Summary:
This adds support to differential fields to display warnings before a revision
gets accepted. Since lint and unit are differential fields, the code for their
warnings was moved into their respective field specification classes, so there
is only one code path for warnings (lint, unit, or custom).
Test Plan:
Select 'Accept' on a revision with lint/unit warnings and see messages appear
like they used to. Change it back to 'Comment' and they go away. Repeat with
a revision without lint/unit warnings and see no warnings appear. Checked
darkconsole to see no errors due to this.
Reviewers: jungejason, epriestley, vrana
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2363
Summary:
I think this improves things, let me know if you have feedback.
Also addresses T840.
Test Plan: See screenshots...
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2357
Summary:
Before: {F10754}
After: {F10753}
Test Plan:
View revision with lint warnings and unit errors.
Click on Details.
Click on Details.
Click on Details.
Click on Details.
Reviewers: asukhachev, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2351
Summary:
Many times when I'm reading a big diff, I want to go to the
TOC. Add it.
Test Plan:
can navigate with 't'. It also shows up in '?'
Revert Plan:
Reviewers: epriestley, vrana
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: nh, aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2335
Summary: Inspired by D2242.
Test Plan:
Select text in left pane.
Select text in right pane.
Select all.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2249
Test Plan:
Ctrl+click on Show Diff in Chrome - button is not grayed-out, new tab is opened.
Click on it - button is grayed out.
Repeat in Firefox.
Reviewers: epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1137
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2278
Test Plan:
Click on "passing a null index to idx()" in DarkConsole.
Click on entry in stack trace.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2275
Summary:
Ctrl+click opens the link to a new tab in most browsers.
Shift+click to a new window.
Alt+click or Meta+click downloads the target.
This diff respects these conventions by disabling JX.Workflow for these modifiers.
Test Plan:
Click Flag Task - inline dialog.
Ctrl+click Flag Task - new tab with standalone dialog.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2276
Test Plan:
Comment `JX.DOM.remove(pre)` to better see the problem in old code.
Apply this diff and verify that the pre is not shown.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2245
Summary:
...pretty sure the JS is too hack-tastic but it works...! :D
also fixed a small error from assert_instances_of change where a null value is all errors and what have you
Test Plan: played around with tasks in firefox and safari. made cc, owner, and project changes, as well as priority, etc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1074
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2234
Summary:
'cuz we need to be phamous!
V1 feature set
- posts
-- standard thing you'd expect - a title and a remarkup-powered body and...
-- "phame" title - a short string that can be used to reference the story. this gets auto-updated when you mess with the title.
-- configuration - for now, do you want Facebook, Disqus or no comments? this is a per-post thing but feeds from an instance-wide configuration
Please do toss out any must have features or changes.
Test Plan: played around with this bad boy like whoa
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T1111
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2202
Summary: In Safari, Firefox and Chrome, respect cursor position and selection ranges.
Test Plan: Dragged-and-dropped files into the middle of text, end of text, and a selected text range in Safari, Firefox and Chrome. Copy/pasted files into similar cases in Chrome. Got expected, normal behavior in all cases.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1016
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2155
Summary:
The older logic was incorrect:
- It chose `change.left` for `data.on_right` being true.
- 'O' and 'N' mean 'old' and 'new', not 'left' and 'right'. In diff-of-diffs, both sides are 'N'.
So, select the changeset ID correctly (pick the right side one for on_right), and select the new file prefix correctly (N for new, O for old).
Test Plan: Waved my mouse over some inline comments in a diff-of-diffs, got reasonable-looking reticles.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1076
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2138
Summary:
various stripe stuff, including
- external stripe library
- payment form
- test controller to play with payment form, sample business logic
My main questions / discussion topics are...
- is the stripe PHP library too big? (ie should I write something more simple just for phabricator?)
-- if its cool, what is the best way to include the client? (ie should I make it a submodule rather than the flat copy here?)
- is the JS I wrote (too) ridiculous?
