Summary:
Ref T5702. This is a forward-looking change which provides some very broad API improvements but does not implement them. In particular:
- Controllers no longer require `$request` to construct. This is mostly for T5702, directly, but simplifies things in general. Instead, we call `setRequest()` before using a controller. Only a small number of sites activate controllers, so this is less code overall, and more consistent with most constructors not having any parameters or effects.
- `$request` now offers `getURIData($key, ...)`. This is an alternate way of accessing `$data` which is currently only available on `willProcessRequest(array $data)`. Almost all controllers which implement this method do so in order to read one or two things out of the URI data. Instead, let them just read this data directly when processing the request.
- Introduce `handleRequest(AphrontRequest $request)` and deprecate (very softly) `processRequest()`. The majority of `processRequest()` calls begin `$request = $this->getRequest()`, which is avoided with the more practical signature.
- Provide `getViewer()` on `$request`, and a convenience `getViewer()` on `$controller`. This fixes `$viewer = $request->getUser();` into `$viewer = $request->getViewer();`, and converts the `$request + $viewer` two-liner into a single `$this->getViewer()`.
Test Plan:
- Browsed around in general.
- Hit special controllers (redirect, 404).
- Hit AuditList controller (uses new style).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10698
Summary: Ref T5702. This primarily gets URI routing out of Aphront and into an Application, for consistency.
Test Plan: Loaded some pages, got static resources.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10696
Summary: Ref T5702. Primarily, this gets the custom DarkConsole URI routes out of the Aphront core and into an Application, like almost all other routes.
Test Plan: Used DarkConsole.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10695
Summary:
Resolves T5937. HTTPS redirects caused by `security.require-https` use a full scheme, domain and port in the URI. Consequently, this causes invocation of the new external redirect logic and prevents redirection from occurring properly when accessing the HTTP version of Phabricator that has `security.require-https` turned on.
I've also fixed the automatic slash redirection logic to add the external flag where appropriate.
Test Plan: Configured SSL on my local machine and turned on `security.require-https`. Observed the "Refusing to redirect" exception on master, while the redirect completed successfully with this patch.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5937
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10318
Summary: Fixes T5798. We basically weren't using the caching mechanism. Also adds service calls for S3 stuff, and support for seeing a little info like you can for conduit.
Test Plan: uploaded a paste, looked at paste list - no s3 service calls. edited the paste, looked at paste list - no s3 service calls and edited content properly shown
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5798
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10294
Summary:
Via HackerOne. Chrome (at least) interprets backslashes like forward slashes, so a redirect to "/\evil.com" is the same as a redirect to "//evil.com".
- Reject local URIs with backslashes (we never generate these).
- Fully-qualify all "Location:" redirects.
- Require external redirects to be marked explicitly.
Test Plan:
- Expanded existing test coverage.
- Verified that neither Diffusion nor Phriction can generate URIs with backslashes (they are escaped in Diffusion, and removed by slugging in Phriction).
- Logged in with Facebook (OAuth2 submits a form to the external site, and isn't affected) and Twitter (OAuth1 redirects, and is affected).
- Went through some local redirects (login, save-an-object).
- Verified file still work.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10291
Summary:
Instead of allowing all routes based on security.alternate-file-domain, now, when security.alternate-file-domain is set, and the request matches this domain, requests are validated against an explicit list. Allowed routes:
- /res/
- /file/data/
- /file/xform/
- /phame/r/
This will be redone by T5702 to be less of a hack.
Test Plan:
- browse around (incl. Phame live) to make sure there is no regression from this when security.alternate-file-domain is not used.
- check that celerity resources and files (incl. previews) are served with security.alternate-file-domain set.
- check that phame live blog is serving its css correctly with security.alternate-file-domain set.
- check that requests outside of the whitelist generate an exception for security.alternate-file-domain
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10048
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary: Ref T3116. If you have MFA on your account, require a code to sign a legal document.
Test Plan: Signed legal documents, got checkpointed.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9772
Summary: Applied some more linter fixes that I previously missed because my global `arc` install was out-of-date.
Test Plan: Will run `arc unit` on another host.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9443
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary: We haven't needed this for like three years, so we probably won't ever need it. It's in history if we do.
Test Plan: thought long and hard
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9311
Summary:
D9153 fixed half of this, but exposed another issue, which is that we don't actually serve ".eot" and ".ttf" through Celerity right now.
