1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-22 23:02:42 +01:00
Commit graph

1102 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
47856dc93f Track how many columns use a particular trigger
Summary:
Ref T5474. In 99% of cases, a separate "archived/active" status for triggers probably doesn't make much sense: there's not much reason to ever disable/archive a trigger explcitly, and the archival rule is really just "is this trigger used by anything?".

(The one reason I can think of to disable a trigger manually is because you want to put something in a column and skip trigger rules, but you can already do this from the task detail page anyway, and disabling the trigger globally is a bad way to accomplish this if it's in use by other columns.)

Instead of adding a separate "status", just track how many columns a trigger is used by and consider it "inactive" if it is not used by any active columns.

Test Plan: This is slightly hard to test exhaustively since you can't share a trigger across multiple columns right now, but: rebuild indexes, poked around the trigger list and trigger details, added/removed triggers.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T5474

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20308
2019-03-25 14:04:55 -07:00
epriestley
252b6f2260 Provide basic scaffolding for workboard column triggers
Summary:
Depends on D20278. Ref T5474. This change creates some new empty objects that do nothing, and some new views for looking at those objects. There's no actual useful behavior yet.

The "Edit" controller is custom instead of being driven by "EditEngine" because I expect it to be a Herald-style "add new rules" UI, and EditEngine isn't a clean match for those today (although maybe I'll try to move it over).

The general idea here is:

  - Triggers are "real" objects with a real PHID.
  - Each trigger has a name and a collection of rules, like "Change status to: X" or "Play sound: Y".
  - Each column may be bound to a trigger.
  - Multiple columns may share the same trigger.
  - Later UI refinements will make the cases around "copy trigger" vs "reference the same trigger" vs "create a new ad-hoc trigger" more clear.
  - Triggers have their own edit policy.
  - Triggers are always world-visible, like Herald rules.

Test Plan: Poked around, created some empty trigger objects, and nothing exploded. This doesn't actually do anything useful yet since triggers can't have any rule behavior and columns can't actually be bound to triggers.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T5474

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20279
2019-03-25 13:13:58 -07:00
epriestley
bacf1f44e0 Modularize HeraldRule transactions
Summary:
Ref T13249. See PHI1115. I initially wanted to make `bin/policy unlock --owner <user> H123` work to transfer ownership of a Herald rule, although I'm no longer really sure this makes much sense.

In any case, this makes things a little better and more modern.

I removed the storage table for rule comments. Adding comments to Herald rules doesn't work and probably doesn't make much sense.

Test Plan: Created and edited Herald rules, grepped for all the transaction type constants.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13249

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20258
2019-03-07 11:55:31 -08:00
epriestley
d36d0efc35 Add behaviors to Build Plans: hold drafts, affect buildables, warn on landing, restartable, runnable
Summary:
Depends on D20219. Ref T13258. Ref T11415. Installs sometimes have long-running builds or unimportant builds which they may not want to hold up drafts, affect buildable status, or warn during `arc land`.

Some builds have side effects (like deployment or merging) and are not idempotent. They can cause problems if restarted.

In other cases, builds are isolated and idempotent and generally safe, and it's okay for marketing interns to restart them.

To address these cases, add "Behaviors" to Build Plans:

  - Hold Drafts: Controls how the build affects revision promotion from "Draft".
  - Warn on Land: Controls the "arc land" warning.
  - Affects Buildable: Controls whether we care about this build when figuring out if a buildable passed or failed overall.
  - Restartable: Controls whether this build may restart or not.
  - Runnable: Allows you to weaken the requirements to run the build if you're confident it's safe to run it on arbitrary old versions of things.

NOTE: This only implements UI, none of these options actually do anything yet.

Test Plan:
Mostly poked around the UI. I'll actually implement these behaviors next, and vet them more thoroughly.

{F6244828}

{F6244830}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13258, T11415

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20220
2019-03-06 05:40:06 -08:00
epriestley
ee2bc07c90 No-op old search indexing migrations which no longer run and have been obsoleted by upgrade "activities"
Summary:
See T13253. After D20200 (which changed the task schema) these migrations no longer run, since the PHP code will expect a column to exist that won't exist until a `20190220.` migration runs.

We don't need these migrations, since anyone upgrading through September 2017 gets a "rebuild search indexes" activity anyway (see T11932). Just no-op them.

Test Plan: Grepped for `queueDocumentForIndexing()` in `autopatches/`, removed all of it.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20243
2019-03-05 11:31:49 -08:00
Austin McKinley
abc26aa96f Track total time from task creation to task archival
Summary:
Ref T5401. Depends on D20201. Add timestamps to worker tasks to track task creation, and pass that through to archive tasks. This lets us measure the total time the task spent in the queue, not just the duration it was actually running.

Also displays this information in the daemon status console; see screenshot: {F6225726}

Test Plan:
Stopped daemons, ran `bin/search index --all --background` to create lots of tasks, restarted daemons, observed expected values for `dateCreated` and `epochArchived` in the archive worker table.

Also tested the changes to `unarchiveTask` by forcing a search task to permanently fail and then `bin/worker retry`ing it.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T5401

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20200
2019-02-20 14:44:29 -08:00
epriestley
deea2f01f5 Allow unit tests to have arbitrarily long names (>255 characters)
Summary:
Depends on D20179. Ref T13088. See PHI351. See PHI1018. In various cases, unit tests names are 19 paths mashed together.

