Summary: We already allow you to create comments, but we don't show them on the
commit page. After style / view unification this is easy; show comments on the
commit page.
Test Plan: Made comments on a commit using the audit too, saw them show up in
Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1687
Summary:
Currently, audits are only accessible through the Owners tool. Start moving them
to their own first-class tool in preparation for broader audit integration.
- Lay some infrastructure groundwork (e.g. AuditQuery).
- Build a basic /audit/ view.
- Show audits on the commit page in Diffusion.
This has some code duplication with stuff we've already got, but I'll merge
everything together as we move forward on this.
Test Plan: Looked at /audit/ and a commit.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1685
Summary:
add basic auditing functionalities. For the related commits for a
package, we detect the following conditions which might be suspicious to the
owners of the package:
* no revision specified
* revision not found
* author not match
* reviewedby not match
* owners not involved
* commit author not recognized
The owners of the package can change the status of the audit entries by
accepting it or specify concern.
The owner can turn on/off the auditing for a package.
Test Plan:
* verified that non-owner cannot see the details of the audit and cannot modify
it
* verified that all the audit reasons can be detected
* tested dropdown filtering and package search
* verified really normal change not detected
* verified accept/concern a commit
* tested enable/disable a package for auditing
* verified one audit applies to all <commit, packages> to the packages the
auditor owns
* verified that re-parsing a commit won't have effect if there exists a
relationship for <commit, package> already
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, benmathews, btrahan, mpodobnik, prithvi, TomL, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1242