Make sure we include them in the routes.
Test Plan:
- Downloaded CSS, JS, TTF, EOT, WOFF, JPG, etc., through Celerity.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9154
Summary:
Ref T4398. This prompts users for multi-factor auth on login.
Roughly, this introduces the idea of "partial" sessions, which we haven't finished constructing yet. In practice, this means the session has made it through primary auth but not through multi-factor auth. Add a workflow for bringing a partial session up to a full one.
Test Plan:
- Used Conduit.
- Logged in as multi-factor user.
- Logged in as no-factor user.
- Tried to do non-login-things with a partial session.
- Reviewed account activity logs.
{F149295}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8922
Summary:
Ref T4398. Allows auth factors to render and validate when prompted to take a hi-sec action.
This has a whole lot of rough edges still (see D8875) but does fundamentally work correctly.
Test Plan:
- Added two different TOTP factors to my account for EXTRA SECURITY.
- Took hisec actions with no auth factors, and with attached auth factors.
- Hit all the error/failure states of the hisec entry process.
- Verified hisec failures appear in activity logs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8886
Summary:
Ref T4398. This is roughly a "sudo" mode, like GitHub has for accessing SSH keys, or Facebook has for managing credit cards. GitHub actually calls theirs "sudo" mode, but I think that's too technical for big parts of our audience. I've gone with "high security mode".
This doesn't actually get exposed in the UI yet (and we don't have any meaningful auth factors to prompt the user for) but the workflow works overall. I'll go through it in a comment, since I need to arrange some screenshots.
Test Plan: See guided walkthrough.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8851
Summary: A small but appreciable number of users find flavor on buttons confusing. Remove this flavor. This retains flavor in headers, error messages, etc., which doesn't cause confusion.
Test Plan: Looked at a revision, task, paste, macro, etc.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8812
Summary:
Couple of minor cleanup things here:
- Pass handles to ApplicationTransactions when rendering their stories; this happened implicitly before but doesn't now.
- Add `?text=1` to do ad-hoc rendering of a story in text mode.
- Make Conduit skip unrenderable stories.
- Fix/modernize some text in the Commit story.
Test Plan: Rendered text versions of stories via Conduit and `?text=1`.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: zeeg, spicyj, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8793
Summary:
See <https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/pull/563>.
I think this secondary construction of a `$user` is very old, and predates subsequent changes which cause a proper user to construct earlier, so using the user on the `$request` should (I think) always work. I couldn't immediately find any cases where it does not.
Test Plan: With `debug.stop-on-redirect` set, hit various redirects, like jump-naving to T1. Got a proper stop dialog.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8718
Summary: I accidentally made these exceptionally ugly recently.
Test Plan: {F137411}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8684
Summary:
This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like:
epriestley email.add 1 1233989813
epriestley email.add 1 1234298239
epriestley email.add 1 1238293981
We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit.
One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection.
This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too.
To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors.
Test Plan:
This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec:
{F137406}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
Summary:
- Point them at the new Diviner.
- Make them a little less cumbersome to write.
Test Plan: Found almost all of these links in the UI and clicked them.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8553
Summary:
This is the other half of D8548. Specifically, the attack here was to set your own editor link to `javascript\n:...` and then you could XSS yourself. This isn't a hugely damaging attack, but we can be more certain by adding a whitelist here.
We already whitelist linkable protocols in remarkup (`uri.allowed-protocols`) in general.
Test Plan:
Tried to set and use valid/invalid editor URIs.
{F130883}
{F130884}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8551
Summary:
Fixes T3471. Specific issues:
- Add the ability to set a temporary cookie (expires when the browser closes).
- We overwrote 'phcid' on every page load. This creates some issues with browser extensions. Instead, only write it if isn't set. To counterbalance this, make it temporary.
- Make the 'next_uri' cookie temporary.
- Make the 'phreg' cookie temporary.
- Fix an issue where deleted cookies would persist after 302 (?) in some cases (this is/was 100% for me locally).
Test Plan:
- Closed my browser, reopned it, verified temporary cookies were gone.
- Logged in, authed, linked, logged out.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3471
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8537
Summary:
Fixes T4610. Open to suggestions, etc., if there's anything I'm missing.
Also:
- Moves these "system" endpoints into a real application.
- Makes `isUnlisted()` work a little more consistently.
