Summary: Ref T7094. I am not sure when this text is legitimately exposed to users - they should be getting an error about not being able to see the object before they get an error about not being able to see a given transaction... That said, I think this text is logically correct at least.
Test Plan: read the text
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11632
Summary:
Ref T7094. We should do a policy query on the files IMO because there exists a scenario where the file gets locked down directly. This requires being a bit more disciplined about setting user, which in turn requires deciding whether or not to show edit / reply links as a separate piece of logic, not conditional on user presence.
This is not the best code but I don't think it gets worse with this and is just some other nuance in any larger cleanup we take on someday.
Test Plan: looked at a revision and noted inline comments rendered correctly with reply / edit actions. looked at a diff standalone and noted no reply / edit actions as expected. looked at a "details" link on a transaction and it rendered correctly. looked at a diff in phriction of page edits and it looked good. grepped around and verified the remaining callsite in diffusion already has the setUser call.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7094
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11579
Summary: Fixes T6819. This isn't as useful as you might think and has one horribly buggy behavior - if you edit an object which has a description and a projects field, you can be unable to remove the associated project as the automagic association from the description kicks in. Further, since we've added the ability for applications to create multiple email addresses AND herald can react to those emails - say by programmatically adding projects - the known needs for this feature are basically 0. If this proves to be false we can maybe add some other syntax for these mentions - see T6819 for ideas / discussion.
Test Plan: removed a project from a maniphest task while still mentioning it in the description and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11573
Summary: due to typehints, passing null is going to barf here. Ref D11564, ref T5039.
Test Plan: made an edit to a task from the web ui and it didnt fatal
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11571
Summary:
Fixes T5039. The trick / possibly lame part here is we only match 1 application email and its undefined which one. e.g. if a user emails us at address x, y, and z only one of those will pick up the mail. Ergo, don't let users define non-sensical herald conditions like "matches all". Also document what I think was non-intuitive about the code with an inline comment; we have to return an array with just a phid from an object and out of context it feels very "what the...???"
Note this needs to be deployed to other applications still, but I think its okay to close T5039 aggressively here since its done from a user story perspective.
Test Plan: set up a herald rule to flag tasks created as blue via app email x. sent an email to x via `bin/mail receive-test` and verified the task had the blue flag
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11564
Summary: Removes the 1x application icons, and uses the fonticons instead. Feed was only known location.
Test Plan:
feed, dashboards, grep for use
{F275636}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11496
Summary: Fixes T6989. Basically return a nice dialogue like we do for "NoEffect" transactions. This is a little prettier than the other dialogue was. Also, stop adding TYPE_EDGE as a transaction type as we end up having it 2x, which then makes the error get validated 2x.
Test Plan: tried to add myself as a reviewer and got a nice error message.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6989
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11448
Summary: Ref T6962. Mainly accomplished by re-factoring the base editor `buildMailBody` function and then using it differently in the `DifferentialTransactionEditor`.
Test Plan: commented on a revision leaving inline feedback. inspected via bin/mail and it looked good! also made a maniphest comment and checked that email, which still looked good.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6962
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11402
Summary: Fixes T6895, When viewing comment edit history, user should not see a dropdown for each comment edit transaction.
Test Plan: Edit task comment, view comment edit history, comment transactions should not provide a dropdown with action items.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6895
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11355
Summary: Fixes T6594, Logged out users should be able to "View Raw" comments in public objects.
Test Plan: Log out, open maniphest task with comments, open dropdown associated with comment, click "View Raw", should be able to see raw comment.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6594
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11295
Summary:
Ref T3165. Builds a dedicated index for Conpherence to avoid scale/policy filtering concerns.
- This is pretty one-off but I think it's generally OK.
- There's no UI for it.
- `ConpherenceFulltextQuery` is very low-level. You would need to do another query on the PHIDs it returns to actually show anything to the user.
- The `previousTransactionPHID` is so you can load chat context efficiently. Specifically, if you want to show results like this:
> previous line of context
> **line of chat that matches the query**
> next line of context
...you can read the previous lines out of `previousTransactionPHID` directly, and the next lines by issuing one query with `WHERE previousTransactionPHID IN (...)`.
I'm not 100% sure this is useful, but it seemed like a reasonable thing to provide, since there's no way to query this efficiently otherwise and I figure a lot of chat might make way more sense with a couple of lines of context.
Test Plan:
- Indexed a thread manually (whole thing indexed).
- Indexed a thread by updating it (just the new comment indexed).
