Summary: See D939. Regardless of what we do there, these will break, and they're
pretty silly anyway (see the giant caveat comments in the second one).
Test Plan: Clicked a direct-jump comment link, did save/cancel for inline
comments.
Reviewers: phil, cpojer, tomo, mroch
Reviewed By: phil
CC: aran, phil
Differential Revision: 940
don't show "Undo"
Summary: When a user hits "Reply" on an inline comment, doesn't type anything,
and then hits "Cancel", we incorrectly store the text of the comment the user is
replying to as the "original" text, and then detect that they've changed it when
they immediately cancel. Instead, store empty string as the original text.
Test Plan:
- Hit "Reply" and then "Cancel" on an inline comment. No undo now.
- Hit "Reply", typed some text, and then hit "Cancel". Got an undo which
restored my text.
Reviewers: tomo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, tomo
Differential Revision: 879
Summary:
We don't currently validate CSRF tokens on this workflow. This allows an
attacker to upload arbitrary files on the user's behalf. Although I believe the
tight list of servable mime-types means that's more or less the end of the
attack, this is still a vulnerability.
In the long term, the right solution is probably to pass CSRF tokens on all Ajax
requests in an HTTP header (or just a GET param) or something like that.
However, this endpoint is unique and this is the quickest and most direct way to
close the hole.
Test Plan:
- Drop-uploaded files to Files, Maniphest, Phriction and Differential.
- Modified CSRF vaidator to use __csrf__.'x' and verified uploads and form
submissions don't work.
Reviewers: andrewjcg, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, erling
Commenters: andrewjcg, pedram
CC: aran, epriestley, andrewjcg, pedram
Differential Revision: 758
Summary: -
Test Plan:
This was a pretty straightforward replace. Everything should
be sane.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: tomo, epriestley, mroch
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 803
Summary: Provide a more coarse keyboard navigation option to jump between files.
Test Plan:
- Used "j" and "k" to jump between changes in files.
- Used "J" and "K" to jump between files.
- Pressed "?" and read help about this.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Commenters: fzamore
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason, fzamore
Differential Revision: 764
Summary:
This gets all the major pieces working. Allows you to drag-and-drop files in
Differential and Phriction, and embed files in remarkup with {Fxxx} references.
See also task.
I'm explicitly not documenting this yet since it's still pretty rough.
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped stuff into Differential and Phriction.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, tomo
Commenters: tomo
CC: aran, tomo, jungejason
Differential Revision: 674
Summary:
- There's no way you can figure out the ID of a file right now. Expose that
more prominently.
- Put the drag-and-drop uploader on the main page so you don't have to click
through.
- Restore the basic uploader so IE users can theoretically use the suite I
guess? Added author info to basic uploader.
- Show author information in the table.
- Show date information in the table.
- Link file names.
- Rename table for filter views.
- When you upload one file, just jump to it. When you upload multiple files,
jump to your uploads and highlight them.
- Add an "arc download" hint.
Test Plan: Uploaded single files, groups of files, and files via simple
uploader.
Reviewers: codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Commenters: codeblock
CC: aran, codeblock, epriestley
Differential Revision: 746
Summary:
Currently, you can only edit your own affiliation to projects. Enable users to
be managed in a more reasonable batched way.
I'll lock this down to admins/owners and add a transaction log at some point.
Test Plan: Edited project affiliations. Verified Herald still works.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 677
Summary: When a JX.Request fails, there's no default error handling. Rather than
write some kind of custom stuff, just use JX.Workflow so we get exception
dialogs. We have plans to enhance these anyway (see T302).
Test Plan: Changed the changeset view controller to throw exceptions. Verified I
got un-mysterious exception dialogs when a changeset failed because of an
exception in either initial rendering or after hitting "see more".
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, tomo
CC: aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 679
Summary: Preview Phriction documents as they are edited, similar to how
Differential/Maniphest work.
Test Plan: Mashed my keyboard while editing a Phriction document.
Reviewed By: hsb
Reviewers: hsb, codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, hsb
Differential Revision: 684
Summary:
We currently cycle CSRF tokens every hour and check for the last two valid ones.
This means that a form could go stale in as little as an hour, and is certainly
stale after two.