-- particularly unhappy with the error message stuff being in JS *but* it seemed the best choice given the most juicy error messages come from the stripe JS such that the overall code complexity is lowest this way.
- how should the stripe JS be included?
-- flat copy like I did here?
-- some sort of external?
-- can we just load it off stripe servers at request time? (I like that from the "if stripe is down, stripe is down" perspective)
- wasn't sure if the date control was too silly and should just be baked into the form?
-- for some reason I feel like its good to be prepared to walk away from Stripe / switch providers here, though I think this is on the wrong side of pragmatic
Test Plan: - played around with sample client form
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2096
Summary: I looooove JS! It makes me giddy with glee!
Test Plan: Picked dates. See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2086
Summary:
Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks.
Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used
this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it.
The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish.
Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when
reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks
against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two
tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some
code to deal with this at some point if necessary.
I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all.
(There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header
counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.)
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt
Maniphest Tasks: T859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
Summary:
**Who can delete global rules?**: I discussed this with @jungejason. The current behavior is that the rule author or any administrator can delete a global rule, but this
isn't consistent with who can edit a rule (anyone) and doesn't really make much sense (it's an artifact of the global/personal split). I proposed that anyone can delete a
rule but we don't actually delete them, and log the deletion. However, when it came time to actually write the code for this I backed off a bit and continued actually
deleting the rules -- I think this does a reasonable job of balancing accountability with complexity. So the new impelmentation is:
- Personal rules can be deleted only by their owners.
- Global rules can be deleted by any user.
- All deletes are logged.
- Logs are more detailed.
- All logged actions can be viewed in aggregate.
**Minor Cleanup**
- Merged `HomeController` and `AllController`.
- Moved most queries to Query classes.
- Use AphrontFormSelectControl::renderSelectTag() where appropriate (this is a fairly recent addition).
- Use an AphrontErrorView to render the dry run notice (this didn't exist when I ported).
- Reenable some transaction code (this works again now).
- Removed the ability for admins to change rule authors (this was a little buggy, messy, and doesn't make tons of sense after the personal/global rule split).
- Rules which depend on other rules now display the right options (all global rules, all your personal rules for personal rules).
- Fix a bug in AphrontTableView where the "no data" cell would be rendered too wide if some columns are not visible.
- Allow selectFilter() in AphrontNavFilterView to be called without a 'default' argument.
Test Plan:
- Browsed, created, edited, deleted personal and gules.
- Verified generated logs.
- Did some dry runs.
- Verified transcript list and transcript details.
- Created/edited all/any rules; created/edited once/every time rules.
- Filtered admin views by users.
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2040
Summary:
- When an inline comment preview corresponds to an inline comment on the page, link to it. Just punt in the tough case where the inline is on some other page.
- In "haunted" mode, "z" now toggles through three modes: normal, comment area only, and comment + previews.
Test Plan:
- Viewed visible and not-visible inline comment previews, clicked "View" links.
- Tapped "z" a bunch to toggle haunt modes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T517, T214
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2041
Summary: I think these are all the actions which make any sense.
Test Plan:
- Performed and verified each action through the batch editor.
- Performed a large batch edit which applied each action type multiple times and verified the aggregate behavior was correct.
Reviewers: btrahan, cpiro
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1971
Summary:
Depends on D1921. Depends on D1899.
Add the "View Options" dropdown menu to Diffusion, with options like "show standalone", "show raw file", "show all", etc.
Test Plan: Viewed commits in Differential and Diffusion.
Reviewers: davidreuss, nh, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1932
Summary:
Make clicking the link also select the object (this operation is very common). Add an arrow to the left to view the object (this operation is very rare). Increase link target area to the entire cell.
Also simplify some handlers.
Test Plan: Clicked things with wild abandon. Behavior seemed unchanged.
Reviewers: cpiro, btrahan
Reviewed By: cpiro
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1962
Summary:
- We incorrectly count resolution changes and other noise as opens / closes.
- Show one graph: open bugs over time (red line minus green line). This and its derivative are the values you actually care about. It is difficult to see the derivative with both lines, but easy with one line.
