hover icon show on the policy dropdown. Also fixed some spacing. Fixes T4017
Test Plan: hover over the policy dropdown
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4017
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7388
Summary:
This code is a little funky right now, and can return `array("error message")` and then try to call `getHunks()` on it. Additionally, each field loads the commit's changes separately.
Instead, load the commit's changes once and cache them, and handle exceptions appropriately.
Test Plan:
- Created a rule like "changed, added, removed content all match /.*/" to force all fields to generate.
- Ran it successfully.
- Faked an error and ran it, got reasonable results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: bigo, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7384
Summary:
Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together:
- **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc.
- `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically.
- `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists.
- `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them.
- `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit.
- `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues.
- `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems.
- `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages.
- `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence.
This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are:
1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me.
2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall.
The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs.
Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
Summary: Ref T4010. Adds a history page and restores the transaction title strings, which previously sort-of existed in the defunct feed story class.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7371
Summary:
Ref T4010. Projects have a weird proto-version of ApplicationTransactions which is very similar but not quite the same.
Move the storage to a modern format, but keep all the other code for now.
Test Plan: Migrated project transactions; edited projects.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7370
Summary:
Conduit doesn't currently have an analog to "shouldAllowPublic", so the recent policy checks added here caught legitimate Conduit calls when viewing Diffusion as a logged-out user.
Add `shouldAllowPublic()` and set it for all the Diffusion queries.
(More calls probably need this, but we can add it when we hit them.)
Test Plan: Looked at Diffusion as a logged-out user with public access enabled.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7380
Summary: `class_exists()` is case-insensitive, but `PhabricatorApplication::getByClass()` is not.
Test Plan: Fixed unit test to fail, then fixed code to pass unit test.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7379
Summary: This adds back the top border on section headers and cleans up the tab CSS just a hair.
Test Plan: tested files, tasks, and custom field profile.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7378
Summary:
Ref T1344. This is //very// rough. Some UI issues:
- Empty states for the board and columns are junky.
- Column widths are crazy. I think we need to set them to fixed-width, since we may have an arbitrarily large number of columns?
- I don't think we have the header UI elements in M10 yet and that mock is pretty old, so I sort of very roughly approximated it.
- What should we do when you click a task title? Popping the whole task in a dialog is possible but needs a bunch of work to actually work. Might need to build "sheets" or something.
- Icons are slightly clipped for some reason.
- All the backend stuff is totally faked.
Generally, my plan is just to use these to implement all of T390. Specifically:
- "Kanban" projects will have "Backlog" on the left. You'll drag them toward the right as you make progress.
- "Milestone" projects will have "No Milestone" on the left, then "Milestone 9", "Milestone 8", etc.
- "Sprint" projects will have "Backlog" on the left, then "Sprint 31", "Sprint 30", etc.
So all of these things end up being pretty much exactly the same, with some minor text changes and new columns showing up on the left vs the right or whatever.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran, sascha-egerer
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7374
Summary:
While we mostly have reasonable effective object accessibility when you lock a user out of an application, it's primarily enforced at the controller level. Users can still, e.g., load the handles of objects they can't actually see. Instead, lock the queries to the applications so that you can, e.g., never load a revision if you don't have access to Differential.
This has several parts:
- For PolicyAware queries, provide an application class name method.
- If the query specifies a class name and the user doesn't have permission to use it, fail the entire query unconditionally.
- For handles, simplify query construction and count all the PHIDs as "restricted" so we get a UI full of "restricted" instead of "unknown" handles.
Test Plan:
- Added a unit test to verify I got all the class names right.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a normal user with public policies on and off.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a restricted user with public policies on and off. With restrictions, saw all traces of restricted apps removed or restricted.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7367
Summary:
Ref T2222. Shrink the API to make it easier to move this object's storage to ApplicationTransactions.
Fixes T3415. This moves the "Summary" and "Test Plan" into the property list, and thereby fixes all the attribution problems associated with commandeering, creating a revision from another user's diff, etc.
Test Plan: Browsed several revisions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3415, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7375
Summary: Ref T4010. Adds storage and indexes for custom fields. These tables are the same as people/maniphest/differential.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade`.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7369
Summary:
Fixes T3675.
