Summary: We currently have a lot of calls to `addCrumb(id(new PhabricatorCrumbView())->...)` which can be expressed much more simply with a convenience method. Nearly all crumbs are only textual.
Test Plan:
- This was mostly automated, then I cleaned up a few unusual sites manually.
- Bunch of grep / randomly clicking around.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: hach-que, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7787
Summary: Changes to checkmark and crossed circle to match active projects
Test Plan: installed and uninstalled an application. poor conpherence.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7390
Summary: Ref T603. When a user selects "Custom", we pop open the rules dialog and let them create a new rule or edit the existing rule.
Test Plan: Set some objects to have custom policies.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7300
Summary: This builds out and implements PHUIPropertyListView (container) and PHUIPropertyListItemView (section) as well as adding tabs.
Test Plan: Tested each page I edited with the exception of Releeph and Phortune, though those changes look ok to me diff wise. Updated examples page with tabs.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7283
Summary: Ref T603. I nuked this check by accident and neglected to test the negative case.
Test Plan: Saved a non-public policy (Herald Global) and a public policy (Maniphest View).
Reviewers: asherkin, btrahan
Reviewed By: asherkin
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7278
Summary: Ref T603. Currently, we hard-code defense against setting policies to "Public" in several places, and special case only the CAN_VIEW policy. In fact, other policies (like Default View) should also be able to be set to public. Instead of hard-coding this, move it to the capability definitions.
Test Plan: Set default view policy in Maniphest to "Public", created a task, verified default policy.
Reviewers: btrahan, asherkin
Reviewed By: asherkin
CC: asherkin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7276
Summary: Ref T603. Use more modern elements.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7264
Summary: Ref T603. This could be a nicer UX, but limit the amount of foot-shooting that users can possibly do. You can still manage if you're really tricky ("Members of project X", then leave the project) but this should make it hard to make a mistake. It seems very unlikely any user ever intends to lock themselves out of an application.
Test Plan: Set an application's view policy to permissive ("Administrators") and nonpermissive ("No One") values. The former were accepted, the latter rejected.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7218
Summary:
Ref T603. I had to partially revert this earlier because it accidentally blocked access to Conduit and File data for installs without "policy.allow-public", since the applications are available to "all users" but some endpoints actually need to be available even when not logged in.
This readjusts the gating in the controller to properly apply application visibility restrictions, and then adds a giant pile of unit test coverage to make sure it sticks and all the weird cases are covered.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Executed most of the tests manually, by using logged in / admin / public / disabled users.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7211
Summary:
Ref T603. Enables:
- Application policies can be edited.
- Applications can define custom policies (this will be used for setting defaults, like "what is the default visibiltiy of new tasks", and meta-policies, like "who can create a task?").
Test Plan: Edited application policies. A future diff does more with custom policies.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7205
Summary:
Three changes here.
- Add `setActionList()`, and use that to set the action list.
- Add `setPropertyList()`, and use that to set the property list.
These will let us add some apropriate CSS so we can fix the border issue, and get rid of a bunch of goofy `.x + .y` selectors.
- Replace `addContent()` with `appendChild()`.
This is just a consistency thing; `AphrontView` already provides `appendChild()`, and `addContent()` did the same thing.
Test Plan:
- Viewed "All Config".
- Viewed a countdown.
- Viewed a revision (add comment, change list, table of contents, comment, local commits, open revisions affecting these files, update history).
- Viewed Diffusion (browse, change, history, repository, lint).
- Viewed Drydock (resource, lease).
- Viewed Files.
- Viewed Herald.
- Viewed Legalpad.
- Viewed macro (edit, edit audio, view).
- Viewed Maniphest.
- Viewed Applications.
- Viewed Paste.
- Viewed People.
- Viewed Phulux.
- Viewed Pholio.
- Viewed Phame (blog, post).
- Viewed Phortune (account, product).
- Viewed Ponder (questions, answers, comments).
- Viewed Releeph.
- Viewed Projects.
- Viewed Slowvote.
NOTE: Images in Files aren't on a black background anymore -- I assume that's on purpose?
NOTE: Some jankiness in Phortune, I'll clean that up when I get back to it. Not related to this diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7174
Summary: This adds the 'PHUIObjectBox' to nearly every place that should get it. I need to comb through Diffusion a little more. I've left Differential mostly alone, but may decide to do it anyways this weekend. I'm sure I missed something else, but these are easy enough to update.
Test Plan: tested each new layout.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7162
Summary: The adds the ability to set 'properties' such as state, privacy, due date to the header of objects.
Test Plan: Implemented in Paste, Pholio. Tested various states.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7016
Summary: Adds plain support for object lists that just look like lists
Test Plan: review UIexamples and a number of other applications
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6922
Summary:
^\s+(['"])dust\1\s*=>\s*true,?\s*$\n
Test Plan: Looked through the diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6769
Summary:
Fixes T2691. Now, all PhabricatorActionListViews in the codebase setObjectHref to $request->getRequestURI. This value is passed over to PhabricatorActionItems right before they are rendered. If a PhabricatorActionItem is a workflow and there is no user OR the user is logged out, we used this objectURI to construct a log in URI.
