1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-21 04:50:55 +01:00
Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joshua Spence
279a0e5371 Don't explicitly keep track of _activeListenerCount in the Aphlict server.
Summary: The `_activeListenerCount` variable is overkill, we should be able to achieve the same result using `Object.keys(this._listeners).length`.

Test Plan:
Mucked around in a NodeJS shell.

```lang=js
> Object.keys({}).length
0
> Object.keys({foo: 'bar'}).length
1
> Object.keys({1: 'foo', 2: 'bar'}).length
2
```

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9554
2014-06-16 05:20:00 +10:00
Joshua Spence
84d259cea2 Modify the Aphlict server to transmit messages instead of broadcasting them.
Summary: Ref T4324. Ref T5284. This adds server-side support for keeping track of a set of PHIDs that the Aphlict clients have subscribed to. Instead of broadcasting a notification to all clients (after which the clients can poll `/notification/individual` in order to determine whether or not they are interested in the notification), transmit notifications only to clients that have subscribed to a PHID that is relevant to the notification.

Test Plan:
I opened up two clients on the same host (incognito tabs in Chrome). Here is the output from the server:

```
> sudo ./bin/aphlict debug
Starting Aphlict server in foreground...
Launching server:

    $ 'nodejs' '/usr/src/phabricator/src/applications/aphlict/management/../../../../support/aphlict/server/aphlict_server.js' --port='22280' --admin='22281' --host='localhost' --user='aphlict'

[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:27 GMT+0000 (UTC)] Started Server (PID 4546)
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:36 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <FlashPolicy> Policy Request From ::ffff:192.168.1.1
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:37 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Connected from ::ffff:192.168.1.1
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:37 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Received data: {"command":"subscribe","data":["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]}
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:37 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Subscribed to: ["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:39 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Received data: {"command":"subscribe","data":["PHID-USER-kfohe3ca5oe6ygykmioq"]}
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:39 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Subscribed to: ["PHID-USER-kfohe3ca5oe6ygykmioq"]
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:42 GMT+0000 (UTC)] notification: {"key":"6023751084283587681","type":"notification","subscribers":["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]}
[Wed Jun 11 2014 19:10:42 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Wrote Message
```

I verified (using the "Network" tab in Chrome) that an AJAX request to `/notification/individual/` was only made in the tab belonging to the user that triggered the test notification.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T5284, T4324

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9458
2014-06-11 12:17:29 -07:00
Joshua Spence
ab4324148a Make the Aphlict server more resilient.
Summary:
Currently, the Aphlict server will crash if invalid JSON data is `POST`ed to it. I have fixed this to, instead, return a 400. Also made some minor formatting changes.

Ref T4324. Ref T5284. Also, modify the data structure that is passed around (i.e. `POST`ed to the Aphlict server and broadcast to the Aphlict clients) to include the subscribers. Initially, I figured that we shouldn't expose this information to the clients... however, it is necessary for T4324 that the `AphlictMaster` is able to route a notification to the appropriate clients.

Test Plan:
Making the following `curl` request: `curl --data "{" http://localhost:22281/`.

**Before**
```
sudo ./bin/aphlict debug
Starting Aphlict server in foreground...
Launching server:

    $ 'nodejs' '/usr/src/phabricator/src/applications/aphlict/management/../../../../support/aphlict/server/aphlict_server.js' --port='22280' --admin='22281' --host='localhost' --user='aphlict'

[Wed Jun 11 2014 17:07:51 GMT+0000 (UTC)] Started Server (PID 2033)
[Wed Jun 11 2014 17:07:55 GMT+0000 (UTC)]
<<< UNCAUGHT EXCEPTION! >>>

SyntaxError: Unexpected end of input
>>> Server exited!
```

**After**
(No output... the bad JSON is caught and a 400 is returned)

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T4324, T5284

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9480
2014-06-11 10:17:12 -07:00
epriestley
f302bfc8f8 Break Aphlict's flash policy server into a separate class
Summary: Ref T4324. One of the server we start just sends pre-canned XML responses. Separate it out of the main file and hand it all the objects it interacts with in structured, reasonable ways.

Test Plan: Hit "Send Test Notification", saw notification, saw flash policy info in the log.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4324

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8257
2014-02-17 16:01:09 -08:00
epriestley
28fe44da0a Break some of Aphlict into reasonable classes with sensible responsibilities
Summary:
Ref T4324.

  - Create `Listener` to represent listening clients.
  - Create `ListenerList` to represent the current list of clients.
  - Create `Logfile` to handle logging.

Test Plan: Clicked "Send Test Notification", verified logs, status and notifications all work correctly.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4324

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8256
2014-02-17 16:00:51 -08:00
epriestley
260eb5344b Allow Aphlict to load Javelin and use Javelin class definitions
Summary:
Ref T4324. The server code is probably going to get a fair amount more complicated, so allow it to load Javelin classes in a mostly-reasonable way.

This integration has a few warts, but should be good enough to let us manage complexity through the next iteration of the server.

(Mostly I just want the concicse Javelin mechanism for defining new classes.)

Version bump is just so I can figure stuff out if this creates any issues for users based on which version of things they're running.

Test Plan: Started server, posted some messages through it.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T4324

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8253
2014-02-17 16:00:01 -08:00