Summary:
Ref T3663. This is a proto-transaction record which is obsoleted by real transactions. It has no UI, so I'm not bothering to retain/migrate the data since there's no regression.
Just get rid of it and all its writers. I'm keeping the table for now in case something crazy uses this somehow, so no data is actually destroyed.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6784
Summary: This has two use sites and no special logic.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6783
Summary: Ref T3718. Releeph has a custom implementation of this exception; a more general version exists in CustomField. Use the more general one. Nothing catches the specific one.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6782
Summary: Ref T3092. This was obsoleted recently and has no more call/use sites.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6779
Summary: Ref T3663. This is obsolete code which is used only in this migration, which Facebook has already performed and which isn't relevant for any other installs.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6777
Summary:
Releeph branch lists in project views have a bunch of custom UI right now; give them more standard UI and ApplicationSearch.
This drops a small piece of functionality: we now show only a total open request count instead of a detailed enumeration of each request status. I assume this is reasonable (that is, the important piece is "is there something to do on this branch?"), but we can muck with it if the more detailed status is important.
Test Plan: {F54344}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6764
Summary: Ref T2766. Does the integration via ApplicationTransactionsEditor. Only did addCC and Flag for proof of concept.
Test Plan: Made a rule to cc, made a rule to flag. They worked! (will attach screens to diff)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2766
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6766
Summary:
Ref T3721. Releeph currently attempts to implement a flexible, field-driven search for branches, but it's building all of its own infrastructure and it ends up heading down some weird paths. In particular, it loads **every** request and then makes calls into fields to filter them. It also tries to be very very general, which isn't really necessary (for example, I think it's reasonable for us to assume that we won't let you disable the "requestor" field).
ApplicationSearch and CustomField provide more scalable approaches to this problem; move search on top of them. The query still ends up doing some filtering in-process, but it's now far more limited in scope and can be denormalized later.
Test Plan: {F54304}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3721
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6758
Summary: Ref T3718. This is not used and does not seem particularly useful.
Test Plan: Grep.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6755
Summary:
Ref T1703. Ref T3718. This introduces `PhabricatorCustomFieldAttachment`, which is just a fancy `array()`. The goal here is to simplify `PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface` as much as possible.
In particular, it can now use common infrastructure (`assertAttached()`) and is more difficult to get wrong.
Test Plan: Edited custom fields on profile.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6752
Summary:
Fixes T3661. Ref T3718. This makes Releeph custom fields extend PhabricatorCustomField so we can start moving over other pieces of infrastructure (rendering, storage, etc) to run through the same pathways. It's roughly the minimum amount of work required to be able to move forward.
NOTE: This removes per-project custom field selectors. Fields are now configured for an entire install. My understanding is that Facebook does not use this feature, and modern field infrastructure has moved away from selectors.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited projects, branches, and requests in Releeph. Grepped for removed config. Grepped for `field_selector`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3661, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6750
Summary:
Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here:
**PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller:
foreach ($fields as $field) {
// do some junk
}
Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`.
**PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc).
**Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it.
The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes).
**Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs.
Test Plan:
{F54240}
{F54241}
{F54242}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
Summary:
Ref T1809. Provide ApplicationSearch to Flags and allow the user to select flags by color.
@chad might have some design feedback on my control.
Test Plan: {F54131}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1809
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6747
Summary:
Ref T1809. Ref T603. Ref T3599. Makes flags policy aware.
This change reduces the utility of flag search/browse; the next change will switch it to ApplicationSearch to restore utility. Representing all that ordering in terms of cursor paging is also a giant pain.
Test Plan: Viewed Differential, Flags, etc. Grepped for all PhabricatorFlagQuery callsites.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T1809, T3599
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6746
Summary:
Fixes T3698. Sometimes views need to render differently depending on whether they contain content or not. The existing approach for this is `isEmptyContent()`, which doesn't work well and is sort of hacky (it implies double-rendering content, which is not always free or side-effect free).
Instead, provide a test for an element without children. This test is powerful enough to catch the easy cases of `null`, etc., and just do the expected thing, but will not catch a View which is reduced upon rendering. Since this is rare and we have no actual need for it today, just accept that as a limitation.
Test Plan:
Viewed Timeline and Feed UI examples. Viewed Feed (feed), Pholio (timelineview), and Differential (old transactionview).
{F53915}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3698
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6718
Summary: Fixes T3641. Probably needs some @chad love though on colors and what have you. Technique was to jam this into the existing notifications stuff as much as possible. I think its "okay" but if we were to add more stuff here (like a 3rd application) this could get a quality pass to consolidate even more code.
Test Plan: played with it in Chrome and Safari - looks reasonable
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6708
Summary:
This is mostly for personal reasons / lols, but they have a perfectly functional OAuth2 API and it takes like 15 minutes to add a provider now and I was in this code anyway...
@chad, we could use JIRA, Twitter and Twitch.tv auth icons if you have a chance.
Test Plan: {F53564}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6706
Summary: Ref T2769. This isn't a real adapter and its methods are increasingly hacky messes. Make "dry run" a first-class concept on the HeraldEngine instead and remove the adapter.
Test Plan: Ran Herald via test console and via CLI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6693
Summary:
Ref T2769. This will house the transaction list and replace the "edit log" stuff.
The UI is a little bit rough and can probably share more code with the transaction history, but seems mostly-reasonable.