This is probably not an ideal name, and the test harness should probably pick a better name, but if users are fine with it and don't want to do the work to summarize on their own, accept them. We may summarize with "..." in some cases depending on how this fares in the UI.

The actual implementation is a separate "strings" table which is just `<hash-of-string, full-string>`. The unit message table can end up being mostly strings, so this should reduce storage requirements a bit.

For now, I'm not forcing a migration: new writes use the new table, existing rows retain the data. I plan to provide a migration tool, recommend migration, then force migration eventually.

Prior to that, I'm likely to move at least some other columns to use this table (e.g., lint names), since we have a lot of similar data (arbitrarily long user string constants that we are unlikely to need to search or filter).

Test Plan: {F6213819}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13088

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20180
2019-02-19 11:21:42 -08:00
epriestley
4b10bc2b64 Correct schema irregularities (including weird keys) with worker task tables
Summary:
Ref T13253. Fixes T6615. See that task for discussion.

  - Remove three keys which serve no real purpose: `dataID` doesn't do anything for us, and the two `leaseOwner` keys are unused.
  - Rename `leaseOwner_2` to `key_owner`.
  - Fix an issue where `dataID` was nullable in the active table and non-nullable in the archive table.

In practice, //all// workers have data, so all workers have a `dataID`: if they didn't, we'd already fatal when trying to move tasks to the archive table. Just clean this up for consistency, and remove the ancient codepath which imagined tasks with no data.

Test Plan:
  - Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, inspected tables.
  - Ran `bin/phd debug taskmaster`, worked through a bunch of tasks with no problems.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13253, T6615

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20175
2019-02-15 19:17:33 -08:00
epriestley
541d794c13 Give ExternalAccount a providerConfigPHID, tying it to a particular provider
Summary:
Depends on D20111. Ref T6703. Currently, each ExternalAccount row is tied to a provider by `providerType` + `providerDomain`. This effectively prevents multiple providers of the same type, since, e.g., two LDAP providers may be on different ports on the same domain. The `domain` also isn't really a useful idea anyway because you can move which hostname an LDAP server is on, and LDAP actually uses the value `self` in all cases. Yeah, yikes.

Instead, just bind each account to a particular provider. Then we can have an LDAP "alice" on seven different servers on different ports on the same machine and they can all move around and we'll still have a consistent, cohesive view of the world.

(On its own, this creates some issues with the link/unlink/refresh flows. Those will be updated in followups, and doing this change in a way with no intermediate breaks would require fixing them to use IDs to reference providerType/providerDomain, then fixing this, then undoing the first fix most of the way.)

Test Plan: Ran migrations, sanity-checked database. See followup changes for more comprehensive testing.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T6703

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20112
2019-02-12 14:48:14 -08:00
epriestley
8fab8d8a18 Prepare owners package audit rules to become more flexible
Summary:
Ref T13244. See PHI1055. (Earlier, see D20091 and PHI1047.) Previously, we expanded the Owners package autoreview rules from "Yes/No" to several "Review (Blocking) If Non-Owner Author Not Subscribed via Package" kinds of rules. The sky didn't fall and this feature didn't turn into "Herald-in-Owners", so I'm comfortable doing something similar to the "Audit" rules.

PHI1055 is a request for a way to configure slightly different audit behavior, and expanding the options seems like a good approach to satisfy the use case.

Prepare to add more options by moving everything into a class that defines all the behavior of different states, and converting the "0/1" boolean column to a text column.

Test Plan:
  - Created several packages, some with and some without auditing.
  - Inspected database for: package state; and associated transactions.
  - Ran the migrations.
  - Inspected database to confirm that state and transactions migrated correctly.
  - Reviewed transaction logs.
  - Created and edited packages and audit state.
  - Viewed the "Package List" element in Diffusion.
  - Pulled package information with `owners.search`, got sensible results.
  - Edited package audit status with `owners.edit`.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13244

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20124
2019-02-07 15:38:12 -08:00
epriestley
f0364eef8a Remove weird integration between Legalpad and the ExternalAccount table
Summary:
Depends on D20107. Ref T6703. Legalpad currently inserts "email" records into the external account table, but they're never used for anything and nothing else references them.

They also aren't necessary for anything important to work, and the only effect they have is making the UI say "External Account" instead of "None" under the "Account" column. In particular, the signatures still record the actual email address.

Stop doing this, remove all the references, and destroy all the rows.

(Long ago, Maniphest may also have done this, but no longer does. Nuance/Gatekeeper use a more modern and more suitable "ExternalObject" thing that I initially started adapting here before realizing that Legalpad doesn't actually care about this data.)

Test Plan: Signed documents with an email address, saw signature reflected properly in UI. Grepped for other callsites.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T6703

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20108
2019-02-07 15:00:00 -08:00
epriestley
a46c25d2ba Make two ancient migrations fatal if they affect data
Summary:
Depends on D20106. Ref T6703. Since I plan to change the `ExternalAccount` table, these migrations (which rely on `save()`) will stop working.

