Summary:
Ref T1536. LDAP is very likely the worst thing in existence.
This has some rough edges (error handling isn't perfect) but is already better than the current LDAP experience! durrr
Test Plan: Registered and logged in using LDAP.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6177
Summary: Ref T1536. Support for GitHub on new flows.
Test Plan: Registered and logged in with GitHub.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6166
Summary: Ref T1536. Adds Disqus as a Provider.
Test Plan: Registered and logged in with Disqus.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6165
Summary:
Ref T1536. Ref T1930. Code is not reachable.
This provides password authentication and registration on the new provider/adapter framework.
I sort of cheated a little bit and don't really route any password logic through the adapter (instead, this provider uses an empty adapter and just sets the type/domain on it). I think the right way to do this //conceptually// is to treat username/passwords as an external black box which the adapter communicates with. However, this creates a lot of practical implementation and UX problems:
- There would basically be two steps -- in the first one, you interact with the "password black box", which behaves like an OAuth provider. This produces some ExternalAccount associated with the username/password pair, then we go into normal registration.
- In normal registration, we'd proceed normally.
This means:
- The registration flow would be split into two parts, one where you select a username/password (interacting with the black box) and one where you actually register (interacting with the generic flow). This is unusual and probably confusing for users.
- We would need to do a lot of re-hashing of passwords, since passwords currently depend on the username and user PHID, which won't exist yet during registration or the "black box" phase. This is a big mess I don't want to deal with.
- We hit a weird condition where two users complete step 1 with the same username but don't complete step 2 yet. The box knows about two different copies of the username, with two different passwords. When we arrive at step 2 the second time we have a lot of bad choices about how to reoslve it, most of which create security problems. The most stragihtforward and "pure" way to resolve the issues is to put password-auth usernames in a separate space, but this would be incredibly confusuing to users (your login name might not be the same as your username, which is bizarre).
- If we change this, we need to update all the other password-related code, which I don't want to bother with (at least for now).
Instead, let registration know about a "default" registration controller (which is always password, if enabled), and let it require a password. This gives us a much simpler (albeit slightly less pure) implementation:
- All the fields are on one form.
- Password adapter is just a shell.
- Password provider does the heavy lifting.
We might make this more pure at some point, but I'm generally pretty satisfied with this.
This doesn't implement the brute-force CAPTCHA protection, that will be coming soon.
Test Plan: Registered with password only and logged in with a password. Hit various error conditions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T1930
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6164
Summary:
Ref T1536. None of this code is reachable.
Implements new-auth login (so you can actually login) and login validation (which checks that cookies were set correctly).
Test Plan: Manually enabled FB auth, went through the auth flow to login/logout. Manually hit most of the validation errors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6162
Summary:
Ref T1536. Code is intentionally made unreachable (see PhabricatorAuthProviderOAuthFacebook->isEnabled()).
This adds:
- A provider-driven "start" screen (this has the list of ways you can login/register).
- Registration actually works.
- Facebook OAuth works.
@chad, do you have any design ideas on the start screen? I think we poked at it before, but the big issue was that there were a limitless number of providers. Today, we have:
- Password
- LDAP
- Facebook
- GitHub
- Phabricator
- Disqus
- Google
We plan to add:
- Asana
- An arbitrary number of additional instances of Phabricator
Users want to add:
- OpenID
- Custom providers
And I'd like to have these at some point:
- Stripe
- WePay
- Amazon
- Bitbucket
So basically any UI for this has to accommodate 300 zillion auth options. I don't think we need to solve any UX problems here (realistically, installs enable 1-2 auth options and users don't actually face an overwhelming number of choices) but making the login forms less ugly would be nice. No combination of prebuilt elements seems to look very good for this use case.
Test Plan: Registered a new acount with Facebook.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6161
Summary:
Ref T1536. None of this code is reachable.
`PhabricatorAuthLoginController` provides a completely generic login/link flow, similar to how D6155 provides a generic registration flow.
`PhabricatorAuthProvider` wraps a `PhutilAuthAdapter` and glues the generic top-level flow to a concrete authentication provider.
Test Plan: Static only, code isn't meaningfully reachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6159
Summary:
Currently, registration and authentication are pretty messy. Two concrete problems:
- The `PhabricatorLDAPRegistrationController` and `PhabricatorOAuthDefaultRegistrationController` controllers are giant copy/pastes of one another. This is really bad.
- We can't practically implement OpenID because we can't reissue the authentication request.
