Summary:
Ref T4292. For hosted, clustered repositories we have a good way to increment the internal version of the repository: every time a user pushes something, we increment the version by 1.
We don't have a great way to do this for observed/remote repositories because when we `git fetch` we might get nothing, or we might get some changes, and we can't easily tell //what// changes we got.
For example, if we see that another node is at "version 97", and we do a fetch and see some changes, we don't know if we're in sync with them (i.e., also at "version 97") or ahead of them (at "version 98").
This implements a simple way to version an observed repository:
- Take the head of every branch/tag.
- Look them up.
- Pick the biggest internal ID number.
This will work //except// when branches are deleted, which could cause the version to go backward if the "biggest commit" is the one that was deleted. This should be OK, since it's rare and the effects are minor and the repository will "self-heal" on the next actual push.
Test Plan:
- Created an observed repository.
- Ran `bin/repository update` and observed a sensible version number appear in the version table.
- Pushed to the remote, did another update, saw a sensible update.
- Did an update with no push, saw no effect on version number.
- Toggled repository to hosted, saw the version reset.
- Simulated read traffic to out-of-sync node, saw it do a remote fetch.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4292
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15986
Summary:
Ref T11051. This is still not as clear as it should be, but is at least working as intended now.
I believe this part of the code just never worked. The test plan on D10489 didn't specifically cover it.
Test Plan:
Did this sort of thing in a repository:
```
$ git checkout -b featurex
$ echo x >> y
$ git commit -am wip
$ arc diff
```
Then I simulated just pushing it (this flow is a little more involved than necessary):
```
$ arc land --hold
$ git commit --amend
$ # remove all metadata -- particularly, "Differential Revision"!
$ git push HEAD:master
```
I got a not-great but more-useful dialog:
{F1667318}
Prior to this change, the hash match was incorrectly not reported at all.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11051
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15989
Summary:
Fixes T11042. Currently, all `bin/storage` workflows stop if `cluster.read-only` is set:
```
$ ./bin/storage adjust
Usage Exception: Phabricator is currently in read-only mode. Use --force to override this mode.
```
However, some of them (`status`, `dump`, `databases`, etc) are read-only anyway and safe to run. Don't prompt in these cases.
Test Plan:
- Set `cluster.read-only` to `true`.
- Ran `bin/storage dump`, `bin/storage status`, etc. No longer received messages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11042
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15987
Summary:
Ref T5267. Fixes T9643. Currently, we can not parse/extract a small fraction of strings:
- PHP files which contain obscure syntax that XHPAST can not parse.
- HEREDOCs do not have a useable `evalStatic()` behavior right now.
Emit these as warnings, but continue and generate all usable/extractable translations.
Test Plan:
```
epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $ ./bin/i18n extract . >/dev/null
Found 4,548 files...
Done.
WARNING: Failed to extract strings from file "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/externals/stripe-php/lib/Stripe/ApiRequestor.php": XHPAST Parse Error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING on line 357
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 141 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/scripts/repository/commit_hook.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 24 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorClusterConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 23 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 49 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 83 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 91 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 97 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 103 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 113 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 119 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 128 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 137 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 149 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 159 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 166 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 179 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 192 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 24 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/config/option/PhabricatorNotificationConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 26 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterCircleCIBuildStepImplementation.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 154 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/maniphest/config/PhabricatorManiphestConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 282 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/maniphest/config/PhabricatorManiphestConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 84 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/maniphest/editor/ManiphestEditEngine.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 345 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/metamta/storage/PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 59 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/owners/editor/PhabricatorOwnersPackageEditEngine.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 26 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/project/config/PhabricatorProjectConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 53 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/project/config/PhabricatorProjectConfigOptions.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 98 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/search/engine/PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 165 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/search/engine/PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 252 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/search/engine/PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 299 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/search/engine/PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 360 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/search/engine/PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 439 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/search/engine/PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 529 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/search/engine/PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 54 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationLockController.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 56 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/transactions/view/PhabricatorApplicationEditHTTPParameterHelpView.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 126 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/transactions/view/PhabricatorApplicationEditHTTPParameterHelpView.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 185 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/transactions/view/PhabricatorApplicationEditHTTPParameterHelpView.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 238 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/transactions/view/PhabricatorApplicationEditHTTPParameterHelpView.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 288 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/transactions/view/PhabricatorApplicationEditHTTPParameterHelpView.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
WARNING: Failed to evaluate pht() call on line 17 in "/Users/epriestley/dev/core/lib/phabricator/src/applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorRemarkupUIExample.php": Unexpected node during static evaluation, of type: n_HEREDOC
epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5267, T9643
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15983
Summary:
Fixes T11043. This page was still reading the old information directly instead of going through the cluster-aware stuff.
