Summary:
Ref T12738. This makes clicking "Throw In Trash" technically do something, sort of.
In Nuance, the default mode of operation for actions is asynchronous -- so you don't have to wait for a response from Twitter or GitHub after you mash the "send default reply tweet" / "close this pull request with a nice response" button and can move directly to the next item instead.
In the future, some operations will attempt to apply synchronously (e.g., local actions like "ignore this item forever"). This fakes our way through that for now.
There's also no connection to the action actually doing anything yet, but I'll probably rig that up next.
Test Plan: {F4975227}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18010
Summary:
Ref T12738. This is mostly just laying in groundwork and prerequisites, like the ability to query items by queue.
Eventually, this will become the main UI which staff use to process a queue of items. For now, it does nothing and renders nonsense.
This and probably the next big chunk of changes are all going to be made-up, nonfinal things that just make basic operations work until we have fundamental flows -- like "assign", "comment", "close" -- working at a basic level and can think more about UI/workflow.
Test Plan:
Visited the page, it loaded a mostly-reasonable item and then rendered nonsense:
{F4975050}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18008
Summary:
Ref T10537. Currently, Nuance has a `NuanceRequestor` object, intended to represent the external user who created content (e.g., a GitHub account or a Twitter account or whatever).
This object is currently almost unused, and its design predates Doorkeeper. In D15541, I chose to use doorkeeper objects instead of NuanceRequestor objects to represent requestors.
I don't currently anticipate a need for such an object, given that we have Doorkeeper. If we do need it in the future for some reason, it would be fairly easy to restore it, create a requestor type which wraps a Doorkeeper object, and then migrate. Not super thrilling to do that, but not a huge mess.
`NuanceItem` still has a `requestorPHID`, but this is now a less formal object PHID instead of a more formal Requestor-object PHID, and holds a doorkeeper exeternal object PHID for GitHub events.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `nuancerequestor`.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`.
- Grepped for `requestor`, remaining uses of this term seem reasonable/correct.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15546
Summary:
Ref T10537. Generally, when users interact with Nuance items we'll dump a command into a queue and apply it in the background. This avoids race conditions with multiple users interacting with an item, which Nuance is more subject to than other applications because it has an import/external component.
The "sync" command doesn't actually do anything yet.
Test Plan: {F1186365}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15506
Summary:
Ref T10537. This adds an update daemon for pulling item data (e.g., figuring out who the author of a GitHub comment is) and routing items (e.g., sending them to a queue or applying them directly to a task).
Also adds `bin/nuance update --item X` for doing this manually for debugging.
And adds item types, for specializing item behavior. Previously, sources completely dictated item behavior, but I think we want something a little more flexible.
Test Plan:
- This still does nothing.
- Ran `bin/nuance update --item 15`.
- Saw an item route to a default queue.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15441
Summary:
Ref T10537. Ref T10538. This polls the GitHub events API and creates Nuance items from the raw data.
It does nothing useful with them.
Test Plan:
- Polled GitHub.
- Saw some items get created.
- X-Poll-Interval seemed to work.
- ETag seemed to work.
- Recognizing when we hit items we've already seen seemed to work.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537, T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15440
Summary:
Ref T10537. More infrastructure:
- Put a `bin/nuance` in place with `bin/nuance import`. This has no useful behavior yet.
- Allow sources to be searched by substring. This supports `bin/nuance import --source whatever` so you don't have to dig up PHIDs.
Test Plan:
- Applied migrations.
- Ran `bin/nuance import --source ...` (no meaningful effect, but works fine).
- Searched for sources by substring in the UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15436
Summary:
Ref T10537. Some sources (like the future "GitHub Repository" source) need to poll remotes.
- Provide a mechanism for sources to emit import cursors.
- Hook them into the trigger daemon so they'll fire periodically.
- Provide some storage.
This diff does nothing useful or interesting, and is pure infrastructure.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`, no adjustment issues.
- Poked around Nuance.