They could be rewritten to use raw queries, but I suspect few or no installs are affected. At least for now, just make them safe: if they would affect data, fatal and tell the user to perform a more gradual upgrade.

Also remove an `ALTER IGNORE TABLE` (this syntax was removed at some point) and fix a `%Q` when adjusting certain types of primary keys.

Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade --no-quickstart --force --namespace test1234` to get a complete migration since the beginning of time.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T6703

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20107
2019-02-06 17:08:34 -08:00
epriestley
48a3760814 Correct a bug where milestone "spacePHID" columns could become desynchronized
Summary:
Depends on D20041. See PHI1046. If you do this:

- Create a parent project called "Crab" in Space 1.
- Create a milestone called "Left Claw".
- Shift "Crab" to Space 2.
- Create a milestone called "Right Claw".

...you currently end up with "Left Claw" in the wrong `spacePHID` in the database. At the application level it's in the correct space, but when we `WHERE ... AND spacePHID IN (...)` we can incorrectly filter it out.

Test Plan:
  - Did the above setup.
  - Saved "Crab", saw the space fix itself.
  - Put things back in the broken state.
  - Ran the migration script, saw things fix themselves again.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: aeiser, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20063
2019-01-30 19:41:49 -08:00
epriestley
c9760e8d64 Support subtypes in Projects
Summary:
Ref T13242. See PHI1039. Maniphest subtypes generally seem to be working well. I designed them as a general capability that might be extended to other `EditEngine` objects later, and PHI1039 describes a situation where extending subtypes to projects would give us some reasonable tools.

(Some installs also already use icons/colors as a sort of lightweight version of subtypes, so I believe this is generally useful capability.)

Some of this is a little bit copy-pasted and could probably be shared, but I'd like to wait a bit longer before merging it. For example, both configs have exactly the same structure right now, but Projects should possibly have some different flags (for example: to disable creating subprojects / milestones).

This implementation is pretty basic for now: notably, subprojects/milestones don't get the nice "choose from among subtype forms" treatment that tasks do. If this ends up being part of a solution to PHI1039, I'd plan to fill that in later on.

Test Plan: Defined multiple subtypes, created subtype forms, created projects with appropriate subtypes. Filtered them by subtype. Saw subtype information on list/detail views.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13242

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20040
2019-01-30 06:17:55 -08:00
epriestley
596435b35e Support designating a contact number as "primary"
Summary:
Depends on D20010. Ref T920. Allow users to designate which contact number is "primary": the number we'll actually send stuff to.

Since this interacts in weird ways with "disable", just do a "when any number is touched, put all of the user's rows into the right state" sort of thing.

Test Plan:
  - Added numbers, made numbers primary, disabled a primary number, un-disabled a number with no primaries. Got sensible behavior in all cases.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T920

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20011
2019-01-23 14:03:08 -08:00
epriestley
f0c6ee4823 Add "Contact Numbers" so we can send users SMS mesages
Summary:
Ref T920. To send you SMS messages, we need to know your phone number.

This adds bare-bone basics (transactions, storage, editor, etc).

From here:

**Disabling Numbers**: I'll let you disable numbers in an upcoming diff.

**Primary Number**: I think I'm just going to let you pick a number as "primary", similar to how email works. We could imagine a world where you have one "MFA" number and one "notifications" number, but this seems unlikely-ish?

**Publishing Numbers (Profile / API)**: At some point, we could let you say that a number is public / "show on my profile" and provide API access / directory features. Not planning to touch this for now.

**Non-Phone Numbers**: Eventually this could be a list of other similar contact mechanisms (APNS/GCM devices, Whatsapp numbers, ICQ number, twitter handle so MFA can slide into your DM's?). Not planning to touch this for now, but the path should be straightforward when we get there. This is why it's called "Contact Number", not "Phone Number".

**MFA-Required + SMS**: Right now, if the only MFA provider is SMS and MFA is required on the install, you can't actually get into Settings to add a contact number to configure SMS. I'll look at the best way to deal with this in an upcoming diff -- likely, giving you partial access to more of Setings before you get thorugh the MFA gate. Conceptually, it seems reasonable to let you adjust some other settings, like "Language" and "Accessibility", before you set up MFA, so if the "you need to add MFA" portal was more like a partial Settings screen, maybe that's pretty reasonable.

**Verifying Numbers**: We'll probably need to tackle this eventually, but I'm not planning to worry about it for now.

Test Plan: {F6137174}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: avivey, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T920

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19988
2019-01-23 13:39:56 -08:00
epriestley
0fcff78253 Convert user MFA factors to point at configurable "MFA Providers", not raw "MFA Factors"
Summary:
Ref T13222. Users configure "Factor Configs", which say "I have an entry on my phone for TOTP secret key XYZ".

Currently, these point at raw implementations -- always "TOTP" in practice.

To support configuring available MFA types (like "no MFA") and adding MFA types that need some options set (like "Duo", which needs API keys), bind "Factor Configs" to a "Factor Provider" instead.

In the future, several "Factors" will be available (TOTP, SMS, Duo, Postal Mail, ...). Administrators configure zero or more "MFA Providers" they want to use (e.g., "Duo" + here's my API key). Then users can add configs for these providers (e.g., "here's my Duo account").

