Summary:
also fix some bugs where we weren't properly capturing the expiry value or scope of access tokens.
This code isn't the cleanest as some providers don't confirm what scope you've been granted. In that case, assume the access token is of the minimum scope Phabricator requires. This seems more useful to me as only Phabricator at the moment really easily / consistently lets the user increase / decrease the granted scope so its basically always the correct assumption at the time we make it.
Test Plan: linked and unlinked Phabricator, Github, Disqus and Facebook accounts from Phabricator instaneces
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: zeeg, aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2431
Summary:
Allow the pull daemon to take a list of repositories. By default, pull all repositories.
Make some effort to respect pull frequencies, although we'll necessarily suffer a bit if running with only one process.
NOTE: We still launch one discovery daemon per working copy, so this only cuts the daemon count in half.
Test Plan:
- Ran `phd debug pulllocal`, verified behavior.
- Ran `pull.php P MTEST SVNTEST --trace`, verified it pulled the repos and ran the right commands.
- Ran `phd repository-launch-master`, verified the right daemons launched, checked daemon console.
- Ran `phd repository-launch-readonly`, verified the right daemon launched, checked daemon console.
Reviewers: btrahan, csilvers, davidreuss
Reviewed By: csilvers
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2418
Summary:
- Move email to a separate table.
- Migrate existing email to new storage.
- Allow users to add and remove email addresses.
- Allow users to verify email addresses.
- Allow users to change their primary email address.
- Convert all the registration/reset/login code to understand these changes.
- There are a few security considerations here but I think I've addressed them. Principally, it is important to never let a user acquire a verified email address they don't actually own. We ensure this by tightening the scoping of token generation rules to be (user, email) specific.
- This should have essentially zero impact on Facebook, but may require some minor changes in the registration code -- I don't exactly remember how it is set up.
Not included here (next steps):
- Allow configuration to restrict email to certain domains.
- Allow configuration to require validated email.
Test Plan:
This is a fairly extensive, difficult-to-test change.
- From "Email Addresses" interface:
- Added new email (verified email verifications sent).
- Changed primary email (verified old/new notificactions sent).
- Resent verification emails (verified they sent).
- Removed email.
- Tried to add already-owned email.
- Created new users with "accountadmin". Edited existing users with "accountadmin".
- Created new users with "add_user.php".
- Created new users with web interface.
- Clicked welcome email link, verified it verified email.
- Reset password.
- Linked/unlinked oauth accounts.
- Logged in with oauth account.
- Logged in with email.
- Registered with Oauth account.
- Tried to register with OAuth account with duplicate email.
- Verified errors for email verification with bad tokens, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2393
Summary:
- We used to have connection-level caching, so we needed getTransactionKey() to make sure there was one transaction state per real connection. We now cache in Lisk and each Connection object is guaranteed to represent a real, unique connection, so we can make this a non-static.
- I kept the classes separate because it was a little easier, but maybe we should merge them?
- Also track/implement read/write locking.
- (The advantage of this over just writing LOCK IN SHARE MODE is that you can use, e.g., some Query class even if you don't have access to the queries it runs.)
Test Plan: Can you come up with a way to write unit tests for this? It seems like testing that it works requires deadlocking MySQL if the test is running in one process.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2398
Summary: Primarily for @csilvers who has 92 million repositories or something. This is a touch hacky, but movitated by pragmatism.
Test Plan:
- Ran "repository.create" to create repositories, "repository.query" to list them.
- Tested most or maybe all of the error conditions, probably.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, csilvers
Reviewed By: csilvers
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2396
Summary:
I wanted to point someone on a file uploaded to Phabricator and the normal link is just too long.
I guess that this also improves security. Because pointing someone to the file directly reveals the secret key used in /data/ and it can be served without auth?
We already use `{F123}` so there will be no conflicts in future because we wouldn't want to reuse it for something else.
I promote the link on /file/ - it adds one redirect but I think it's worth it. I also considered making the link from the File ID column but there are already too many links (with some duplicity).
Test Plan:
/file/
/F123 (redirect)
/F9999999999 (404)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2380
Summary:
I will use it for highlighting users which are not currently available.
Maybe I will also use it in the nagging tool.
I don't plan creating a UI for it as API is currently enough for us.
Maybe I will visualize it at /calendar/ later.
I plan creating `user.deletestatus` method when this one will be done.