Test Plan: Accessed `/robots.txt`, `/status/` and `/debug/`.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4610
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8532
Summary:
Ref T4593. Via HackerOne. An attacker can use the anchor reattachment, combined with the Facebook token workflow, combined with redirection on OAuth errors to capture access tokens. The attack works roughly like this:
- Create an OAuth application on Phabricator.
- Set the domain to `evil.com`.
- Grab the OAuth URI for it (something like `https://phabricator.com/oauthserver/auth/?redirect_uri=http://evil.com&...`).
- Add an invalid `scope` parameter (`scope=xyz`).
- Use //that// URI to build a Facebook OAuth URI (something like `https://facebook.com/oauth/?redirect_uri=http://phabricator.com/...&response_type=token`).
- After the user authorizes the application on Facebook (or instantly if they've already authorized it), they're redirected to the OAuth server, which processes the request. Since this is the 'token' workflow, it has auth information in the URL anchor/fragment.
- The OAuth server notices the `scope` error and 302's to the attacker's domain, preserving the anchor in most browsers through anchor reattachment.
- The attacker reads the anchor in JS and can do client workflow stuff.
To fix this, I've made several general changes/modernizations:
- Add a new application and make it beta. This is mostly cleanup, but also turns the server off for typical installs (it's not generally useful quite yet).
- Add a "Console" page to make it easier to navigate.
- Modernize some of the UI, since I was touching most of it anyways.
Then I've made specific security-focused changes:
- In the web-based OAuth workflow, send back a human-readable page when errors occur. I //think// this is universally correct. Previously, humans would get a blob of JSON if they entered an invalid URI, etc. This type of response is correct for the companion endpoint ("ServerTokenController") since it's called by programs, but I believe not correct for this endpoint ("AuthController") since it's used by humans. Most of this is general cleanup (give humans human-readable errors instead of JSON blobs).
- Never 302 off this endpoint automatically. Previously, a small set of errors (notably, bad `scope`) would cause a 302 with 'error'. This exposes us to anchor reattachment, and isn't generally helpful to anyone, since the requesting application did something wrong and even if it's prepared to handle the error, it can't really do anything better than we can.
- The only time we'll 'error' back now from this workflow is if a user explicitly cancels the workflow. This isn't a 302, but a normal link (the cancel button), so the anchor is lost.
- Even if the application is already approved, don't blindly 302. Instead, show the user a confirmation dialog with a 'continue' link. This is perhaps slightly less user-friendly than the straight redirect, but I think it's pretty reasonable in general, and it gives us a lot of protection against these classes of attack. This redirect is then through a link, not a 302, so the anchor is again detached.
-
Test Plan: I attempted to hit everything I touched. See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4593
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8517
Summary:
- Allow Celerity to map and serve WOFF files.
- Add Source Sans Pro, Source Sans Pro Bold, and the corresponding LICENSE.
- Add a `font-source-sans-pro` resource for the font.
Test Plan:
- Changed body `font-face` to `'Source Sans Pro'`.
- Added `require_celerity_resource('font-source-sans-pro')` in StandardPageView.
Works in Firefox/Chrome/Safari, at least:
{F123296}
{F123297}
{F123298}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8430
Summary:
Currently, the linter raises `XHP29` warnings for these files because they are not abstract or final.
I guess there are two possibly solutions, either making the classes final or marking them as `@concrete-extensible`. Given that there are no subclasses of these classes in the `phabricator`, `arcanist` and `libphutil` repositories... I opted to declare the classes as final.
Test Plan:
The following linter warnings are gone:
```
>>> Lint for src/aphront/configuration/AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration.php:
Warning (XHP29) Class Not abstract Or final
This class is neither 'final' nor 'abstract', and does not have a
docblock marking it '@concrete-extensible'.
3 /**
4 * @group aphront
5 */
>>> 6 class AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration
7 extends AphrontApplicationConfiguration {
8
9 public function __construct() {
>>> Lint for src/applications/differential/mail/DifferentialReplyHandler.php:
Warning (XHP29) Class Not abstract Or final
This class is neither 'final' nor 'abstract', and does not have a
docblock marking it '@concrete-extensible'.
1 <?php
2
>>> 3 class DifferentialReplyHandler extends PhabricatorMailReplyHandler {
4
5 private $receivedMail;
6
```
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8347
Summary:
Ref T1191. I believe we only have three meaningful binary fields across all applications:
- The general cache may contain gzipped content.