Have it ask the cluster-aware stuff for information instead.
Test Plan:
- Nuked MySQL on localhost.
- Configured cluster hosts.
- Loaded "Database Status" page -- worked after patch.
- Grepped for any remaining `mysql.configuration-provider` stragglers, came up empty.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11043
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15982
Summary:
Fixes T8510. Results are internally ordered by "name", which is the full list of strings a user can type to match a result. On the balance, it is probably good/correct to order by this (particularly, it allows `function(x)` to sort near `x`).
However, the way projects were built put the tags first, so a project like "Discovery" could end up last if it had originally been created with a different name like "Search Team", so that its first slug is "search-team".
Instead, put the display name first in the ordering.
Test Plan:
{F1661775}
To reproduce in particular:
- Create a project named "Zebra".
- Create a lot of projects named "Armadillo-blahblahblah".
- Rename "Zebra" to "Armadillo".
Before the patch, the new "Armadillo" project would still sort as though it were named "Zebra". After the patch, it sorts as expected normally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8510
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15981
Summary: Ref T5267. Put "Deutsch" in the list instead of "German", so you can find your language without knowing the English word for it.
Test Plan: {F1661598}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5267
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15980
Summary:
Ref T5267. Ref T4103. Currently, adding new locale support to the upstream fills this menu with confusing options which don't do anything. Separate it into four groups:
- Translations: these have a "reasonable number" of strings and you'll probably see some obvious effect if you switch to the translation.
- Limited Translations: these have very few or no strings, and include locales which we've added but don't ship translations for.
- Silly Translations: Pirate english, etc.
- Test Translations: ALLCAPS, raw strings, etc.
Czech is currently in "test" instead of "limited" for historical reasons; I'll remedy this in the next change.
Test Plan: {F1661523}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103, T5267
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15978
Summary:
Ref T4103. This removes these options:
{F1660585}
The jump nav option came from T916, when we had a separate jump nav on the home page. Essentially no one has ever been confused by the behavior of search or disabled this feature. Here are the stats for this install:
| Total Users | 36656 |
| Have Set Any Preference | 3084 |
| Have Disabled Jump | 6
| Are Not "Security Researchers" | 2
| Any Account Activity | 0
The "/" option came in the same change, but the preference came from T989. This keystroke conflicts with a default Firefox keystroke. Almost no one cares about this either, but I count 6 real users who have disabled the behavior. I suspect the number of real users who //use// it may be smaller.
In Safari and Firefox, the "tab" key does the same thing.
In Chrome, the "tab" key does the same thing if {nav Preferences > Web Content > "Pressing Tab highlights..."} is disabled.
Upshot: jump nav is great, bulk of the change in T989 was clearly great, specific preferences that came out of it seem not-so-great and now is a good time to kill them as we head into T4103.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed constants.
- Pressed "/".
- Searched for `T123`.
- Viewed settings.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15976
Summary:
Fixes T11020. I think this resolves things -- `$new_version` (set above) should be used, not `$new_log` directly.
Specifically, we would get into trouble if the initial push failed for some reason (working copy not initialized yet, commit hook rejected, etc).
Test Plan: Made a bad push to a new repository. Saw it freeze before the patch and succeed afterwards.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11020
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15969
Summary: Fixes T11010. This also needs to be inflated until we fix the whole client/server responsibility issue here.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision while observing error log, no error.
- Disabled "allow self accept", tried to make myself a reviewer, got rejected with an error message.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15966
Summary:
Fixes T11030. Fixes T11032.
