Summary:
Ref T9132. Like D14659, I'll hold this until after the cut.
This swaps commenting in Maniphest over to EditEngine / stackable actions. New code doesn't have parity yet, although none of the things we're missing should technically be //strictly mandatory//. There's a list inline. I'll restore these in the next diffs.
Briefly -- comments, subscribers and projects work. Status, owners and priority do not yet.
Test Plan:
- Made comments and added subscribers and projects.
- Read through the old code to look for missing features and tried to document them all.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14663
Summary:
Ref T9132. I'm going hold this until after the release cut since it isn't going to land completely smoothly, but I think I can prep it today/tomorrow and hopefully get it close enough to working to put in HEAD on Saturday after the push.
This adds the basics: new EditEngine, new EditController, and new `maniphest.edit` API endpoint.
I put the new stuff at `editpro/` for now until it works a little better.
Some notes on stuff this is dropping/changing/not-working-yet:
- Preview for the description. I'd rather solve this by putting a "Preview" button on every Remarkup area if we want to retain it. Particularly, it does not generalize to adding custom remarkup fields in its current form. See also T3967.
- Per-field policies are no longer enforced. They were never truly enforced anyway (for example, any user who can edit a task has always been able to edit every field via Conduit or email actions or Herald, where Herald supports things), and only really served as a hint to users. I think we can obsolete this by having installs hide/lock these fields instead. This is a desirable outcome for me, since I don't like retaining these policies and the idea of truly enforcing them properly is worrisome. These were originally added for Uber as an onboarding sort of thing. I'll prepare users for this in greater detail in the documentation.
- Couple of minor bugs with ordering / defaults / only-one-owner-allowed in this diff that I'll clean up in future diffs before this stuff lands.
- I don't have a concrete plan on "Create Similar Task" / "Clone" yet (do you have thoughts? Is this worth trying to do in every application?). I'll probably just mostly mimic the current behavior.
Test Plan: I'll vet this more thoroughly in followups, just banged around some tasks for now and created/edited via the API.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14659
Summary:
Ref T9132. When I've touched `PhabricatorApplication` I keep hitting this bad `pht()` junk.
The warning is correct, these strings are not extactable and can not be translated.
Fix it so they can be extracted and translated.
Broadly, in all cases we want to render one of these:
> 95 Things (for fewer than some limit)
> 99+ Things (when we hit the limit)
Test Plan: Looked at homepage status counts, moused over them, saw reasonable strings. Grepped for removed method.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14638
Summary: Ref T992. I noticed that `ManiphestTask` mail doesn't render Remarkup properly (instead, it renders Remarkup literally). I //think// this is because the code calls `addTextSection()` rather than `addRemarkupSection()`.
Test Plan: Created a new Maniphest Task and saw Remarkup in the generated self-email (inspect the email contents with `./bin/mail show-outbound`). I didn't test the other affected applications.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T992
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14511
Summary:
Fixes T9596.
Was unable to navigate to a task in Maniphest.
Test Plan: navigate to that task.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, avivey, tycho.tatitscheff
Reviewed By: avivey, tycho.tatitscheff
Subscribers: tycho.tatitscheff, avivey, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9596
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14300
Summary: Fixes T9592.
Test Plan: Log out ! Navigates to a task. See the add button grey-ed out !
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9592
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14299
Summary: If you `!assign cahd` when you meant to `!assign chad`, we'll hit an "Undefined variable: assign_phid" a little further down.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it. See IRC.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14291
Summary:
Fixes T9558. The recent changes to validate PHID fields don't work cleanly with this gross hack.
This can probably be unwound now but it will definitely get fixed in T9132 so I may just wait for that.
Test Plan: Edited a custom "users" field in Maniphest. This should only affect Maniphest because it has a weird hack.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9558
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14264
Summary:
This reverts commit 1583738842.
See T8646 for discussion. This version of the feature feels terrible on real data.
Test Plan: Strict revert.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14097
Summary:
Ref T8646. This is fairly rough:
This interface is very niche, and not really flexible enough to accommodate other result customization (but I don't think we have any plans here)?