Test Plan: Looked at burnup chart. Saw charty things. Verified resolution changes no longer make the line move.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T923, T982
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1945
Summary: This diff is really complicated, only a master programmer like myself could have accomplished it.
Test Plan: derrrrrp
Reviewers: davidreuss, nh, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1936
Summary: Works in Safari, Firefox, Chrome.
Test Plan: Copied some text, threw up a little in my mouth.
Reviewers: aran, tuomaspelkonen, tomo, rstout, btrahan
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, epriestley, ddfisher
Maniphest Tasks: T145, T995
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D244
Summary:
It is currently not possible to select source code covered by reticle when creating comment.
This diff hides reticle on mouseout from reply area.
Test Plan:
Hover inline comment, verify that reticle is displayed.
Reply, verify that reticle is displayed when mouseover reply, hidden otherwise.
Repeat for create.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1851
Summary:
Resolves T989
- users can now disable the '/' keyboard shortcut which focuses the
search box
- users can now disable the jump nav functionality of the search box
Test Plan:
- verified that the '/' keyboard shortcut works with preference enabled
or unset
- verified that '/' no longer has any effect and disappears from
keyboard shortcuts help overlay with preference disabled
- verified that search boxes have jump nav capabilities with jump nav
functionality preference unset or enabled
- verified that search boxes do not jump with jump nav preference
disabled
- verified that the jump nav still works as a jump nav with jump nav
preference disabled
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: simpkins, aran, epriestley, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T989
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1902
Summary:
I've found it quite confusing that uploading a single image displays the image itself but uploading more images displays My Files.
I've also got a user report about it because most users don't know that they can drop the image directly to the comment textarea and they are interested mainly in the ID of the uploaded file.
Test Plan: Upload a file.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1891
Summary:
- Show a tip in the margin about what coverage colors mean.
- Highlight the line when mousing over coverage.
- Randomly change the colors to different colors.
- Fix a bug with "show more" that I introduced with the other coverage diff (oops!)
Test Plan: Moused over coverage things.
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, btrahan
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T965
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1874
Summary: There are a few things we can improve with tooltips.
Test Plan: Moused over all the stuff on the test page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T965
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1870
Summary:
Currently, we sort all results alphabetically. This isn't ideal. Instead, sort them like this:
- If the viewing user appears in the list, always sort them first. This is common in a lot of contexts and some "Ben Evans" guy is sorting first on secure.phabricator.com and causing me no end of aggravation.
- If the tokens match a "priority" component (e.g., username), sort that before results which do not have a "priority" match.
- Within a group (self, priority, everything else) sort tokens alphabetically.
NOTE: I need to go add setUser() to all the tokenizers to make the "self" rule work, but that's trivial so I figured I'd get this out first.
Test Plan:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/4s2a72l5hhyyqqkq4bnd/PHID-FILE-x2r6ubk7s7dz54kxmtwx/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.03_AM.png
Previously, "aaaaaepriestley" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "epriestley" (the viewing user). Now, "epriestley" sorts first because that is the viewer.
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/rmnxgnafz42f23fsjwui/PHID-FILE-yrnn55jl3ysbntldq3af/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.09_AM.png
Previously, "aaaagopher" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "banana" (the "priority" match). Now, "banana" sorts first because it priority matches on username.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T946
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1807
Summary: Provide a reasonable JS API for the Aphlict client. Provide an example behavior to invoke it.
Test Plan:
Ran "aphlict_server.js" with:
$ sudo node aphlict_server.js
Loaded /aphlict/. Opened console. Got "hello" from the server every second.
Got reasonable errors with the server not present ("Security exception", but this is because it can't connect to port 843 to access the policy server).
Reviewers: ddfisher, keebuhm, allenjohnashton, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T944
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1800
Summary:
- all search boxes are now jump navs (old functionality retained if none
of the jump nav patterns match)
- added global keyboard shortcut '/' to focus the search box in the upper
right
Test Plan:
- pressed '/' and noticed the search box gains keyboard focus
- triggered jump nav functionality from search box and saw it worked
- did a search which did not match a jump nav pattern and saw it worked
(and searched in the selected context)
NOTE: The search box on the /search/ page is also changed to have jump
nav functionality. Old functionality is not impared. Still, this may not
be desirable.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1794
Summary:
- These are still slow, awkward and hideous -- but slightly better than
before.