- Maniphest had a couple of old non-event listeners; move them to events.
- Make most of the similar listeners a little more similar.
- Add checks for access to the application.
Test Plan:
- Viewed profile, project, task, revision.
- Clicked all the actions.
- Blocked access to various applications and verified the actions vanished.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3675
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7365
Summary:
Ref T3675. Some of these listeners shouldn't do their thing if the viewer doesn't have access to an application (for example, users without access to Differential should not be able to "Edit Tasks"). Set the stage for that:
- Introduce `PhabricatorEventListener`, which has an application.
- Populate this for event listeners installed by applications.
- Rename the "PeopleMenu" listeners to "ActionMenu" listeners, which better describes their modern behavior.
This doesn't actually change any behaviors.
Test Plan: Viewed Maniphest, Differntial, People.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3675
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7364
Summary: Ref T1279. The new stuff seems stable, so stop writes to the old tables.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed reviewers.
- Grepped for `::RELATIONSHIP_TABLE` to verify we really have no more reads.
- Grepped for `::RELATION_REVIEWER`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7360
Summary:
This is primarily a client request, and a little bit use-case specific, but policies seem to be holding up well and I'm getting more comfortable about maintaining this. Much if it can run through ApplicationTransactions.
Allow the ability to edit status, policies, priorities, assignees and projects of a task to be restricted to some subset of users. Also allow bulk edit to be locked. This affects the editor itself and the edit, view and list interfaces.
Test Plan: As a restricted user, created, edited and commented on tasks. Tried to drag them around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7357
Summary: Fixes T4001. I broke this some time ago and no one has complained. I don't think it gets much use, and we haven't added it for the newer apps. Just get rid of it rather than adapt the URIs for ApplicationSearch.
Test Plan: Unit tests, sent myself some email.
Reviewers: zeeg, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4001
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7355
Summary: Drop the "Pro" bit.
Test Plan: Created/edited tasks, moved tasks around, generally made a mess. Nothing burned down.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7352
Summary:
We have this commented-out chunk of code now which was originally buggy and is now just nonfunctional.
For now, the core edit types don't always require CAN_EDIT (e.g., subscribe, comment, add edges), except for editing the edit policy itself, which always does. Add a supplemental capability check there and let everything else go through with CAN_VIEW. We can buff the policy checks on application editors over time, they all require appropriate capabilities to get to in the first place anyway.
Test Plan: Created and edited some tasks without getting overwhelmed with policy exceptions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7351
Summary:
Ref T3569. Two issues:
# Since `sort()` is not stable, instantaneous events (ending on the same second they start) would sometime sort wrong and produce the wrong results. Guarantee they sort correctly.
# Because events can end at any time, there are some additional special cases the algorithm didn't handle properly. Draw a bunch of ASCII art diagrams so these cases work properly.
Test Plan:
- No more fatal when tracking an object for the first time.
- Unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: skyronic, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7350
Summary:
Ref T4007. Fixes T4009. Ref T4008.
- Move blurb to a text section.
- Make it render as remarkup.
- Put policy information and status information in header.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4009, T4007, T4008
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7373
Summary:
I'll hold this for a couple weeks.
These classes are now only used to render legacy feed stories. I don't plan to migrate the stories since I don't think they're particularly valuable, and migrating them would be complex and time consuming.
With these classes removed, legacy Maniphest feed stories simply vanish from feed.
Test Plan: `grep`, viewed feed, verified it worked but omitted old-style stories.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7114
Summary: Fixes T3898. This feature needs generalization at some point, but just unbreak it for now since a surprising number of users like it.
Test Plan: Pressed "z".
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran, spicyj
Maniphest Tasks: T3898
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7366
Summary:
Fixes T2146. This is a really simple approach, you just do:
!print .rule {
whatever: blah;
}
And it transforms it into:
.printable .rule {
whatever: blah;
}
@media print {
.rule {
whatever: blah;
}
}
So we end up with these rules twice, but they should compress well and we shouldn't need that many of them, and this fix is way way simpler than all the nonsense I discussed in T2146.
Test Plan:
- Added a unit test.
- Added a simple rule to throw away the menubar when printing.