When a stale form is submitted, you basically get a terrible heisen-state where
some of your data might persist if you're lucky but more likely it all just
vanishes. The .js file below outlines some more details.
This is a pretty terrible UX and we don't need to be as conservative about CSRF
validation as we're being. Remedy this problem by:
- Accepting the last 6 CSRF tokens instead of the last 1 (i.e., pages are
valid for at least 6 hours, and for as long as 7).
- Using JS to refresh the CSRF token every 55 minutes (i.e., pages connected
to the internet are valid indefinitely).
- Showing the user an explicit message about what went wrong when CSRF
validation fails so the experience is less bewildering.
They should now only be able to submit with a bad CSRF token if:
- They load a page, disconnect from the internet for 7 hours, reconnect, and
submit the form within 55 minutes; or
- They are actually the victim of a CSRF attack.
We could eventually fix the first one by tracking reconnects, which might be
"free" once the notification server gets built. It will probably never be an
issue in practice.
Test Plan:
- Reduced CSRF cycle frequency to 2 seconds, submitted a form after 15
seconds, got the CSRF exception.
- Reduced csrf-refresh cycle frequency to 3 seconds, submitted a form after 15
seconds, got a clean form post.
- Added debugging code the the csrf refresh to make sure it was doing sensible
things (pulling different tokens, finding all the inputs).
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 660
Summary:
See T303. Enable comment panel haunting.
I hid the preview for the sticky panel, which I think is reasonable?
Test Plan:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/view/PHID-FILE-64713fa8a7c2a22e5b93/
Reviewed By: broofa
Reviewers: broofa, jungejason, aran, tomo, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, broofa
Differential Revision: 615
Summary:
We currently have only an "Add reviewers" action, add "Add CCs". This can also
be accomplished less-discoverably with mentions.
Test Plan:
Added reviewers and CCs to revisions. Toggled display between reviewers and CCs.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tomo, mroch, jsp, jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 521
Summary:
This ended up being pretty hard to see, make it a bit easier.
Test Plan:
Focused things using the keyboard reticle.
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: tomo, moskov, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 483
Summary:
Permit "j" and "k" to cycle through individual changeblocks, similar to how this
feature works in ReviewBoard. This still needs a bunch of refinement but it's
getting closer to being useful.
Also moved reticle underneath the table so you can click links through it (derp
derp).
Test Plan:
Used "j" and "k" to cycle through individual changes.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: moskov, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 426
Summary:
Allow duplicate tasks to be selected and merged in Maniphest.
I didn't create a separate transaction type for this because that implies a
bunch of really complicated rules which I don't want to sort out right now
(e.g., do we need to do cycle detection for merges? If so, what do we do when we
detect a cycle?) since I think it's unnecessary to get right for the initial
implementation (my Tasks merge implementation was similar to this and worked
quite well) and if/when we eventually need the metadata to be available in a
computer-readable form that need should inform the implementation.
Plenty of room for improvement here, of course.
Test Plan:
Merged duplicate tasks, tried to perform invalid merge operations (e.g., merge a
task into itself).
Tested existing attach workflows (task -> revision, revision -> task).
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: anjali, aran
Differential Revision: 459
Summary:
Some day, maybe close the existing dialog too but there's no public method on
JX.Workflow for that right now.
Test Plan:
Hit "??????", then "esc", got back to the page instead of just popping a deep
stack.
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: tomo
CC: aran, tomo
Differential Revision: 450
errors.
Summary:
Make sure reviewers know what they are doing.
Test Plan:
Tested with different diffs that had lint and unit problems.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason
CC: grglr, aran, epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 432
Summary:
Provide a quick workflow for adding a new project. This ended up being sort of
complicated because we don't currently put forms in dialogs. I separated the
actual <form /> tag out of the display/layout of AphrontFormView to enable this
(the dialog is itself a form).
Limitations: if you create a new project and then remove it, it won't appear in
the tokenizer until you reload the page. We need to add the ability for the
datasource to drop its cache to enable this, which is super complicated.
Test Plan:
Used "Create new project" to add a new project when creating a task.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 422
Summary:
Addon that allows you to create a live countdown page to
some event.
Here is the ticket that this code is based on
https://secure.phabricator.com/T36
Test Plan:
Tested by manually setting dates in the timer.js file and
checking if they made sense.