Upshot:

  - Factor: a PHP subclass, implements the technical details of a type of MFA factor (TOTP, SMS, Duo, etc).
  - FactorProvider: a storage object, owned by administrators, configuration of a Factor that says "this should be available on this install", plus provides API keys, a human-readable name, etc.
  - FactorConfig: a storage object, owned by a user, says "I have a factor for provider X on my phone/whatever with secret key Q / my duo account is X / my address is Y".

Couple of things not covered here:

  - Statuses for providers ("Disabled", "Deprecated") don't do anything yet, but you can't edit them anyway.
  - Some `bin/auth` tools need to be updated.
  - When no providers are configured, the MFA panel should probably vanish.
  - Documentation.

Test Plan:
  - Ran migration with providers, saw configs point at the first provider.
  - Ran migration without providers, saw a provider created and configs pointed at it.
  - Added/removed factors and providers. Passed MFA gates. Spot-checked database for general sanity.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19975
2019-01-23 13:37:43 -08:00
epriestley
2c713b2d25 Add "Auth Messages" to support customizing onboarding/welcome flows
Summary:
Ref T13222. Long ago, we had a Config option (`welcome.html`) to let you dump HTML onto the login screen, but this was relatively hard to use and not good from a security perspective.

In some cases this was obsoleted by Dashboards, but there's at least some remaining set of use cases for actual login instructions on the login screen. For example, WMF has some guidance on //which// SSO mechanism to use based on what types of account you have. On `secure`, users assume they can register by clicking "Log In With GitHub" or whatever, and it might reduce frustration to tell them upfront that registration is closed.

Some other types of auth messaging could also either use customization or defaults (e.g., the invite/welcome/approve mail).

We could do this with a bunch of Config options, but I'd generally like to move to a world where there's less stuff in Config and more configuration is contextual. I think it tends to be easier to use, and we get a lot of fringe benefits (granular permissions, API, normal transaction logs, more abililty to customize workflows and provide contextual help/hints, etc). Here, for example, we can provide a remarkup preview, which would be trickier with Config.

This does not actually do anything yet.

Test Plan: {F6137541}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19992
2019-01-18 19:53:19 -08:00
epriestley
6b6c991ad4 Allow Phortune accounts to customize their billing address and name
Summary:
See PHI1023. Ref T7607. Occasionally, companies need their billing address (or some other custom text) to appear on invoices to satisfy process or compliance requirements.

Allow accounts to have a custom "Billing Name" and a custom "Billing Address" which appear on invoices.

Test Plan: {F6134707}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T7607

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19979
2019-01-16 16:16:27 -08:00
epriestley
a62f334d95 Add a skeleton for configurable MFA provider types
Summary:
Ref T13222. Ref T13231. See PHI912. I'm planning to turn MFA providers into concrete objects, so you can disable and configure them.

Currently, we only support TOTP, which doesn't require any configuration, but other provider types (like Duo or Yubikey OTP) do require some configuration (server URIs, API keys, etc). TOTP //could// also have some configuration, like "bits of entropy" or "allowed window size" or whatever, if we want.

Add concrete objects for this and standard transaction / policy / query support. These objects don't do anything interesting yet and don't actually interact with MFA, this is just skeleton code for now.

Test Plan:
{F6090444}

{F6090445}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13231, T13222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19935
2019-01-16 12:27:23 -08:00
epriestley
cfcd35d8a3 Remove standalone SMS support in favor of a "Mail, SMS, and other media are mostly the same thing" approach
Summary:
Ref T920. Over time, mail has become much more complex and I think considering "mail", "sms", "postcards", "whatsapp", etc., to be mostly-the-same is now a more promising avenue than building separate stacks for each one.

Throw away all the standalone SMS code, including the Twilio config options. I have a separate diff that adds Twilio as a mail adapter and functions correctly, but it needs some more work to bring upstream.

This permanently destroys the `sms` table, which no real reachable code ever wrote to. I'll call this out in the changelog.

Test Plan:
  - Grepped for `SMS` and `Twilio`.
  - Ran storage upgrade.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T920

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19939
2019-01-03 04:05:20 -08:00
epriestley
1e2bc7775b Remove the onboard "mailKey" from Pholio Mocks
Summary: Depends on D19921. Ref T11351. Ref T13065. Update Pholio to use the shared mail infrastructure. See D19670 for a previous change in this vein.

Test Plan: Ran upgrade, spot-checked that everything made it into the new table alive.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13065, T11351

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19922
2018-12-20 15:30:02 -08:00
epriestley
21f07bf6f7 Make Images in Pholio refer to mocks by PHID instead of ID
Summary:
Ref T11351. In Pholio, we currently use a `mockID`, but a `mockPHID` is generally preferable / more modern / more flexible. In particular, we need PHIDs to load handles and prefer PHIDs when exposing information to the API, and using PHIDs internally makes a bunch of things easier/better/faster and ~nothing harder/worse/slower.

I'll add some inlines about a few things.

Test Plan: Ran migrations, spot-checked database for sanity. Loaded Pholio, saw data unchanged. Created and edited images.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T11351

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19914
2018-12-20 14:54:25 -08:00
epriestley
ce953ea447 Explicitly mark MFA challenges as "answered" and "completed"
Summary:
Depends on D19893. Ref T13222. See PHI873. A challenge is "answered" if you provide a valid response. A challenge is "completed" if we let you through the MFA check and do whatever actual action the check is protecting.

