Summary:
Ref T10537. Currently, Nuance has a `NuanceRequestor` object, intended to represent the external user who created content (e.g., a GitHub account or a Twitter account or whatever).
This object is currently almost unused, and its design predates Doorkeeper. In D15541, I chose to use doorkeeper objects instead of NuanceRequestor objects to represent requestors.
I don't currently anticipate a need for such an object, given that we have Doorkeeper. If we do need it in the future for some reason, it would be fairly easy to restore it, create a requestor type which wraps a Doorkeeper object, and then migrate. Not super thrilling to do that, but not a huge mess.
`NuanceItem` still has a `requestorPHID`, but this is now a less formal object PHID instead of a more formal Requestor-object PHID, and holds a doorkeeper exeternal object PHID for GitHub events.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `nuancerequestor`.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`.
- Grepped for `requestor`, remaining uses of this term seem reasonable/correct.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15546
Summary:
Ref T10538. The primary GitHub event activity stream does not report minor events (labels, milestones, etc).
GitHub has a second, similar activity stream which does report these events (the "Issues Events API").
Use two separate cursors: one consumes the primary stream; the second consumes the events stream.
One possible issue with this is that we may write events in a different order than they occurred, so GitHub shows "comment, label, close" but we show "comment, close, label" or similar. This is probably OK because the secondary API doesn't seem to have any very important events (e.g., it's probably fine if label changes are out-of-order), but we can conceivably put some buffer stage in between the two if it's an issue.
Test Plan: {F1164894}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15446
Summary:
Ref T10537. Ref T10538. This polls the GitHub events API and creates Nuance items from the raw data.
It does nothing useful with them.
Test Plan:
- Polled GitHub.
- Saw some items get created.
- X-Poll-Interval seemed to work.
- ETag seemed to work.
- Recognizing when we hit items we've already seen seemed to work.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537, T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15440
Summary:
Ref T10537. Some sources (like the future "GitHub Repository" source) need to poll remotes.
- Provide a mechanism for sources to emit import cursors.
- Hook them into the trigger daemon so they'll fire periodically.
- Provide some storage.
This diff does nothing useful or interesting, and is pure infrastructure.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`, no adjustment issues.
- Poked around Nuance.
- Ran the trigger daemon, verified it didn't crash and checked for Nuance stuff to do.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15435
Summary: Ref T10537. Converts sources to EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Created a new source.
- Edited an existing source.
- Submitted a complaint with the complaint form.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15434
Summary: Moves all the one off object calls to PHUIRemarkupView, adds a "Document" call as well (future plans).
Test Plan: Visited most pages I could get access to, but may want extra careful eyes on this diff.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15281
Summary: You can already pass other icons, but this makes it a bit simpler.
Test Plan: Test Maniphest, Badges
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14131
Summary:
Ref T8783. Sort out some relationships and fields:
- Make Items 1:1 with Queues: each item is always in exactly one queue. Minor discussion on T8783. I think this is easier to understand and reason about (and implement!) and can't come up with any real cases where it isn't powerful enough.
- Remove "QueueItem", which allowed items to be in multiple queues at once.
- Remove "dateNuanced", which is equivalent to "dateCreated" in all cases.
Then add really basic routing:
- Add "Default Queue" for Sources. New items from the source route into that queue.
- (Some day there will be routing rules, but for now the rule is "always route into the default queue".)
- Show queue on items.
- Show more / more useful edit history and transactions in several UIs.
Test Plan:
{F749445}
{F749446}
{F749447}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13988
Summary:
Ref T8783.
The "View" UI is where a user would check their request for feedback or a resolution, if it's something that makes sense for them to interact with from the web UI.
The "Edit" UI is the manage/admin UI where you'd respond to a request. It's similar to the view UI but will have actions and eventually some queue UI, etc.
(I don't think items need a normal "Edit" UI -- it doesn't make sense to "Edit" a tweet or inbound email -- but maybe this will shuffle around a little eventually.)
Test Plan:
View
{F747218}
Edit
{F747219}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13980
Summary:
Ref T8783. If you have a source (like a "report bug" form), let it put a link (like "View Form") on the source detail page.
This also straightens out getting definitions from sources, which had a bug with the modern way we do `PhutilClassMapQuery`.
Specifically, if you called the old mechanism on two different sources, they'd return the same definition object, but they need to return different definitions.
Test Plan:
{F747093}
{F747092}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13966
Summary: Use `PhutilClassMapQuery` where appropriate.
Test Plan: Browsed around the UI to verify things seemed somewhat working.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13429
Summary:
Ref T8434. Hard-codes form sources as a complaint form.
This form is close to perfect and I'm not actually sure we need to let users customize it at all.
Test Plan: {F473587}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13166
Summary:
Ref T8434. Minor cleanup/modernization. I made type selection modal (like Herald, Auth, etc) so we can render the form on the next screen based on the type.
{F472519}
Test Plan: Created a new source, edited an existing source.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13161
Summary: This removes the bulk of the "Form Errors" text, some variations likely exists. These are a bit redundant and space consuming. I'd also like to back ErrorView more into PHUIObjectBox.
Test Plan: Test out the forms, see errors without the text.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7924
Summary: ...and get the basic edit flow "working" for a new NuanceSourceDefinition - the Phabricator Form. ...and fix a dumb bug in the query class so when you redirect to the view page / try to edit an existing NuanceSource you don't fatal.
Test Plan: played around with the edit form and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7585
