1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-09-20 17:28:51 +02:00
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joshua Spence
6270114767 Various linter fixes.
Summary:
- Removed trailing newlines.
- Added newline at EOF.
- Removed leading newlines.
- Trimmed trailing whitespace.
- Spelling fix.
- Added newline at EOF

Test Plan: N/A

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: hach-que, chad, Korvin, epriestley, aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8344
2014-02-26 12:44:58 -08:00
epriestley
68b597ff75 SQL Patch Management: SQL Changes
Summary:
Splits out the SQL changes. These are most of the changes, but primarily mechanical:

  - Moved "initialize.sql" to "0000.legacy.sql" and partially reverted to an older version, such that patches 0000 + 000 + 001 + ... + 137 put us in the right state when applied sequentially.
  - Removed "create database" commands from all SQL. These are handled by separate DB patches now, so we have the data to do operations like "storage databases" (list databases) and "storage destroy" (drop databases).
  - Removed "phabricator_" namespace from all SQL, and replaced with "{$NAMESPACE}_" token so we can namespace databases.
  - Shortened some column lengths so patches apply correctly if originally created as InnoDB; also a few similar tweaks elsewhere.

Test Plan: See D2323 for discussion and test plan.

Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan, jungejason

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T140, T345

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2329
2012-04-30 07:53:53 -07:00
epriestley
b028920a5e Minor, subpriority default previously reverse ordered eveything
Auditors: btrahan
2012-04-02 12:26:50 -07:00
epriestley
e7853e4801 Allow tasks to be subprioritized by drag-and-drop
Summary:
Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks.

Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used
this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it.

The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish.

Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when
reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks
against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two
tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some
code to deal with this at some point if necessary.

I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all.

(There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header
counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.)

Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt

Maniphest Tasks: T859

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
2012-04-02 12:12:04 -07:00