Summary: Fixes T4985, add manage page, change view page to show only panels. Arguably, PhabricatorDashboardArrangeController is no longer necessary. Also, still trying to figure out if I updated all flows that involve "arrange/{id}". Probably missed some. Also not sure of the Manage Dashboard icon. Please advise.
Test Plan: Create dashboard, add panels, "view/{id}" should show just panels, Manage Dashboard should show timeline and edit links.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4985
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9258
Summary:
Ref T4398. This code hadn't been touched in a while and had a few crufty bits.
**One Time Resets**: Currently, password reset (and similar links) are valid for about 48 hours, but we always use one token to generate them (it's bound to the account). This isn't horrible, but it could be better, and it produces a lot of false positives on HackerOne.
Instead, use TemporaryTokens to make each link one-time only and good for no more than 24 hours.
**Coupling of Email Verification and One-Time Login**: Currently, one-time login links ("password reset links") are tightly bound to an email address, and using a link verifies that email address.
This is convenient for "Welcome" emails, so the user doesn't need to go through two rounds of checking email in order to login, then very their email, then actually get access to Phabricator.
However, for other types of these links (like those generated by `bin/auth recover`) there's no need to do any email verification.
Instead, make the email verification part optional, and use it on welcome links but not other types of links.
**Message Customization**: These links can come out of several workflows: welcome, password reset, username change, or `bin/auth recover`. Add a hint to the URI so the text on the page can be customized a bit to help users through the workflow.
**Reset Emails Going to Main Account Email**: Previously, we would send password reset email to the user's primary account email. However, since we verify email coming from reset links this isn't correct and could allow a user to verify an email without actually controlling it.
Since the user needs a real account in the first place this does not seem useful on its own, but might be a component in some other attack. The user might also no longer have access to their primary account, in which case this wouldn't be wrong, but would not be very useful.
Mitigate this in two ways:
- First, send to the actual email address the user entered, not the primary account email address.
- Second, don't let these links verify emails: they're just login links. This primarily makes it more difficult for an attacker to add someone else's email to their account, send them a reset link, get them to login and implicitly verify the email by not reading very carefully, and then figure out something interesting to do (there's currently no followup attack here, but allowing this does seem undesirable).
**Password Reset Without Old Password**: After a user logs in via email, we send them to the password settings panel (if passwords are enabled) with a code that lets them set a new password without knowing the old one.
Previously, this code was static and based on the email address. Instead, issue a one-time code.
**Jump Into Hisec**: Normally, when a user who has multi-factor auth on their account logs in, we prompt them for factors but don't put them in high security. You usually don't want to go do high-security stuff immediately after login, and it would be confusing and annoying if normal logins gave you a "YOU ARE IN HIGH SECURITY" alert bubble.
However, if we're taking you to the password reset screen, we //do// want to put the user in high security, since that screen requires high security. If we don't do this, the user gets two factor prompts in a row.
To accomplish this, we set a cookie when we know we're sending the user into a high security workflow. This cookie makes login finalization upgrade all the way from "partial" to "high security", instead of stopping halfway at "normal". This is safe because the user has just passed a factor check; the only reason we don't normally do this is to reduce annoyance.
**Some UI Cleanup**: Some of this was using really old UI. Modernize it a bit.
Test Plan:
- **One Time Resets**
- Used a reset link.
- Tried to reuse a reset link, got denied.
- Verified each link is different.
- **Coupling of Email Verification and One-Time Login**
- Verified that `bin/auth`, password reset, and username change links do not have an email verifying URI component.
- Tried to tack one on, got denied.
- Used the welcome email link to login + verify.
- Tried to mutate the URI to not verify, or verify something else: got denied.
- **Message Customization**
- Viewed messages on the different workflows. They seemed OK.
- **Reset Emails Going to Main Account Email**
- Sent password reset email to non-primary email.
- Received email at specified address.
- Verified it does not verify the address.
- **Password Reset Without Old Password**
- Reset password without knowledge of old one after email reset.
- Tried to do that without a key, got denied.
- Tried to reuse a key, got denied.
- **Jump Into Hisec**
- Logged in with MFA user, got factor'd, jumped directly into hisec.
- Logged in with non-MFA user, no factors, normal password reset.
- **Some UI Cleanup**
- Viewed new UI.
- **Misc**
- Created accounts, logged in with welcome link, got verified.
- Changed a username, used link to log back in.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9252
Summary:
Ref T4398. We have several auth-related systems which require (or are improved by) the ability to hand out one-time codes which expire after a short period of time.
In particular, these are:
- SMS multi-factor: we need to be able to hand out one-time codes for this in order to prove the user has the phone.