Test Plan: {F53253}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6690
Summary:
Ref T2769. Move all of this stuff into Adapters and get rid of the hard-coded classes.
I cheated in two places.
Test Plan: Edited and activated Herald rules.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6688
Summary: Ref T2769. Moves all traces of HeraldConditionConfig into Adapters.
Test Plan: Edited rules and used Test Console to exercise both affected code paths. Tried to save invalid rules to hit error pat.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6679
Summary: Ref T2769. Get rid of the last use of `HeraldContentTypeConfig` by moving repetition options into Adapters.
Test Plan: Viewed / edited Herald rules.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6664
Summary: Ref T2769. Shift the bulk of value and action config into Adapters.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited Herald list and rules.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6660
Summary:
Ref T2769. Get content types out of hard-coded config and into dynamic adapters.
This removes the "MERGE" and "OWNERS" content types, which were vestigal. These needs are likely better addressed through subscriptions/transactions, and are obsolete, and haven't existed for 2+ years and no one has asked for them to be restored.
Test Plan: Mostly a bunch of grep. Viewed rule list, rule edit. Edited a revision.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6656
Summary: Ref T2769. I'm planning to keep this pretty simple, but we have this ad-hoc edit log for rules already and some other mess that we can clean up.
Test Plan: No effect yet; see future changes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6654
Summary: Ref T2769. Ref T2625. Herald is currently a giant mishmash of hard-codes and weird special cases. Move toward modernization and normality.
Test Plan: {F52716}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625, T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6652
Summary:
Ref T603. Ref T2769. Herald currently interacts with policies in a bad way; specifically, I can create a rule which emails me for everything, and thus learn about objects I can't otherwise see.
This shouldn't be possible, so I'm going to reduce personal rules to have only the viewer's scope.
For global rules, I think I'm always going to let any user edit them, but make who the rule acts as part of the configuration. There will be an option to make a rule omnipotent, but only admins (or some other special subset of users) will be able to select it.
Transactions/subscriptions will provide a check against users editing global rules in ways that are bad.
Test Plan: Next diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2769
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6649
Summary: Tightens up the CSS to display more items (4 wide on 15") and fixes some mobile CSS issues with appseach. Fixes T3614
Test Plan: Tested Pholio, Macros, mobile layouts
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3614
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6694
Summary: Email replies and subscribers seem to go hand in hand so deploy both at once.
Test Plan: played around with bin/mail. Verified replies posted comments on the paste.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3650
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6682
Summary: Ref T2625. This doesn't do anything fancy, but gives feed a little more flexibility.
Test Plan: Viewed `/feed/`.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6681
Summary: Ref T3671. Depends on D6674. Continues work in D6673, D6674 and extends it into Legalpad and Phriction. Then deletes a bunch of dead code.
Test Plan: Edited documents in Legalpad and Phriction, verified I got reasonable looking previews.
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6675
Summary:
Ref T3578. Ref T3671. Depends on D6673. Use `PHUIRemarkupPreviewPanel` (introduced in D6673) to provide question create/edit and answer edit previews in Ponder.
Then delete a million lines of duplicate code.
Test Plan: Edited a question; edited an answer. Saw live previews.
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3578, T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6674
Summary:
Ref T3671. A lot of applications have pretty ad-hoc preview code. Clean it up a bit and add Summary preview to Differential.
After ApplicationTransactions we might want to try to serialize the whole form and show a preview of all the transactions, but this seems not very useful in most cases (I'd guess that Remarkup previews are 99% of the value) and tricky to get right (e.g., adding images which don't exist yet to Pholio mocks).
I think I can add this in a few other places, too.
Test Plan:
Edited Maniphest Tasks and Differential Revisions, mashed some buttons. Verified previews rendered correctly. Grepped for removed CSS classes (no hits).
{F52907}
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6673
Summary: Fixes T3679. This comes up every so often and the old script is extremely broad (nuke everything in a repository). Provide a more surgical tool.
Test Plan: Ran a bunch of variations of the script and they all seemed to work OK.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, staticshock
Maniphest Tasks: T3679
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6678
Summary: Ref T3650. This adds a create transaction, transactions for metadata (title, langauge, view policy), and comments. Editor is used on all create /edit paths.
Test Plan: made some pastes via web and email - yay. edited pastes - yay. verified txns showed up on pastes and in feed correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3516, T3650
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6645
Summary: Fixes T1144. Though actually I think T1144 wanted some handy way to email from the command-line / arc, this is cooler. :D
Test Plan: set conf properly and then ./bin/mail receive-test --as btrahan --to pasties@phabricator.dev | README --> it worked...! couldn't test files as easily but verified exception thrown when I tried to test.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1144
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6622
Summary: Ref T3578. Restores the voting UI and makes it a little prettier.
Test Plan: {F52089}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3578
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6614
Summary: Ref T3373. Most edits aren't too interesting, put them on a separate history page.
Test Plan: Viewed question page; viewed history page for question and answer.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6612
Summary: Ref T3373. Same issues as the other commenting patch; it's huge and the JS is a bit buggy. Backend is fine, though.
Test Plan: Made some comments on a question.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6610
Summary:
Ref T3373. This is still pretty messy:
- The JS bugs out a bit with multiple primary object PHIDs on a single page. I'll fix this in a followup.
- The comment form itself is enormous, I'll restore some show/hide stuff in a followup.
Test Plan: Added answer comments in Ponder.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6608