Potentially added some undesirable behavior to aggressively setUser (and later setObjectURI) from within the List on Actions... This should be okay-ish unless there was a vision of actions having different user objects associated with them. I think this is a safe assumption.
Test Plan: played around with a mock all logged out (Ref T2652) and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2691
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6416
Summary:
Currently, we give you an "Install" button for Beta apps even when "phabricator.show-beta-applications" is disabled. This is unclear.
Instead, disable the button and tell the user about the config when it is clicked.
Arguably, we should restructure this so you can selectively install "Beta" apps without setting the config, but almost all the beta apps are terrible so just make things consistent for now.
Test Plan: Tried to install a beta app without beta apps enabled.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5652
Summary: T2381
Test Plan:
Click on the ignore link in /config/issue/ and respond to the dialog box.
Also, test uninstalling and reinstalling an application in the web UI (to verify that refractoring didn't break anything).
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2381
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5234
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary:
By default, order applications in application order. See discussion in D4708.
Principally, this is intended to make sure that application event handlers are registered in order, and thus fire in order.
Test Plan:
Looked at /applications/, homepage tiles, verified they both still work.
I didn't actually test the event handler bit since it's fairly complicated to test blind; D4708 should provide a test case.
Reviewers: btrahan, Afaque_Hussain
Reviewed By: Afaque_Hussain
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4791
Summary:
I missed these in review, but here are a couple of tweaks:
- Call `setWorkflow(true)` on the actions. This makes the dialogs pop up on the same page with Javascript if it's available.
- When the user installs/uninstalls an application, send them back to the application's detail page, not the application list.
Test Plan:
- Uninstalled an application (saw dialog, got sent back to detail page).
- Installed an application (saw dialog, got sent back to detail page).
- Canceled an application uninstall.
Reviewers: Afaque_Hussain
Reviewed By: Afaque_Hussain
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4762
Summary: More Information on Applications on Applications List View. Also, added tags in Applications Details view to show their status.
Test Plan: Manual Checking
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4759
Summary: Disabled Uninstall state for essential applications of Phabricator. Information provided why they cannot uninstall these applications. Also take care of users trying to install an application which cannot be uninstalled by editing the URI.
Test Plan: Manually tested
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4743
Summary: Disabled uninstalling of applications which can't be uninstalled. Also, applications which cannot be uninstalled always show that they are installed even if users somehow manually edit the configuration.
Test Plan: Manually edited the URI to uninstall applications which can't be unisntalled.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4741
Summary: Code Refactored as suggested by epriestley
Test Plan: Same test plan as of Installation & Uninstallation of Applications
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4740
Summary: Created Applications application which allows uninstallation & installation of application.
Test Plan: In "Applications" application, clicked on uninstalled the application by cliking Uninstall and chekcing whether they are really uninstalled(Disabling URI & in appearance in the side pane). Then Clicked on the install button of the uninstalled application to check whether they are installed.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4715
Summary: This works after pht() + html got sorted out.
Test Plan: Looked at some object attribute lists.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4645
Summary:
Added Applications Details View
Applications Detail View
Test Plan: In "Applications" application, clicked on each application to check whether the each application detail view is displayed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4615
Summary: Created "Applications" application which lists all the installed applications in phabricator.
Test Plan: Navigated to localphabricatorinstall.com/applications and check whether it actually shows the list of all installed applications.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2352
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4548
Summary:
No fancy-pants smarty stuff yet, but merges /applications/ and the awful application buttons into the dark navigation.
Hover state is maybe a little weird.
Test Plan: {F29324}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, codeblock
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4431
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary: So they're maybe a little easier to deal with? I'm going to take this formally to "plz @chad plz help" land.
Test Plan: {F20329}
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3609
Summary:
- Fix width, corresponding to wider sprites.
- Sprite the "Audit" icon.
- Mark the meta-application as device-ready.
- Fix some collapse/expand bugs with the draggable local navs.
- Add texture to local nav.
- Darken the application nav to make it more cohesive with the main nav. I think this is an improvement?
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, netfoxcity
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3338
Summary:
There's currently no way to get here from the UI since nav tabs don't exist anymore. It's also always been hard to find this feature even when we had the tabs, since it's surprising that it's inside "MetaMTA".
- Move mailing lists to a separate application.
- Add `buildApplicationPage()`, since we don't really need `buildStandardPageResponse()` any more -- we can infer all the information from `PhabricatorApplication`. This will let us get rid of a lot of the `PhabricatorXXXController` classes which just define application information.
- Add `getApplicationURI()` to reduce code duplication, and in case we want to let you move applications around some day.
Test Plan: Looked/edited/saved mailing lists.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T631
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3248
Summary:
- Adds a new "Applications" application.
- Builds an application list via application config instead of via hard-coding, so we can move toward better concepts of installing/uninstalling applications, etc.
- Applications indicate that they need attention with notice counts and brief status messages rathern than 50 giant tables of all sorts of app data.
I want to try replacing the home screen with this screen, pretty much. Not sure if this is totally crazy or not. What does everyone else think?
Test Plan: Will add screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, vrana, alanh
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, davidreuss, champo
Maniphest Tasks: T1569
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3129
