1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-01 11:12:42 +01:00
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
vrana
6cc196a2e5 Move files in Phabricator one level up
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.

NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.

Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.

Auditors: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T1103
2012-06-01 12:32:44 -07:00
Bob Trahan
0327a5fc69 OAuthServer polish and random sauce
Summary:
This diff makes the OAuthServer more compliant with the spec by
- making it return well-formatted error codes with error types from the spec.
- making it respect the "state" variable, which is a transparent variable the
client passes and the server passes back
- making it be super, duper compliant with respect to redirect uris
-- if specified in authorization step, check if its valid relative to the client
registered URI and if so save it
-- if specified in authorization step, check if its been specified in the access
step and error if it doesn't match or doesn't exist
-- note we don't make any use of it in the access step which seems strange but
hey, that's what the spec says!
This diff makes the OAuthServer suck less by
- making the "cancel" button do something in the user authorization flow
- making the client list view and client edit view be a bit more usable around
client secrets
- fixing a few bugs I managed to introduce along the way

Test Plan:
- create a test phabricator client, updated my conf, and then linked and
unlinked phabricator to itself
- wrote some tests for PhabricatorOAuthServer -- they pass!
-- these validate the various validate URI checks
- tried a few important authorization calls
--
http://phabricator.dev/oauthserver/auth/?client_id=X&state=test&redirect_uri=http://www.evil.com
--- verified error'd from mismatching redirect uri's
--- verified state parameter in response
--- verified did not redirect to client redirect uri
-- http://phabricator.dev/oauthserver/auth/?client_id=X w/ existing
authorization
--- got redirected to proper client url with error that response_type not
specified
-- http://phabricator.dev/oauthserver/auth/?client_id=X&response_type=code w/
existing authorization
--- got redirected to proper client url with pertinent code!
- tried a few important access calls
-- verified appropriate errors if missing any required parameters
-- verified good access code with appropriate other variables resulted in an
access token
- verified that if redirect_uri set correctly in authorization required for
access and errors if differs at all / only succeeds if exactly the same

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, epriestley, ajtrichards

Maniphest Tasks: T889, T906, T897

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1727
2012-03-01 14:46:18 -08:00
Bob Trahan
af295e0b26 OAuth Server enhancements -- more complete access token response and groundwork
for scope

Summary:
this patch makes the access token response "complete" relative to spec by
returning when it expires AND that the token_type is in fact 'Bearer'.

This patch also lays the groundwork for scope by fixing the underlying data
model and adding the first scope checks for "offline_access" relative to expires
and the "whoami" method.   Further, conduit is augmented to open up individual
methods for access via OAuth generally to enable "whoami" access.   There's also
a tidy little scope class to keep track of all the various scopes we plan to
have as well as strings for display (T849 - work undone)

Somewhat of a hack but Conduit methods by default have SCOPE_NOT_ACCESSIBLE.  We
then don't even bother with the OAuth stuff within conduit if we're not supposed
to be accessing the method via Conduit.   Felt relatively clean to me in terms
of additional code complexity, etc.

Next up ends up being T848 (scope in OAuth) and T849 (let user's authorize
clients for specific scopes which kinds of needs T850).  There's also a bunch of
work that needs to be done to return the appropriate, well-formatted error
codes.  All in due time...!

Test Plan:
verified that an access_token with no scope doesn't let me see
anything anymore.  :(  verified that access_tokens made awhile ago expire.  :(

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T888, T848

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1657
2012-02-21 16:33:06 -08:00
Bob Trahan
7a3f33b5c2 OAuth - Phabricator OAuth server and Phabricator client for new Phabricator OAuth Server
Summary:
adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands:
 - auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application.  if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri
 - token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token
 - whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server.
Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data.  T850 will
delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator
product.

This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator
OAuth Server.  (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator
codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature)

Also, related to make this work well
 - clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific
information and extending the provider classes as appropriate.
 - augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where
the Phabricator client is concerned

What's missing here...   See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852.

Test Plan:
- created a dummy client via the test handler.   setup development.conf to have
have proper variables for this dummy client.  went through authorization and
de-authorization flows
- viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw
provider-specific debugging information

Reviewers: epriestley

CC: aran, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
2012-02-19 14:00:13 -08:00