Test Plan:
`storage upgrade`
Call Conduit `user.addstatus`.
Verify DB.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2382
Summary: I have a patch which makes uploads all fancy and adds progress bars, but document the landscape first since it's quite complicated.
Test Plan: Generated, read docs. Configured `storage.upload-size-limit` to various values.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T875
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2381
Summary: I will need it for nagging tool.
Test Plan:
None yet.
Please suggest me how to create a testing database (I need to insert some data in the table). I guess that it is now possible?
There is also probably some bug in `arc unit` - `setEnvConfig()` is not called before `getEnvConfig()` resulting in fatal error.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2376
Summary:
We will need it for two purposes:
- Status tool.
- Nagging tool - @aran suggested using "3 business days" and I don't want it to fall on New Year's Eve or such.
I don't plan working on any interface for editing this as this kind of data should be always imported.
Test Plan:
`bin/storage upgrade`
`scripts/calendar/import_us_holidays.php`
/calendar/
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2375
Summary:
- This is only slightly useful for updating Differential, since DiffQuery (vs RawDiffQuery) already gets you most of what you need. The only thing is that DiffQuery returns the diff for one path only right now(and the SVN version is very "special"). Should be easy to fix in the Git/HG cases at least, though (or maybe just use RawDiffQuery to avoid the SVN mess).
- Added a "download raw diff" link.
Test Plan: Viewed Diffusion and raw commits for SVN, Mercurial and Git repositories.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2350
Summary:
- Unit tests can request storage fixtures.
- We build one fixture across all tests in the process, which can quickstart (takes roughly 1s to build, 200ms to destroy for me). This is a one-time cost for running an arbitrary number of fixture-based tests.
- We isolate all the connections inside transactions for each test, so individual tests don't affect one another.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests, which cover the important properties of fixtures.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason, edward
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, davidreuss
Maniphest Tasks: T140
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2345
Summary:
I think this improves things, let me know if you have feedback.
Also addresses T840.
Test Plan: See screenshots...
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2357
Summary: basically by validating we have good user data when we set the user data.
Test Plan: simulated a failure from a phabricator on phabricator oauth scenario. viewed ui that correctly told me there was an error with the provider and to try again.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2337
Summary:
This addresses three issues with the current patch management system:
# Two people developing at the same time often pick the same SQL patch number, and then have to go rename it. The system catches this, but it's silly.
# Second/third-party developers can't use the same system to manage auxiliary storage they may want to add.
# There's no way to build mock databases for unit tests that need to do reads.
To resolve these things, you can now name your patches whatever you want and conflicts are just merge conflicts, which are less of a pain to fix than filename conflicts.
Dependencies are now a DAG, with implicit dependencies created on the prior patch if no dependencies are specified. Developers can add new concrete subclasses of `PhabricatorSQLPatchList` to add storage management, and define the dependency branchpoint of their patches so they apply in the correct order (although, generally, they should not depend on the mainline patches, presumably).
The commands `storage upgrade --namespace test1234` and `storage destroy --namespace test1234` will allow unit tests to build and destroy MySQL storage.
A "quickstart" mode allows an upgrade from scratch in ~1200ms. Destruction takes about 200ms. These seem like fairily reasonable costs to actually use in tests. Building from scratch patch-by-patch takes about 6000ms.
Test Plan:
- Created new databases from scratch with and without quickstart in a separate test namespace. Pointed the webapp at the test namespaces, browsed around, everything looked good.
- Compared quickstart and no-quickstart dump states, they're identical except for mysqldump timestamps and a few similar things.
- Upgraded a legacy database to the new storage format.
- Destroyed / dumped storage.
Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, nh
Maniphest Tasks: T140, T345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2323
Summary:
This is mostly intended to simplify D2323.
We currently allow users to edit and customize the links on the homepage, but as far as I know no one actually does this (no one complained when we redid the homepage earlier this year) and it creates a lot of mess in the database patches and quickstart dump. After D2331, this is the only data we load in the patch files. The patch files are also a mess with respect to this data and have various different versions of it.
Also the current UI is just kind of bad, it stretches stuff across too many screens and is generally ungood. Nuking this lets us nuke a lot of code in general.
(In the long term, I think we'll move toward an "application" model anyway, and this stuff will go away sooner or later.)