Additionally, the OAuth registration controller can be replaced wholesale by config, which is a huge API surface area and a giant mess.
Broadly, the problem right now is that registration does too much: we hand it some set of indirect credentials (like OAuth tokens) and expect it to take those the entire way to a registered user. Instead, break registration into smaller steps:
- User authenticates with remote service.
- Phabricator pulls information (remote account ID, username, email, real name, profile picture, etc) from the remote service and saves it as `PhabricatorUserCredentials`.
- Phabricator hands the `PhabricatorUserCredentials` to the registration form, which is agnostic about where they originate from: it can process LDAP credentials, OAuth credentials, plain old email credentials, HTTP basic auth credentials, etc.
This doesn't do anything yet -- there is no way to create credentials objects (and no storage patch), but I wanted to get any initial feedback, especially about the event call for T2394. In particular, I think the implementation would look something like this:
$profile = $event->getValue('profile')
$username = $profile->getDefaultUsername();
$is_employee = is_this_a_facebook_employee($username);
if (!$is_employee) {
throw new Exception("You are not employed at Facebook.");
}
$fbid = get_fbid_for_facebook_username($username);
$profile->setDefaultEmail($fbid);
$profile->setCanEditUsername(false);
$profile->setCanEditEmail(false);
$profile->setCanEditRealName(false);
$profile->setShouldVerifyEmail(true);
Seem reasonable?
Test Plan: N/A yet, probably fatals.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, codeblock, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin, nh, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T2394
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4647
Summary: Ref T1536. This is similar to D6172 but much simpler: we don't need to retain external interfaces here and can do a straight migration.
Test Plan: TBA
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6173
Summary: Ref T1536. Migrates the OAuthInfo table to ExternalAccount, and makes `PhabricatorUserOAuthInfo` a wrapper for an ExternalAccount.
Test Plan: Logged in with OAuth, registered with OAuth, linked/unlinked OAuth accounts, checked OAuth status screen, deleted an account with related OAuth.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6172
Summary: Rough pass at a PHUIButtonView Class. Keeps phutil_tag intact and adds some image features if you use the class.
Test Plan: UIExamples
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6192
Summary:
Ref T1703. This sets the stage for (but does not yet implement) custom UI types for config. In particular, a draggable list for custom fields.
I might make all the builtin types go through this at some point too, but don't really want to bother for the moment. It would be very slightly cleaner but woudn't get us much of anything.
Test Plan:
UI now renders via custom code, although that code does nothing (produces an unadorned text field):
{F45693}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6154
Summary:
Ref T1703.
- Adds "Title".
- Adds "Blurb".
- Adds `user.fields` config for selecting and reordering. This will get UI in the next patch.
Test Plan:
{F45689}
{F45690}
Edited the fields, too.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6153
Summary:
Adds a profile edit controller (with just one field and on links to it) that uses ApplicationTransactions and CustomField.
{F45617}
My plan is to move the other profile fields to this interface and get rid of Settings -> Profile. Basically, these will be "settings":
- Sex
- Language
- Timezone
These will be "profile":
- Real Name
- Title
- Blurb
- Profile Image (but I'm going to put this on a separate UI)
- Other custom fields
Test Plan: Edited my realname using the new interface.
Reviewers: chad, seporaitis
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6152
Summary:
None of this code is reachable yet. See discussion in D6147. Ref T1703.
Provide tighter integration between ApplicationTransactions and CustomField. Basically, I'm just trying to get all the shared stuff into the base implementation.
Test Plan: Code not reachable.
Reviewers: chad, seporaitis
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6149
Summary:
Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit.
For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though:
- Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch.
- Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed.
- Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field.
For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278.
For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet.
For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this:
- We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled.
- We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom.
- There are two downsides to this approach:
- If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream.
- If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability.
- I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to.
- We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother.
- There are numerous upsides to this approach:
- We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration.
- In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore.
- Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click.
- Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff.
- Generally, it's super easy for users to understand.
This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it.
Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet.
Reviewers: chad, seporaitis
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
Summary:
Also you have to drop them. So drag, and then drop.
This needs some cleanup and reconciliation/generalization with the Maniphest implementation. In particular, you can't drag things to the very top right now, and they should share more CSS and more behaviors.
Test Plan:
Look I alphabetized them:
{F45286}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6136
Summary: This adds examples and abstracts out CSS for common nav re-use.