- Allow HTTP access to "Public" repositories even if `diffusion.allow-http-auth` is disabled.
- If you run Phabricator on an unusual port (???) use that port as the default when generating HTTP URIs.
Test Plan:
- Faked `phabricator.base-uri` to an unusual port, saw repository HTTP URI generate with an unusual port.
- Disabled `diffusion.allow-http-auth`, confirmed that toggling view policy between "public" and "users" activated or deactivated HTTP clone URI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11030, T11032
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15973
Summary:
Ref T11016. I think I inverted the meaning of this function by accident in D14893.
The intent is to return a list of users: direct users, and all members of all projects.
Prior to this patch actually returns direct users, and all projects they are members of.
Test Plan:
- Created "Project with Dog".
- Added user "dog" to project.
- Created package "X", owning file "/x", with audit enabled.
- Made "X" owned by "Project with Dog".
- Modified "/x" and had user "dog" accept it.
- Landed change.
- Prior to change: package "X" incorrectly added as auditor.
- After change: package "X" correctly omitted as auditor, because a member reviewed the change.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11016
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15971
Summary:
Fixes T11017. We add packages as "uninteresting" auditors so that we can query commits by package later.
Until recently, this didn't matter because we didn't send mail to packages. But now we do, so stop mailing them when they don't actually need to do anything.
Test Plan:
- Made a commit to a file which was part of a package but which I owned (so it does not trigger auditing).
- `var_dump()`'d mail "To:" PHIDs.
- Before patch: included package.
- After patch: no package.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11017
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15970
Summary:
Fixes T11020. I think this resolves things -- `$new_version` (set above) should be used, not `$new_log` directly.
Specifically, we would get into trouble if the initial push failed for some reason (working copy not initialized yet, commit hook rejected, etc).
Test Plan: Made a bad push to a new repository. Saw it freeze before the patch and succeed afterwards.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11020
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15969
Summary: Fixes T11010. This also needs to be inflated until we fix the whole client/server responsibility issue here.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision while observing error log, no error.
- Disabled "allow self accept", tried to make myself a reviewer, got rejected with an error message.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15966
Summary: Ref T9606, Clicking on the calendar preview header in user's profile page should link to user's full month calendar
Test Plan: Open user profile, scroll to calendar preview, click on Calendar box header. This should open the month calendar for the user (not viewer)
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9606
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15967
Summary: Hover hint on calendar list items should be to the right in day view, left in profile view, on top in month view
Test Plan: Open profile view, calendar items should have a left hover. Open day view, calendar items should have a right hover. Open month view, calendar items should have top hover.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9606
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15964
Summary: Ref T9606
Test Plan: Open people profile for a user with events today/tomorrow, see a panel under badges panel with event list
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9606
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15851
Summary:
Ref T3025.
- Show current zone to make the current vs new more clear.
- Tweak some text.
Test Plan: {F1656534}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3025
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15965
Summary:
Fixes T10381. When we converted to `PHUIRemarkupView`, some instructional text got linebreaks added when it shouldn't have them (the source is written in PHP and wrapped at 80 characters, but the output should flow naturally).
Fix this so we don't preserve linebreaks.
This also makes `PHUIRemarkupView` a little more powerful and inches us toward fixing Phame/CORGI remarkup issues, getting rid of `PhabricatorMarkupInterface` / `PhabricatorMarkupOneOff`, and dropping all the application hard-coding in `PhabricatorMarkupEngine`.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all callsites, looking for callsites which accept remarkup written in `<<<HEREDOC` format.
- Viewed form instructions, Conduit API methods, HTTP parameter edit instructions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10381
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15963
Summary:
Ref T3025. Chrome gives us an easily-accessible, much better guess at which timezone the user is in.
Firefox also exposes "Intl" but this doesn't seem to be a reliable method to read the timezone.
Test Plan:
In Chrome, swapped my system date/time between zones, clicked the "reconcile" popup, got the dropdown prefilled accurately.
In Safari (no `Intl` API) got the normal flow with no default selected.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3025
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15962
Summary: Ref T10512. This is fairly bare-bones but appears to work.
