Phabricator
Summary: ...this breaks without D1328. Used good ole "codemod" to do this
work, with lots of manual edits around 80 chars.
Test Plan: clicked around phabricator tool suite, particular differential, a
bunch
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1351
corresponding ConduitAPI
Summary: reasonable title... also made this new functionality used by the
repository worker for parsing diffs
Test Plan:
- looked at the conduit console and queried for various types of hashes,
including hashes with no match. got correct results.
- identified a reasonable diff from a local git repo. set the revision status
to 2 (ACCEPTED) in the database. augmented the worker parser code to var_dump
and die after finding revision id. ran scripts/repository/reparse.php
--message rX and verified my var_dumps. removed var_dumps and die and ran
reparse.php again with same paramters. verified revision looked good in
diffusion and there were no errors.
- repeated the above reparse.php jonx for a mercurial repo. note svn isn't in
this hash game so that test was particularly exciting no-op'dness i did not
bother with
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1315
Summary:
- Use DifferentialRevisionQuery, not DifferentialRevisionListData, to select
revisions.
- Make UI simpler (I hope?) and more flexible, similar to Maniphest. It now
shows "Active", "Revisions", "Reviews" and "Subscribed" instead of a hodge-podge
of miscellaneous stuff. All now really has all revisions, not just open
revisions.
- Allow views to be filtered and sorted more flexibly.
- Allow anonymous users to use the per-user views, just don't default them
there.
NOTE: This might have performance implications! I need some help evaluating
them.
@nh / @jungejason / @aran, can one of you run some queries agianst FB's corpus?
The "active revisions" view is built much differently now. Before, we issued two
queries:
- SELECT (open revisions you authored that need revision) UNION ALL (open
revisions you are reviewing that need review)
- SELECT (open revisions you authored that need review) UNION ALL (open
revisions you are reviewing that need revision)
These two queries generate the "Action Required" and "Waiting on Others" views,
and are available in P247.
Now, we issue only one query:
- SELECT (open revisions you authored or are reviewing)
Then we divide them into the two tables in PHP. That query is available in P246.
On the secure.phabricator.com data, this new approach seems to be much better
(like, 10x better). But the secure.phabricator.com data isn't very large. Can
someone run it against Facebook's data (using a few heavy-hitting PHIDs, like
ola or something) to make sure it won't cause a regression?
In particular:
- Run the queries and make sure the new version doesn't take too long.
- Run the queries with EXPLAIN and give me the output maybe?
Test Plan:
- Looked at different filters.
- Changed "View User" PHID.
- Changed open/all.
- Changed sort order.
- Ran EXPLAIN / select against secure.phabricator.com corpus.
Reviewers: btrahan, nh, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: cpiro, aran, btrahan, epriestley, jungejason, nh
Maniphest Tasks: T586
Differential Revision: 1186
couple bug fixes
Summary:
- Add the ability to query for "responsible users" (author or reviewer).
- Add the ability to query for "subscribers" (reviewer or CC).
- Fix an issue where CC and Reviewer used the same join table alias and were
incompatible.
- Remove support for 'paths' for the moment, since each path needs a
repository ID. (There are no clients for this.)
- Remove single withX() methods that have no callsites -- withPath() is
singular because it accepts two arguments and I didn't want to have an ad-hoc
type format, but I think we can get away without these for other conditions.
- Include GROUP BY in more cases where may need it. This doesn't actually
change program behavior since we uniquify in loadFromArray(), it just means less
data over the wire.
These new query classes are to support rewriting the Differential list view on
top of DifferentialRevisionQuery.
Test Plan:
- Issued queries via conduit for "responsible users".
- Issued queries via conduit for "subscribers".
- Issued queries via conduit for "cc" with "reviewer" at the same time.
- Issued queries via conduit for "cc", "reviewer", "responsible users" and
"subscribers" at the same time.
- Issued a "subscribers" and "reviewers" query which returned duplicates;
verified GROUP BY took effect.
Reviewers: nh, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: nh
CC: aran, nh
Differential Revision: 1182
Summary:
Changed cc/reviewer search to be a union/or instead of intersection/and within
each list. Also added support to search for multiple authors (same behavior as
cc/reviewer), and updated conduit call to match. (See discussion on D1158.)
Test Plan:
Used the conduit call to search for revisions with one of 2 people on the cc
list, and checked the results to see that it wasn't constraining to requiring
both be on the cc list.
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, nh, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1179
Summary:
Created a differential.query conduit method that is built on top of
DifferentialRevisionQuery. I also added support for querying by author, ccs, and
reviewers to DifferentialRevisionQuery, so feature parity can be brought up to
match differential.find and its backing class DifferentialRevisionListData.
Test Plan:
Tried a few calls to the conduit call using the web interface, and got back
reasonable looking data.
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, nh, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1158
Summary:
For T262, we need to query for revisions by affected path.
We currently have a class called "DifferentialRevisionListData" but it's sort of
nasty and it would have been really cumbersome to add this query to it.
Instead, this provides a query object more in line with ManiphestTaskQuery,
which I'm pretty happy with. I'd eventually like to get rid of
DifferentialRevisionListData but it's used in a couple of places right now.
Test Plan: Used phpsh to execute queries, got back apparently-sensible result
sets.
Reviewers: jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 978
