Summary:
Depends on D19105. Ref T13077. Fixes T12344.
The `[[ ... ]]` syntax accepts and handles characters which would require URL encoding if they appeared in URIs. For example, `[[ 100% Natural Cheese Dust ]]` is a legitimate, supported piece of remarkup syntax, and does not need to be written as `... 100%25 Natural ...`.
Likewise, `[[ BUY $DOGE ]]` is legitimate and does not need to be written as `[[ BUY %24DOGE ]]`. This piece of syntax creates a link to `/w/buy_$doge/`. This may or may not appear in your browser's URL bar as `/w/buy_%24doge/`, but internally "$" is a valid slug character and you'll see `buy_$doge` over Conduit, etc.
However, since users may reasonably copy paths from their browser URL bar, they may have unnecessary URL encoding. The syntax `[[ buy_$doge ]]` is legitimate, but a user copy/pasting may write `[[ buy_%24doge ]]` instead.
Currently, this extra URL encoding causes links to break, since `[[ buy_%24doge ]]` is a treated as link to `/w/buy_24doge/`, just like `[[ Fresh 100%AB Blood ]]` is a link to `/w/fresh_100_ab_blood/`.
To fix this:
- When the target for a link can be URL decoded, try to do lookups on both the un-decoded and decoded variations.
- If the un-decoded variation works, great: use it. This preserves behavior for all existing, working links.
- If the un-decoded variation fails but the decoded variation works, okay: we'll assume you copy-pasted a URL-encoded version and strip URL encoding.
- If both fail, same behavior as before.
Also, use a different spelling for "existent".
See T13084 for some "attacks" based on this behavior. I think the usability affordance this behavior provides greatly outweighs the very mild threat those attacks represent.
Test Plan:
- Created links to existing, nonexisting, and existing-but-not-visible documents, all of which worked normally.
- Created links to `[[ $doge ]]` and `[[ %24doge ]]`, saw them both go to the right place.
- Performed the "attacks" in T13084.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T12344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19106
Summary:
Fixes T10969. Ref T13077. When you create a Phriction document with a relative link (`[[ ./path/to/page ]]`) the initial email currently points to the wrong place.
This is because the context object (the page) isn't passed to the markup engine. Without this context, the relative link is rendered as though it appeared somewhere else (like a task or revision) where relative links don't make sense.
Test Plan: Created a new Phriction document with a relative link to `[[ ./porcupine_facts/starmap ]]`, saw a usable link in the resulting email.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T10969
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19105
Summary: Ref T4280. At some point (probably D15732) we started getting anchor parsing wrong. Just pop the anchor off before doing all the logic, then put it back on at the end.
Test Plan:
Tested various forms like:
```
[[ x ]]
[[ x | z ]]
[[ x#y | z ]]
[[ ./x#y | z ]]
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4280
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16083
Summary: This still wasn't quite right -- a link like `[[ Porcupine Facts ]]` with a space would not lookup correctly, and would render as `porcupine_facts`.
Test Plan: Verified that `[[ Porcupine Facts ]]` now works correctly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15780
Summary: Fixes T10845.
Test Plan: Verified that `[[ quack ]]` and `[[ QUACK ]]` both work. Previously, the link had to exactly match the capitalization of the target.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10845
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15777
Summary:
Fixes T10840. When rendering mail, this rule wasn't falling through in quite the right way.
Also adjust where the rules are for this so the special styles show up in Maniphest, etc.
Test Plan:
Made this comment:
{F1238266}
Which produced this HTML:
{F1238267}
...and sent this mail:
{F1238283}
Reviewers: hach-que, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15767
Summary: Also make `../` work to start relative a link so I don't have to document it as `./../path`.
Test Plan:
- Used `./`, `../`. `./../`, and normal links (proper title pickup).
- Used bad links (red).
- Regenerated documentation:
{F1221692}
Reviewers: hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15734
Summary: Ref T7691 (errata). This shows links to Phriction documents in red if they're missing, and links to Phriction documents in grey with a lock icon if the user doesn't have the correct permissions to see the document.
Test Plan:
Tested a bunch of different configurations:
```
[[ ./../ ]] Back to Main Document
[[ ./../subdocument_2]] Mmmm more documents
[[ ./../invisible_document]] Mmmm more documents
[[ ./../ | Explicit Title ]] Back to Main Document
[[ ./../subdocument_2 | Explicit Title ]] Mmmm more documents
[[ ./../invisible_document | Explicit Title ]] Mmmm more documents
[[ ]] Absolute link
[[ subdocument_2 ]] Absolute link
[[ invisible_document ]] Absolute link
[[ | Explicit Title ]] Absolute link
[[ subdocument_2 | Explicit Title ]] Absolute link
[[ invisible_document | Explicit Title ]] Absolute link
```
Got the expected result:
{F1221106}
Reviewers: epriestley, chad, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7691
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15733
Summary:
Resolves T7691. This turned out more complex than I really wanted, mainly because I needed to feed the slug information through to both the document renderer and the preview window that appears in the edit controller.
After this change, you can now create relative links in Phriction by doing `[[ ./../some/relative/path ]]`. Relative paths aren't handled anywhere else (they'll still render, but the dots are turned into a literal 'dot' as per existing behaviour).
Test Plan: Created some Phriction documents with relative links, saw them all link correctly.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7691
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15732
Summary: Ref T6343, adding HTMLMailMode to remarkup, and most objects should now be processed and appear pretty in emails.
Test Plan: Add a comment to a Maniphest task containing a mention of an object like '{T1}' or 'T1'. Emails should show a styled version of the object similar to how the object looks in the context of the Maniphest task in the UI.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343, T2617
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10859