If you only have one MFA factor, challenges will be "completed" immediately after they are "answered". However, if you have two or more factors, it's possible to "answer" one or more prompts, but fewer than all of the prompts, and end up with "answered" challenges that are not "completed".

In the future, it may also be possible to answer all the challenges but then have an error occur before they are marked "completed" (for example, a unique key collision in the transaction code). For now, nothing interesting happens between "answered" and "completed". This would take the form of the caller explicitly providing flags like "wait to mark the challenges as completed until I do something" and "okay, mark the challenges as completed now".

This change prevents all token reuse, even on the same workflow. Future changes will let the answered challenges "stick" to the client form so you don't have to re-answer challenges for a short period of time if you hit a unique key collision.

Test Plan:
  - Used a token to get through an MFA gate.
  - Tried to go through another gate, was told to wait for a long time for the next challenge window.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19894
2018-12-20 14:45:22 -08:00
epriestley
aa3b2ec5dc Give Pholio Images an authorPHID and use ExtendedPolicies to implement policy behavior
Summary:
Depends on D19912. Ref T11351. Images currently use `getMock()->getPolicy()` stuff to define policies. This causes bugs with object policies like "Subscribers", since the policy engine tries to evaluate the subscribers //for the image// when the intent is to evaluate the subscribers for the mock.

Move this to ExtendedPolicies to fix the behavior, and give Images sensible policy behavior when they aren't attached to a mock (specifically: only the user who created the image can see it).

Test Plan: Applied migrations, created and edited mocks and images without anything blowing up. Set mock visibility to "Subscribers", everything worked great.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T11351

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19913
2018-12-19 10:50:52 -08:00
epriestley
46052878b1 Bind MFA challenges to particular workflows, like signing a specific Legalpad document
Summary:
Depends on D19888. Ref T13222. When we issue an MFA challenge, prevent the user from responding to it in the context of a different workflow: if you ask for MFA to do something minor (award a token) you can't use the same challenge to do something more serious (launch nukes).

This defuses highly-hypothetical attacks where the attacker:

  - already controls the user's session (since the challenge is already bound to the session); and
  - can observe MFA codes.

One version of this attack is the "spill coffee on the victim when the code is shown on their phone, then grab their phone" attack. This whole vector really strains the bounds of plausibility, but it's easy to lock challenges to a workflow and it's possible that there's some more clever version of the "spill coffee" attack available to more sophisticated social engineers or with future MFA factors which we don't yet support.

The "spill coffee" attack, in detail, is:

  - Go over to the victim's desk.
  - Ask them to do something safe and nonsuspicious that requires MFA (sign `L123 Best Friendship Agreement`).
  - When they unlock their phone, spill coffee all over them.
  - Urge them to go to the bathroom to clean up immediately, leaving their phone and computer in your custody.
  - Type the MFA code shown on the phone into a dangerous MFA prompt (sign `L345 Eternal Declaration of War`).
  - When they return, they may not suspect anything (it would be normal for the MFA token to have expired), or you can spill more coffee on their computer now to destroy it, and blame it on the earlier spill.

Test Plan:
  - Triggered signatures for two different documents.
  - Got prompted in one, got a "wait" in the other.
  - Backed out of the good prompt, returned, still prompted.
  - Answered the good prompt.
  - Waited for the bad prompt to expire.
  - Went through the bad prompt again, got an actual prompt this time.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19889
2018-12-18 12:06:16 -08:00
epriestley
b8cbfda07c Track MFA "challenges" so we can bind challenges to sessions and support SMS and other push MFA
Summary:
Ref T13222. See PHI873. Ref T9770.

Currently, we support only TOTP MFA. For some MFA (SMS and "push-to-app"-style MFA) we may need to keep track of MFA details (e.g., the code we SMS'd you). There isn't much support for that yet.

We also currently allow free reuse of TOTP responses across sessions and workflows. This hypothetically enables some "spyglass" attacks where you look at someone's phone and type the code in before they do. T9770 discusses this in more detail, but is focused on an attack window starting when the user submits the form. I claim the attack window opens when the TOTP code is shown on their phone, and the window between the code being shown and being submitted is //much// more interesting than the window after it is submitted.

To address both of these cases, start tracking MFA "Challenges". These are basically a record that we asked you to give us MFA credentials.

For TOTP, the challenge binds a particular timestep to a given session, so an attacker can't look at your phone and type the code into their browser before (or after) you do -- they have a different session. For now, this means that codes are reusable in the same session, but that will be refined in the future.

For SMS / push, the "Challenge" would store the code we sent you so we could validate it.

This is mostly a step on the way toward one-shot MFA, ad-hoc MFA in comment action stacks, and figuring out what's going on with Duo.

Test Plan:
  - Passed MFA normally.
  - Passed MFA normally, simultaneously, as two different users.
  - With two different sessions for the same user:
    - Opened MFA in A, opened MFA in B. B got a "wait".
    - Submitted MFA in A.
    - Clicked "Wait" a bunch in B.
    - Submitted MFA in B when prompted.
  - Passed MFA normally, then passed MFA normally again with the same code in the same session. (This change does not prevent code reuse.)