- Wrote a hacky test script and got reasonable-looking query results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3165
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11234
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary:
Removes an unused PhabricatorFeedStory Parameter from all getTitleForFeed() and getApplicationTransactionTitleForFeed() functions.
Ref D11088 Ref T6545
Test Plan: ran all unit tests and viewed some dashboard feeds
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6545
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11146
Summary:
Ref T4411
I'm not quite sure if this is the right place for this as it will be difficult to provide proper user feedback of why we removed a particular subscriber.
Is the ApplicationTransactionEditor generally the right place to extract mentioned phids in comments?
On the other hand in some cases we cannot really give user feedback why a user was not subscribed (e.g.: commits & diffs)
Adding a diff to a repo where the user mentioned has no view permissions the subscriber is currently still added. Still would have to find where this is donet...
Any other places?
Unrelated: Is there any way to remove a subscriber from a commit/audit ?
Test Plan:
- Edited tasks with the mentioned user having view permissions to this specific task and without
- Raised concern with a commit and commented on the audit with the user having view permissions to the repo and without
- Added a commit to a repo with and without the mentioned user having permissions
- Mention a user in a task & commit comment with and without permissions
- Mentioning a user in a diff description & comments with and without permissions to the specific diff
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4411
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11049
Summary:
Shows a timeline of all modified settings Fixes T6545
Will show all settings (no pagination, should be not so difficult to add if needed but most installs won't have hundreds of settings changes)
I'm not happy by how the PhabricatorConfigTransaction object is instructed to render the config keys but i don't see any other reasonable way.
We could always show the keys though.
Test Plan: Changed settings and called the history page
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6545
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11088
Summary: These classes are named differently from other `PhabricatorEdgeType` subclasses. Rename them for consistency.
Test Plan: I would expect the linter to complain if I missed anything.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11112
Summary:
...except the transaction class itself, which still needs some knowledge of these transactions for older installs.
Ref T5245. T5604 and T5245 are now in a similar place -- there's an unknown set of bugs introduced from my changes and there's still old display code lying around with some old transactions in the database. I'll stomp out the bugs if / when they surface and data migration is up next.
This revision also adds a "TransactionPreviewString" method to the edge objects so that we can have a prettier "Bob edited associated projects." preview of this transaction.
Test Plan: added a project from task detail and saw correct preview throughout process with correct project added. bulk removed a project from some tasks. added a project from the edit details pane.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11013
Summary:
There's a comma to the lower-left of my profile picture here:
{F248962}
This is on a page like https://secure.phabricator.com/F248948
What's happening is that some `render()` method is returning a valid result like `array($stuff, null)`. This is getting passed to JS as an array, which is implicitly `join()`'ing it into a string, adding a comma.
Instead, make sure we render these to strings on the server side before shipping them to the client.
Test Plan: No more comma on file previews.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10974
Summary: Fixes T6731. I don't really understand the intent behind the two view classes here, but to get this to work I need to pass yet more data to the lower-level class.
Test Plan: Viewed a task with many comments. Clicked "show older". Quoted everything I could. Verified for each quote that it quoted correctly, inlcuding linking to the prior transaction.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6731
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10973
Summary: Fixes T6727. Repro is: mention a task on another task, in a comment.
The inverse edge editor applying the "alincoln mentioned this in <other task>" transaction doesn't have enough data to execute Herald rules.
Just don't try to execute the rules, since they don't make much sesne from a product perspective and are tricky from a technical perspective.
Test Plan: Commented on `T1` with `T2` in comment body and a Herald rule that examines subscribers.
Reviewers: btrahan
NOTE: Cowboy committing this since any task mention fatals.
Summary: Fixes T6694. Ref T4712. Turns out the logic here was slightly incorrect; we don't want to use the id of the last thing we hid but rather the first thing we show. I had garbage test data ("asdsadsadsa", etc) I guess so I didn't notice this.
Test Plan: made a new task where user a and user b alternated 3 comments each, cooperatively numbering them from 1 - 20. as both users, showed older transactions. pre-patch the issue described in T6694 occurred and post patch I saw the entire counting sequence.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4712, T6694
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10933
Summary: Fixes T6693.
Test Plan:
Made a bunch of comments on a diff with differential, being sure to leave inlines here and there. This reproduced the issue in T6693. With this patch this issue no longer reproduces!