- Checked the latter with `/?__print__=1`.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2146
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7363
Summary:
See screenshots. Some simplifications:
- Tabbed and non-tabbed lists are now allowed to be mixed. We just make the non-tabbed lists permanent and put them on the bottom (e.g., image and audio data in Files).
- You can provide a tab name instead of an entire tab object and we'll build an object for you.
- We respect `setSelected()` on the tab objects now.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7362
Summary: Make tabs do stuff when you click 'em.
Test Plan:
- Clicked object box tabs in UIExample.
- Viewed some existing non-tab UIs (Differential, Maniphest).
- Viewed some existing non-tab, multiple-list UIs (Diffusion).
- Grepped for methods I changed.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7361
Summary:
Ref T2222. This implements step (1) described there, which is moving over all the inline comments.
The old and new tables are simliar. The only real trick here is that `transactionPHID` and `legacyCommentID` mean roughly the same thing (`null` if the inline is a draft, non-null if it has been submitted) but we don't have real `transactionPHID`s yet. We just make some up -- we'll backfill them later.
Two risks here:
- I need to take a second look at the keys on this table. I think we need to tweak them a bit, and it will be less disruptive to do that before this migration than after.
- This will take a while for Facebook, and other large installs with tens of thousands of revisions. I'll communicate this.
I'm otherwise pretty satisfied with this, seems to work well and is pretty low risk / non-disruptive.
Test Plan:
- Before migrating, then after migrating:
- Made a bunch of inlines (drafts, submitted).
- Edited and deleted inlines.
- Verified inlines showed up in preview.
- Verified that inlines aren't indexed when they're drafts (`bin/search index D935`).
- Verified that inlines ARE indexed when they're not drafts.
- Verified that drafts inlines make revisions appear as "with draft" in the revision list.
- Made left, right, and draft inlines.
- Migrated (`bin/storage upgrade`).
- Verified that my inlines from before the migration still showed up.
- (Repeated all the stuff above.)
- Manually inspected the inline comment table.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: FacebookPOC, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7139
Summary: This data was migrated by D6977 and is now obsolete. I'll hold this patch for a week or two in case we get reports of migration errors.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, saw the table vanish. Grepped for references to the table.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6997
Summary: I touched this code recently but it needs an unusual special case because we call through with the "omnipotent user" from the daemons. As per the TODO below, this will all get cleaned up at some point.
Test Plan: Will make @poop verify.
Reviewers: btrahan, poop
Reviewed By: poop
CC: poop, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7356
Summary: This capability was replaced with an application-wide "manage" capability. It's checked for just above.
Test Plan: Edited audio!
Reviewers: btrahan, ljalonen, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7353
Summary:
Ref T3569. Fixes T3567. When figuring out how much time has been spent on an object, subtract "preemptive" events which interrupted the object.
Also, make the UI look vaguely sane:
{F72773}
Test Plan: Added a bunch of unit tests, mucked around in the UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: hach-que, skyronic, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3567, T3569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7349
Summary: Believe it or not, I forgot how to create a link in Remarkup.
Test Plan: Clicked on it with selected URL, selected text and without a selection.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7336
Summary: Ref T603. While policies aren't completely perfect, they are substantially functional to the best of my knowledge -- definitely in good enough shape that we want to hear about issues with them, now.
Test Plan: Edited a task, repository, and project.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7343
Summary: Ref T603. If you don't have access to an application, prevent execution of its (authenticated) methods.
Test Plan: Restricted Tokens to only admins, then tried to view/call Token methods as a non-admin.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7342
Summary:
I refactored this recently and accidentally dropped the download URI.
Also fix a warning with, e.g., files named `README`.
Test Plan: Clicked a thumb, clicked "Download", got a file.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, dctrwatson
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7341
Summary:
Ref T603. Currently, we render handles the user doesn't have permission to see in a manner identical to handles that don't exist. This is confusing, and not required by policies (which restrict content, but permit knowledge that an object exists).
Instead, render them in different styles. Bad/invalid objects look like:
Unknown Object (Task)
Restricted objects look like:
[o] Restricted Task
...where `[o]` is the padlock icon.
Test Plan:
{F71100}
{F71101}
It's possible this renders weird somewhere, but I wasn't immediately able to find any issues. Yell if you see something.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7334