I'm just //summarizing// the content of documents, basically showing the first paragraph of their content, summary, etc. This isn't what Google does: it shows snippets surrounding the actual search terms. However, this is more involved and might be less useful in structured data: for example, I'd imagine that the first line of most phriciton documents, maniphest tasks and Differential revisions really might be the best machine-generatable summary of them. The actual contextual snippeting in Google doesn't often seem hugely useful to me. But this might also not be very useful.
There's not much design, not sure if you had any ideas.
I only implemented this for tasks, revisions and the wiki since those seem most useful.
I'm generally on the fence about this, but it's not a ton of work to swap out for something else later. Maybe we can see how it feels? But happy to toss it or rethink the approach.
Test Plan: {F788026}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8646
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14095
Summary: Fixes T9369.
Test Plan:
- Sent a mail with Mail.app to `bugs@local.phacility.com`.
- Used "View Raw Mail", copy-pasted it into `mail.txt` on disk.
- Ran `cat mail.txt | ./scripts/mail/manage_mail.php --process-duplicates`.
- Saw task get created and me get added as CC.
- Changed "To" to include another user, ran command again, saw task get created and other user get added as CC.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9369
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14086
Summary:
Fixes T9237. A while ago, the old (more-pink) indigo got split into "pink" (more pink) and "indigo" (more purple), but we didn't change this color config in Maniphest.
This generally made the color more purple, and it's now pretty simliar to the "needs triage" color (violet).
Make it "pink" instead.
Test Plan: {F742617}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9237
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13954
Summary: Ref T8726. No surprises.
Test Plan:
Created rules using both action variants, applied upgrade, saw rules still work correctly.
{F658842}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13701
Summary: Ref T8726. Converts these actions to be modular. No real surprises in this change.
Test Plan:
{F658709}
- Wrote some rules.
- Migrated them forward.
- Used a bunch of these rules.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13699
Summary:
Ref T8726. This modularizes "Mark with flag", plus rebuilds transcripts in a more modern/flexible way. The big transcript stuff is:
- Transcripts are now translatable.
- Transcripts can now show multiple outputs from a single action. For example, an action like "add A, B, C to subscribers" can now say "added A; B is invalid; C was already subscribed".
Test Plan: {F637784}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: joshuaspence, eadler, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13649
Summary:
Ref T8726. Herald actions are technically sort-of modular already, but make them more aggressively modular similar to `HeraldField`.
I plan to obsolete and replace `HeraldCustomAction`.
Test Plan: Saw actions in nice groups; created and ran a "Do Nothing" action. Transcripts are a bit rough for now.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13646
Summary:
Ref T8726. Some adapters now have a large number of fields, and we lost the sort-of-human-readable implicit ordering when fields were modularized.
Instead, group and sort fields.
Test Plan: {F603066}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13619
Summary: Ref T8726. This gets rid of all the `VALUE_*` constants and lets Fields provide arbitrary typeaheads without upstream/JS changes.
Test Plan: Used all tokenizers. Used "Another Herald Rule". Grepped for all removed constants.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13616
Summary:
Ref T8726. I want to modularize values and reduce how hard-coded / copypasta'd they are.
- Rename `get...StandardCondition()` to `get...StandardType()`, since we can drive both conditions and values from it.
- Rename `STANDARD_LIST` to `STANDARD_PHID_LIST` for consistency: all "lists" are lists of PHIDs.
- For all standard types which don't require typehaeads, lift their logic into the base class.
- I'll lift typeaheads soon, but need to generalize them first.
Test Plan: Edited various Herald rules, saw value UI generate correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13612
Summary: Ref T8726.
Test Plan:
Created a giant rule with every commit field:
{F594686}
Ran the upgrade, got the same rule with new fields:
{F594688}
Used "Test Console" to run transcripts, saw all the fields populate correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13567
Summary: Use `PhutilClassMapQuery` where appropriate.
Test Plan: Browsed around the UI to verify things seemed somewhat working.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13429
Summary:
Ref T8726. The only notable bit here is that the "body" / "title" fields (which are currently shared across a bunch of types) are getting split into application variants.
Among other things, this will let us label the field "Commit message" for commits, for example.
Test Plan:
- Created a rule using all four fields.
- Applied patch, saw rule break ("unknown field").
- Ran storage upgrade, saw rule fix itself in the migration.