I'll add a drop-database patch some time later, just in case anyone does actually use this, so they can get their data out of MySQL.
Test Plan: Looked at home page, clicked "More Stuff", got a single list of other apps/things.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, edward, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2332
Summary:
Also couple of small changes:
- Add method name to title.
- 404 for /conduit/method/x/.
- Remove utilities from side panel.
- Remove side panel from log.
Test Plan:
/conduit/
/conduit/method/x/
/conduit/method/user.whoami/
/conduit/log/
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2326
Summary:
- When viewing a commit, show its tags.
- For commits with many tags, show a list of all tags on the tag list interface.
- Improve some handling of symbolic references.
- When tags contain content, show it on the browse view reached by clicking the tag name.
Test Plan: Looked at commits with and without tags, clicked "More tags...", clicked tag names.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, davidreuss, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1130
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2290
Summary:
- Track + message through file moves.
- Stop + message on file create.
- Stop + message on first commit.
Test Plan:
- Tested blaming through a move, through a create, and through the first commit.
- Verified this doesn't break anything in SVN / Mercurial.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1091
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2295
Summary: "Committed" is SVN-specific language, and confusing in Git and Mercurial. Use neutral language instead.
Test Plan: Inspection.
Reviewers: btrahan, Makinde, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2087
Summary:
I have no idea what I'm doing, but here's part of an elasticsearch engine. These things work:
- Indexing stuff (??)
- Searching for text/type?
- Reconstructing things??
All the complicated stuff doesn't work. I'm having a hard time figuring out the best way to model things because elasticsearch's documentation is not exactly the most complete or illuminating.
@amckinley, does this look sane-ish so far? Particularly, the /phabricator/<type>/<phid>/ URI scheme and how I've set up the relationships and fields in the documents?
How should I model the relationship and field queries? I want, like, an "equal" query but it seems like I've got "text" or "term" to work with and neither are exact match? And "term" doesn't consider PHIDs to be terms since they have hyphens in them?
I'll keep kind of slogging my way forward here but if you have valuable wisdom to share it would probably get me to a better end state much faster. The whole query construction phase is pretty much black magic to me.
Test Plan: nyancat
Reviewers: amckinley, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, 20after4, vrana
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D790
Summary: Lists the 25 most recent tags on the "Repository" page.
Test Plan: Looked at a git repository with a tag, saw it. Looked at HG/SVN repos, they didn't break.
Reviewers: davidreuss, 20after4, btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: davidreuss
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1130
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2255
Summary: Introduces a scope-guarded way to override the env config, for unit tests which are sensitive to config values.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2237
Summary:
Provides a basic start for access policies. Objects expose various capabilities, like CAN_VIEW, CAN_EDIT, etc., and set a policy for each capability. We currently implement three policies, PUBLIC (anyone, including logged-out), USERS (any logged-in) and NOONE (nobody). There's also a way to provide automatic capability grants (e.g., the owner of an object can always see it, even if some capability is set to "NOONE"), but I'm not sure how great the implementation feels and it might change.
Most of the code here is providing a primitive for efficient policy-aware list queries. The problem with doing queries naively is that you have to do crazy amounts of filtering, e.g. to show the user page 6, you need to filter at least 600 objects (and likely more) before you can figure out which ones are 500-600 for them. You can't just do "LIMIT 500, 100" because that might have only 50 results, or no results. Instead, the query looks like "WHERE id > last_visible_id", and then we fetch additional pages as necessary to satisfy the request.
The general idea is that we move all data access to Query classes and have them do object filtering. The ID paging primitive allows efficient paging in most cases, and the executeOne() method provides a concise way to do policy checks for edit/view screens.
We'll probably end up with mostly broader policy UIs or configuration-based policies, but there are at least a few cases for per-object privacy (e.g., marking tasks as "Security", and restricting things to the members of projects) so I figured we'd start with a flexible primitive and the simplify it in the UI where we can.
Test Plan: Unit tests, played around in the UI with various policy settings.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2210
Summary:
'cuz we need to be phamous!
V1 feature set
- posts
-- standard thing you'd expect - a title and a remarkup-powered body and...
-- "phame" title - a short string that can be used to reference the story. this gets auto-updated when you mess with the title.
-- configuration - for now, do you want Facebook, Disqus or no comments? this is a per-post thing but feeds from an instance-wide configuration
Please do toss out any must have features or changes.