- The file storage blob may contain arbitrary binary content.
- The Passphrase secret can store arbitrary binary data (although it currently never does).
This adds Lisk config for binary fields, and uses `%B` where necessary.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Forced file uploads to use MySQL, uploaded binaries.
- Disabled the CONFIG_BINARY on the file storage blob and tried again, got an appropraite failure.
- Tried to register with an account containing a G-Clef, and was stopped before the insert.
Reviewers: btrahan, arice
Reviewed By: arice
CC: arice, chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8316
Summary:
Ref T4324. Add a real `Application` class. Use modern UI elements.
@chad, we could use an icon :3
Test Plan: {F114477}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8254
Summary:
Ref T4420. This sets up the basics for modular typeahead sources. Basically, the huge `switch()` is just replaced with class-based runtime dispatch.
The only clever bit I'm doing here is with `CompositeDatasource`, which pretty much just combines the results from several other datasources. We can use this to implement some of the weird cases where we need multiple types of results, although I think I can entirely eliminate many of them entirely. It also makes top-level implementation simpler, since more logic can go inside the sources.
Sources are also application-aware, will be responsible for placeholder text, and have a slightly nicer debug view.
Test Plan: {F112859}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8228
Summary: Ref T1139. This has some issues and glitches, but is a reasonable initial attempt that gets some of the big pieces in. We have about 5,200 strings in Phabricator.
Test Plan: {F108261}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1139
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8138
Summary: Ref T3979. Currently, the home page lives in an old application called "directory" and is informally defined. Make it a real application called "Home", with a formal definition. It isn't launchable and can't be uninstalled.
Test Plan: Loaded home, saw exact same stuff.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8074
Summary:
Ref T2380. If an install has a CDN domain configured, but does not list it as an alternate domain (which is standard/correct, but not incredibly common, see T2380), we'll currently try to set anonymous cookies on it. These will correctly fail security rules.
Instead, don't try to set these cookies.
I missed this in testing yesterday because I have a file domain, but I also have it configured as an alternate domain, which allows cookies to be set. Generally, domain management is due for some refactoring.
Test Plan: Set file domain but not as an alternate, logged out, nuked file domain cookies, reloaded page. No error after patch.
Reviewers: btrahan, csilvers
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2380
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8057
Summary: Fixes T4339. If you're anonymous, we use a digest of your session key to generate a CSRF token. Otherwise, everything works normally.
Test Plan: Logged out, logged in, tweaked CSRF in forms -- I'll add some inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8046
Summary: Ref T4339. We have more magical cookie names than we should, move them all to a central location.
Test Plan: Registered, logged in, linked account, logged out. See inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8041
Summary: Cookie-prefix should fix phabricator instances where x.com and x.y.com have conflicting cookie names
Test Plan: Pushed branch to dev.phab.example.com, logged into phab.example.com and into dev.phab.example.com.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7979
Summary: Ref T4222. Adds the map name to Celerity resource URIs, so we can serve out of any map.
Test Plan: Poked around, verified URIs have "/phabricator/" in them now.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7877
Summary:
Ref T4222. Currently, CelerityResourceResponse holds response resources in flat maps. Instead, specify which map resources appear in.
Also, provide `requireResource()` and `initBehavior()` APIs on the Controller and View base classes. These provide a cleaner abstraction over `require_celerity_resource()` and `Javelin::initBehavior()`, but are otherwise the same. Move a few callsites over.
Test Plan:
- Reloaded pages.
- Browsed around Differential.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7876
Summary:
Ref T4222.
- Removes the old map and changes the CelerityResourceMap API to be entirely driven by the new map.
- The new map is about 50% smaller and organized more sensibly.
- This removes the `/pkg/` URI component. All resources are now required to have unique names, so we can tell if a resource is a package or not by looking at the name.
- Removes some junky old APIs.
- Cleans up some other APIs.
- Added some feedback for `bin/celerity map`.
- `CelerityResourceMap` is still a singleton which is inextricably bound to the Phabricator map; this will change in the future.
Test Plan:
- Reloaded pages.
- Verified packaging works by looking at generated includes.
- Forced minification on and verified it worked.
- Forced no-timestamps on and verified it worked.
- Rebuilt map.
- Ran old script and verified error message.
- Checked logs.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7872
Summary: Ref T4140. Provide more debugging information so we can figure out what's going on with redirect loops.
Test Plan: {F83868}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7620