Test Plan: Tested DocumentExample and ListExample
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6138
Summary:
This diff covers a bit of ground.
- PHUIDocumentExample has been added
- PHUIDocument has been extended with new features
- PhabricatorMenuView is now PHUIListView
- PhabricatorMenuItemView is now PHUIItemListView
Overall - I think I've gotten all the edges covered here. There is some derpi-ness that we can talk about, comments in the code. Responsive design is missing from the new features on PHUIDocument, will follow up later.
Test Plan: Tested mobile and desktop menus, old phriction layout, new document views, new lists, and object lists.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6130
Summary: Ref T988. Mostly backend changes, with a very rough frontend on top of them. See Conpherence discussion.
Test Plan: {F45010}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6113
Summary: D6114 fixed some bugs but on production it shows up as a new bug where Saturday is the first day? stop messing with the DateTime object so much and do some old school epoch manipulation. This works correctly on my laptop and my still fail in production, but it will rule out DateTime suckage.
Test Plan: still works on laptop
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6115
Summary: See D6115.
Test Plan:
- Ran unit tests.
- Viewed reports.
- Created a countdown.
- Searched chatlog.
- Searched pastes by created date.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6116
Summary: Ref T988. Lots of rough edges still, but this pulls the right data and dumps it into a reasonable-looking shell.
Test Plan: {F44883}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6104
Summary:
Ref T988. Fixes T3150. I want to use this element in Diviner, so separate it from Phriction.
This makes no changes to the actual display except for fixing {T3150} by adding `overflow: hidden;`.
Test Plan: Viewed Phriction documents in mobile and desktop views.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988, T3150
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6101
Summary: Last of the methods. Fixes T3166.
Test Plan: updated a thread in all the various ways except remove and it worked. removed myself and it worked! tried to remove someone else and it yelled at me.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3166
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6103
Summary: Ref T3166. Returned all the data I could think of, though notable "metadata" isn't used in conpherence (yet afaik) AND its somewhat silly to return the conpherence id / phid you specified, but seems handy.
Test Plan: played with conduit console.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3166
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6098
Summary: Ref T988. Ref T2625. Rough cut of ApplicationSearch in Diviner, for detailed Atom queries. This isn't useful yet, and isn't linked in the UI.
Test Plan: {F44836}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988, T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6094
Summary:
Ref T2625. Fixes T2812. Implement ApplicationSearch in People.
{F44788}
Test Plan: Made People queries. Used Conduit. Used `@mentions`.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625, T2812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6092
Summary: Ref T2625. Ref T1163. A couple of small generalization nudges, but this is almost entirely straightforward.
Test Plan: Executed various File queries.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1163, T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6091
Summary: nice title. also adds a description to the create thread method which I forgot to add... Ref T3166.
Test Plan: queried threads by ids, by phids, and by offset / limit tweakage. Got the right stuff!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3166
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6096
Summary:
Ref T1163. Ref T2625. This could probably use some tweaks, but I kept things mostly-generic.
I added a new control for freeform dates so we can have it render help or whatever later on.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625, T1163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6084
Summary: Ref T3166. I moved the create logic into a static method in the editor class to keep things tidy.
Test Plan: created a conpherence from UI. purdy. tried errors and got UI to show "required". for conduit, created a thread with all the bells and whistles and it worked. verified i got proper exceptions with bum conduit calls
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3166
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6083
Summary: Ref T2625. Works out the last kinks of generalization and gives Macros the more powerful new query engine. Overall, this feels pretty good to me.
Test Plan: Executed, saved and edited a bunch of Macro queries.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6078
Summary:
Ref T2625. Lifts almost all of the search logic out of Paste controllers and into Search.
This uses controller delegation for generalization. We use this in a few places, but don't use it very much yet. I think it's pretty reasonable as-is, but I might be able to make even more stuff free.
There are some slightly rough edges around routes, still, but I want to hit Phame and Differential (which both have multiple application search engines) before trying to generalize that.
Test Plan: Executed, browsed and managed Paste searches.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6073
Summary:
We can lose file data through various means; one reasonable way is if files get deleted from disk with 'local-disk' storage. If data goes missing,
Ref T3265. Also, reduce some code duplication.
Test Plan:
Ran `bin/files purge`, `bin/files migrate`, `bin/files rebuild` with various args.
Deleted a file with "local-disk" storage, ran `bin/files purge`, made sure it got picked up.