Test Plan: Queried all users, queried some stuff by constraints.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10512
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15959
Summary: Ref T3025. This adds a check for different client/server timezone offsets and gives users an option to fix them or ignore them.
Test Plan:
- Fiddled with timezone in Settings and System Preferences.
- Got appropriate prompts and behavior after simulating various trips to and from exotic locales.
In particular, this slightly tricky case seems to work correctly:
- Travel to NY.
- Ignore discrepancy (you're only there for a couple hours for an important meeting, and returning to SF on a later flight).
- Return to SF for a few days.
- Travel back to NY.
- You should be prompted again, since you left the timezone after you ignored the discrepancy.
{F1654528}
{F1654529}
{F1654530}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3025
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15961
Summary: Bumping this up higher since two column views get extra tight fast below 900 px. This felt most correct to me, dialing it back from first attempt at 960. Mostly I don't want to ever accidentally trigger it when I'm on the 12" MacBook. Ref T10926
Test Plan: Durable Column, Workboards, Dashboards, Tasks.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: avivey, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10926
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15960
Summary:
Ref T5187. This definitely feels a bit flimsy and I'm going to hold it until I cut the release since it changes a couple of things about Workflow in general, but it seems to work OK and most of it is fine.
The intent is described in T5187#176236.
In practice, most of that works like I describe, then the `phui-file-upload` behavior gets some weird glue to figure out if the input is part of the form. Not the most elegant system, but I think it'll hold until we come up with many reasons to write a lot more Javascript.
Test Plan:
Used both drag-and-drop and the upload dialog to upload files in Safari, Firefox and Chrome.
{F1653716}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5187
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15953
Summary: Makes the background transparent for uploaded thumbs. This page in general needs lots of work, but here's the minimum. Fixes T10986
Test Plan: Edit a Mock with a transparent jeff.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15957
Summary: Couple of edge cases here I never cleaned up. This inlines points and projects better, with spacing and use of grey to better differentate from project tag colors.
Test Plan:
Review edge cases on workboard with multiple short and long project names.
{F1653998}
{F1653999}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15956
Summary: Converts to table so text wraps on long strings well, button always stays top right, better spacing underneath.
Test Plan: Mail, Gmail, mobile
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15955
Summary:
Ref T10939. This makes the `viewer()` function work again. It retains its own meaning (viewer, plus all their projects and packages).
There's no `exact-viewer()` function; we could conceivably add one eventually if we need it.
Test Plan:
- Queried for `viewer()`, got the same results as querying by my own username.
- Browsed function in token browser.
- Reviewed autogenerated documentation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15951
Summary:
Ref T10939. If you haven't installed a dashboard, we show an "Active Revisions" panel on the homepage by default. I waited a bit to update this, but the new buckets don't seem to have caused any major problems so far.
Update this to use the new logic. I'm just showing "must review" + "should review", which is similar to the old beahvior.
Also replace the notification count with this same number. This is a little different from the old behavior, but simpler, and I think we should probably move toward getting rid of these counts completely.
Test Plan:
- Viewed homepage as logged-in user, saw my revisions (including revisions I have authority over only because of project membership).
- Saw consistent notification count.
- Grepped for removed method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15950
Summary: Ref T10917. This is getting added as a link right now, which causes it to get `<a href>`'d in HTML mail. Add it as text instead.
Test Plan: Edited a key, examined HTML mail body carefully.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15952
Summary:
Ref T10917. This cheats fairly heavily to generate SSH key mail:
- Generate normal transaction mail.
- Force it to go to the user.
- Use `setForceDelivery()` to force it to actually be delivered.
- Add some warning language to the mail body.
This doesn't move us much closer to Glorious Infrastructure for this whole class of events, but should do what it needs to for now and doesn't really require anything sketchy.
Test Plan: Created and edited SSH keys, got security notice mail.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15948
Summary:
Ref T10917. Converts web UI edits to transactions.
This is about 95% "the right way", and then I cheated on the last 5% instead of building a real EditEngine. We don't need it for anything else right now and some of the dialog workflows here are a little weird so I'm just planning to skip it for the moment unless it ends up being easier to do after the next phase (mail notifications) or something like that.