I'm not sure if it works across different timezones though.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC:
Differential Revision: 436
Summary:
We use a 'null' row to indicate the element should be appended to the end of the
table (otherwise, it is prepended to the row in question), but also derive the
table from the row. This needs more cleanup in general but fix the immediate
issue at least.
Test Plan:
Added an inline comment to the last line of a file.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 425
Summary:
ReviewBoard has a fancier version of this feature that's more granular -- the
keyboard can focus on individual changes. I think that's good and intend to
implement something similar, but this gets us a step closer and gets rid of some
of the bookkeeping stuff like making shortcuts discoverable.
(I have another brnach with Maniphest merging which also uses fatcow icons,
which is why the README seems a little out of context.)
Test Plan:
Used "j" and "k" to jump between changesets. Pressed "?" and got a list of
available shortcuts.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: moskov, aran, epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 412
Summary:
When a user hits 'cancel' on a 'new', 'edit', or 'reply' operation, add a little
"Changes discarded. __Undo__" insert so they can get their change back. No undo
for delete since there's an explicit prompt. Once this lands we can make
'escape' work again to close dialogs.
This change started feeling really good when I was merging all the duplicate
code and making things more consistent, but by the time I started writing client
rendering it felt gross. I'm not really thrilled with it but I guess it's a step
forward? The feature seems pretty OK in practice. Let me know how much barfing
this causes and I can try to remedy the most acute concerns.
This also fixes a bug where replies always (?) appear on the 'new' side of the
diff (I think?).
Test Plan:
Applied 'new', 'edit', 'delete' and 'reply' operations, pressed 'cancel' and
'okay' in each case, with and without changing text where relevant. All
behaviors seem to conform with expectations, except that canceling out of 'edit'
without changing the text gives you an option to undo when it shouldn't really.
There's no super easy way to get at the original text right now.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: simpkins, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 406
Summary:
This simplifies it a lot and prevents it from spazzing out when some control is
foucsed.
Test Plan:
Hit "?", "`".
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 410
Summary: Implements a simple infrastructure for keyboard shortcuts, see T184, and a "help" shortcut.
There's a lot of room for refinement here but I think it basically works. Each shortcut can also provide a "tooltip" handler which allows it to show help when the alt/option key is held down.
Test Plan: Pressed "?" and got help. Pressed "?" in various contexts where it should not activate (modifier keys, text input focused) and didn't get help.
Reviewers: aran, tuomaspelkonen, jungejason
CC: moskov
Differential Revision: 362
Summary:
Allows you to link to comments with "D123#3" or "T123#3", then adds a pile of JS
to try to make it not terrible. :/
The thing I'm trying to avoid here is when someone says "look at this!
http://blog.com/#comment-239291" and you click and your browser jumps somewhere
random and you have no idea which comment they meant. Since I really hate this,
I've tried to avoid it by making sure the comment is always highlighted.
Test Plan:
Put T1#1 and D1#1 in remarkup and verified they linked properly.
Clicked anchors on individual comments.
Faked all comments hidden in Differential and verified they expanded on anchor
or anchor change.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, tomo, mroch, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 383
Summary:
Make it discoverable, show uploading progress, show file thumbnails, allow you
to remove files, make it a generic form component.
Test Plan:
Uploaded ducks
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: aran, tomo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley, tomo
Differential Revision: 334
Summary:
It was possible to submit a comment multiple times if the submit
button was pressed more than once quickly. Added javascript code
that disables the button when it is clicked.
Test Plan:
Tried to click the button multiple times very quickly, but the
button was disabled after the first click.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason
Commenters: aran
CC: aran, epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 337
Summary:
We hit this very short (1s) timeout when the browser chooses to resolve all the
diff requests before the preview request. In the long term we could start the
preview request only after all the diff requests resolve, but this solves the
issue for now and there's no reason for such a short timeout.
The historical reason to have this timeout at all is that intern was megaflaky
and that's no longer a problem.
Test Plan:
Faked it so it would use a 1ms timeout the first time and then a 20s timeout;
got reasonable behavior.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 329
Summary:
This needs a bunch of UI polish (critically, it's totally undiscoverable) but it
basically works correctly. I'll clean it up in some followups.