Test Plan: played around with this bad boy like whoa
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T1111
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2202
Summary:
There have been a couple of requests for this since bookmarks are "out this year like woah" and "totally uncool dude".
Allow users to save named custom queries and make them the /maniphest/ default if they so desire.
A little messy. :/
Test Plan: Saved, edited, deleted custom queries. Made custom query default; made 'no default' default. Verified default behavior. Issued a modified search from a custom query.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, 20after4
Maniphest Tasks: T923, T1034
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1964
Summary: See T1021. Raise configuration or implementation exceptions immediately. When all engines fail, raise an aggregate exception with details.
Test Plan: Forced all engines to fail, received an aggregate exception. Forced an engine to fail with a config exception, recevied it immediately.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1021
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2157
Summary:
We don't use versioned URIs for images, so when they change users may get old versions.
This was a particular issue with the recent logo change, which several users reported cache-related issues from.
Instead, use Celerity to manage image URI versions in addition to CSS/JS.
This is complicated, because we need to rewrite image URIs inside of CSS, which means the hash of a CSS file has to be derived from the current image data. Otherwise, when we updated an image the CSS wouldn't update, so we wouldn't be any better off.
So basically we:
- Find all the "raw" files, and put them into the map.
- Find all the CSS/JS, perform content-altering transformations on it (i.e., not minification) based on the partial map, and then put it into the map based on transformed hashes.
(If we wanted, we could now do CSS variables or whatever for "free", more or less.)
Test Plan:
- Regenerated celerity map, browsed site, verified images generated with versioned URIs.
- Moved "blue" flag image over "green" flag image, regenerated map, verified "green" flag image and the associated CSS changed hashes.
- Added transformation unit tests; ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1073
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2146
Summary: These elements look heavy and out of place right now.
Test Plan: Looked at error views in uiexample page.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2144
Summary: This separates common MySQL stuff (identifiers and comments escaping, error codes, connection retries) from PHP extension specific stuff (connect, query, fetch, errors, escape string).
Test Plan:
/
Use `AphrontMySQLiDatabaseConnection` in `PhabricatorLiskDAO`, load homepage, edit task, save task.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: nh, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2113
Summary: ...also make the pager usage in ChatLog use the nice formatWhereClause functionality
Test Plan: set $page_size = 2 and paged around the data a bit
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T905
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2106
Summary:
various stripe stuff, including
- external stripe library
- payment form
- test controller to play with payment form, sample business logic
My main questions / discussion topics are...
- is the stripe PHP library too big? (ie should I write something more simple just for phabricator?)
-- if its cool, what is the best way to include the client? (ie should I make it a submodule rather than the flat copy here?)
- is the JS I wrote (too) ridiculous?
-- particularly unhappy with the error message stuff being in JS *but* it seemed the best choice given the most juicy error messages come from the stripe JS such that the overall code complexity is lowest this way.
- how should the stripe JS be included?
-- flat copy like I did here?
-- some sort of external?
-- can we just load it off stripe servers at request time? (I like that from the "if stripe is down, stripe is down" perspective)
- wasn't sure if the date control was too silly and should just be baked into the form?
-- for some reason I feel like its good to be prepared to walk away from Stripe / switch providers here, though I think this is on the wrong side of pragmatic
Test Plan: - played around with sample client form
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2096
Summary:
We have a lot of cases where we store object relationships, but it's all kind of messy and custom. Some particular problems:
- We go to great lengths to enforce order stability in Differential revisions, but the implementation is complex and inelegant.
- Some relationships are stored on-object, so we can't pull the inverses easily. For example, Maniphest shows child tasks but not parent tasks.
- I want to add more of these and don't want to continue building custom stuff.
- UIs like the "attach stuff to other stuff" UI need custom branches for each object type.
- Stuff like "allow commits to close tasks" is notrivial because of nonstandard metadata storage.
Provide an association-like "edge" framework to fix these problems. This is nearly identical to associations, with a few differences:
- I put edge metadata in a separate table and don't load it by default, to keep edge rows small and allow large metadata if necessary. The on-edge metadata seemed to get abused a lot at Facebook.
- I put a 'seq' column on the edges to ensure they have an explicit, stable ordering within a source and type.
This isn't actually used anywhere yet, but my first target is attaching commits to tasks for T904.