Reviewers: dctrwatson, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3265
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6068
Summary:
Ref T2625. Currently, custom saved queries can be edited but not deleted. Allow them to be deleted. Also:
- Clean up an unused property in `PhabricatorPasteViewController`.
- Fix an issue with left nav highlighting of builtin queries.
- Improve submit behavior for edits.
- Add a cancel button on edits.
Test Plan: Saved, edited and deleted queries.
Reviewers: btrahan, blc
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6059
Summary: Ref T2625. Rename the "Name" controller to "Edit" and allow it to edit named queries. Also some UI touchups. Add an edit link to the saved query browse view.
Test Plan: Created and edited named queries.
Reviewers: btrahan, blc
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6056
Summary: Same as D6051, but for SavedQueries instead of NamedQueries. These are POLICY_PUBLIC because you need to know the hash to access them, and because we want to let users copy/paste query URLs. Ref T2625.
Test Plan: Saved a query, reused a saved query.
Reviewers: btrahan, blc
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6054
Summary: Adds a first-class Query object for querying NamedQueries. xzibit would be proud.
Test Plan: Updated query edit interface to use this query, verified it works correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan, blc
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6051
Summary: Add a button to the Remarkup area that explains how to attach an image and remove the separate upload field.
Test Plan: Check that the dialog pops up correctly and that dropping images onto the Remarkup area works.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T879
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6049
Summary: Adds support for the "encoding" field to the new transactional interface.
Test Plan:
{F44189}
{F44190}
Some of the encodings in the second screen are from testing, and can no longer be set.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6035
Summary: I want to use some of these for instructional text in Diffusion. Provide a concrete class to make one-offs cacheable and switch Releeph to use it.
Test Plan: {F44175}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6032
Summary:
Ref T2231, T603. Plan of attack here is pretty much:
- Built out a new (currently not linked in the UI) edit interface in Diffusion which is transaction-based and has a sensible layout.
- Build out a new create interface based on PagedForm which dumps into the new edit interface.
- Throw the old stuff away.
- Everyone lives happily ever after.
Test Plan:
{F44163}
{F44164}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2231
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6029
Summary:
Spent an hour or two helping a user figure this out. Make sure I never do that again.
If the webserver is configured with an empty or bogus PATH, binaries like 'which' and 'diff' (and 'git', and 'svn', etc.) may not be available. In most cases, this is fine, because we get an error like "sh: whatever-command not found", which is obvious to diagnose.
In the case of 'diff', we don't get this, because 'diff' is expected to exit with a nonzero code for differing files -- so we interpret the "sh: whatever-command not found" as "files differ" and then try to parse the empty output.
Explicitly check for 'which' (on Windows, 'where') and 'diff' during setup (I plan to refine the behavior around 'git', 'svn' and 'hg' at some point, but this is less pressing since the errors are trivial to support).
Test Plan: Faked failures on all modes, verified setup warnings look reasonable.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6008
Summary:
Ref T2232. Very busy day on IRC so I feel like I've made 20 minutes of progress in 1-minute spurts here, but this adds the basics for a form that can have multiple pages and automatically handle pagination and reading to/from the request, objects and responses.
The UIExample is reasonably instructive. Basically, you make a form, add pages to the form, and add controls to the pages. The core flow control looks like this:
if ($request->isFormPost()) {
$form->readFromRequest($request); // (1)
if ($form->isComplete()) { // (2)
$response = $form->writeToResponse($response); // (3)
// Process result here. // (4)
}
} else {
$form->readFromObject($object); // (5)
}
The key parts are:
# This reads the form state from the request, including reading all the inactive pages.
# This tests if all pages are valid and the user just clicked "Done" on the last page.
# This produces a "response", which might be writing to an object (for simpler forms) or creating a transaction record (for more complex forms).
# Here, we would save the object or apply the transactions.
# When the user views the form for the first time, we preload all the values from some object (which might just be empty).
Ultimate goal here is to fix repository creation to not be a terrible pit of awfulness.
There are probably a lot of rough edges and missing features still, but this seems to not be totally crazy.
I'm using two submit buttons with different names which doesn't work on IE7 or something, but we can JS our way out of that if we need to.
Test Plan: Paged forward and backward through the form.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2232
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6003
Summary:
Now has policy support (not really)
Now uses CountdownQuery
Now has handles
Now uses common way for remarkup
Remarkup still looks terrible
Test Plan: Added countdowns, edited countdowns. Did even embed some. Couldn't break it
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T2624
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6012