- Password reset emails: we use a time-based rotating token right now, but we could improve this with a one-time token, so once you reset your password the link is dead.
- TOTP auth: we don't need to verify/invalidate keys, but can improve security by doing so.
This adds a generic one-time code storage table, and strengthens the TOTP enrollment process by using it. Specifically, you can no longer edit the enrollment form (the one with a QR code) to force your own key as the TOTP key: only keys Phabricator generated are accepted. This has no practical security impact, but generally helps raise the barrier potential attackers face.
Followup changes will use this for reset emails, then implement SMS multi-factor.
Test Plan:
- Enrolled in TOTP multi-factor auth.
- Submitted an error in the form, saw the same key presented.
- Edited the form with web tools to provide a different key, saw it reject and the server generate an alternate.
- Change the expiration to 5 seconds instead of 1 hour, submitted the form over and over again, saw it cycle the key after 5 seconds.
- Looked at the database and saw the tokens I expected.
- Ran the GC and saw all the 5-second expiry tokens get cleaned up.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9217
Summary: Fixes T4983, Panel prefix 'W' should be recognized as a shortcut to a dashboard panel
Test Plan: Open any comment input, type '{W1}', or other existing panel, preview should embed that panel.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4983
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9215
Summary:
See title. Adds PhabricatorDashboardInstall data object which scopes installs to objectPHID + applicationClass. This is because we already have a collision for user home pages and user profiles. Assume only one dashboard per objectPHID + applicationClass though at the database level.
Fixes T5076.
Test Plan: From dashboard view, installed a dashboard - success! Went back to dashboard view and uninstalled it!
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5076
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9206
Summary: To get there, upgrade "headerless" to "headerMode". Add a new removepanel controller. Fixes T5084.
Test Plan: removed some panels to much success
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5078, T5084
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9156
Summary:
Ref T4967. Adds a "Watch" relationship to projects, which is stronger than member/subscribed.
Specifically, when a task is tagged with a project, we'll include all project watchers in the email/notifications. Normally we don't include projects unless they're explicitly CC'd, or have some other active role in the object (like being a reviewer or auditor).
This allows you to closely follow a project without needing to write a Herald rule for every project you care about.
Test Plan:
- Watched/unwatched a project.
- Tested the watch/subscribe/member relationships:
- Watching implies subscribe.
- Joining implies subscribe.
- Leaving implies unsubscribe + unwatch.
- You can't unsubscribe until you unwatch (slightly better would be unsubscribe implies unwatch, but this is a bit tricky).
- Watched a project, then recevied email about a tagged task without otherwise being involved.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9185
Summary: Fixes T4859. See that for details.
Test Plan:
- Verified things still work on my local (domain root) install.
- Added some unit tests.
- Did not verify a non-root install since I don't have one handy, hopefully @salehe can help.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: salehe, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8836
Summary:
Ref T4994. This stuff works:
- You can dump a blob of coverage information into `diffusion.updatecoverage`. This wipes existing coverage information and replaces it.
- It shows up when viewing files.
- It shows up when viewing commits.
This stuff does not work:
- When viewing files, the Javascript hover interaction isn't tied in yet.
- We always show this information, even if you're behind the commit where it was generated.
- You can't do incremental updates.
- There's no aggregation at the file (this file has 90% coverage), diff (the changes in this commit are 90% covered), or directory (the code in this directory has 90% coverage) levels yet.
- This is probably not the final form of the UI, storage, or API, so you should expect occasional changes over time. I've marked the method as "Unstable" for now.
Test Plan:
- Ran `save_lint.php` to check for collateral damage; it worked fine.
- Ran `save_lint.php` on a new branch to check creation.
- Published some fake coverage information.
- Viewed an affected commit.
- Viewed an affected file.
{F151915}
{F151916}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5044, T4994
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9022
Summary:
This gets us the ability to specify a "layout mode" and which column a panel should appear in at panel add time. Changing the layout mode from a multi column view to a single column view or vice versa will reset all panels to the left most column.
You can also drag and drop where columns appear via the "arrange" mode.
We also have a new dashboard create flow. Create dashboard -> arrange mode. (As opposed to view mode.) This could all possibly use massaging.
Fixes T4996.
Test Plan:
made a dashboard with panels in multiple columns. verified correct widths for various layout modes
re-arranged collumns like whoa.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4996
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9031
Summary:
Create transaction, editor, etc, and move command generation over to editor.
Show in a timeline in the buildable page.
Also prevent Engine from creating an empty transaction when build starts (Fixes T4885).
Fixes T4886.
Test Plan: Restart builds and buildables, look at timeline.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4885, T4886
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9110
Summary:
Allows you to quickly search for files within a repository. Roughly:
- We build a big tree of everything and ship it to the client.
- The client implements a bunch of Sublime-ish magic to find paths.
Test Plan: {F154007}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, zeeg
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9087
Summary: Ref T4986. Move push logs to a View, then have all the stuff that needs to use it use that View.
Test Plan: Viewed push logs and transaction detail in Diffusion. Created a panel.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9104
Summary: Ref T2683. Throw a more tailored exception to allow callers to distinguish between bad refs (which are expected, if users try to visit garbage branches) and other types of errors.
Test Plan: Tried to view branch "alksndfklansdf". Viewed branch "master".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2683
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9094
Summary: Ref T4986. Allows the Drydock search engines to render as panels.
Test Plan: Viewed affected interfaces in Drydock. Created panels from each engine.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9103
Summary: Ref T2683. This query is currently unbatched and happens inside a view. Leave it inside the view for now, but separate it and make it batchable.
Test Plan: {F34848}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, vrana, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2683
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5252
Summary:
Ref T2683. This is a refinement and simplification of D5257. In particular:
- D5257 only cached the commit chain, not path changes. This meant that we had to go issue an awkward query (which was slow on Facebook's install) periodically while reading the cache. This was reasonable locally but killed performance at FB scale. Instead, we can include path information in the cache. It is very rare that this is large except in Subversion, and we do not need to use this cache in Subversion. In other VCSes, the scale of this data is quite small (a handful of bytes per commit on average).
- D5257 required a large, slow offline computation step. This relies on D9044 to populate parent data so we can build the cache online at will, and let it expire with normal LRU/LFU/whatever semantics. We need this parent data for other reasons anyway.
- D5257 separated graph chunks per-repository. This change assumes we'll be able to pull stuff from APC most of the time and that the cost of switching chunks is not very large, so we can just build one chunk cache across all repositories. This allows the cache to be simpler.
- D5257 needed an offline cache, and used a unique cache structure. Since this one can be built online it can mostly use normal cache code.
- This also supports online appends to the cache.
- Finally, this has a timeout to guarantee a ceiling on the worst case: the worst case is something like a query for a file that has never existed, in a repository which receives exactly 1 commit every time other repositories receive 4095 commits, on a cold cache. If we hit cases like this we can bail after warming the cache up a bit and fall back to asking the VCS for an answer.
This cache isn't perfect, but I believe it will give us substantial gains in the average case. It can often satisfy "average-looking" queries in 4-8ms, and pathological-ish queries in 20ms on my machine; `hg` usually can't even start up in less than 100ms. The major thing that's attractive about this approach is that it does not require anything external or complicated, and will "just work", even producing reasonble improvements for users without APC.
In followups, I'll modify queries to use this cache and see if it holds up in more realistic workloads.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/repository cache` to examine the behavior of this cache.
- Did some profiling/testing from the web UI using `debug.php`.
- This //appears// to provide a reasonable fast way to issue this query very quickly in the average case, without the various issues that plagued D5257.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, jhurwitz
Maniphest Tasks: T2683
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9045
Summary:
Ref T4455. This adds a `repository_parents` table which stores `<childCommitID, parentCommitID>` relationships.
For new commits, it is populated when commits are discovered.
For older commits, there's a `bin/repository parents` script to rebuild the data.
Right now, there's no UI suggestion that you should run the script. I haven't come up with a super clean way to do this, and this table will only improve performance for now, so it's not important that we get everyone to run the script right away. I'm just leaving it for the moment, and we can figure out how to tell admins to run it later.
The ultimate goal is to solve T2683, but solving T4455 gets us some stuff anyway (for example, we can serve `diffusion.commitparentsquery` faster out of this cache).
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/repository discover` to discover new commits in Git, SVN and Mercurial repositories.
- Used `bin/repository parents` to rebuild Git and Mercurial repositories (SVN repos just exit with a message).
- Verified that the table appears to be sensible.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4455
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9044
Summary: The removes the sprite sheet 'icons' and replaces it with FontAwesome fonts.
Test Plan:
- Grep for SPRITE_ICONS and replace
- Grep for sprite-icons and replace
- Grep for PhabricatorActionList and choose all new icons
- Grep for Crumbs and fix icons
- Test/Replace PHUIList Icon support
- Test/Replace ObjectList Icon support (foot, epoch, etc)
- Browse as many pages as I could get to
- Remove sprite-icons and move remarkup to own sheet
- Review this diff in Differential
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9052
Summary:
Also fix a few other minor issues:
- Use lint config.
- Fix a method signature from `arc unit --everything` (unrelated).
- Add a javelin doc.
Test Plan: Ran `arc lint`, `arc unit`, `arc linters`.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9072
Summary: See <http://fab.wmflabs.org/T88>. While this issue is on MW's side, these links are kind of ugly and have more readable alternate forms now. Update them to use proper modern forms.
Test Plan: See inlines.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9042
Summary:
Provides a working SMS implementation with support for Twilio.
This version doesn't really retry if we get any gruff at all. Future versions should retry.
Test Plan: used bin/sms to send messages and look at them.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aurelijus, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T920
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8930
Summary: Ref T4986. I think this is the last of the easy ones, there are about 10 not-quite-so-trivial ones left.
Test Plan:
- Viewed app results.
- Created panels.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9025
Summary: Ref T4986. Getting closer. Nothing out of the ordinary in this group.
Test Plan:
For each application:
- Viewed the normal search results.
- Created a panel version and viewed it.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9024
Summary: Ref T4986. These are mostly mechanical now, I skipped a couple of slightly tricky ones. Still a bunch to go.
Test Plan:
For each engine:
- Viewed the application;
- created a panel to issue the query.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9017
Summary:
Ref T4986. This one needs `getApplicationURI()` so make it a little beefier to deal with that.
(It would be vaguely nice to somehow share the handle and application stuff between Controllers and Engine classes like this, but I don't immediately see a clean way to do it without traits. Not a big deal, in any case.)
Test Plan:
- Viewed Calendar.
- Made a Calendar panel.
- Viewed feed.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9012
Summary:
Ref T4986. This adds a bit of structure for handles, since we used to have Controller utilities but no longer do.
Hopefully these will start going faster soon...
Test Plan:
- Checked feed for collateral damage.
- Checked slowvote for collateral damage.
- Made a slowvote panel.
{F151550}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9010
Summary:
Ref T4986. We need to introduce alternate views to make this more pleasant, but let rendering move to engines so it can be shared between panels and controllers.
I also moved some of the pagination logic in to avoid duplicating that.
So far, only Feed works. I'm going to do these gradually since we have ~40-50 of them.
Test Plan:
- Used global search to check for collateral damage.
- Used not-global search too.
- Used normal feed.
{F151541}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9008
Summary: Ref T4986. This isn't pretty/usable yet (I need to move rendering out of ListController classes and into SearchEngine classes, I think) but does pull the correct results.
Test Plan: {F151537}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4986
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9007
Summary:
This plugin provides an OAuth authentication provider to authenticate users using WordPress.com Connect.
This diff corresponds to github pull request https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/pull/593/ and had its libphutil counterpart reviewed in D9004.
Test Plan: Configured WordPress.com as an authentication provider, saw it show up on the login screen, registered a new account, got expected defaults for my username/name/email/profile picture.
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9019
Summary:
Ref T4119. This is ugly for now, but technically works.
The comment area and transaction log don't realy know about each other, so for the moment the linking is a bit manual. Differential/Maniphest are special cases anyway.
Test Plan: {F149992}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4119
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8957
Summary:
Fixes T4909. Adds a "remove" link next to the edit link, which permanently hides a comment. Addresses two use cases:
- Allowing administrators to clean up spam.
- Allowing users to try to put the genie back in the bottle if they post passwords or sensitive links, etc.
The user who removed the comment is named in the removal text to enforce some level of administrative accountability.
No data is deleted, but there's currently no method to restore these comments. We'll see if we need one.
This is cheating a little bit by storing "removed" as "2" in the isDeleted field. This doesn't seem tooooo bad for now.
Test Plan:
- Removed some of my comments.
- As an administrator, removed other users' comments.
- Failed to view history of a removed comment.
- Failed to edit a removed comment.
- Failed to remove a removed comment.
- Verified feed doesn't show the old comment after comment removal.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: qgil, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8945
Summary: Ref T4843. Chips away at a few more things.
Test Plan: Used VoiceOver and got a generally more sensible-seeming result.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4843
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8978
Summary: Fixes T4931. Each new credential should come with the ability to lock the credential permanently, so that no one can ever edit again. Each existing credential must allow user to lock existing credential.
Test Plan: Create new credential, verify that you can lock it before saving it. Open existing unlocked credential, verify that option to lock it exists. Once credential is locked, the option to reveal it should be disabled, and editing the credential won't allow username/password updates.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4931
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8947
Summary:
Ref T4749. Ref T3265. Ref T4909. Several goals here:
- Move user destruction to the CLI to limit the power of rogue admins.