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13222, T9770

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19886
2018-12-17 07:00:21 -08:00
epriestley
1d34238dc9 Upgrade sessions digests to HMAC256, retaining compatibility with old digests
Summary:
Ref T13222. Ref T13225. We store a digest of the session key in the session table (not the session key itself) so that users with access to this table can't easily steal sessions by just setting their cookies to values from the table.

Users with access to the database can //probably// do plenty of other bad stuff (e.g., T13134 mentions digesting Conduit tokens) but there's very little cost to storing digests instead of live tokens.

We currently digest session keys with HMAC-SHA1. This is fine, but HMAC-SHA256 is better. Upgrade:

  - Always write new digests.
  - We still match sessions with either digest.
  - When we read a session with an old digest, upgrade it to a new digest.

In a few months we can throw away the old code. When we do, installs that skip upgrades for a long time may suffer a one-time logout, but I'll note this in the changelog.

We could avoid this by storing `hmac256(hmac1(key))` instead and re-hashing in a migration, but I think the cost of a one-time logout for some tiny subset of users is very low, and worth keeping things simpler in the long run.

Test Plan:
  - Hit a page with an old session, got a session upgrade.
  - Reviewed sessions in Settings.
  - Reviewed user logs.
  - Logged out.
  - Logged in.
  - Terminated other sessions individually.
  - Terminated all other sessions.
  - Spot checked session table for general sanity.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13225, T13222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19883
2018-12-13 16:15:38 -08:00
epriestley
c58506aeaa Give sessions real PHIDs and slightly modernize session queries
Summary:
Ref T13222. See PHI873. I'm preparing to introduce a new MFA "Challenge" table which stores state about challenges we've issued (to bind challenges to sessions and prevent most challenge reuse).

This table will reference sessions (since each challenge will be bound to a particular session) but sessions currently don't have PHIDs. Give them PHIDs and slightly modernize some related code.

Test Plan:
  - Ran migrations.
  - Verified table got PHIDs.
  - Used `var_dump()` to dump an organic user session.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19881
2018-12-13 16:14:41 -08:00
epriestley
793f185d29 Remove application callsites to "LiskDAO->loadOneRelative()"
Summary: Ref T13218. This is like `loadOneWhere(...)` but with more dark magic. Get rid of it.

Test Plan:
- Forced `20130219.commitsummarymig.php` to hit this code and ran it with `bin/storage upgrade --force --apply ...`.
- Ran `20130409.commitdrev.php` with `bin/storage upgrade --force --apply ...`.
- Called `user.search` to indirectly get primary email information.
- Did not test Releeph at all.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13218

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19876
2018-12-12 16:39:44 -08:00
epriestley
96f9b0917e Improve performance of two recent commit migrations
Summary:
Ref T13216. See PHI959. These two recent migrations can be expressed more efficiently:

  - When updating commit audit statuses, the field isn't JSON encoded or anything so we can just issue several bulk UPDATEs.
  - When inserting mail keys, we can batch them in groups of 100.

Test Plan: Used `bin/storage upgrade -f --apply phabricator:...` to reapply patches. Saw equivalent behavior and faster runtimes.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13216

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19802
2018-11-15 03:52:06 -08:00
epriestley
da40f80741 Update PhabricatorLiskDAO::chunkSQL() for new %Q semantics
Summary:
Ref T13217. This method is slightly tricky:

  - We can't safely return a string: return an array instead.
  - It no longer makes sense to accept glue. All callers use `', '` as glue anyway, so hard-code that.

Then convert all callsites.

Test Plan: Browsed around, saw fewer "unsafe" errors in error log.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13217

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19784
2018-11-13 08:59:18 -08:00
epriestley
b12e92e6e2 Add timing information for commit hooks to push logs
Summary:
Depends on D19779. Ref T13216. The push logs currently record the "hostWait", which is roughly "locking + subprocess cost". We also record locking separately, so we can figure out "subprocess cost" alone by subtracting the lock costs.

However, the subprocess (normally `git receive-pack`) runs hooks, and we don't have an easy way to figure out how much time was spent doing actual `git` stuff vs spent doing commit hook processing. This would have been useful in diagnosing at least one recent issue.

Track at least a rough hook cost and record it in the push logs.

Test Plan: Pushed to a repository, saw a reasonable hook cost appear in the database table.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13216

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19780
2018-11-08 06:00:26 -08:00
epriestley
966db4d38e Add an intracluster synchronization log for cluster repositories
Summary:
Depends on D19778. Ref T13216. See PHI943, PHI889, et al.

We currently have a push log and a pull log, but do not separately log intracluster synchronization events. We've encountered several specific cases where having this kind of log would be helpful:

  - In PHI943, an install was accidentally aborting locks early. Having timing information in the sync log would let us identify this more quickly.
  - In PHI889, an install hit an issue with `MaxStartups` configuration in `sshd`. A log would let us identify when this is an issue.
  - In PHI889, I floated a "push the linux kernel + fetch timeout" theory. A sync log would let us see sync/fetch timeouts to confirm this being a problem in practice.
  - A sync log will help us assess, develop, test, and monitor intracluster routing sync changes (likely those in T13211) in the future.