- Allow "open" reports to be sorted.
- Add a "burn" chart/table for assessing project volatility.
- Add navigation.
Test Plan: Looked at reports.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1737
Test Plan:
Edit inline comment.
Clear its text.
Hit Cancel.
Try to find Undo link on the usual place with no success.
Repeat for same text.
Repeat for different text, this time with success.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1739
Summary:
The current approach of using a modal overlay dialog to create/edit inline
comments is pretty silly. Use an inline textarea instead.
This element isn't perfect and we have some mild modalness issues, but I think
it's better than the silly thing we've got going on right now. We can keep
poking it as people break it.
Test Plan:
- Created comments; submitted and undid them in empty and nonempty states.
Used undo for nonempty states + cancel.
- Edited comments; saved and canceled them. Used undo for changed state.
- Replied to comments; yada yada as above.
- Deleted comments.
- Did various modal trickery where I clicked "Reply" on something else with a
dialog already up, this very mildly glitches but I think it's not a big issue.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, Makinde, nh
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T431
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1716
Summary: Add comment previews and saved drafts to audits, like Maniphest /
Differential.
Test Plan: Typed stuff into the box. Got a preview. Reloaded page. Stuff was
still there. Submitted comment. Stuff is gone.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1699
Summary:
Allows you to write a commit rule that triggers an audit by a user (personal
rules) or a project (global rules).
Mostly this is trying to make auditing more lightweight and accessible in
environments where setting up Owners packages doesn't make sense.
For instance, Disqus wants a rule like "trigger an audit for everything that
didn't have a Differential revision". While not necessarily scalable, this is a
perfectly reasonable rule for a small company, but a lot of work to implement
with Owners (and you'll get a lot of collateral damage if you don't make every
committer a project owner).
Instead, they can create a project called 'Unreviewed Commits' and write a rule
like:
- When: Differential revision does not exist
- Action: Trigger an Audit for project: "Unreviewed Commits"
Then whoever cares can join that project and they'll see those audits in their
queue, and when they approve/raise on commits their actions will affect the
project audit.
Similarly, if I want to look at all commits that match some other rule (say,
XSS) but only want to do it like once a month, I can just set up an audit rule
and go through the queue when I feel like it.
NOTE: This abuses the 'packagePHID' field to also store user and project PHIDs.
Through the magic of handles, this (apparently) works fine for now; I'll do a
big schema patch soon but have several other edits I want to make at the same
time.
Also:
- Adds an "active" fiew for /audit/, eventually this will be like the
Differential "active" view (stuff that is relevant to you right now).
- On commits, highlight triggered audits you are responsible for.
Test Plan: Added personal and global audit triggers to Herald, reparsed some
commits with --herald, got audits. Browsed all audit interfaces to make sure
nothing exploded. Viewed a commit where I was responsible for only some audits.
Performed audits and made sure the triggers I am supposed to be responsible for
updated properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1690
Test Plan:
Go to revision with lots of comments in Firefox.
Click on one of the last three comments permalink.
Repeat in Chrome.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1702
Summary:
First stab at a batch editor for Maniphest. Basically, you can select a group of
tasks and then import them into the "batch" interface, where you can edit all of
them at once.
High level goal is to make it easier for users in PM/filer/support/QA roles to
deal with large numbers of tasks quickly.
This implementation has a few major limitations:
- The only available actions are "add projects" and "remove projects".
- There is no review / undo / log stuff.
- All the changes are applied in-process, which may not scale terribly well.
However, the immediate need is just around projects and this seemed like a
reasonable place to draw the line for a minimal useful version of the tool.
Test Plan: Used batch editor to add and remove projects from groups of tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, yairlivne
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, sandra
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1680