Test Plan: Made a mock page that used Editor and Query. Verified adding and removing edges, overwriting edges, writing and loading edge data, sequence number generation.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, 20after4
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2088
Summary: I looooove JS! It makes me giddy with glee!
Test Plan: Picked dates. See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2086
Summary:
- The UI is pretty straightforward, since Handle just works (tm)
- Added two methods to the owners object to handle the new layer of
indirection. Then ran git grep PhabricatorOwnersOwner and changed
callsites as appropriate.
Sending this to get a round of feedback before I test the non-trivial
changes in this diff.
Test Plan:
- owners tool: edit, view, list for basic functionality.
- phlog for the two new methods I added
Reviewers: epriestley, blair, jungejason
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2079
Summary:
Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks.
Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used
this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it.
The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish.
Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when
reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks
against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two
tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some
code to deal with this at some point if necessary.
I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all.
(There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header
counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.)
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt
Maniphest Tasks: T859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
Summary:
- Remove the "Priority" column, since this is indicated by the color swatch, to save space.
- Reduce the "Updated" column from datetime to date only, since time isn't incredibly useful, to save space.
- Show the first two projects a task is associated with, and "..." if there are more.
- Show "None" (for "no owner") in a lighter color.
Test Plan: Looked at tasks on homepage and in Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan, 20after4
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2065
Summary:
- Differential, Maniphest and Diffusion use slightly different styles for the object detail panels.
- Instead, use the same styles and CSS.
- Add object actions to Diffusion, including "Flag".
Test Plan: Looked at revisions, tasks and commit. Flagged and unflagged commits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1041
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2062
Summary:
**Who can delete global rules?**: I discussed this with @jungejason. The current behavior is that the rule author or any administrator can delete a global rule, but this
isn't consistent with who can edit a rule (anyone) and doesn't really make much sense (it's an artifact of the global/personal split). I proposed that anyone can delete a
rule but we don't actually delete them, and log the deletion. However, when it came time to actually write the code for this I backed off a bit and continued actually
deleting the rules -- I think this does a reasonable job of balancing accountability with complexity. So the new impelmentation is:
- Personal rules can be deleted only by their owners.
- Global rules can be deleted by any user.
- All deletes are logged.
- Logs are more detailed.
- All logged actions can be viewed in aggregate.
**Minor Cleanup**
- Merged `HomeController` and `AllController`.
- Moved most queries to Query classes.
- Use AphrontFormSelectControl::renderSelectTag() where appropriate (this is a fairly recent addition).
- Use an AphrontErrorView to render the dry run notice (this didn't exist when I ported).
- Reenable some transaction code (this works again now).
- Removed the ability for admins to change rule authors (this was a little buggy, messy, and doesn't make tons of sense after the personal/global rule split).
- Rules which depend on other rules now display the right options (all global rules, all your personal rules for personal rules).
- Fix a bug in AphrontTableView where the "no data" cell would be rendered too wide if some columns are not visible.
- Allow selectFilter() in AphrontNavFilterView to be called without a 'default' argument.
Test Plan:
- Browsed, created, edited, deleted personal and gules.
- Verified generated logs.
- Did some dry runs.
- Verified transcript list and transcript details.
- Created/edited all/any rules; created/edited once/every time rules.
- Filtered admin views by users.
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2040
Summary:
Flags are a personal collection of things you want to take a look at later. You can use several different colors and add notes.
Not really sure if this is actually a good idea or not but it was easy to build.
Planned features:
- Allow Herald rules to add flags.
- In the "edit flag" dialog, have a "[x] Subscribe Me" checkbox that CCs you.
- Support Diffusion.
- Support Phriction.
- Always show flags on an object if you have them (in every view)?
- Edit dialog feels a little heavy?
- More filtering in /flag/ tool.
- Add a top-level links somewhere?
Test Plan: Added, edited and removed flags from things. Viewed flags in flag view.
Reviewers: aran, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1041
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2024
Summary:
- Still really really rough.
- Adds a full synchronous mode for debugging.
- Adds some logging.
- It can now allocate EC2 machines and put webroots on them in a hacky, terrible way.
- Adds a base query class.
Test Plan: oh hey look a test page? http://ec2-50-18-65-151.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com:2011/
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2026
Summary: Show parent commit information to make it easier to understand merges.
Test Plan: Looked at commits in SVN, hg, git.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T961
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2021