Test Plan:
Uploaded some files via drag-and-drop, made comments, etc.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tomo, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: anjali, aran
Differential Revision: 332
Summary:
When a task description is updated, there's currently no way to see the change.
Build an "expanded summary" mode for transactions that shows description change
details. Also include changes in the email.
Test Plan:
Changed task descriptions, clicked "show details", read email.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 320
Summary:
You can currently attach tasks to revisions from Differential, but not revisions
to tasks from Maniphest. Allow editing from either side.
This logic is kind of tricky but the alternative was massive code duplication.
Test Plan:
Added and removed revisions from maniphest. Added and removed tasks from
differential.
This should have no impact on the Facebook install since none of this is used
there.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tomo, tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 288
Summary:
Separates changeset IDs from rendering. Now each changeset has a "rendering
reference" which is basically a description of what the ajax endpoint should
render. For Differential, it's in the form "id/vs". For Diffusion,
"branch/path;commit".
I believe this fixes pretty much all of the bugs related to "show more" breaking
in various obscure ways, although I never got a great repro for T153.
Test Plan:
Clicked "show more" in diffusion change and commit views and differential diff,
diff-of-diff, standalone-diff, standalone-diff-of-diff views. Verified refs and
'whitespace' were always sent correctly.
Made inline comments on diffs and diffs-of-diffs. Used "Reply".
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Differential Revision: 274
Summary:
Browsing comments was a bit difficult without the possibllity to jump
between comments. These links will make the browsing easier.
Test Plan:
Tested on multiple diffs that the links were working correctly.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: jungejason, aran, tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Differential Revision: 266
Summary: When rendering a Maniphest comment preview, also render a preview of the transaction.
Test Plan: tested previews for all transaction types, got reasonable renders
Summary:
Expanding lines duplicated some lines occasionally, because whitespace
option was different for the original request and the following request.
Test Plan:
Tested that the broken changeset was correct now.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: jungejason, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 263
Summary:
Moves shared code from Differential and Maniphest comment previews into
PhabricatorShapedRequest, and then implements Maniphest previews.
This doesn't implement comment drafts, I'll follow up with that but it requires
this and is completely separable.
This also always shows the preview as "commented" rather than previewing the
actual transaction. I'll follow up with that but I think it will require a
little factoring and this is useful even without transaction details.
I need to tweak the styling a bit too.
Test Plan:
Typed text in Maniphest and Differential. Toggled Differential action. Made
comments.
Reviewed By: rm
Reviewers: rm, tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, rm
Differential Revision: 258
Summary:
Javelin is currently embedded in Phabricator via copy-and-paste of prebuilt
packages. This is not so great.
Pull it in as a submodule instead and make all the Phabriator resources declare
proper dependency trees. Add Javelin linting.
Test Plan:
I tried to run through pretty much all the JS functionality on the site. This is
still a high-risk change, but I did a pretty thorough test
Differential: inline comments, revealing diffs, list tokenizers, comment
preview, editing/deleting comments, add review action.
Maniphest: list tokenizer, comment actions
Herald: rule editing, tokenizers, add/remove rows
Reviewed By: tomo
Reviewers: aran, tomo, mroch, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, tomo, epriestley
Differential Revision: 223
Summary:
When function phlog() is called, stacktrace and detailed log information
is shown in DarkConsole.
Test Plan:
Called 'phlog' function from various places in Phabricator and checked that
the debug information was available in DarkConsole.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 101
Summary:
Editing Maniphest tasks for a Differential Revision required user to hit
'search' every time he changed search parameters. Now select and text input
changes trigger search automatically.
Test Plan:
Tested that changing the select and entering text automatically gave the
correct results.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason
Commenters: jungejason
CC: epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 102
Summary:
use XHPAST parser to parse the file, and generate a table for
the code to highlight it. This is part of the task of "Port Diffusion's
Browse File view to Phabricator".
Test Plan:
browse file, try commit version, line number functionality.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: epriestley
Differential Revision: 83
Summary: Interface for selecting objects to attach to other objects
(e.g., Maniphest tasks to Differential diffs and vice versa).
Test Plan: still rough
Reviewers:
CC:
