1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-03 04:02:43 +01:00
Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
9c4b8a0fb2 Adjust payment workflows to deal with merchants and configurable providers in Phortune
Summary:
Ref T2787. Builds on D10649 by rebining existing objects (carts, charges, etc) to merchantPHIDs and providerPHIDs instead of an implicit global merchant and weird global artifacts (providerType / providerKey).

Basically:

  - When you create something that users can pay for, you specify a merchant to control where the payment goes.
  - Accounts are install-wide, but payment methods are bound to merchants. This seems to do a reasonable job of balancing usability and technical concerns.
  - Replace a bunch of weird links between objects with standard PHIDs.
  - Improve "add payment method" flow.

Test Plan: Went through the Fund flow with Stripe and WePay, funding an initiative.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10652
2014-10-07 14:41:59 -07:00
epriestley
35dc510e18 Add more structure to Phortune product purchasing flow
Summary:
Ref T2787. When a user purchases a product in Phortune, transition the cart through a purchased state and invoke product callbacks so applications can respond to the workflow.

Also shore up some stuff like preventing negative amounts of funding.

Test Plan: Backed an initiative and saw it show up on the initiative after completing the purcahsing workflow.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10635
2014-10-06 10:36:43 -07:00
epriestley
e4f399b9fa Scaffolding for Fund
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is all pretty boilerplate, and does not interact with Phortune at all yet.

You can create "Initiatives", which have a title and description, and support most of the expected infrastructure (policies, transactions, mentions, edges, appsearch, remakrup, etc).

Only notable decisions:

  - Initiatives have an explicit owner. I think it's good to have a single clearly-responsible user behind an initiative.
  - I think that's it?

Test Plan:
  - Created an initiative.
  - Edited an initiative.
  - Changed application policy defaults.
  - Searched for initiatives.
  - Subscribed to an initiative.
  - Opened/closed an initiative.
  - Used `I123` and `{I123}` in remarkup.
  - Destroyed an initiative.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10481
2014-09-11 13:38:58 -07:00