Successfully "showed older changes" in Maniphest too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6693
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10931
Summary: Only necessary for edits, only bother if the comment version is greater than 1. Ref T6690. This is another way to fix T6690 -- this check will never run since you can't edit a conpherence comment -- **but** the fix already applied should happen too to future proof Conpherence.
Test Plan: made a comment on a diff - success. edited the comment and mentions were generated.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6690
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10928
Summary: Fixes T6648. We do some automagical hotness based on the text you enter in remarkup textareas - e.g. adding projects or mentioning other objects. Refine the code here so that even when just editing a comment we build these transactions and apply them.
Test Plan: edited a comment and noted new mentions and projects showed up appropriately...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6648
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10922
Summary:
Ref T4712. Thus far, it seems that most "non-standard" things can be done pretty easily in the controller. Aside from deploying, this diff had to fix a few bugs / missing implementations of stuff.
(Notably, PhabricatorAuthProviderConfig, HeraldRule, PhabricatorSlowvotePoll, and AlmanacNetwork needed to implement PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface, PhabricatorAuthAuthProviderPHIDType had to be added, and a rendering bug in transactions of type PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider had to be fixed.)
Test Plan: Almanac - looked at binding, device, network, and service view controllers and verified timeline displayed properly. Herald - looked at a rule and verified timeline. Slowvote - looked at a vote and verified timeline. Auth - looked at an auth provider (Facebook) and verified proper display of transactions within timeline.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4712
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10921
Summary: Ref T4712. This adds pagination. Future diffs will need to deploy `buildTransactionTimeline` everywhere and massage this stuff as necessary if we hit any special cases.
Test Plan: Set page size to "5" to make it need to paginate often. Verified proper transactions loaded in and the javascript actions worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4712
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10887
Summary: See <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T906>. This behavior is a bug; we should remove the button if the user can't use the application.
Test Plan:
- With Macro uninstalled, did these things verifying the button vanished:
- Sent a user a message.
- Edited a revision.
- Edited repository basic information.
- Edited an initiative.
- Edited a Harbormaster build step.
- Added task comments.
- Edited profile blurb.
- Edited blog description.
- Commented on Pholio mock.
- Uploaded Pholio image.
- Edited Phortune merchant.
- Edited Phriction document.
- Edited Ponder answer.
- Edited Ponder question.
- Edited Slowvote poll.
- Edited a comment.
- Reinstalled Macro and saw button come back.
- Used button to put silly text on a funny picture.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10900
Summary: Ref T1217, Add link to email preferences to email template
Test Plan: Add comment to object like Maniphest task, check that email has a footer with a link to email preferences.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10883
Summary: Ref T6343, adding HTMLMailMode to remarkup, and most objects should now be processed and appear pretty in emails.
Test Plan: Add a comment to a Maniphest task containing a mention of an object like '{T1}' or 'T1'. Emails should show a styled version of the object similar to how the object looks in the context of the Maniphest task in the UI.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343, T2617
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10859
Summary:
Ref T5833. Currently, we have an `AlmanacDeviceProperty`, but it doesn't use CustomFields and is specific to devices. Make this more generic:
- Reuse most of the CustomField infrastructure (so we can eventually get easy support for nice editor UIs, etc).
- Make properties more generic so Services, Bindings and Devices can all have them.
The major difference between this implementation and existing CustomField implementations is that all other implementations are application-authoritative: the application code determines what the available list of fields is.
I want Almanac to be a bit more freeform (basically: you can write whatever properties you want, and we'll put nice UIs on them if we have a nice UI available). For example, we might have some sort of "ServiceTemplate" that says "a database binding should usually have the fields 'writable', 'active', 'credential'", which would do things like offer these as options and put a nice UI on them, but you should also be able to write whatever other properties you want and add services without building a specific service template for them.
This involves a little bit of rule bending, but ends up pretty clean. We can adjust CustomField to accommodate this a bit more gracefully later on if it makes sense.
Test Plan: {F229172}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10777
Summary: Fixes T6427.
Test Plan: Log out of sandbox, navigate to public task, click 'See Details' in a transaction. Get Dialog.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6427
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10759
Summary: missing a setHandles on this codepath I think...? Fixes T6300.
Test Plan: not actually tested - I just think this is the fix since the other renderX methods all do this setHandles thing and I can't figure out how handles get set otherwise...
Reviewers: epriestley, avivey
Reviewed By: epriestley, avivey
Subscribers: avivey, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6300
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10699
Summary: Fixes T6201. This stuff didn't fully get updated for ApplicationTransactions. Get it working again (notably, make inline comment text publish) and clean it up a little bit.