- Edited tasks, triggered rule, viewed transcripts.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: eadler, joshuaspence, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13501
Summary: Ref T8726. These are a bit involved because they have custom rendering and editor values.
Test Plan: Created new rule using these fields, edited tasks to trigger them, viewed transcripts.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: eadler, joshuaspence, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13500
Summary: Move some `PhabricatorSearchField` subclasses to be adjacent to the application to which they belong. This seems generally better to me than lumping them all together in the `src/applications/search/field/` directory. I was also wondering if it makes sense to rename these subclasses as `PhabricatorXSearchField` rather than `PhabricatorSearchXField` (as per T5655), but wasn't really sure if these objects are meant to be search-fields, or just fields belonging to the #search application.
Test Plan: N/A.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13374
Summary: Fixes T8740. This data is required for now, and didn't get brought across properly from the original standalone foreground editor.
Test Plan: Did a bulk editor "add project", got a clean result.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8740
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13533
Summary: Ref T8099, Fixes T8339. This lets us pull in the status icon and display in lists and object headers.
Test Plan: Look at a list of open and closed tasks, see icons match state (duplicate, spite, defaults).
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099, T8339
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13490
Summary: Ref T8099, Fixes T8338. This allows re-ordering of Maniphest Tasks in the redesign. Somehow seems more fragile, but I couldn't break anything with it.
Test Plan: Try ordering into first position after header, last position, changing priority outright, everything I can drag.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099, T8338
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13487
Summary: Ref T8099, Fixes padding and spacing when status tags are coming from Maniphest. Also, maybe remove this?
Test Plan: Test closed tasks in Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13434
Summary:
Ref T8637. This does nothing interesting, just has empty scaffolding for a bulk job queue.
Basic idea is that when you do something like a batch edit in Maniphest, we:
- Create a BulkJob with all the details.
- Queue a worker to start the job.
- Send you to a progress bar page for the job.
In the background:
- The "start job" worker creates a ton of Task objects, then queues worker tasks to do the work.
In the foreground:
- Fancy ajax animates the progress bar and it goes wooosh.
In general:
- Big jobs actually work.
- Jobs get logged.
- You can monitor jobs.
- Terrible junk like T8637 should be much harder to write and much easier to catch and diagnose.
Test Plan:
No interesting code/beahavior yet. Clean `storage adjust`.
{F526411}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8637
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13392
Summary: Ref T8637. This class has some really old parameter handling which can send `withIDs(array())` down a "fetch everything" pathway. Clean up most of it.
Test Plan: Issued every ApplicationSearch query.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8637
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13390
Summary:
Ref T8637. If a user tries to batch edit a list of tasks which can't be edited, we fall through to `withIDs(array())`, which can affect //everything//.
Explicitly stop batch editing if we don't have valid IDs or valid tasks.
The UI sort-of warns you that something is wrong, but this is ultimately a pretty severe UX issue. I'll fix the underlying Query in the next diff.
Test Plan: Tried to batch edit a list of tasks I didn't have permission to edit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: lloyd.oliver, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8637
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13388
Summary:
Fixes T6787. I'm kind of cheating a little bit here by not unifying default selection with `initializeNew(...)` methods, but I figure we can let this settle for a bit and then go do that later. It's pretty minor.
Since we're not doing templates I kind of want to swap the `'template'` key to `'type'` so maybe I'll do that too at some point.
@chad, freel free to change these, I was just trying to make them pretty obvious. I //do// think it's good for them to stand out, but my approach is probably a bit inconsistent/heavy-handed in the new design.
Test Plan:
{F525024}
{F525025}
{F525026}
{F525027}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, joshuaspence, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13387
Summary: Ref T8099, Adds more infomation to the icon in Maniphest Task Lists.
Test Plan: Hover over icons in a Maniphest Task
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13367
Summary: Ref T8099. This adds a new class which all search engines return for layout. I thought about this a number of ways, and I think this is the cleanest path. Each Engine can return whatever UI bits they needs, and AppSearch or Dashboard picks and lays the bits out as needed. In the AppSearch case, interfaces like Notifications, Calendar, Legalpad all need more custom layouts. I think this also leaves a resonable path forward for NUX as well. Also, not sure I implemented the class correctly, but assume thats easy to fix?
Test Plan: Review and do a search in each application changed. Grep for all call sites.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13332