- Ran the trigger daemon, verified it didn't crash and checked for Nuance stuff to do.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15435
Summary: Ref T10537. Converts sources to EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Created a new source.
- Edited an existing source.
- Submitted a complaint with the complaint form.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15434
Summary: Ref T10537. Minor updates to simplify and modernize these codepaths.
Test Plan: Searched for queues and sources.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15429
Summary:
Ref T8783.
The "View" UI is where a user would check their request for feedback or a resolution, if it's something that makes sense for them to interact with from the web UI.
The "Edit" UI is the manage/admin UI where you'd respond to a request. It's similar to the view UI but will have actions and eventually some queue UI, etc.
(I don't think items need a normal "Edit" UI -- it doesn't make sense to "Edit" a tweet or inbound email -- but maybe this will shuffle around a little eventually.)
Test Plan:
View
{F747218}
Edit
{F747219}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13980
Summary: I got a couple of tasks stuck in my local queue a while ago when touching Nuance, fix a couple minor issues to clean them up.
Test Plan: Ran tasks in queue, got clean results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13532
Summary: Ref T8099. This adds a new class which all search engines return for layout. I thought about this a number of ways, and I think this is the cleanest path. Each Engine can return whatever UI bits they needs, and AppSearch or Dashboard picks and lays the bits out as needed. In the AppSearch case, interfaces like Notifications, Calendar, Legalpad all need more custom layouts. I think this also leaves a resonable path forward for NUX as well. Also, not sure I implemented the class correctly, but assume thats easy to fix?
Test Plan: Review and do a search in each application changed. Grep for all call sites.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13332
Summary:
Ref T8434. Hard-codes form sources as a complaint form.
This form is close to perfect and I'm not actually sure we need to let users customize it at all.
Test Plan: {F473587}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13166
Summary: Ref T8434. Throw these together.
Test Plan: Created a new Queue.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13163
Summary: Ref T8434. Now you can list them.
Test Plan: Listed sources.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13162
Summary:
Ref T8434. Minor cleanup/modernization. I made type selection modal (like Herald, Auth, etc) so we can render the form on the next screen based on the type.
{F472519}
Test Plan: Created a new source, edited an existing source.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13161
Summary: Ref T8434. Touch things up a bit. This also cleans up the missing ApplicationTransactionInterface for T6367.
Test Plan: Didn't create a new queue. Didn't edit an existing queue.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jeremyb, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13160
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595.
To support a unified "Projects:" query across all applications, a future diff is going to add a set of "Edge Logic" capabilities to `PolicyAwareQuery` which write the required SELECT, JOIN, WHERE, HAVING and GROUP clauses for you.
With the addition of "Edge Logic", we'll have three systems which may need to build components of query claues: ordering/paging, customfields/applicationsearch, and edge logic.
For most clauses, queries don't currently call into the parent explicitly to get default components. I want to move more query construction logic up the class tree so it can be shared.
For most methods, this isn't a problem, but many subclasses define a `buildWhereClause()`. Make all such definitions protected and consistent.
This causes no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, which does a pretty through job of verifying this statically.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12453
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: ...and get the basic edit flow "working" for a new NuanceSourceDefinition - the Phabricator Form. ...and fix a dumb bug in the query class so when you redirect to the view page / try to edit an existing NuanceSource you don't fatal.
Test Plan: played around with the edit form and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7585
Summary:
I updated the wiki too - https://secure.phabricator.com/w/projects/pebkac/ - with what I am thinking right now. Rough plan here is
- next diff:
- implement editors and transactions
- implement "web type" for contact source
- /pebkac/item/new/ will be the entry point for this
- implement "actions" on a contact
- probably some "polish" on the scaffolding laid out here; like "create" permissions maybs
- diffs after that:
- implement "twitter" type for source
- implement email reply handler stuff for item and source
Probs a great time to blast huge holes in all this stuff. :D
Test Plan: these pages load and arc lint doesn't complain
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7465
