Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary:
This is better than writing "(UNSTABLE!!!)" in front of the text description.
I'll add a wiki to keep track of API changes, too.
See also D2087, which motivates this.
Test Plan: Browsed console, saw "deprecated" and "unstable" on appropriate methods.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2271
for scope
Summary:
this patch makes the access token response "complete" relative to spec by
returning when it expires AND that the token_type is in fact 'Bearer'.
This patch also lays the groundwork for scope by fixing the underlying data
model and adding the first scope checks for "offline_access" relative to expires
and the "whoami" method. Further, conduit is augmented to open up individual
methods for access via OAuth generally to enable "whoami" access. There's also
a tidy little scope class to keep track of all the various scopes we plan to
have as well as strings for display (T849 - work undone)
Somewhat of a hack but Conduit methods by default have SCOPE_NOT_ACCESSIBLE. We
then don't even bother with the OAuth stuff within conduit if we're not supposed
to be accessing the method via Conduit. Felt relatively clean to me in terms
of additional code complexity, etc.
Next up ends up being T848 (scope in OAuth) and T849 (let user's authorize
clients for specific scopes which kinds of needs T850). There's also a bunch of
work that needs to be done to return the appropriate, well-formatted error
codes. All in due time...!
Test Plan:
verified that an access_token with no scope doesn't let me see
anything anymore. :( verified that access_tokens made awhile ago expire. :(
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T888, T848
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1657
Summary:
conduit was using getProductionURI instead of getURI for checking that the
request was sent to the correct host, which causes problems in some dev
environments
Test Plan:
echo '{}' | arc call-conduit --conduit-uri=mydevserver
where my dev server is configured with phabricator.production-uri pointing to
prod instead of my devserver
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1543
Summary:
Provide a catchall mechanism to find unprotected writes.
- Depends on D758.
- Similar to WriteOnHTTPGet stuff from Facebook's stack.
- Since we have a small number of storage mechanisms and highly structured
read/write pathways, we can explicitly answer the question "is this page
performing a write?".
- Never allow writes without CSRF checks.
- This will probably break some things. That's fine: they're CSRF
vulnerabilities or weird edge cases that we can fix. But don't push to Facebook
for a few days unless you're prepared to deal with this.
- **>>> MEGADERP: All Conduit write APIs are currently vulnerable to CSRF!
<<<**
Test Plan:
- Ran some scripts that perform writes (scripts/search indexers), no issues.
- Performed normal CSRF submits.
- Added writes to an un-CSRF'd page, got an exception.
- Executed conduit methods.
- Did login/logout (this works because the logged-out user validates the
logged-out csrf "token").
- Did OAuth login.
- Did OAuth registration.
Reviewers: pedram, andrewjcg, erling, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran,
codeblock
Commenters: pedram
CC: aran, epriestley, pedram
Differential Revision: 777
Summary: This allows us to detect a mismatched client and server hostname. See
D591.
Test Plan: See D591.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: jungejason, llorca, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 592