Test Plan:
- Published a Differential feed story into Asana with comment text.
- Pulbished a Diffusion feed story into Asana with comment text.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6201
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10584
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Adds support for custom fields.
- Adds support for partial indexes (indexes on a prefix of a column).
- Drops old auxiliary storage table: this was moved to custom field storage about a year ago.
- Drops old project table: this was moved to edges about two months ago.
Test Plan:
- Viewed web UI, saw fewer issues.
- Used `grep` to verify no readers/writers for storage or project table.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10526
Summary: Ref T1191. This fills in some more features and gets audit and auth nearly generating reasonable expected schemata.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10500
Summary: ...also re-jiggers all the anchor stuff to use $xaction ID. This seemed like the simplest way once I got in the code, as well as having nice properties for if / when we want to re-add some ajax stuff since the ID is a pretty solid piece of data to key off. Fixes T6083.
Test Plan: mentioned DX in private DX+1. Could see on DX the mention as me and not as the other user. For transactions, I left a comment on Paste and it worked, and I edited an existing transaction and it worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10488
Summary: Fixes T6059.
Test Plan: Made a comment on TX mentioning TX and TX+1. TX did not get a "mentioned" transaction while TX+1 did.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6059
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10464
Summary: Some versions of PHP aren't very happy about both interfaces and superclasses defining a method. Just remove it from MentionableInterface and leave it as implicit.
Auditors: btrahan
Summary: Fixes T4036. Now if you say something on diff X like "This reminds me of Tx and Dy and commitHashFoo and Px." each of those objects gets a little visible transaction that the mention occurred. No feed, email, or notifications.
Test Plan: made a comment like above and verified transactions. also submitted a diff that "Fixes Tx" and Tx did not get the transaction as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4036
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10451
Summary: Fixes T6037. We don't currently write the "this file is attached to such-and-such object" edge on comment edits.
Test Plan: Edited a comment, adding `{Fnnn}`. Verified file was not attached before the edit, but was afterward.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6037
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10423
Summary:
Fixes T4057. This sort of sidesteps the trickiest (but very rare) case of things like embedded slowvotes. We might be able to refine that later.
In the common bad case (macros, large images) it gets reasonable results by using `overflow: hidden` with `max-height`.
We use `PhabriatorMarkupEngine::summarize()` to try to just render the first paragraph.
Test Plan: {F195093}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4057
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10355
Summary: its not necessary. Fixes T5906
Test Plan: clicked "Login to Comment" and went straight to the login form, sans intermediary dialogue
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5906
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10295
Summary:
Added support for side-by-side HTML and plaintext email building.
We can control if the HTML stuff is sent by by a new config, metamta.html-emails
Test Plan:
Been running this in our deployment for a few months now.
====Well behaved clients====
- Gmail
- Mail.app
====Bad clients====
- [[ http://airmailapp.com/ | Airmail ]]. They confuse Gmail too, though.
====Need testing====
- Outlook (Windows + Mac)
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: webframp, taoqiping, chad, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T992
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9375
Summary: Should help with debugging. In the web UI there is now a link to "View Email". This uses the same debugging output that `./bin/mail show-outbound` uses. Fixes T5768. Code is very defensive as I think these tables may be truncated eventually?
Test Plan: viewed some emails and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5768
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10244
Summary: Fixes T4973. For `PhabricatorProjectInterface` objects, add a header to let clients do mail filtering.
Test Plan: Saw `X-Phabricator-Projects: <#goat_farm>` in outbound mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: rush898, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4973
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10256
Summary:
Ref T5861. Ref T5769. If users don't care at all about something, allow them to ignore it.
We have some higher-volume notifications either built now (column changes) or coming (mentions) which users might reasonably want to ignore completely.
Test Plan:
Ignored some notifications, then took appropraite actions. Saw my user culled from the notification subscriber list.
{F189531}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5769, T5861
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10240
Summary:
Ref T5861. Currently, mail tags are hard-coded; move them into applications. Each Editor defines its own tags.
This has zero impact on the UI or behavior.
Test Plan:
- Checked/unchecked some options, saved form.
- Swapped back to `master` and saw exactly the same values.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5861
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10238
Summary:
Fixes T5456. We lost this logic in the transition to applicationtransactions.
When publishing a feed story, mark all of the object's projects as related, so the project filter in feed works.
Test Plan: Made a comment on a task associated with a project, saw the story in filtered feed.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: timor, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5456
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10233