Some of these events are present in the pull log already, but only if they make it as far as running a `git upload-pack` subprocess (not the case with `MaxStartups` problems) -- and they can't record end-to-end timing.

No UI yet, I'll add that in a future change.

Test Plan:
  - Forced all operations to synchronize by adding `|| true` to the version check.
  - Pulled, got a sync log in the database.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13216

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19779
2018-11-07 18:24:20 -08:00
epriestley
5d4970d6b2 Fix a bug where "View as Query" could replace a saved query row by ID, causing workboard 404s
Summary:
Fixes T13208. See that task for details.

The `clone $query` line is safe if `$query` is a builtin query (like "open").

However, if it's a saved query we clone not only the query parameters but the ID, too. Then when we `save()` the query later, we overwrite the original query.

So this would happen in the database. First, you run a query and save it as the workboard default (query key "abc123"):

| 123 | abc123 | {"...xxx..."} |

Then we `clone` it and change the parameters, and `save()` it. But that causes an `UPDATE ... WHERE id = 123` and the table now looks like this:

| 123 | def456 | {"...yyy..."} |

What we want is to create a new query instead, with an `INSERT ...`:

| 123 | abc123 | {"...xxx..."} |
| 124 | def456 | {"...yyy..."} |

Test Plan:
  - Followed reproduction steps from above.
    - With just the new `save()` guard, hit the guard error.
    - With the `newCopy()`, got a new copy of the query and "View as Query" remained functional without overwriting the original query row.
  - Ran migration, saw an affected board get fixed.

Reviewers: amckinley, joshuaspence

Reviewed By: joshuaspence

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13208

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19768
2018-11-01 05:44:49 -07:00
epriestley
e9309fdd6a When a Drydock lease schedules a resource to be reclaimed, awaken the lease update task when the reclaim completes
Summary:
Depends on D19751. Ref T13210. When Drydock needs to reclaim an existing unused resource in order to build a new resource to satisfy a lease, the lease which triggered the reclaim currently gets thrown back into the pool with a 15-second yield.

If the queue is pretty empty and the reclaim is quick, this can mean that we spend up to 15 extra seconds just waiting for the lease update task to get another shot at building a resource (the resource reclaim may complete in a second or two, but nothing else happens until the yield ends).

Instead, when a lease triggers a reclaim, have the reclaim reawaken the lease task when it completes. In the best case, this saves us 15 seconds of waiting. In other cases (the task already completed some other way, the resource gets claimed before the lease gets to it), it's harmless.

Test Plan:
  - Allocated A, A, A working copies with limit 3. Leased a B working copy.
  - Before patch: allocation took ~32 seconds.
  - After patch: allocation takes ~17 seconds (i.e., about 15 seconds less).

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13210

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19752
2018-10-26 06:09:52 -07:00
epriestley
10f219fb82 Allow Drydock logs to be associated with RepositoryOperation objects
Summary: Ref T13197. See PHI873. I want to give RepositoryOperation objects access to Drydock logging like leases, resources, and blueprints currently have. This just does the schema/query changes, no actual UI or new logging yet.

Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, poked around the UI looking for anything broken.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19671
2018-09-15 07:55:14 -07:00
epriestley
40d5d5c984 Remove "mailKey" from "PhabricatorRepositoryCommit"
Summary: Ref T13197. Ref T13065. This continues the gradual purge of dedicated "mailKey" columns in favor of shared infrastructure.

Test Plan:
  - Ran migration.
  - Visually inspected database.
  - Grepped for `mailKey`.
  - Added some comments, saw the daemons generate corresponding mail.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13197, T13065

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19670
2018-09-15 07:54:15 -07:00
epriestley
d63281cc54 Migrate remaining Audit database status constants
Summary: Depends on D19652. Ref T13197. See PHI851. This migrates the actual `auditStatus` on Commits, and older status transactions.

Test Plan:
  - Ran migrations.
  - Spot-checked the database for sanity.
  - Ran some different queries, got unchanged results from before migration.
  - Reviewed historic audit state transactions, and accepted/raised concern on new audits. All state transactions appeared to generate properly.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19655
2018-09-12 12:21:27 -07:00
epriestley
09703938fb Migrate old commit saved queries to new audit status constants
Summary: Depends on D19651. Ref T13197. The application now accepts either numeric or string values. However, for consistency and to reduce surprise in the future, migrate existing saved queries to use string values.

Test Plan: Saved some queries on `master` with numeric constants, ran the migration, saw string constants in the database and equivalent behavior in the UI.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13197

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19652
2018-09-12 12:21:02 -07:00
epriestley
dc0924deed Properly namespace the query in the spliced-in content cleanup patch
Yikes. Actually ran it this time!
2018-08-31 12:07:07 -07:00
epriestley
c5960c71f9 Splice in a patch to remove Phriction content rows with no document
The unique key on <documentPHID, version> may fail to apply if any content
rows don't have a valid document. This is rare, but we have some old random
garbage rows on "secure.phabricator.com" which prevent the next patch from
applying. Just toss these rows, they're junk.
2018-08-31 12:02:52 -07:00
epriestley
3b1294cf45 Store Phriction max version on Document, improve editing rules for editing documents with drafts
Summary:
Ref T13077. We need to know the maximum version of a document in several cases, so denormalize it onto the Document object.