- Start consolidating all "destroy named object" scripts into a single UI, to make it easier to know how to destroy things.
- Structure object destruction so we can do a better and more automatic job of cleaning up transactions, edges, search indexes, etc.
- Log when we destroy objects so there's a record if data goes missing.
Test Plan: Used `bin/remove destroy` to destroy several users.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3265, T4749, T4909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8940
Summary: Ref T4938. `arc close` needs to know about custom statuses and this conduit method is step 1 of letting it know
Test Plan: See next diff, which works!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4938
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8937
Summary:
Ref T4398. This prompts users for multi-factor auth on login.
Roughly, this introduces the idea of "partial" sessions, which we haven't finished constructing yet. In practice, this means the session has made it through primary auth but not through multi-factor auth. Add a workflow for bringing a partial session up to a full one.
Test Plan:
- Used Conduit.
- Logged in as multi-factor user.
- Logged in as no-factor user.
- Tried to do non-login-things with a partial session.
- Reviewed account activity logs.
{F149295}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8922
Summary: Ref T4398. Prevent users from brute forcing multi-factor auth by rate limiting attempts. This slightly refines the rate limiting to allow callers to check for a rate limit without adding points, and gives users credit for successfully completing an auth workflow.
Test Plan: Tried to enter hisec with bad credentials 11 times in a row, got rate limited.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8911
Summary:
Ref T4398. The major goals here is to let administrators strip auth factors in two cases:
- A user lost their phone and needs access restored to their account; or
- an install previously used an API-based factor like SMS, but want to stop supporting it (this isn't possible today).
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/auth list-factors` to show installed factors.
- Used `bin/auth strip` with various mixtures of flags to selectively choose and strip factors from accounts.
- Also ran `bin/auth refresh` to verify refreshing OAuth tokens works (small `OAuth` vs `OAuth2` tweak).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8909
Summary: Ref T3583. Use the same approach Harbormaster does to give panels cheap forms.
Test Plan:
{F149218}
{F149219}
{F149220}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8919
Summary:
Ref T3583. Adds edges, query relationships, etc. Lots of debugging/temporary UI.
My general intent here is to use edges to track where panels appear, and then put additional data on the dashboard itself to control layout, positioning, etc.
Dashboards don't actually render yet so this is still pretty boring.
Test Plan:
{F149175}
{F149176}
{F149177}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8916
Summary: Ref T3583. These will be the primary class carrying panel implementations.
Test Plan:
{F149125}
{F149126}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8912
Summary: 'cuz those can be complicated. Fixes T4738. I needed to do a fair amount of heavy lifting to get the policy stuff rendering correctly. For now, I made this end point very one purpose and tried to make that clear.
Test Plan: looked at some custom policies. see screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8890
Summary:
Ref T4398. This is still pretty rough and isn't exposed in the UI yet, but basically works. Some missing features / areas for improvement:
- Rate limiting attempts (see TODO).
- Marking tokens used after they're used once (see TODO), maybe. I can't think of ways an attacker could capture a token without also capturing a session, offhand.
- Actually turning this on (see TODO).
- This workflow is pretty wordy. It would be nice to calm it down a bit.
- But also add more help/context to help users figure out what's going on here, I think it's not very obvious if you don't already know what "TOTP" is.
- Add admin tool to strip auth factors off an account ("Help, I lost my phone and can't log in!").
- Add admin tool to show users who don't have multi-factor auth? (so you can pester them)
- Generate QR codes to make the transfer process easier (they're fairly complicated).
- Make the "entering hi-sec" workflow actually check for auth factors and use them correctly.
- Turn this on so users can use it.
- Adding SMS as an option would be nice eventually.
- Adding "password" as an option, maybe? TOTP feels fairly good to me.
I'll post a couple of screens...
Test Plan:
- Added TOTP token with Google Authenticator.
- Added TOTP token with Authy.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8875
Summary:
Ref T4398. This adds a settings panel for account activity so users can review activity on their own account. Some goals are:
- Make it easier for us to develop and support auth and credential information, see T4398. This is the primary driver.
- Make it easier for users to understand and review auth and credential information (see T4842 for an example -- this isn't there yet, but builds toward it).
- Improve user confidence in security by making logging more apparent and accessible.
Minor corresponding changes:
- Entering and exiting hisec mode is now logged.
- This, sessions, and OAuth authorizations have moved to a new "Sessions and Logs" area, since "Authentication" was getting huge.
Test Plan:
- Viewed new panel.
- Viewed old UI.
- Entered/exited hisec and got prompted.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8871