Test Plan: {F1652160}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15947
Summary:
Ref T10917. This primarily prepares these for transactions by giving us a place to:
- review old deactivated keys; and
- review changes to keys.
Future changes will add transactions and a timeline so key changes are recorded exhaustively and can be more easily audited.
Test Plan:
{F1652089}
{F1652090}
{F1652091}
{F1652092}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15946
Summary:
Via HackerOne. Currently, you can use "Lock Permanently" to lock a credential permanently, but you can still enable Conduit API access to it. This directly contradicts both intent of the setting and its description as presented to the user.
Instead:
- When a credential is locked, revoke Conduit API access.
- Prevent API access from being enabled for locked credentials.
- Prevent API access to locked credentials, period.
Test Plan:
- Created a credential.
- Enabled API access.
- Locked credential.
- Saw API access become disabled.
- Tried to enable API access; was rebuffed.
- Queried credential via API, wasn't granted access.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15944
Summary:
Ref T10917. Currently, when you delete an SSH key, we really truly delete it forever.
This isn't very consistent with other applications, but we built this stuff a long time ago before we were as rigorous about retaining data and making it auditable.
In partiular, destroying data isn't good for auditing after security issues, since it means we can't show you logs of any changes an attacker might have made to your keys.
To prepare to improve this, stop destoying data. This will allow later changes to become transaction-oriented and show normal transaction logs.
The tricky part here is that we have a `UNIQUE KEY` on the public key part of the key.
Instead, I changed this to `UNIQUE (key, isActive)`, where `isActive` is a nullable boolean column. This works because MySQL does not enforce "unique" if part of the key is `NULL`.
So you can't have two rows with `("A", 1)`, but you can have as many rows as you want with `("A", null)`. This lets us keep the "each key may only be active for one user/object" rule without requiring us to delete any data.
Test Plan:
- Ran schema changes.
- Viewed public keys.
- Tried to add a duplicate key, got rejected (already associated with another object).
- Deleted SSH key.
- Verified that the key was no longer actually deleted from the database, just marked inactive (in future changes, I'll update the UI to be more clear about this).
- Uploaded a new copy of the same public key, worked fine (no duplicate key rejection).
- Tried to upload yet another copy, got rejected.
- Generated a new keypair.
- Tried to upload a duplicate to an Almanac device, got rejected.
- Generated a new pair for a device.
- Trusted a device key.
- Untrusted a device key.
- "Deleted" a device key.
- Tried to trust a deleted device key, got "inactive" message.
- Ran `bin/ssh-auth`, got good output with unique keys.
- Ran `cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub | ./bin/ssh-auth-key`, got good output with one key.
- Used `auth.querypublickeys` Conduit method to query keys, got good active keys.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15943
Summary: Ref T10694. Switch default mode to HTML since it has a number of significant advantages and we haven't seen reports of significant problems.
Test Plan:
- Switched preference to default (saw "HTML" in UI).
- Sent myself some mail.
- Got HTML mail.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15885
Summary:
Ref T10694. If this feels good, I'd plan to eventually add something similar to other applications ("View Task", etc).
Not sure if we should keep the object link later in the mail body or not. I left it for now.
Test Plan: {F1307256, size=full}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15884
Summary: Wow! Real value here.
Test Plan: No more red underlines.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15941
Summary: Fixes T10493. See that task and inline comments for discussion.
Test Plan:
Created an object with some projects, saw the transaction in resulting mail:
{F1600496}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10493
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15942
Fixes T10981. Ref T10939. `arc` currently has some odd, hard-coded checks
(missing reviewers, all reviewers away) that depend on the field value being
in a certain format.
The recent changes swapped the field value from scalars (PHIDs) to
dictionaries and broke this workflow. It worked fine in testing because we
apply these checks very inconsistently (not on update or `--edit`).
To get around this for now, serialize into "PHID!" and then unserialize on
the other side. This is icky but keeps us from needing to require an `arc`
upgrade.
These checks are generally bad news and should move to the server side in the
long run (T4631).
(This probably prevents clean `arc diff`, so I'm just cowboy committing it.)
Auditors: chad