Then clean up some behaviors where we edit a document with, e.g., 7 versions but version 5 is currently published. For now, we: edit starting with version 7, save as version 8, and immediately publish the new version.

Test Plan:
  - Ran migration.
  - Edited a draft page without hitting any weird version errors.
  - Checked database for sensible `maxVersion` values.

Reviewers: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13077

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19625
2018-08-30 10:12:51 -07:00
epriestley
0a77b0e53e Work around an issue in MariaDB where dropping a column from a UNIQUE KEY fails
Summary:
See T13193. See T13077. If we drop a column which is part of a UNIQUE KEY, MariaDB raises an error.

This is probably a bad idea on our side anyway, but in this case it wasn't an obviously bad idea.

To get around this:

  - Drop the unique key, if it exists, before dropping the column.
  - Explicitly add the new unique key afterward.

Test Plan: Ran `bin/storage upgrade` locally without issue, but I'm on MySQL. Will follow up on T13193.

Reviewers: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19624
2018-08-30 06:25:39 -07:00
epriestley
50f4adef64 Remove on-object mailkeys from Phriction
Summary: Depends on D19619. Ref T13065. Ref T13077. Migrate Phriction mail keys to the new infrastructure and drop the column.

Test Plan: Ran migrations, spot-checked the database.

Reviewers: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T13065

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19620
2018-08-29 13:43:13 -07:00
epriestley
64cee4a902 Move Phriction internal document/content references from IDs to PHIDs
Summary:
Ref T13077. This is mostly just a small cleanup change, even though the actual change is large.

We currently reference content and document objects from one another with `contentID` and `documentID`, but this means that `contentID` must be nullable. Switching to PHIDs allows the column to be non-nullable.

This also supports reorienting some current and future transactions around PHIDs, which is preferable for the API. In particular, I'm adding a "publish version X" transaction soon, and would rather callers pass a PHID than an ID or version number, since this will make the API more consistent and powerful.

Today, `contentID` gets used as a cheaty way to order documents by (content) edit time. Since PHIDs aren't orderable and stuff is going to become actually-revertible soon, replace this with an epoch timestamp.

Test Plan:
  - Created, edited, moved, retitled, and deleted Phriction documents.
  - Grepped for `documentID` and `contentID`.
  - This probably breaks //something// but I'll be in this code for a bit and am likely to catch whatever breaks.

Reviewers: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13077

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19619
2018-08-29 13:41:24 -07:00
epriestley
2f5c6541fc Add an "Activated Epoch" and an "Acquired Epoch" to Drydock Leases
Summary: Ref T13189. See PHI690. When a lease is first acquired or activated, note the time. This supports better visibility into queue lengths. For now, this is only queryable via DB and visible in the UI, but can be more broadly exposed in the future.

Test Plan: Landed a revision, saw the leases get sensible timestamps for acquisition/activation.

Reviewers: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13189

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19613
2018-08-27 11:27:45 -07:00
Austin McKinley
a6951a0a5a Add migration to encourage rebuilding repository identities
Summary: Ref T12164. Defines a new manual activity that suggests rebuilding repository identities before Phabricator begins to rely on them.

Test Plan:
- Ran migration, observed expected setup issue: {F5788217}
- Ran `bin/config done identities` and observed setup issue get marked as done.
- Ran `/bin/storage upgrade --apply phabricator:20170912.ferret.01.activity.php` to make sure I didn't break the reindex migration; observed reindex setup issue appear as expected.
- Ran `./bin/config done reindex` and observed reindex issue cleared as expected.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T12164

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19497
2018-08-10 13:47:03 -07:00
epriestley
8d8086fccf Add Spaces support to Phriction
Summary:
Ref T13164. See PHI774. Fixes T12435.

Since Phriction is hierarchical, there isn't a super strong motivation to support Spaces: you can generally set policies on a small number of documents to get the desired effective policy behavior.

However, it still improves consistency and there's no reason //not// to support Spaces. In the case where you have some moderately weird/complex policy on one or more Spaces, using Spaces to define the policy behavior can make things a bit simpler and easier to understand.

This probably doesn't actually fix whatever the root problem in T12435 was (complicated, non-hierarchical access policies?). See also a bunch of discussion in T12442. So we might end up going beyond this to address other use cases, but I think this is reasonable regardless.

Test Plan: Created and edited Phriction documents and shifted them between Spaces. Searched by Space, etc.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13164, T12435

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19553
2018-07-31 10:24:28 -07:00
epriestley
13cac5c362 Add Spaces to Projects
Summary:
See PHI774. Ref T13164. There is no reason projects //don't// support Spaces, just a vague concern that it's not hugely useful and might be a bit confusing.

However, it's at least somewhat useful (to improve consistency and reduce special casing) and doesn't necessarily seem more confusing than Projects are anyway. Support is trivial from a technical point of view, so just hook it up.

Test Plan: Created new projects, shifted projects between spaces. The support is all pretty much automatic.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13164

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19549
2018-07-31 10:15:41 -07:00